Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fed Cuts Discount Rate, Lends More to Avert Meltdown

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:32 AM
Original message
Fed Cuts Discount Rate, Lends More to Avert Meltdown
Source: Bloomberg

March 17 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve, struggling to prevent a meltdown in financial markets, cut the rate on direct loans to banks and became lender of last resort to the biggest dealers in U.S. government bonds.

In its first weekend emergency action in almost three decades, the central bank lowered the so-called discount rate by a quarter of a percentage point to 3.25 percent. The Fed also will lend to the 20 firms that buy Treasury securities directly from it. In a further step, the Fed will provide up to $30 billion to JPMorgan Chase & Co. to help it finance the purchase of Bear Stearns Cos. after a run on Wall Street's fifth-largest securities firm.



Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aohB5r1v9ZYk&refer=home



Every day I wake up it's uglier than before. I would love to see things fall apart on Republicans but this is beginning to get downright scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Fed has loaned money to buy US Treasury securities?
Isn't that similar to what was going on before the crash in the 1930's? Investors were borrowing to buy securities and could not pay back the loans when the value of the securities fell out. The collateral was no longer worth what was owed. Banks called in the loans but the money was gone.

So now if the Treasury securities lose value who pays back the loans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Got a mirror handy? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Congress has to put a STOP to this insanity --- !!!
Are we all calling Congress ---

The FED is printing money and charging us interest on it --- !!!

The Treasury should be the the only source for printing money --- and it should only be
done on instructions from Congress ---

These economic decisions are political and should be decided by Congress---

Presume they'd like to avoid all of this, however --- !!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Your gonna think I'm nuts, but I just remembered
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 11:01 AM by woodsprite
Every month since hubby and I have been married, we've been buying $50 savings bonds. It's an auto deduction thing, and it's never in the forefront of my mind unless I see it come in the mail. Any ideas as to what would be the best way to handle these? Would the money be better stuffed in my mattress? (only halfway joking there) That's the feeling I'm getting. I'm not finance savy at all, but I agree with you that this is getting really scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. At the rate the interest rates are dropping, that money may only be good
for stuffing mattresses. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Free markets
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. What this really means to you: higher prices because the dollar becomes worth less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. Can I borrow 250K to pay off my mortgage? AT 2%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe we'll be bailing out the FED next . .. ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. here we go again -- just bidness as usually -- nothing unusual here -- feed them more McGreevy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. Roubini: A Generalized Run on the Shadow Financial System
A Generalized Run on the Shadow Financial System
Nouriel Roubini | Mar 17, 2008

Since the onset of the liquidity and credit crunch last summer this column has been arguing that monetary policy would be impotent to address such a crunch because, in part, of the existence of a non-bank “shadow financial system”. This system is composed of conduits, SIVs, investment banks/broker dealers, money market funds, hedge funds and other non bank financial institutions.

All these institutions look similar to banks because they are highly leveraged and borrow short and in liquid ways and invest or lend long and in illiquid ways. This shadow financial system is, like banks, subject not only to credit and market risk but also to rollover or liquidity risk, i.e. the risk deriving from having a large stock of short term liabilities (relative to liquid assets) that may not roll over if creditors decide to withdraw their credits to these institutions.

Unlike banks this shadow financial system does not have access to the lender of last resort support of the central bank as these are not depository institutions regulated by the central banks. What we are now observing – with the case of Bear Stearns and the recent disaster among SIVs, conduits, run on a number of hedge funds and money market funds is a generalized liquidity run on this shadow financial system.

The response of the Fed to this run has been radical and in the form of the extension of the lender of last resort support to non bank financial institutions. Specifically, the new $200 bn term facility allows primary dealers – many of which are non banks – to swap their toxic mortgage backed securities for US Treasuries; second, the Fed provided emergency support to Bear Stearns and following the purchase of Bear Stearns by JPMorgan, is now providing a $30 bn plus support to JPMorgan to help the rescue of Bear Stearns; finally, now the Fed is allowing primary dealers to access the Fed discount window at the same terms as banks.

This is the most radical change and expansions of Fed powers and functions since the Great Depression: essentially the Fed now can lend unlimited amounts to non bank highly leveraged institutions that it does not regulate. The Fed is treating this run on the shadow financial system as a liquidity run but the Fed has no idea of whether such institutions are insolvent. As JPMorgan paid only about $200 million for Bear Stearns – and only after the Fed promised a $30 billlion loan – this was a clear case where this non bank financial institution was insolvent.

The Fed has no idea of which other primary dealers may be insolvent as it does not supervise and regulate those primary dealers that are not banks. But it is treating this crisis – the most severe financial crisis in the US since the Great Depression – as if it was purely a liquidity crisis. By lending massive amounts to potentially insolvent institutions that it does not supervise or regulate and that may be insolvent the Fed is taking serious financial risks and seriously exacerbate moral hazard distortions. Here you have highly leveraged non bank financial institutions that made reckless investments and lending, had extremely poor risk management and altogether disregarded liquidity risks; some may be insolvent but now the Fed is providing them with a blank check for unlimited amounts. This is a most radical action and a signal of how severe the crisis of the banking system and non-bank shadow financial system is. This is the worst US financial crisis since the Great Depression and the Fed is treating it as if it was only a liquidity crisis. But this is not just a liquidity crisis; it is rather a credit and insolvency crisis. And it is not the job of the Fed to bail out insolvent non bank financial institutions. If a bail out should occur this is a fiscal policy action that should be decided by Congress after the relevant equity holders have been wiped out and senior management fired without golden parachutes and huge severance packages.

http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/249924




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC