Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing: Tanker contest was 'seriously flawed'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:25 AM
Original message
Boeing: Tanker contest was 'seriously flawed'
Source: Seattle Post-Intelligencer

In formally protesting the Air Force's decision to award a tanker contract worth about $35 billion to a team that includes the parent of rival Airbus, The Boeing Co. said the competition was "seriously flawed."

The Air Force has said that it simply picked the plane that better suited its needs.

Meanwhile, The Associated Press reported Tuesday that aides to Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, lobbied last year on behalf of EADS. And Bloomberg News reported that the Loeffler Group, led by Tom Loeffler, now co-chairman of McCain's campaign, received $220,000 from EADS in 2007, according to congressional lobbying records.

McCain said Tuesday that his only role in the tanker issue was to try to ensure fairness.



Read more: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/354573_tankerprotest12.html



The US filed a complaint with the WTO alleging that Airbus/EADS unfairly benefited from European subsidies awarded to the company. Airbus/EADS countered by arguing the Boeing receives similar subsidies in the form of tax breaks. The original tanker contract required bidders to explain how the outcome of the WTO dispute might affect their ability to perform under the contract. This requirement was regarded as hurting the Airbus/EADS bid.

McCain wrote a letter to the Air Force in December 2006 complaining about the requirement. Four days later it was removed from the bid specifications.

http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/aerospace/archives/134001.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Boeing has a good chance of winning because apparently the criteria used were different than those
in the RFP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It appears that the Air Force made several substantive changes in favor of EADS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wish a reporter would evaluate the effect of subsides on Airbus cost. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. why aren't Repukes screaming about a French company winning a defense contract?
I'm sure they could come up with something about the plane surrendering at the border ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "surrendering at the border"
:spray: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. I kinda hate Boeing
Not to be too harsh to the employees of the company, but their management is the worst example of the military-industrial complex run amok. Lobbying, lying, warmongering, profiteering, and all for bigger stock options for senior management.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. and the worst example of management, period.. but they are 'ours'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The previous lease deal that they pushed was sure a beauty!
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 05:45 PM by depakid
That alone probably ought to ave disqualified them from this contract.

Not to mention that the Northop/Airbus entry is the better aircraft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. they didn't figure in the effect of Subsidies on airbus.. not as cheap as it looks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC