Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GM exec stands by calling global warming a "crock"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:17 PM
Original message
GM exec stands by calling global warming a "crock"
Source: Reuters

DETROIT (Reuters) - General Motors Corp Vice Chairman Bob Lutz has defended remarks he made dismissing global warming as a "total crock of s---," saying his views had no bearing on GM's commitment to build environmentally friendly vehicles.

Lutz, GM's outspoken product development chief, has been under fire from Internet bloggers since last month when he was quoted as making the remark to reporters in Texas.

In a posting on his GM blog on Thursday, Lutz said those "spewing virtual vitriol" at him for minimizing the threat of climate change were "missing the big picture."

"What they should be doing in earnest is forming opinions, not about me but about GM and what this company is doing that is ... hugely beneficial to the causes they so enthusiastically claim to support," he said in a posting titled, "Talk About a Crock."

<snip>

As part of a campaign against higher fuel economy standards, Lutz wrote in a 2006 blog posting that forcing automakers to sell smaller cars would be "like trying to address the obesity problem in this country by forcing clothing manufacturers to sell smaller, tighter sizes."

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2237297620080222?sp=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ano Genitus Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's not a bad idea, selling smaller clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. can that wait 'til summer gets here
'cuz it's too cold for smaller clothes today :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Making smaller clothes will force obese people to lose weight...
...just like dumping paraplegics out of their wheelchairs will force them to stand up. And maybe we should refuse to provide insulin injections to diabetics. That'll teach them not to have too much glucose in their blood.

/sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. And let's eliminate proctologists.
That'll eliminate all of the world's as- oh never mind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Any woman will tell you
the stores already are doing this. Size "O" exists. And many mall stores don't stock beyond a size 12 -- which just happens to be the average size of the American woman. I wear a 10 and often that's the LARGEST size available. Plenty of 2s and 4s. I bought workout T-shirts last week and got the "L" size though I'm 5'7" 140 lbs. So, the smaller clothes thing...it's happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ano Genitus Donating Member (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I wouldn't have known that. Are shoulder pads still easy to come by?
(I ask because I'm imagining you dress like Barbara Stanwyk, which may be totally wrong!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Sadly, shoulder pads have not made
a comeback since their infamous 1980's "Dynasty" popularity. I do have an ankle bracelet like Barbara wore in "Double Indemnity".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. I remember getting into a debate about the "petite" sizes of women's clothes.
Some of the dresses were like tents. I told my wife that something that large should not be labeled "petite."

It's obviously some psychological ploy by the clothing industry to draw the large women to their line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boilinmad Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
64. Petite...
..is only related to the height of the woman, not the size. They are just cut shorter. Its like a mans 48 short suit. Large, but just cut shorter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
56. I Am A Size 4 on the bottom But I Need A Size 10 up top
I can never buy a unit suit. I have very broad shoulders as I am a swimmer but my hips are tiny. Plus the pants in size 4 are fine around the waist but they are always 2 inches too short. Clothes made in China are not meant for my body. I am 5-9 for fucks sake these clothes are for women 5-4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
68. Er, excuse me
Global warming -> women's clothing sizes

Y'all win the prize for Most Random Topic Redirect of 2008

:applause: :toast: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting clothes/suv analogy --
I've thought for years that our attraction to SUV's is b/c we are so dammned fat, and SUV's are roomier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. lutz is a fucking idiot
that`s the only good thing i can say about him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's Determined to Lie Right to the End
He knows Global Warming is real and dangerous. he just finds making a profit more important than the environment he lives in. All addicts deny the reality even though that substance they abuse is killing them. They lie about it's addictiveness and it's dangers all to continue getting that fix.

Greed is a sickness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. To the end of what?
He won't really see the effects of warming in his lifetime - you may not either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. um...open your eyes,read a newspaper,read b/w the lines there is ample evidence currently
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 09:13 PM by natrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:20 PM
Original message
I don't need your advice, I didn't say that
I didn't say it wasn't true, I said Lutz would die before he sees it.

Stop it with your fake superiority - I don't need a lesson from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #27
53. As I Said Before... Greed is a Sickness
sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. He is going to ride GM all the way down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. GM lost $39 billion dollars in the last quarter.
That's roughly $5,000 per SECOND going down the toilet. Listening to this guy talk, I am beginning to understand why.

The problem is cultural.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. You really don't know what you're talking about
Most of that was a tax write down - they didn't actually lose that.

Mstly though I'm sick of people being happy when businesses fail. You DO understand that's people's jobs you're snickering and having fun with don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sodbuster Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Tax write down
Jeffro- Can you splain for the rest of us how GM is able to Write Down this amount without having to spend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Sure, ifyou need it
Most of it was from tax credits they received, though they can still show it as a "loss" even though it was never actually spent. It's a pretty standard way of avoiding income taxes for big companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sodbuster Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #36
49. I guess I do need an explanation....
Sounds like you know what the tax credits GM received are for. What are they for specifically? What is the government (you and me) giving GM a credit for? Don't mean to sound dense.

I have to agree with the following poster. I don't see anybody laughing about people losing their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #49
71. While he's at it he can explain what part 30,000 layoffs
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 11:23 AM by wtmusic
play in their sophisticated tax writedown scheme.

onedit: welcome to DU

:bounce: :toast: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
48. Who the fuck is snickering?
You don't see a cultural problem in GM management? You haven't noticed that their heads are so far up their asses that they just drove the car off the cliff? Are you a GM executive or something?

Most of that was a "tax write down", which means that they were playing accounting games that bit them in the ass. There is no way this can be spun as a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. I wonder where this guy is from?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. According to your map he's from America
Detroit, to be precise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. He's admitted the only reason they're building hybrids is for PR.
Lutz the putz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Who cares why?
What, you think they're altruistic? That's funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Has nothing to do with altruism
Has to do with having the vision to recognize a trend. Lutz is blind as a bat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. But they ARE producing the hybrid
So what's your point? Just to bust on GM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Their hybrids are worthless
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 09:52 PM by wtmusic
Underperforming & expensive. But they do have a little green leaf emblem on the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRF450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. A hybrid Tundra wouldn't be any better than the current hybrid Silverado.
21mpg city is pretty damn good for a vehicle that weighs 7-8000lbs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #51
69. You bet it would
Thanks to the bullshit "status metal" that GM includes gratis on every one of their guzzlers, the curb weight of a Silverado is 2,000 lbs heavier than a Tundra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
58. Name one hybrid that ISN'T worthless
They all are. Even the Prius is a waste. It pollutes more to make the battery than it saves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #58
70. "It pollutes more to make the battery than it saves."
Too funny -- that pathetic line. Now I know you're full of shit.

Link, anything? Even something from a GM brochure would be an improvement.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Rational people stand by calling GM exec "an asshat."
Somebody needs to start compiling a list of people who've managed to sink big corporations through massive total incompetance. Lutz and Carly Fiorina could be the first names on the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
predfan Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. A friend loaned me a collection of David Brinkley ( as in "Good night, Chet,
Good night , David) one minute musings from their show. In 1983 he spoke a new report about the greenhouse effect, in which scientists predicted the poles would melt and the oceans would rise. Fortunately, he said, scientist predicted it would take about 200 years or so. Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Lutz the Yutz, still clueless after all these years. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
38. His friends say he's a klutz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. And this would be one of the GM execs which has missed every
marker that could have driven the company away from the cliff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Japanese & Euro auto makers continue laughing all the way to the bank.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bullshit, if this clueless idiot can't bring him self
to believe the overwhelming peer reviewed scientific evidence of the day regarding an issue so critical to life and death it self on a global scale, G.M. will never do squat under his "leadership", except slowly go down hill and lose market share to the 21st century companies more willing to adapt to reality.

One other quibble with his asinine analogy, fuel for automobiles is finite and limited to the dead dinosaur remains they can pump out of the Earth, that's why Americans and Iraqis are dying to this day.

The material for clothing can be grown over and over and it's production isn't destroying life as we know it at least not on the scale of carbon belching automobiles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Of course they are! Their sales are tanking and they are trying to convince
people to buy their over priced cars. Cars that are not even close to being fuel efficient. How many
people did they just lay off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f the letter Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. Did he actually say that? With reporters present?
Way to go Bob Lutz! hm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I'm done with GM. Bought a Venture minivan.
In less than 80,000 miles, they had to tear the engine apart because of some seals leaking fluid. I didn't want to buy a GM before that purchase because I had so much trouble with the previous GMs that I owned. Owned a Cutlass that leaked radiator coolant into the oil at less than 75,000 miles. Owned a Buick that had a bad EGR valve that the dealership wouldn't replace, even though it was still under warranty. It had less than 60,000 miles. Had a Chevy Lumina that needed its transmission rebuilt at around 50,000 miles.

I don't beat on my cars and I service them regularly and tell the service departments to take care of anything that is even beginning to look or sound bad.

The only reason I bought the Venture was because my brother in-law worked for GM and he begged me to buy it under his employee discount plan.

I don't care if they offer to give me the vehicle. I won't drive a GM again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. The Venture was crap - that's what you get for being cheap
and buying the cheapest van they sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. I bought the cheapest Toyota they sell.
I've had it for seven years with only routine maintenance. 40-45mpg.

Too bad GM can't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #31
72. Now I've heard it all
GM's crappy products are the fault of the parsimonious customers who buy them.

Whoo. Desperation is never pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
77. God forbid that a customer should expect a product to work as advertised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
74. I don't believe a word you said
I read your other posts on this forum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. GM and Ford both screwed themselves by not putting out Electric Vehicles.
The Auto Industry screwed up big time because of not putting out electrical vehicles. Back in 2002, I went to an Electrical Expo where there was an electric 1 ton cargo van. I was told it would cost $38,0000.00, but there were only limited supply. Also GM has had the Volt since the 80's, see "Who killed the Electric Car?", but it seems that corporate loyalty was more important than providing the public with an alternative to the internal combustion engine. I also knew of a fellow, who killed himself, who came up with a fuel injection system for the Ford Mustang that allowed an average of nearly 60 miles to the Gallon, Highway. I think he got around $80,000.00 for his invention. He was depressed for months after that. I also heard of an Electrical Engineer who disappeared who had a means of converting peoples vehicles for $1800.00 1990's money, to electric vehicles. An engineer told me about him, said he was threatened for weeks before disappearing. What I am getting at is that Big Auto shot itself in the foot not providing the American People with alternatives to the Vehicles they were selling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffro40 Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. 2009 Production of the Volt is on track
By this time next year I'll be driving a plug-in electric vehicle from GM, the Volt. I'll power it from my solar and wind array.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal1973 Donating Member (964 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Lutz should be fired.
He is clearly a far right idiot.

I what to thank the idiot for helping me to determine to not buy a GM product. I'm looking to acquire a new car. GM were considered but not anymore.

My next car either will be a Hybrid Toyota or a Hybrid Lexus.

Again Lutz should be fired. One other it shows why GM had limbaugh and the douche hannity in ads.

Lutz and GM a crock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Wow, you'll be even ahead of GM
who has already stated they won't be out until 2010, at the earliest.

You building it yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #59
67. You're a GM employee getting a hand-built prototype?
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 11:24 AM by wtmusic
Ha! Good one. Or maybe it explains your blind allegiance. Or maybe you're another marketing shill hired to invade blogs (you must know OKIsItJustMe, or maybe you are him. I really don't give a crap).

There are plenty of reasons to trash other companies but GM makes such an inviting target. Lutz says "Global Warming is a crock of shit" he is just plain fucking wrong. He might as well say "gravity is a crock" or "the earth is flat". When someone with that reach of influence makes an absurd, uninformed comment solely to better his shitty bottom line he does it at the expense of an irreplaceable environment that my kids and your kids are going to have to live in. If he's so goddamn knowledgeable I'm sure he would have no problem debating Nobel Prize winner Al Gore on the subject.

Speaking of asshats -- is being one now a requirement to work there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
44. Fuck GM
Of all the cars I've owned, I've NEVER owned a GM product.

They've always been the WRONG car company for my driving needs.

Too big, too wasteful on gas, uninspired designs and pushy marketing.

That's GM in a nutshell.

That, plus "Who Killed the Electric Car" turned me OFF GM forever.

Let them die. Sorry about all the jobs, but it's a new era now.

Evolve or die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
45. So this guy
talks shit in public right and left, adds a blog to it, continually runs his mouth filled with partially hydrogenated statements and somehow would wish not to be talked about? This guy is a human SUV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
46. My Prius and Honda Civic hybrid has felt REAL goooooood for the last 7 years!!!!
PH@#K yYU GM!!!

You Union boys and Gals..... GM has royally screwed you over.
A huge debt just to unemploy all you union memebers and outsource and get rid of alllll pensions!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
47. Hey!!! Le'ts buy Bob Lut a crock fill it up with ....welll.... you know.....
his wish come true....

L OL!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
50. Dude, so are your cars!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
52. No surprise that company's been teetering on the brink of bankruptcy
and management has NO ONE to blame but themselves for their idiotinc American exceptionalism....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
55. Turning aluminum into hydrogen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
57. worst case: GM tanks, toyota buys them, they get some good management for a change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #57
65. Toyota recalled more autos than they built last year...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
60. That makes two things Lutz knows nothing about.
Turning a profit and now science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
61. It's hard to get a person to admit the facts
When his job depends on ignoring them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
62. Shuff it up your ass Lutz!
GM, along with Toyota and Ford had perfectly sound EVs. And what did they do with them after OPEC and shurb(mostly) through a fit about the California mandate??! Bush threatened to sue California over it and the GM, Toyota and Ford all 'recalled' all their leased EVs and simply destroyed them all.

All auto manufacturers are in bed with Big Oil, not a conspiracy but a fact.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boilinmad Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
63. The "big picture"..
...is that Lutz is a big fat greedy asshole that should shut his piehole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
66. If GM does not "win" with efficient vehicles, their market for automobiles will collapse
People will start adjusting their lives so that they drive a lot less if and when the price of gasoline doubles again. The concept of high school students having a car to drive to a minimum wage part time job will be history. Some business models will collapse if they cannot turn a profit when gasoline is $6.00/gallon.

Sales of automobiles will drop below 17,000,000 and keep falling. GM better find a product consumers can afford to operate or their company will shrink. And so will all the other automakers.

GM's battery powered technology and two-mode hybrids put them definitely ahead of the competion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #66
73. Yeah, but that extreme-RWs like Lutz WANT their companies to shrink:
they'll get MULTI-MILLION $$$ in bonu$$e$ like the Wall Street crook$ do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. And lose his stock options? Kind of silly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
76. obesity problem
Okay. so we have to go on a diet. How come GM still wants to sell everybody muumuus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
78. Because they make their fucking money off SUVs which tear up the planet
Of course they say it is a crock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC