Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tests Show No Agent In Iraq Mortar Shells

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:05 PM
Original message
Tests Show No Agent In Iraq Mortar Shells
CAMP EDEN, Iraq - "Tests by Danish and American experts indicate there is no chemical agent in mortar shells unearthed last week in southern Iraq, but more testing is needed to confirm the findings, the Danish military reported Wednesday.

The preliminary findings cast doubt whether the suspicious shells will become the "smoking gun" proving that Iraq still maintained supplies of banned chemical weapons when the United States and its allies launched the war last March.

The U.S.-led Iraq Survey Group conducted tests on five shells and none of them showed traces of chemical agents, the Danish army said in a statement released in Copenhagen.

"Based on the tests, the experts conclude that none of the shells contain chemical warfare agents," it said, adding that more tests are needed for final confirmation."

EDIT

http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/news/world/7708636.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. reported ..
reported on the bottom of page F44.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is not funny anymore...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know man... that rust...
you can get tetanus from those things! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Has anyone made a list of all the false calls
There has to be 30-40 by now :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Didn't you hear?
We've already found two mobile bioweapons labs and nuk-u-ler bombs buried in some guy's back yard. I know because the TV told me so. All the retractions are just liberal media bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. You have to love how they say . . .
that it casts doubt on whether the shells would be the "smoking gun" proving that Iraq maintained its supplies of banned weapons. . . . .

Ummm, sorry but even if the tests had come back positive, those shells were in no condition to be considered "smoking guns", hell you couldn't even rightly consider them weapons, since there's no way you could fire a rusted out pile of metal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Do You See How The Media Is Towing The ShrubCo Line...
of slowing lowering the bar with respect to it's reasoning for this war. Instead of weapons of mass destruction we now have "banned weapons". Blister agents are not W'sMD, so This tells me that if the tests came back positive the media would have taken out all of the stops to vindicate the cabal. The media loves this guy and really, really, really wants keep their tax cuts.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Field test kits
Used by EOD in the fifties would identify explosives on site. I suspect with new technology Field tests will also identify 'chemical agents'.

These stories are hard to believe.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanroat Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Have you seen those shells?
More like the 'rusting gun.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Surprise.
They do keep hoping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Posters here were correct again
Several people said the suspicious chemical that was found was just the residue of the high explosives, or something like that. Still, the government gets their intended effect of the big "WMD Found!" headline, followed by the little retraction on page 99.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Even if those things were in pristine condition
And were full of blister gas/mustard gas, when did mortar shells get promoted to WMD? A mortar launcher is a short to intermediate range artillery weapon. Was Iraq going to launch a mortar attack across the Atlantic?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. I have a nagging suspicion / theory
.
.
.
That "weapons" have either been discoverd or planted

and will be "discovered" just before the election-

and where would they be ?

Well, it's been bugging me that we have NEVER heard or seen any pictures of the many underground bunkers and complexes that are already documented to exist in Iraq.

After a wee "blurb" on discovering the entrance to the bunker at Saddam Airport (which by the way has a road underground all the way to Baghdad) - we have heard NOTHING !

Access to the Airport has been under American control since the beginning, so my suspicions persist

Sumthin' to think about - -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I don't know about those 'extensive bunkers'
I know there was a lot of hype before the war about their existence, and some third-party comments that some Eastern European contractors had been brought in to build them.

But...


Anyone remember the schematics of bin Ladens 'Massive Underground Hideaway in a Hollowed Out Mountain'? yOu know, the blueprints that showed they even had modern hospitals underground with elevators and steel blast doors?

Turned out to be a nothing more impressive than a few holes in the ground. Those had been a bit overblown, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. You mean like that spider hole?
Why the hell would Saddam be in a spider hole if he had a maze of underground tunnels and bunkers??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I have a friend
who worked for KBR for a few months in Iraq. He says that we are not hearing even a tenth of what has happened there and is happening there. He says he has no doubt that the weapons are there and will be found. We'll see. I share your concern, "Concerned."

BTW, he says that ten schools full of children were hit with bombs at the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I think that if they were going to plant weapons
they would have done it long ago and let the Kay team find them. The national and international press has been scathing on the administration and lack of finds.

I believe they aren't planting (and won't) because there has been so much international press scrutiny - that anything they would "plant" would be debunked almost immediately creating an even worse PR spectacle for this administration than not finding them.

More likely that they will continue to try to shift the discussion in another direction, including pushing the idea that at the last minute the weapons were moved (on the earliest days Rumsfeld was already pushing this idea - naming Syria and Iran intermittently.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. Paging Mr. Brit Hume -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Sorry, he's busy sniffing exudate.
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Even Faux is reporting it
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108390,00.html

Tests on Iraqi Shells Find No Chemical Agent

Wednesday, January 14, 2004

COPENHAGEN, Denmark — Mortar shells found in southern Iraq by the Danish military do not appear to contain chemical weapon agents as originally suspected, Fox News has learned.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. That's funny
because their news ticker is, at this very minute, still reporting that the shells may contain a "blister agent."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. We have more dangerous stuff in our own drinking water
than has turned up in all of these chemical "finds". But, as Shrub said on monday the administration's policy was about regime change. To say that we attacked them for supposed WMDs is revisionist history. Thats why they secretly pulled their weapons sniffers out. Their grasping at fucking straws, man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBigBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. Oh well
another day, another WMD letdown.

Pass the lemonade, Hortense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kick! -NT-
Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
26. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwoody Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. Not yet, anyway!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
28. What a surprise.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
29. SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE! (nt)
Edited on Thu Jan-15-04 08:33 AM by stickdog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC