rayofreason
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:34 PM
Original message |
| Clinton, McCain wins NH primaries, trailed by Obama, Romney |
 |
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 10:42 PM by EarlG
Source: APCONCORD, N.H. (AP) -- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton won New Hampshire's Democratic primary Tuesday night in a startling upset, defeating Sen. Barack Obama and resurrecting her bid for the White House. Sen. John McCain powered past his Republican rivals and back into contention for the GOP nomination. Clinton's victory capped a comeback from last week's third-place finish in the Iowa caucuses and raised the possibility of a long battle for the party nomination between the most viable black candidate in history and the former first lady, who is seeking to become the first woman to occupy the Oval Office. McCain's triumph scrambled the Republican race as well. Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PRIMARY_RDP?SITE... Edited by Admin to update story because this is on the home page.
|

Hanover result in? |
JoFerret |
Jan-08-08 10:35 PM |
#1 |
 
no, and did you hear Dewey beat Truman? |
nyublue |
Jan-08-08 10:36 PM |
#4 |
  
Neither college towns have reported, according to CNN. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 10:41 PM |
#9 |
 
Exactly |
matt819 |
Jan-08-08 10:46 PM |
#14 |
 
Hanover is Dartmouth. |
rayofreason |
Jan-08-08 10:47 PM |
#15 |
 
I feel the same way |
last_texas_dem |
Jan-09-08 11:02 AM |
#138 |

STOLEN!! |
peabody71 |
Jan-09-08 03:02 PM |
#160 |

Exit Polls do NOT equal results...FRAUD is SHOWING AGAIN |
OKthatsIT |
Jan-09-08 05:56 PM |
#167 |

The race is still too close to call |
bluestateguy |
Jan-08-08 10:35 PM |
#2 |
 
Teaching the People to trust the machines, not the POLLS |
Born Free |
Jan-09-08 06:14 AM |
#107 |

Clinton wins NH |
onehandle |
Jan-08-08 10:36 PM |
#3 |

Congrats to Hillary and her supporters! nt |
onehandle |
Jan-08-08 10:36 PM |
#5 |
 
Polls just a few hours ago showed a 10 point lead for Obama! |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 10:43 PM |
#10 |

The polls were wrong. |
rayofreason |
Jan-08-08 11:08 PM |
#31 |

Yes, I know. You're talking to the choir... a 68 year old woman who is dry behind the (y)ears! |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 11:18 PM |
#40 |

If Edwards decides to stay in the race... |
Bretttido |
Jan-08-08 10:37 PM |
#6 |
 
Who is the progressive here then? |
JoFerret |
Jan-08-08 10:40 PM |
#8 |
 
Don't even go there. Edwards is Edwards. Everyone else is 2nd best. |
McCamy Taylor |
Jan-08-08 10:45 PM |
#12 |
  
Well, you may be right about that, but it looks as if many people don't agree with you. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 11:21 PM |
#43 |
 
clearly he should go skulk in a corner |
frogcycle |
Jan-08-08 11:00 PM |
#21 |
  
Obama's team definitely needs to work on the p.r. skills of his supporters. |
yardwork |
Jan-09-08 11:10 AM |
#141 |
 
What?? Edwards is the progressive. nm |
rhett o rick |
Jan-08-08 11:02 PM |
#24 |
 
I don't believe the evidence supports that |
last_texas_dem |
Jan-09-08 11:08 AM |
#140 |
 
What an asshole. |
Heywoodj |
Jan-09-08 03:02 PM |
#159 |

AP cites win; so does MSNBC (from another thread). CNN holds back. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 10:40 PM |
#7 |
 
But... |
ImForGore |
Jan-08-08 11:07 PM |
#28 |

FOX declares Bush the winner |
merwin |
Jan-08-08 11:22 PM |
#47 |

ROFL. Tell me you're NOT watching FOX... really! |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 11:33 PM |
#55 |

I have Fox Noise ... |
ImForGore |
Jan-09-08 02:07 PM |
#156 |

Hogwash |
matt819 |
Jan-08-08 10:44 PM |
#11 |
 
Whatever the eventual vote count |
JoFerret |
Jan-08-08 10:54 PM |
#19 |

I'm an Edwards supporter, but |
petersjo02 |
Jan-08-08 10:46 PM |
#13 |
 
Bull puckey. Hil gets lots of media attention. Edwards is totally ignored. nm |
rhett o rick |
Jan-08-08 11:04 PM |
#25 |
 
Thank you. |
emilyg |
Jan-09-08 12:36 AM |
#77 |

Ditto |
Ronnie |
Jan-09-08 11:42 AM |
#146 |

great.. |
kimsterdemster |
Jan-08-08 10:49 PM |
#16 |

Obama is conceding now. |
rayofreason |
Jan-08-08 10:49 PM |
#17 |
 
Conceding??? IT'S JUST ONE PRIMARY IN A TINY STATE!!! |
Up2Late |
Jan-08-08 11:18 PM |
#39 |

Calm Down Beavis |
Mistwell |
Jan-08-08 11:21 PM |
#44 |

Conceding NH |
rayofreason |
Jan-08-08 11:24 PM |
#49 |

Hillary! Hillary! Hillary! Hillary! Hillary! |
kelvinyany |
Jan-08-08 10:50 PM |
#18 |
 
You know what? I'm proud of all of the Democrats. Remember? |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:22 AM |
#72 |
 
If I could vote |
sushi |
Jan-09-08 12:42 AM |
#79 |

At 68 years of age, I'd like to see BOTH a woman and a black man in the WH. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:15 PM |
#149 |

I won't congratulate her, as I won't vote for her. |
Voltaire99 |
Jan-08-08 10:58 PM |
#20 |
 
We'll see, Voltaire99. Polish up your crystal ball... I think you'll need it. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 11:31 PM |
#53 |
  
There are other parties on the ballot, Ellen |
ekwhite |
Jan-09-08 08:44 AM |
#130 |
 
This is Democratic Underground. One of the rules is that we support Democrats. |
yardwork |
Jan-09-08 11:13 AM |
#142 |
 
Nice Condescending Post |
NBachers |
Jan-09-08 01:55 AM |
#91 |

I think that McCain and Clinton won, says a lot about that state. |
The Backlash Cometh |
Jan-08-08 11:00 PM |
#22 |
 
Working class vote |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:47 AM |
#109 |

If you appraisal is correct, then I would say that would explain, a lot. |
The Backlash Cometh |
Jan-09-08 07:37 AM |
#123 |

HEY!!! |
connecticut yankee |
Jan-08-08 11:01 PM |
#23 |
 
I agree... |
rayofreason |
Jan-08-08 11:07 PM |
#27 |
 
Another stolen election |
fearlessrick |
Jan-08-08 11:10 PM |
#34 |
  
What bullshit, spreading FUD |
rayofreason |
Jan-08-08 11:14 PM |
#35 |
   
Not necessarily, I had the same thought and posted down-thread n/t |
mojowork_n |
Jan-08-08 11:23 PM |
#48 |
  
I disagree |
Mistwell |
Jan-08-08 11:16 PM |
#37 |
  
Those polls had all been conducted before the "Hillary cries" MSM assault. |
pnwmom |
Jan-09-08 12:35 AM |
#76 |
   
I know in my own anecdotal way I was ready to vote for her to |
BleedingHeartPatriot |
Jan-09-08 09:11 AM |
#132 |
  
Dead right with the sexist crap |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:09 PM |
#170 |
  
er, welcome to DU! |
Patriot Abroad |
Jan-09-08 04:05 AM |
#98 |
  
It is my unfortunate duty to point out that you are full of shit. |
karlrschneider |
Jan-09-08 05:08 AM |
#102 |
  
When I went to bed there was a 4 point lead. |
anniebelle |
Jan-09-08 06:35 AM |
#108 |
  
No evidence for that. None |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:52 AM |
#110 |
  
Unless you have some proof, I |
leftynyc |
Jan-09-08 07:46 AM |
#124 |
 
Exactly |
jmondine |
Jan-09-08 12:11 AM |
#67 |

Once again the progressives are ignored. Here we go, status quo forever. nm |
rhett o rick |
Jan-08-08 11:05 PM |
#26 |
 
Don't despair |
Cant trust em |
Jan-08-08 11:08 PM |
#30 |

I was rooting for the progressive, you should know who that is. nm |
rhett o rick |
Jan-08-08 11:10 PM |
#33 |

Kucinich? |
merwin |
Jan-09-08 02:15 AM |
#92 |

I was referring to Edwards. He is a top runner but the corp media is ignoring him |
rhett o rick |
Jan-09-08 10:49 AM |
#136 |

Wow. |
Cant trust em |
Jan-08-08 11:07 PM |
#29 |
 
Indeed WOW |
Mistwell |
Jan-08-08 11:09 PM |
#32 |

Are you ready for me to tell you something you already knew? |
Cant trust em |
Jan-08-08 11:47 PM |
#61 |

WTF? |
mojowork_n |
Jan-08-08 11:15 PM |
#36 |
 
Not bait and switch just wrong polls |
Mistwell |
Jan-08-08 11:19 PM |
#41 |
  
So ALL the polls were off? Nothing to see here? (Move along.) |
mojowork_n |
Jan-09-08 06:00 AM |
#105 |
   
Yes, ALL the polls were off. |
Stewie |
Jan-09-08 11:03 AM |
#139 |
  
Wow! 80% |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:55 AM |
#112 |
 
This level of cynicism and conspiracy |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:54 AM |
#111 |

Interesting that on Charlie Rose, guest Bill Clinton, when asked who he saw |
Dover |
Jan-08-08 11:18 PM |
#38 |
 
What did that show air? I didn't see it... maybe I'll find it on www.opb.org |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 11:20 PM |
#42 |

Don't recall exactly...maybe two or three weeks ago? |
Dover |
Jan-08-08 11:21 PM |
#45 |

Thanks. I found it at www.charlierose.com |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 11:27 PM |
#50 |

Oh great. I was just about to post this link to the archived page: |
Dover |
Jan-08-08 11:45 PM |
#60 |

BOOYA! IN YOUR FACE All you Obama people who couldn't keep from bragging last week!!! |
Up2Late |
Jan-08-08 11:21 PM |
#46 |

If Hillary Gets The Nomination Now... |
JimGinPA |
Jan-08-08 11:27 PM |
#51 |
 
Sen Clinton is my last choice, but I still think your post is irresponsible. If she wins the |
rhett o rick |
Jan-08-08 11:31 PM |
#52 |
  
Regardless of what you think |
JimGinPA |
Jan-08-08 11:37 PM |
#56 |
   
Yes, she can. |
Eric J in MN |
Jan-09-08 12:13 AM |
#68 |
    
Clinton... |
Cardboardurinal |
Jan-09-08 03:01 AM |
#94 |
   
LOL. Funniest post of the day. |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:59 AM |
#116 |
   
Prove it. |
ExPatLeftist |
Jan-09-08 08:09 AM |
#127 |
   
RE: Clinton... |
The_Counsel |
Jan-09-08 11:32 AM |
#145 |
   
Go drown your sorrows in cynicism and despair. |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:58 AM |
#114 |
  
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-08-08 11:38 PM |
#57 |
 
Hi radio_lady. I must agree with you. One thing about Democrats, we fight a lot among ourselves |
rhett o rick |
Jan-08-08 11:47 PM |
#62 |
 
The Republicans are our opponents, but it will be a trek to get to November. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:14 AM |
#69 |
 
Portland is a great town. We live closer to Seattle though. nm |
rhett o rick |
Jan-09-08 12:19 AM |
#71 |
 
Husband had a contract software job in Milton, Washington in 2000. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:27 AM |
#73 |
 
You wish maybe? |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:57 AM |
#113 |

Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-08-08 11:31 PM |
#54 |
 
Boy, that's a positive post. Tell me, Scarface 2004, who DO you support in this election? |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-08-08 11:42 PM |
#58 |
  
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-09-08 05:37 AM |
#104 |
 
My Ex Is From NH And He Is The Biggest Asshole On Earth..A Narcissistic Shit Bag |
Binka |
Jan-08-08 11:42 PM |
#59 |
  
So.. why would you marry A Narcissistic Shit Bag? |
olddad56 |
Jan-09-08 12:10 AM |
#66 |
   
I Never Married Him |
Binka |
Jan-09-08 12:32 AM |
#74 |
  
Binka, I feel sorry for your situation, but is it fair to judge a WHOLE state from one person? |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:45 AM |
#81 |
   
Jesus People I Said My Views Were Skewed |
Binka |
Jan-09-08 12:49 AM |
#83 |
  
No worries. Sorry. I didn't notice the EVIL GRIN. Maybe it should have this one: |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 01:19 AM |
#87 |
  
Ridiculous |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 07:06 AM |
#119 |
  
NH is beautiful |
reggie the dog |
Jan-09-08 05:06 AM |
#101 |
 
Thank you for your thoughtful pov |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 07:03 AM |
#117 |

Great news. It'll be an exciting time until Super Tuesday. |
robcon |
Jan-08-08 11:51 PM |
#63 |
 
I couldn't disagree more |
JimGinPA |
Jan-09-08 12:00 AM |
#64 |

I find your posts disruptive and disagreeable. Who DO you support? |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:33 AM |
#75 |
 
I Would Have Supported Obama |
JimGinPA |
Jan-09-08 12:53 AM |
#84 |

Well, sorry you feel that way. Our primary is a mail in vote in May 2008. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 01:25 AM |
#88 |

We should all support the nominee. |
Apollo11 |
Jan-09-08 04:58 AM |
#100 |

Hear ye. Hear ye. "If Obama doesn't win the nomination in 2008 maybe he will get it in 2016." |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:24 PM |
#150 |

Obama plays dirty, too... |
Venceremos |
Jan-09-08 12:45 AM |
#80 |
 
Against Keyes???? |
JimGinPA |
Jan-09-08 12:56 AM |
#85 |

You apparently have limited knowledge of IL politics.... |
Venceremos |
Jan-09-08 01:18 AM |
#86 |

What does it do to show IL(L) will to another Democrat with a put-down? |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 01:31 AM |
#89 |
 
Take a pill... |
Venceremos |
Jan-09-08 01:40 AM |
#90 |

What? I'm only reacting to your general negativity about these candidates. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:10 PM |
#148 |

Like the Trib needed the Obama camp |
nevergiveup |
Jan-09-08 06:59 AM |
#115 |

That would be the Jack Ryan |
pink-o |
Jan-09-08 11:24 AM |
#144 |

He'll do so well against the GOP then right? |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 07:08 AM |
#121 |

NOW it's a race! |
AnnieBW |
Jan-09-08 12:06 AM |
#65 |
 
The MSM... |
LeFleur1 |
Jan-09-08 12:18 AM |
#70 |

LOL. The mainstream media are eating crow tonight. |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:39 AM |
#78 |

I'll agree with you on that one |
ekwhite |
Jan-09-08 09:01 AM |
#131 |

Where were the people? |
frog92969 |
Jan-09-08 12:45 AM |
#82 |
 
Perhaps they are afraid, very afraid... |
clixtox |
Jan-09-08 03:19 AM |
#95 |
  
We got the bone alright! |
frog92969 |
Jan-09-08 03:26 AM |
#97 |
 
Didn't take long for the flakes and nuts to appear this morning |
Tarc |
Jan-09-08 08:28 AM |
#129 |
  
Thanks for your support |
frog92969 |
Jan-09-08 09:35 AM |
#134 |
   
No no no, thank YOU, Kucinich flag-bearers |
Tarc |
Jan-09-08 09:42 AM |
#135 |
  
What a stupid remark... |
clixtox |
Jan-09-08 11:55 AM |
#147 |
 
go tell it to someone who cares, please |
Tarc |
Jan-09-08 01:52 PM |
#154 |
  
Agreed |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:06 PM |
#169 |
  
"zip it, newbie" |
frog92969 |
Jan-09-08 06:32 PM |
#173 |
 
Comment on target IMO |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:02 PM |
#168 |
 
They voted for Clinton. |
SIMPLYB1980 |
Jan-09-08 02:37 PM |
#157 |

Possibly |
frog92969 |
Jan-09-08 06:50 PM |
#175 |

Went into the Newsagents this morning... |
Thankfully_in_Britain |
Jan-09-08 03:00 AM |
#93 |
 
No,apearantly Diebold and M$M may have made asses of us all-w/links |
frog92969 |
Jan-09-08 03:22 AM |
#96 |
  
Whenever polling is wildly different than results, things need a closer look. |
sss1977 |
Jan-09-08 04:10 AM |
#99 |
 
Exactly. Too bad those same great folks who brought us the poll numbers |
mojowork_n |
Jan-09-08 06:04 AM |
#106 |
 
Here's the front page of today's The Independent (London, England) |
Apollo11 |
Jan-09-08 05:28 AM |
#103 |

Yes, I imagine there are a few people in Canary Wharf... |
Thankfully_in_Britain |
Jan-09-08 07:24 AM |
#122 |

To be fair, the text says that Obama was in a tight battle |
Apollo11 |
Jan-09-08 07:54 AM |
#126 |

But "tight race" is not the impression you get from that front page is it? |
Thankfully_in_Britain |
Jan-10-08 02:55 AM |
#176 |

Wait and see |
droidamus2 |
Jan-09-08 07:04 AM |
#118 |

More Kabuki Theater from the faux US Primaries. n/t |
formercia |
Jan-09-08 07:08 AM |
#120 |

Did Anyone Catch McLame's Victory Speech .....? |
MCMetal |
Jan-09-08 07:52 AM |
#125 |
 
Yeah, one of the most poorly delivered speeches I have ever seen. NM |
ExPatLeftist |
Jan-09-08 08:13 AM |
#128 |
 
My early Valentine to Sen McCain. |
BleedingHeartPatriot |
Jan-09-08 09:17 AM |
#133 |

Son of Cain hugging the Paltry President. It's burned in my brain... |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:40 PM |
#152 |

What was startling about it? |
stevietheman |
Jan-09-08 10:53 AM |
#137 |
 
I live in Iowa... |
nickdisagrees |
Jan-09-08 11:19 AM |
#143 |

Are you really a Democrat if you say that you will never vote for a Democrat for President? |
Radio_Lady |
Jan-09-08 12:31 PM |
#151 |
 
A LOT of Democrats will NOT vote for Hillary |
JimGinPA |
Jan-09-08 12:50 PM |
#153 |
  
Then you really don't belong here |
Tarc |
Jan-09-08 01:56 PM |
#155 |
 
Re: Then you really don't belong here |
nickdisagrees |
Jan-09-08 03:05 PM |
#162 |
 
"You're either with us or against us"... |
JimGinPA |
Jan-09-08 03:35 PM |
#164 |
 
There is no one more divisive |
Tarc |
Jan-09-08 03:42 PM |
#165 |
 
You're pathetic. |
nickdisagrees |
Jan-09-08 03:03 PM |
#161 |

Hope you all enjoy how that turns out for you. |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:11 PM |
#171 |

Perhaps for once... |
nickdisagrees |
Jan-09-08 06:45 PM |
#174 |

POLLS & RESULTS DO NOT JIVE in NH |
OKthatsIT |
Jan-09-08 02:39 PM |
#158 |

The exit polls and the results do jive |
Freddie Stubbs |
Jan-09-08 03:18 PM |
#163 |
 
You're not listening |
OKthatsIT |
Jan-10-08 12:38 PM |
#177 |

Check this out. |
SIMPLYB1980 |
Jan-09-08 04:11 PM |
#166 |
 
That's a joke, right? |
OKthatsIT |
Jan-10-08 12:47 PM |
#179 |

Irrelevant |
JoFerret |
Jan-09-08 06:14 PM |
#172 |

Can't disagree with your mainstream reaction ,there.... |
OKthatsIT |
Jan-10-08 12:39 PM |
#178 |
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 10:38 PM by JoFerret
Seems way too close to call. But - got to say....am not a Clinton fan but find myself pleased by the result. Maybe the premature coronation of any candidate was just distasteful. Truth is they are all too good for that.
|
nyublue
(14 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 4. no, and did you hear Dewey beat Truman? |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 9. Neither college towns have reported, according to CNN. |
 |
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 10:42 PM by Radio_Lady
I forgot my geography, sorry.
Hanover/Dartmouth and Durham/ is that Univ. of NH????
|
matt819
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
 |
Dartmouth (Hanover) and the Upper Valley will vote Obama. Durham is home to UNH and, subject to the extent of student voting, will likely vote Obama.
|
rayofreason
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 15. Hanover is Dartmouth. |
 |
Durham is UNH.
But with 72% reporting at 10:47, Hillary leads 39% to 36%. I don't see how Obama come back. In fact, he is conceding right now.
|
last_texas_dem
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
 |
I am slightly more of an Obama fan than a Clinton fan, but I was glad to see Clinton's victory; I'd rather an at least somewhat competitive series of primaries than a coronation. I didn't like it when the conventional wisdom, for several months before the first primary/caucus, was that Clinton was "inevitable" and it got on my nerves just as much, over the past few days, when people were already talking like an Obama nomination was an inevitability.
|
peabody71
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #138 |
 |
Tim Russert just agreed with Brokaw and Matthews, that "this was the most stunning upset in the history of politics."
|
OKthatsIT
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #160 |
| 167. Exit Polls do NOT equal results...FRAUD is SHOWING AGAIN |
 |
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 05:57 PM by OKthatsIT
Bev Harris (BLACK BOX VOTING) has announced that smaller townships, with considerable smaller voting numbers and where discrepancies are likely to be more apparent, are experiencing voter disenfranhisement.
Some Kucinich and Ron Paul votes were never counted. Voters complained their votes were not in the total figures...this showd up whn tonship tallies came up ZERO for Kucinich and/or Ron Paul.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. The race is still too close to call |
Born Free
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 107. Teaching the People to trust the machines, not the POLLS |
 |
At one time, the polls were pretty close to being accurate, but these days they continue to show us the voting machines can and will produce results far different than the polls suggest. It's a type of mental conditioning all Americans are currently receiving, never-ever trust the opinion polls, trust the machines. Everyone needs to be prepared to accept results that are far different than even exit polls may suggest. Oh yeah, be prepared for "Dewey vs Truman" statements any time someone suggest there may be more to the huge discrepancies than meets the eye. or better yet, being told to get out the tin foil hat. Ten points difference, no problem, 15 points difference, no problem; anything can happen and we all must trust the machines. No paper trails, no recounts just trust the system.
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 10:35 PM by onehandle
Source: APCONCORD, N.H. - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton won New Hampshire's Democratic primary Tuesday night in a startling upset, defeating Sen. Barack Obama and resurrecting her bid for White House. Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/primary_rdp
Congrats to Hillary and her supporters!
|
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Congrats to Hillary and her supporters! nt |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 10. Polls just a few hours ago showed a 10 point lead for Obama! |
rayofreason
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 31. The polls were wrong. |
 |
Don't trust them. They can be manipulated. Also, a very large number decided who to vote for in the last 24 hrs. Polls don't capture that.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
| 40. Yes, I know. You're talking to the choir... a 68 year old woman who is dry behind the (y)ears! |
Bretttido
(754 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. If Edwards decides to stay in the race... |
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 8. Who is the progressive here then? |
McCamy Taylor
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 12. Don't even go there. Edwards is Edwards. Everyone else is 2nd best. |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 43. Well, you may be right about that, but it looks as if many people don't agree with you. |
frogcycle
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 21. clearly he should go skulk in a corner |
 |
and stop interfering with the coronation damn, every time I start to warm a little bit to Obama one of his supporters pipes up.
Maybe OBAMA is THE new Ralph Nader. maybe if he would go skulk in a corner we could have a progressive candidate who would win and do what he says
or maybe the process should be allowed to go past two small states and let people cast a fucking VOTE without the Obama Greek Chorus chanting "shame, shame"
|
yardwork
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 141. Obama's team definitely needs to work on the p.r. skills of his supporters. |
 |
I have to say, many of the Obama supporters on this board at least are some of the rudest posters I've seen.
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 24. What?? Edwards is the progressive. nm |
last_texas_dem
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 140. I don't believe the evidence supports that |
 |
I am a liberal who supports Edwards, but the exit (or was it "entrance"?) polls in IA indicated that his supporters spanned the ideological spectrum. I believe he actually carried the votes of the conservative Democrats attending the caucus. I haven't seen strong evidence that Edwards dropping out would give any sort of strong boost to Obama.
|
Heywood J
(856 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
 |
Ditto on the comment that anytime Obama seems electable, his supporters always come out like assholes to balance it out.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:40 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. AP cites win; so does MSNBC (from another thread). CNN holds back. |
Frisbee
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
merwin
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 47. FOX declares Bush the winner |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
| 55. ROFL. Tell me you're NOT watching FOX... really! |
Frisbee
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #55 |
| 156. I have Fox Noise ... |
 |
Blocked from the channel line-up on my Tivo. I couldn't watch it if I wanted to without a bit of work (not that I'd ever want to). Occasionally, my Tivo would record something on Fox on it's own, and I didn't want to give them the benefit of even one additional viewer for their ratings, so I just removed them altogether. That's what I think of Fox. 
|
matt819
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
More than 215,000 votes to be counted (both D & R), and decidedly Obama towns - the Upper Valley, for example - have yet to show results.
So far the difference between Obama and Clinton is accounted for largely by two towns - Manchester and Nashua, with Obama winning just about everywhere else or running pretty much even.
So this report is utter nonsense, at least coming as it does with only 65% of the votes reported.
Obama will win or will be neck and neck with Clinton, and his support will be demonstrably broader than that of Clinton. On top of that, when Edwards and ther others drop out, as will be inevitable, IMHO, their supporters are not shifting to Clinton but to Obama. Of course, that means nothing in the primary, but the point is that this is not Clinton territory except in a couple of cities.
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 19. Whatever the eventual vote count |
petersjo02
(891 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. I'm an Edwards supporter, but |
 |
after all the media crap Hillary has endured (e.g., Chris Matthews), I say you go, Girl. Get some sleep tonight.
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 25. Bull puckey. Hil gets lots of media attention. Edwards is totally ignored. nm |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
Ronnie
(674 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #77 |
kimsterdemster
(237 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message |
rayofreason
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 17. Obama is conceding now. |
Up2Late
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
| 39. Conceding??? IT'S JUST ONE PRIMARY IN A TINY STATE!!! |
 |
Get a Grip! Conceding. Btw, I'm a long time Hillery supporter, so IN YOU FACE ALL OF YOU Obama people who couldn't keep from bragging last week!
|
Mistwell
(545 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
rayofreason
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
 |
But nothing else.
And I think you knew that. And also, after Iowa, I always posted to the effect "Don't count her out".
|
kelvinyany
(38 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 18. Hillary! Hillary! Hillary! Hillary! Hillary! |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 72. You know what? I'm proud of all of the Democrats. Remember? |
 |
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 12:24 AM by Radio_Lady
"ANYBODY BUT BUSH... OR ANY REPUBLICANS"  THIS IS ABOUT NARROWING THE FIELD TO A TWO-PERSON TICKET...  THIS IS ABOUT NARROWING THE FIELD TO A TWO-PERSON TICKET... 
|
sushi
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #79 |
| 149. At 68 years of age, I'd like to see BOTH a woman and a black man in the WH. |
 |
Anybody else thinking of a Hillary/Obama ticket? It could happen.
But happened to the old chestnut: "Age before beauty"? Think I'll leave that before opening any other doors.
|
Voltaire99
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message |
| 20. I won't congratulate her, as I won't vote for her. |
 |
I'm not terribly surprised her Bush-lite message appeals to NH -- it's the eastern seaboard, technocratic and monied, with a long Republican history that has been courted assiduously by the slimy DINOs. That Obama polled well there is a statement about his corporate-safe status as much as Hillary's vulnerability. Edwards' populism doesn't play in an area that knows it will have to foot the bill for reform (and rightly so).
Enjoy it while you can, Hillary. If it comes down to the convention, the party will be given a choice by progressives: abandon this regressive politics or we leave you to curdle in it alone.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 53. We'll see, Voltaire99. Polish up your crystal ball... I think you'll need it. |
 |
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:32 PM by Radio_Lady
Please tell me you won't vote Republican in November. Just stay home.... unless you can support the eventual Democratic ticket. In peace, Radio Lady Ellen in Oregon
|
ekwhite
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #53 |
| 130. There are other parties on the ballot, Ellen |
 |
I will probably vote Green rather than vote for Hillary. I can't stomach her votes for Iraq and her inability to say that her Iraq vote was a mistake. I would rather vote for a true progressive rather than be sucked into another false choice.
|
yardwork
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #130 |
| 142. This is Democratic Underground. One of the rules is that we support Democrats. |
 |
If you advocate for a third party candidate over a Democrat, you will not be allowed to post here. Those are the rules.
|
NBachers
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 91. Nice Condescending Post |
 |
Snidely McSneery
And would you have described the NH population the same way if Obama or Edwards had won?
I thought not.
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 22. I think that McCain and Clinton won, says a lot about that state. |
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
 |
...seems Hillary won that. Affluent middle class vote - seems Obama did. Says a lot about NH. But WHAT exactly?
(Happy for Hillary. Maybe this process will have an interesting effect.)
|
The Backlash Cometh
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #109 |
| 123. If you appraisal is correct, then I would say that would explain, a lot. |
connecticut yankee
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
These are only two small states. There are forty-eight others.
Super Tuesday is in a month!
Don't count your chickens -- so much more can happen until the Convention.
I don't know why everyone is so excited.
|
rayofreason
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
 |
...Feb 5 is the big day.
But if Hillary had been smashed with the double-digit lead for Obama some had proposed, she would be dead in the water. All the money and endorsement would flow to Obama. Now people will not be so sure.
|
fearlessrick
(1 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
| 34. Another stolen election |
 |
I can't believe nobody has mentioned how we all went to bed last night with all the polls giving Obama a 10-point lead. NH uses all proprietary software (see BradBlog for more on that) and Diebold DREs.
We've just witnessed another stolen election. Obama should have won easily, but the difference between him and Hillary for the Republicans is simple. Hillary can be beaten. Obama would probably have to be... eliminated.
Pay attention, people. These votes are all rigged and we'll never get our democracy back until we get rid of the machines.
|
rayofreason
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 35. What bullshit, spreading FUD |
mojowork_n
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
| 48. Not necessarily, I had the same thought and posted down-thread n/t |
Mistwell
(545 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
 |
I disagree, and think it's a tad insulting to all the Clinton voters who voted today. NH had an 80% turn-out, which is unprecedented and not contemplated in any way by the polling companies. That fact completely wipes out polling data handily.
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 76. Those polls had all been conducted before the "Hillary cries" MSM assault. |
 |
I bet that a lot of fence sitters -- female ones -- decided in her favor during the last twenty four hours.
EXIT polls are historically extremely accurate. Other polls are less reliable when predicting behavior, because voters can change their minds up till the time they're in the booth.
And some new or independent or otherwise "soft" voters may not even have made it to the booth. Maybe there was some over-confidence in the Obama campaign.
|
BleedingHeartPatriot
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #76 |
| 132. I know in my own anecdotal way I was ready to vote for her to |
 |
piss off the Chris Matthews of the world. Even though I'm rooting for Edwards, as I've said over and over, we women know, at a visceral level, the unbelievable level of BS crap she is having to endure for being a female in the man's world of national politics. And, when the predominantly male pundits started piling on, I can completely understand, as a woman, going into the booth and saying to myself, screw the good old boys, in a manner of speaking  , I'm voting for her. Mi dos centavos. MKJ
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #132 |
| 170. Dead right with the sexist crap |
 |
Obama will get lots of comparable stuff.
I think it was an op-ed by Gloria Steinhem in this week's NYTimes that focussed on the sex versus race as a factor in this stuff. Worth a read. Asked the question: would a female Obama be making it as big?
|
Patriot Abroad
(242 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
 |
and you might enjoy spending some time on whatreallyhappened.com, where everything is a conspiracy . . .
I hope and pray that the democratic process has not been subverted so much that the New Hampshire primary is manipulated . . .
|
karlrschneider
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 102. It is my unfortunate duty to point out that you are full of shit. |
anniebelle
(679 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 108. When I went to bed there was a 4 point lead. |
 |
Sounds like you stumbled off the Joe Scarborough "idiot" train. The pundits of this country turned that Obama lead around with all their vitriol against the Clintons. I'm an Edwards supporter myself, but I was feeling the urge to get on Hillary's bandwagon.
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 110. No evidence for that. None |
 |
This was a very fluid situation with lots changing. Maybe people made their minds up when they actually had to face the final moment. Happens. Am sure loads of women gave a second thought right at voting moment and said - Hillary. This time around at least. She had the crap yesterday and all the sneering about being emotional in public. Maybe many people said - hey, she needs a break right now.
Exit and entry polls would be a more reliable judge that polls taken days or even hours before. So - we know we need to watch election fraud, voter suppression and machine malfunction and tampering BUT - paranoia and cynicism do not help.
|
leftynyc
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
| 124. Unless you have some proof, I |
jmondine
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message |
| 26. Once again the progressives are ignored. Here we go, status quo forever. nm |
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 33. I was rooting for the progressive, you should know who that is. nm |
merwin
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #92 |
| 136. I was referring to Edwards. He is a top runner but the corp media is ignoring him |
 |
The corp media likes Obama and Clinton, sort of scary if you ask me. DK is my first choice and Edwards second.
peace
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
This primary season is a wha? wrapped in a who'da thunk it tucked inside a never woulda guessed it.
|
Mistwell
(545 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
 |
I am shocked. Obama went in 9 points ahead, and came out 3-4 points down. That's a 12-13 point mistake in the polling!
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 61. Are you ready for me to tell you something you already knew? |
mojowork_n
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message |
 |
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:19 PM by mojowork_n
Could this have been a bait and switch?
All the cable news channels had Barack up by a lot, in non-stop coverage all day, featuring poll result after poll result.
Encouraging "independent voters" to wander over to the Republican primary?
In 2000, Bill Bradley "lost" to John McCain, because of the same phenomenon, people wandering over to the Other Party, trying to make their voices heard in the most effective way.
|
Mistwell
(545 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
| 41. Not bait and switch just wrong polls |
 |
Nope. There were FEWER Republican voters than predicted, and MORE Democratic voters than predicted. So that's not it.
The polls were wrong because turn-out was 80%, which is unprecedented and completely negates all polling data because they didn't account for it. The polls were looking at likely voters only, which is people who voted in the prior election or prior two elections. But that turns out to be not a representative sample when you have turn-out in these numbers.
|
mojowork_n
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
| 105. So ALL the polls were off? Nothing to see here? (Move along.) |
 |
It can't believe that it's not still extremely suspicious.
If any likely voter had turned into the cable news channels before going to cast a ballot, they would have seen data that showed the election was already decided -- with an Obama win. It was the top story of the day, and repeated over and over again. (With, admittedly, some curious variations in the predicted margin of victory.)
Under those circumstances, why not cast a ballot for the slightly less repulsive Republican candidate?
|
Stewie
(244 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #105 |
| 139. Yes, ALL the polls were off. |
 |
They all use the same sampling models and methodology. When that's flawed, they're all off much like if some factory makes busted engines ALL the cars will break down.
New Hampshire voters like to be contrarian. Perhaps they decided they were being TOLD they must vote Obama by the MSM and felt insulted.
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
| 111. This level of cynicism and conspiracy |
Dover
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 38. Interesting that on Charlie Rose, guest Bill Clinton, when asked who he saw |
 |
Edited on Tue Jan-08-08 11:20 PM by Dover
being strong on the Republican side, said he thought McCain would do well. Charlie nearly fell off the chair and kind of shook his head like..."huh?!". But he didn't pursue it. This was a few weeks ago and Bill was on promoting his book and his wife.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
| 42. What did that show air? I didn't see it... maybe I'll find it on www.opb.org |
Dover
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
| 45. Don't recall exactly...maybe two or three weeks ago? |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
| 50. Thanks. I found it at www.charlierose.com |
Dover
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #50 |
| 60. Oh great. I was just about to post this link to the archived page: |
Up2Late
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |
| 46. BOOYA! IN YOUR FACE All you Obama people who couldn't keep from bragging last week!!! |
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 51. If Hillary Gets The Nomination Now... |
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 52. Sen Clinton is my last choice, but I still think your post is irresponsible. If she wins the |
 |
nomination, we will alllll work for her in spite of what I might have said in previous posts.
|
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 56. Regardless of what you think |
 |
There is no way she can win a general election. This is a sad day for all progressive thinkers.
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
 |
People know the economy was better under Bill Clinton than under George W. Bush.
I'm a Kucinich supporter, but Hillary Clinton can win if she's our nominee.
|
Cardboardurinal
(14 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #68 |
 |
meaning Bill in this case did not do much for the economy. He came in at the most convenient time to look good on the economy. He came in when he was able to downsize the military and the internet bubble brought a lot of revenue into the country...I don't see where Bill had much to do with economic prosperity given the way the 90s worked out. In fact, I believe that Bill is part of why the Bush economy is so bad...I am not saying that Bush isn't mostly to blame. I am saying that Clinton's deregulation of industry and his endorsement of free trade impacted the economy negatively that had a delayed effect. So please stop praising Clinton for having done the things that made the 90s "prosperous," because he didn't actually do much!
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #94 |
| 116. LOL. Funniest post of the day. |
ExPatLeftist
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #94 |
 |
"...And I know it is true cuz Rush told me so."
Funny how people making this argument will then often turn around and explain why Bush IS to thank for the "great economy" under his reign...
And don't forget... Clinton was to blame for the 9/11 attacks (which occurred almost 8 months after he left the presidency) Clinton was also to blame for the first WTC attacks (which occurred about a month after he became president)
Eat the cake or keep it. Can't do both.
If only logical fallacies were dollars... (Well, I guess they are to the likes of Fox News...)
|
The_Counsel
(836 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #94 |
 |
"So please stop praising Clinton for having done the things that made the 90s "prosperous," because he didn't actually do much!"Riiiiight... ...as soon as you stop giving Ronald Reagan credit for the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War. 
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
| 114. Go drown your sorrows in cynicism and despair. |
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #57 |
| 62. Hi radio_lady. I must agree with you. One thing about Democrats, we fight a lot among ourselves |
 |
but when the chips are down, we will fight together against tyranny and the gullible republicans.
ps: I was raised in Portland and went to college in Corvallis. Go Bevs.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #62 |
| 69. The Republicans are our opponents, but it will be a trek to get to November. |
 |
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 12:15 AM by Radio_Lady
We are transplanted Portlanders. We arrived here bag and baggage from Boston, Massachusetts in 1998. It's the state where my husband was born. I had moved to Boston from Miami, Florida in 1972 -- had lived there off and on since I was born in PA.
We love Portland, which is truly a COMPROMISE for us. We spent more than 50 years on the East Coast, so it was a BIG CHANGE and I still miss New England.
In our family: Wife loves cold weather; husband loves warm weather, and so do daughter and her husband. Go figure... The vote was 3 to 1...
We had just a few choices in the West, because hubby and son-in-law are both software engineers. Silicon Valley was out (too hot in summer for me), so we concentrated on the Pacific Northwest.
It was either Seattle or Portland, and Portland won when both guys got jobs here.
We are now retired and travel to warmer places in the wintertime (AZ, CA, HI, NV, FL mostly) as members of the Hilton Grand Vacation Club timeshare group.
In peace,
Radio Lady
|
rhett o rick
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
| 71. Portland is a great town. We live closer to Seattle though. nm |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #71 |
| 73. Husband had a contract software job in Milton, Washington in 2000. |
 |
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 12:29 AM by Radio_Lady
That's south of Federal Way, WA.
We rented a cute little one bedroom apartment, lived there four days a week and went back to Oregon for a three-day weekend. It was fun to live in that area from August 31 to December 31 of that year. Husband then took a job in Vancouver, Washington, which lasted from January to August 2001, before the company went bankrupt! He was forced to retire that year and I had no real prospects for full time work, so I retired too. Since then, we've been volunteering, traveling, and spending time with our grandkids.
We love Seattle and go there any time we can.
In peace,
Radio Lady
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #51 |
 |
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 07:01 AM by JoFerret
It ain't so. Even though the gender barrier is a very tough one. But you know - women are here to stay. Get over it.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
| 58. Boy, that's a positive post. Tell me, Scarface 2004, who DO you support in this election? |
Name removed
(0 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #58 |
Binka
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
| 59. My Ex Is From NH And He Is The Biggest Asshole On Earth..A Narcissistic Shit Bag |
 |
That is all I know of the granite state. My opinion of the state is most definitely skewed. It spawned fuck dog the home wrecker. The voters must all be his relatives. 
|
olddad56
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
| 66. So.. why would you marry A Narcissistic Shit Bag? |
Binka
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #66 |
 |
And by the way thanks for the nasty response.  He seemed perfectly wonderful in the beginning, and I am not a kid I was a 40 year old woman when I met him. I found out he was still married the week I found out I was pregnant with our child. He was a master manipulator and con artist. If you ever have the groovy chance to meet someone like him I hope she kicks you in the balls and takes all your money. What a fucking ignorant thing to say to someone who has been abused and fucked over by an absolute lying asshole. Ignore for you dip shit.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #74 |
| 81. Binka, I feel sorry for your situation, but is it fair to judge a WHOLE state from one person? |
 |
My ex-husband is dead, and he acted like an asshole with me for most of the years we were divorced.
But he lived in the beautiful state of Vermont with his wife (my kids' stepmother) and our two kids for several years. Although it was painful, I did my best to see them in their home and school as much as I could. But I didn't dump on the whole state of Vermont just for that! That is just totally illogical.
|
Binka
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #81 |
| 83. Jesus People I Said My Views Were Skewed |
 |
And I put the evil grin on my post. I do not hold the entire state of NH responsible for this. JESUS. Get a grip.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #83 |
| 87. No worries. Sorry. I didn't notice the EVIL GRIN. Maybe it should have this one: |
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #74 |
reggie the dog
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
 |
the mountains, the quaint small towns, the woods, the farms, and a few beaches as well. I met lots of nice people while on vacation there.
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
| 117. Thank you for your thoughtful pov |
 |
NH has done us all a favor. Too bad they didn't give Edwards a bigger nod but interestingly it seems the working class vote went for Hillary.
|
robcon
(1000+ posts)
|
Tue Jan-08-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message |
| 63. Great news. It'll be an exciting time until Super Tuesday. |
 |
A great month ahead, as the Obama/Clinton dog fight will be very entertaining. Either person will make a great president.
|
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #63 |
| 64. I couldn't disagree more |
 |
I just don't see Obama playing dirty enough (like the Clinton machine will for sure now) to come back from this. He'll just be a footnote in the story of how the Democrats lost another presidential race.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #64 |
| 75. I find your posts disruptive and disagreeable. Who DO you support? |
 |
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 12:37 AM by Radio_Lady
 See my previous post about you upthread. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph... Please provide some sort of positive input. FYI, I'll be thrilled to find out that you really feel as if you belong at the DEMOCRATIC Underground. Thank you, Radio Lady Ellen in Oregon
|
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #75 |
| 84. I Would Have Supported Obama |
 |
But, I live in one of the reddest counties of Pennsylvania. Our Primary is April 22 - by which time this will all have been decided. I have been a volunteer for our sad little Democratic Committee since Gore had the election stolen from him. When Hillary becomes the party choice next month, I will no longer do so.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #84 |
| 88. Well, sorry you feel that way. Our primary is a mail in vote in May 2008. |
 |
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 01:26 AM by Radio_Lady
I don't know what you have against Hillary, but certainly unless Barack Obama withdraws from the race, you can still vote for him. He is a young man and he can be encouraged by votes like yours. Remember -- these are just TWO SMALL STATES that have voted so far. This has to progress to a later point before we can put a ribbon on it, don't you think?
I share your consternation about not being in a state where a vote counts at primary season.
Just as a reference, how would you feel about a Clinton/Obama ticket? How about Obama/Clinton?
Stranger things have happened!
In peace,
Radio Lady Ellen
A Pittsburgh, PA native (at least until age three!)
|
Apollo11
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #84 |
| 100. We should all support the nominee. |
 |
Let's get some perspective here.
After the Convention, everyone needs to get behind the nominee, whoever it is.
We don't need 4 to 8 years of Huckabee or McCain or Romney or Giuliani.
If Obama doesn't win the nomination in 2008 maybe he will get it in 2016.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #100 |
| 150. Hear ye. Hear ye. "If Obama doesn't win the nomination in 2008 maybe he will get it in 2016." |
Venceremos
(485 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #64 |
| 80. Obama plays dirty, too... |
 |
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 12:49 AM by Venceremos
Obama played pretty dirty when running for the US Senate here in Illinois, albeit he did it from "behind the scenes" so alot of people were unaware of it. That aside, I'm doubtful that he can hold up under either the Clinton or Repub attack machines.
And since we're apparently required to state our candidate affiliation in this thread - I'm behind Hillary all the way. She is capable of holding up under the Repub attack machine as she's already been through the fire.
|
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #80 |
Venceremos
(485 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #85 |
| 86. You apparently have limited knowledge of IL politics.... |
 |
I meant Obama played dirty against Blair Hull in the Dem primary and Jack Ryan in the general. The Chicago Tribune just happened to dig up dirt on both candidates messy divorces when they were running against Obama. The Obama campaign “worked aggressively behind the scenes” to get the stories out and it destroyed both opponents campaigns. At least one of the Trib reporters admitted the Obama camp was involved after the election was over (and after Obama repeatedly claimed to have run a clean campaign).
And for reference, Blair Hull was beating Obama in the primary before Hull's divorce problems went public. Jack Ryan was Obama's original Republican opponent. At the Obama camps urging, The Trib forced open Ryan's very messy divorce files -- it eventually led to Ryan having to drop out of the race in disgrace. Then the national Repub party brought in Alan Keyes as a replacement - no need to play dirty against that pathetic joke.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #86 |
| 89. What does it do to show IL(L) will to another Democrat with a put-down? |
 |
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 01:33 AM by Radio_Lady
I know more about Oregon and Massachusets politics than you do! What exactly is your point? You don't like Obama? Fine. Who do you support based on your background? Politics makes strange bedfellows (and we better include other genders and races now). All candidates will have to be prepared to have the skeletons in their closet examined and exposed.  We are trying to achieve civility and consensus in this process. Thank you. Radio Lady in Oregon
|
Venceremos
(485 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #89 |
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #90 |
| 148. What? I'm only reacting to your general negativity about these candidates. |
 |
I rest my case.
I'm not going to continue to search your posts for hints of your "fairness" --
Sincerely,
Radio Lady in Oregon
|
nevergiveup
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #86 |
| 115. Like the Trib needed the Obama camp |
pink-o
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #86 |
| 144. That would be the Jack Ryan |
 |
who was married to Jeri Ryan? (She of Voyager/Boston Public/Shark fame). I remember those divorce files: he forced her to go to sex clubs and engage in demeaning acts, et al. The reason it was so sensational is because Ryan was a typical weasel, running on "family values" platform, only to be exposed for the classic Repig hypocrisy he was harbouring.
If Obama's camp forced those files open, they did the Illinois voters a huge favour! Ryan was a sanctimonious hypocrite right up there with Vitter, Foley and Craig
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #64 |
| 121. He'll do so well against the GOP then right? |
AnnieBW
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message |
 |
I'm sick of hearing the "Hillary is in trouble" shit. The M$M is just DYING to tear her down.
|
LeFleur1
(837 posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #65 |
 |
...still won't admit they don't have ESP. They are sitting around saying, "Wha Happen?" Here's what happened. YOU DON'T HAVE ESP.
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #70 |
| 78. LOL. The mainstream media are eating crow tonight. |
 |
About time they got a comeuppance. Luckily, I'm among mostly Democrats when I volunteer in radio.
|
ekwhite
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Jan-09-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #78 |
| 131. I'll agree with you on that one |
 |
I'm tired of the MSM anointing our chosen candidate before the voting even begins. So far, we have had two contests. Obama won the first, Clinton won the second. There are 48 more states, including my home state of California, left to go.
PS: I'm an Edwards supporter.
|