Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trucks Power China’s Economy, at a Suffocating Cost

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 12:04 AM
Original message
Trucks Power China’s Economy, at a Suffocating Cost
Source: nytimes


December 8, 2007
Trucks Power China’s Economy, at a Suffocating Cost
By KEITH BRADSHER

GUANGZHOU, China — Every night, columns of hulking blue and red freight trucks invade China’s major cities with a reverberating roar of engines and dark clouds of diesel exhaust so thick it dims headlights.

By daybreak in this sprawling metropolis in southeastern China, residents near thoroughfares who leave their windows open overnight find their faces stiff with a dark layer of diesel soot.

................

Trucks here burn diesel fuel contaminated with more than 130 times the pollution-causing sulfur that the United States allows in most diesel. While car sales in China are now growing even faster than truck sales, trucks are by far the largest source of street-level pollution.

Tiny particles of sulfur-laden soot penetrate deep into residents’ lungs, interfering with the absorption of oxygen. Nitrogen oxides from truck exhaust, which build all night because cities limit truck traffic by day, bind each morning with gasoline fumes from China’s growing car fleet to form dense smog that inflames lungs and can cause severe coughing and asthma............

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/08/world/asia/08trucks.html?hp=&pagewanted=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. And yet China signed Kyoto.
Tragic; even trains would be more effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Trains have alwasy been more efficient.
"effective" depends upon the infrastructure. A rail network linking raw materials and ports to manufacturing, to distribution to retail or export centers works very well. The US had such a network once. I am unsure of what China has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lithiumbomb Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Steam, until recently
I believe they have quite a huge rail network. They were manufacturing steam locomotives until the 1990s I believe, and surely some of the network is still steam powered. They're probably in the same situation much of the west is in. While rail is more efficient, and can be more environmentally friendly, it's often cheaper to put your load on a truck instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. China is like the GOP
Never made a promise it wouldn't break. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-08-07 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. It is truly horrific
A sight to behold and avoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. I saw photos from last year
and even places that are not urban are choking in smog.
China is killing itself for wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-09-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. not just itself...
the entire planet will suffer china's conversion to an industrial giant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think we already are.
and that when you add the permafrost in, it does not look good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. What are the Kyoto restrictions on China?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razzleberry Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-10-07 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. none, except for reporting n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC