394
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Hill Close To Deal on War Funds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec-07-07 11:10 PM
Original message
Hill Close To Deal on War Funds
Source: WP

Plan Includes Boost In Domestic Spending

Saturday, December 8, 2007; A01

House Democratic leaders could complete work as soon as Monday on a half-trillion-dollar spending package that will include billions of dollars for the war effort in Iraq without the timelines for the withdrawal of combat forces that President Bush has refused to accept, House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) said yesterday.

In a complicated deal over the war funds, Democrats will include about $11 billion more in domestic spending than Bush has requested, emergency drought relief for the Southeast and legislation to address the subprime mortgage crisis, Hoyer told a meeting of the Washington Post editorial board.

If the bargain were to become law, it would be the third time since Democrats took control of Congress that they would have failed to force Bush to change course in Iraq and continued to fund a war that they have repeatedly vowed to end. But it would also be the clearest instance yet of the president bowing to a Democratic demand for more money for domestic priorities, an increase that he had promised to reject.

"The way you pass appropriations bills is you get agreement among all the relevant players, among which the president with his veto pen is a very relevant player," Hoyer said. "Everybody knows he has no intention of signing anything without money for Iraq, unfettered, without constraints. I think that's ultimately going to be the result."

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   More war money with a few table scraps of pork thrown in...  bluestateguy   Dec-07-07 11:14 PM   #1 
   there is no taxpayer $$ going to those mortage problems.  rodeodance   Dec-07-07 11:24 PM   #3 
   The Dem Congress is  citizen_jane   Dec-07-07 11:22 PM   #2 
   NOT one filibuster from them (the Dems)--just lots of yelling from Repugs and bingo.  rodeodance   Dec-07-07 11:25 PM   #4 
   "failed to force Bush to change course in Iraq"  PSPS   Dec-07-07 11:27 PM   #5 
   The Dems really are trying to lose 2008  Pastiche423   Dec-07-07 11:29 PM   #6 
   because it's just not democracy if you're not killing people  ixion   Dec-07-07 11:35 PM   #7 
   Recommended, because people need to know  Truth2Tell   Dec-08-07 01:18 AM   #8 
   Reid and Pelosi: Bush couldn't have asked for better collaborators  Voltaire99   Dec-08-07 04:07 AM   #9 
   Why is Steny the one floating this deal?  Brrrp   Dec-08-07 06:23 AM   #10 
   Congress really disappoints me...............I'm Done caring  Fluffdaddy   Dec-08-07 06:54 AM   #11 
   pigs....  mike_c   Dec-08-07 10:59 AM   #12 
   Traitorous bastards!  rockybelt   Dec-08-07 01:45 PM   #13 
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec-07-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. More war money with a few table scraps of pork thrown in...
A little money for deadbeats who don't pay their mortgages. That's sure worth a blank check for Baby Bush to play war for another year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec-07-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. there is no taxpayer $$ going to those mortage problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec-07-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Dem Congress is
as spineless as a petri
dish full of amoebas. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec-07-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. NOT one filibuster from them (the Dems)--just lots of yelling from Repugs and bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec-07-07 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. "failed to force Bush to change course in Iraq"
Talk about a biased tilt!

... the third time since Democrats took control of Congress that they would have failed to force Bush to change course in Iraq and continued to fund a war that they have repeatedly vowed to end.

To say they "failed" implies that they tried to do it.

The fact is that the democrats apparently don't want to stop the crime & killing spree any more than bush does. Otherwise, they'd just refuse to bring any bill to the floor for a vote that didn't stop the war crimes and theft of the treasury. Instead, we get more political theater with nonsense about "veto" and "we don't have the votes."

The democrats could easily stop this madness dead in its tracks today if they wanted to. But they don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec-07-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Dems really are trying to lose 2008
aren't they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Dec-07-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. because it's just not democracy if you're not killing people
thanks dems! :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec-08-07 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Recommended, because people need to know
about the complicity.

Everyone who votes for this shit owns this war now. All of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec-08-07 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
9. Reid and Pelosi: Bush couldn't have asked for better collaborators
Bushism is a simple recipe.

Take one part malevolence from the Republican side.

To that, add repeated dashes of feckless Democratic surrender.

Serves eight years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brrrp (124 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec-08-07 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why is Steny the one floating this deal?
Edited on Sat Dec-08-07 06:37 AM by Brrrp
The article describes Nancy as uncommitted. Is Steny doing her dirty work for her?


Maybe she's trying to act like this isn't really her decision, but a "mandate" from her Democratic colleagues in the House.

But it is always her decision. She could simply not agendize this bill, or any other bill that gives Bush the money for the war without a deadline for withdrawal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec-08-07 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
11.  Congress really disappoints me...............I'm Done caring
I sent money,I worked the polls. We won back Congress only to see the Democrats back down to every fight. I Done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec-08-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. pigs....
I'm speechless with anger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt (938 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec-08-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. Traitorous bastards!
Pelosi, Reid, etal, you are now as guilty as George Bush and Dick Cheney with your complicity to keep this illegal and immoral war going. You have no business being in the Congress of The United States. You now belong in prison with your two pals in the white house.

Another dark day for the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Feb 09th 2010, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC