432
DONATIONS
Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Supreme Court agrees to review Exxon Valdez damages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
underpants (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 10:23 AM
Original message
Supreme Court agrees to review Exxon Valdez damages
Source: San Jose Mercury News

WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Monday stepped into the long-running battle over the $2.5 billion in punitive damages owed by Exxon Mobil Corp. for the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989.
Eleven millions gallons of oil spilled into Alaska's Prince William Sound when the supertanker ran aground on a reef. A federal appeals court already had cut in half the $5 billion in damages awarded by a jury in 1994.

The justices said they would consider whether the company should have to pay any punitive damages at all. If the court decides some money is due, Exxon is arguing that $2.5 billion is excessive under laws governing shipping and prior high court decisions limiting punitive damages.


The case probably will be heard in the spring. The court's last ruling on punitive damages, in February, set aside a nearly $80 million judgment against Altria Group Inc.'s Philip Morris USA. The money was awarded to the widow of a smoker in Oregon.



Read more: http://www.mercurynews.com/politics/ci_7311863
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   will that include the people they poisoned during the clean up with deadly toxic chemicals  sam sarrha   Oct-29-07 10:38 AM   #1 
   Well Alaska, kiss that money good-bye. You'll end up footing  acmavm   Oct-29-07 10:38 AM   #2 
   That's Got to Be A Clear Conflict Of Interest  Demeter   Oct-29-07 10:40 AM   #3 
   sometimes I wonder if senator stevens has anything to do with this..  Javaman   Oct-29-07 10:53 AM   #4 
   Almost 20 years.....  ClintonTyree   Oct-29-07 10:54 AM   #5 
   They are hard up for the money....man  underpants   Oct-29-07 11:14 AM   #6 
      That is NET PROFIT and it is equal to OVER One Hundred Million a Day  Bandit   Oct-29-07 01:48 PM   #9 
   Any bets as to the outcome?  Naipes   Oct-29-07 12:03 PM   #7 
   Deep pockets win every time  Gman   Oct-29-07 12:49 PM   #8 
   well we can all see where this is going  Betty   Oct-29-07 10:50 PM   #10 
   Has all this reversal come without some kind of a payoff for the Supremes -- ????  defendandprotect   Oct-29-07 11:37 PM   #11 
   After we restore transparent vote counting--and overthrow these goddamned  Peace Patriot   Oct-30-07 05:31 AM   #12 
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. will that include the people they poisoned during the clean up with deadly toxic chemicals
Edited on Mon Oct-29-07 10:46 AM by sam sarrha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well Alaska, kiss that money good-bye. You'll end up footing
the entire bill for this clean-up yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. That's Got to Be A Clear Conflict Of InterestUpdated at 6:24 AM
If the Supremes have even one share in Exxon, they had better recuse themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. sometimes I wonder if senator stevens has anything to do with this..
since he is friends with big oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Almost 20 years.....
and they're STILL litigating this? :wtf:

The next time I see one of those Exxon Mobil commercials, telling me how conscious they are of the environment, I think I'll throw a brick at the TV. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. They are hard up for the money....man
they only make $40 Billion a quarter ...man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. That is NET PROFIT and it is equal to OVER One Hundred Million a Day
Every single day seven days a week, fifty two weeks a year, year after year...And they are seeking incentives from the State of Alaska for exploration and Development of new fields..One Hundred Million Dollars a Fucking DAYEvery single day...year after year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naipes (168 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Any bets as to the outcome?
This is disgusting. Like the previous post, it's 20 years later and they're still litigating. UGH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deep pockets win every timeUpdated at 5:10 PM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. well we can all see where this is going
the "supreme" court... the best friend of big business. While they take away more and more of the little people's rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Oct-29-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Has all this reversal come without some kind of a payoff for the Supremes -- ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue Oct-30-07 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. After we restore transparent vote counting--and overthrow these goddamned
electronic voting machines, run on 'TRADE SECRET,' PROPRIETARY programming code, owned and controlled by rightwing Bushite corporations--one of the next things we need to do is fire the Supreme Court.

And don't be intimidated by those who say we can't, because we CAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb 10th 2010, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC