Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neocons Seek To Justify Action Against Teheran (U.S. Diplomats Ordered To Compile Dossier Of Wrongs)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 12:02 AM
Original message
Neocons Seek To Justify Action Against Teheran (U.S. Diplomats Ordered To Compile Dossier Of Wrongs)
Source: Telegraph UK

Neocons seek to justify action against Teheran
By Tim Shipman
Last Updated: 12:17am BST 30/09/2007

American diplomats have been ordered to compile a dossier detailing Iran's violations of international law that some fear could be used to justify military strikes against the Islamic republic's nuclear programme.

Members of the US secretariat in the United Nations were asked earlier this month to begin "searching for things that Iran has done wrong", The Sunday Telegraph has learnt. Some US diplomats believe the exercise — reminiscent of attempts by vice-president Dick Cheney and the former defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld to build the case against Saddam Hussein before the Iraq war — will boost calls for military action by neo-conservatives inside and outside the administration.

One diplomat revealed the plans for an Iran dossier to Steven Clemons, a fellow with the New America Foundation, a Washington think-tank, who has previously revealed attempts by Mr Cheney's allies to pressurise President George W Bush into war. He said: "There are people more beholden to the Cheney side who have people searching for things that Iran has done wrong — making the case. They've been given instructions to build a dossier. They've been scouring around for stuff over the last couple of weeks." He recently exposed how a member of Mr Cheney's office used private meetings with neo-conservatives at the American Enterprise think- tank to reveal the vice-president's frustration that Mr Bush had authorised a diplomatic strategy against Iran by his secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice.

Last week, Newsweek magazine went further, claiming that David Wurmser, until last month Mr Cheney's Middle East adviser, had told fellow neo-conservatives that Mr Cheney had considered asking Israel to launch limited missile strikes against the Iranian nuclear site at Natanz. The intention, it was said, would be to provoke a reaction from Teheran that would help justify wider US air strikes.

Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/30/wiran230.xml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. LIke the USofA has room to complain about another nation
violating international law.

Illegal invasions and hostile occupation, sanctioned torture and abuse of POWs or detainees or enemy combatants.

This administration is insane.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. How high can someone kick when high ground is on the same level as pond scum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mslawstudent Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think its a little late to invade.
Their term is almost up. You'd see some corny public relations battle first (3 months) with stuff moving in. Some warning with a stern faced leader. Then 9 months until out of office. Hard to get support, why go to bat for the administration if about to leave office. (lame ducks).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Preparing to massage in intel, I see...
They have had some practice at this. I would hope that at least a few of the "Members of the US secretariat" would resist this effort. I would hope that at least a few of these so-called "diplomats" might object to being handmaidens to slaughter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. seriously?
i cannot see the public caring at all for any 'justification' they might come up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. However
I don't think the opinion of the US public is a factor in their decision making. What does the US public know about starting needless wasteful wars, anyway? Leave it to the experts!

-85% jimmy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC