|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
TexasLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:15 AM Original message |
Nuclear warheads mistakenly flown on B-52 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
1. Holy fucking shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkturian Clone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
132. you can say that again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. "That page has gone AWOL" - - surprise, surprise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:32 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I'm glad I spotted the article before it vanished |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Like everything else in Bushworld, as long as it is scrubbed, it never happened. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:15 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Just a mystery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sce56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
21. Must have a bad link here is the right page |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
104. ROFL!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost Dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #104 |
118. Your comment may be too subtle for the Majority, Megahurtz. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #118 |
124. I Know, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerKid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #4 |
87. The article is spreading! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drm604 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:00 AM Response to Reply #2 |
22. The OP left the trainling "/" off the URL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sce56 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:08 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Hey I beat you to it by two minutes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
34. No - it's a bug with the DU messageboard siftware |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chwaliszewski (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 03:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
37. New link to article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 06:50 AM Response to Reply #37 |
155. isn't it great how the TV media is all over this--Reliable Sources?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
39. Naw, they just moved it, they do that shit frequently--here's the link, it's ALL there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WileEcoyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:30 AM Response to Reply #39 |
68. IT's gone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:56 PM Response to Reply #68 |
133. They simply UPDATED the story.All need to cease with the paranoia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sequoia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
93. It's still showing on San Francisco Gate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #2 |
135. No mystery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
3. A whole chain of people who screwed up--munitions, weapons loaders, crew chiefs, maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shipwack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 03:40 AM Response to Reply #3 |
36. I used to interact with nuke warheads in the Navy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:24 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Well, this was the AIR FORCE that fucked up, not the Navy!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eagle_Eye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 05:47 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. What needs to be down-sized is the nuclear arsenal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shipwack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 05:02 PM Response to Reply #40 |
120. True, true, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:10 PM Response to Reply #120 |
136. Get a load of this, from the latest reports--MASSIVE CLUSTERFUCK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:36 AM Response to Reply #36 |
69. I agree - I was an "unlock" team member while in the U.S.A.F. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nealmhughes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #36 |
140. I was on a FBM submarine for 4 years at sea on and off. We handled nuclear missiles several times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-11-07 11:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
162. plausible deniability? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:44 AM Response to Original message |
6. Here's another link to the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. 'which left the warheads unaccounted for during the approximately 3 1/2 hour flight' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
115. Nuclear personnel are supposed to know where every nuke is, every second of the day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PSPS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
8. "Accident?" Or, maybe, nefarious plans that weren't executed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
9. Um...test run anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:13 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Dry runs are worse than the hershey squirts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
113. I think you nailed it, test run that was leaked. IMHO of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
134. It's certainly an INCOMPETENT method of getting America used to an old paradigm once more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whoa_Nelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
10. Mistakenly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:15 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Mistakenly? Indeed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
12. Imagine the pilots afte they landed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
23. At least they didn't go on a practice bombing run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:41 AM Response to Reply #12 |
33. Actually, nuclear weapons are never armed during transport. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:21 PM Response to Reply #33 |
109. That's what I meant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:27 PM Response to Reply #109 |
117. "Say, that looks like part of a nuclear warhead" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost Dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 05:33 PM Response to Reply #117 |
122. Tragic accident (especially for the 7 immediately dead). Meanwhile, in the ongoing real world: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 01:09 AM Response to Reply #117 |
147. I heard there's a lost nuke in the ocean off of Georgia, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 06:22 AM Response to Reply #12 |
48. Armed or not is irrelevent. They won't explode on a crash. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:07 AM Response to Reply #48 |
62. but they will crack up on impact, and spread nice little |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:26 AM Response to Reply #62 |
76. not a big deal, Pu239 isn't that dangerous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:31 PM Response to Reply #76 |
110. But NASA gets a boatload of fire from the environmentalists... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. The concern with the plutonium in NASA's launches is a Challenger-type disaster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 01:10 AM Response to Reply #114 |
148. Ah, but imagine the amorous atmosphere... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #48 |
111. Oh, I know. But chunks of plutonium are not something to be taken lightly. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:14 PM Response to Reply #12 |
137. If the plane crashed, there'd be no mushroom cloud, but certainly not a good thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
15. OMFG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burrowowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:32 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. The Officier is at fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:34 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I bet one thing is for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:23 AM Response to Original message |
16. When we fuck up in the Air Force, we fuck up BIG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:09 AM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Pure coincidence that it was the Navy Times that published the story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:29 AM Response to Reply #28 |
41. No--ALL the "Military Times" papers had it--Army, Navy, USAF, USMC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
19. No wonder why we can't control nukes in Russia, Iraq or anywhere else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
20. "Air Combat Command will have a command-wide mission stand down Sept. 14" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:06 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. I hope that means that some heads are gonna roll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:07 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. Getting all their birds and crews in order before sustained combat operations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrScorpio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:17 AM Response to Reply #20 |
29. No sorties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:34 AM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Thanks, all; I'll sleep better now. This got me thinking about the 9-11-01 exercises |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 05:22 AM Response to Reply #20 |
44. MAYBE---It Means that Bombing Iran Is OFF!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlurker (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:29 AM Response to Reply #20 |
55. Be on the lookout |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:58 AM Response to Reply #20 |
60. Sounds like it means the country will be undefended on Sept. 14th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:01 AM Response to Reply #20 |
81. Shit. A stand down in Sept when cheney is in a corner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #20 |
91. that, to me, was the scariest part of the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
man4allcats (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
142. My guess is it will almost certainly mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:05 AM Response to Original message |
24. Hmm, who are we going to "accidentally" nuke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DRoseDARs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
31. Opps... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:38 AM Response to Reply #31 |
78. The weapons should never be out of their shipping containers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
32. Ah, at last somebody is acting to protect our precious bodily fluids. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 03:10 AM Response to Original message |
35. What. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colorado_ufo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:17 AM Response to Original message |
38. Why were these missiles armed in the first place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:32 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Sure. They do that shit all the time. Any service with nukes does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
colorado_ufo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 04:26 AM Response to Reply #42 |
149. Seems like there would be an overwhelming amount of security to overcome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 01:25 PM Response to Reply #149 |
151. Yep, there's checklists up the ying yang. What some of my friends are postulating is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 05:21 AM Response to Original message |
43. Mistake? MY FUCKING ASS!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 06:18 AM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Nobody moves nukes without a lot of controls. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:07 AM Response to Reply #47 |
83. So there was a big error and that requires a Stand Down to go over proceedure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:53 AM Response to Reply #83 |
92. has your chocolate alert level been raised to Caramel? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 06:18 PM Response to Reply #92 |
123. Bleah! Life is too short to eat caramel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
46. Hmm, where did we leave those pesky nukes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 06:27 AM Response to Original message |
49. BFD. A hydrogen bomb was actually dropped on Albuquerque |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:09 AM Response to Reply #49 |
64. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #64 |
105. The US lost 11 altogether. Globally around 50 have been lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 06:39 AM Response to Original message |
50. Cheney's trying to steal a bomb! IMO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BridgeTheGap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:11 AM Response to Original message |
51. Headed for Iran? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
52. 2 things come to mind here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:26 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. Good questions. I can't believe our military is so "sloppy" they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #52 |
84. Or creating just enough worry to justify the Stand Down? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-09-07 09:20 AM Response to Reply #52 |
161. 2 responses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Haole Girl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
54. Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peggy Day (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
56. not one link worked for me. except the one from 1957. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JawJaw (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
57. Maybe.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
58. 1. Heads better fucking roll over this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
59. Here's a local news link that works (with video). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:26 AM Response to Reply #59 |
65. I can't even get any of the Military Times' home pages to load |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
61. MSNBC is reporting on this now as breaking news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:39 AM Response to Reply #61 |
71. This happened last thurday though apparently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
63. Whoops! Good thing they didn't end up getting loaded on a plane to Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
66. Another Dick Cheney moment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
67. BushSpin - Iranian Radical Freedom Haters Smuggle Nukes aboard Peaceful B-52 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:12 AM Response to Reply #67 |
73. OMG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrotherBuzz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:08 AM Response to Reply #67 |
95. You mean BUFF's, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
70. Wouldn't someone need Presidential clearance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:15 AM Response to Reply #70 |
74. They woke the bushitler up. He rolled over and said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:31 AM Response to Reply #70 |
88. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #88 |
108. Maybe That's Why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
72. Two more sources: Air Force lost track of five nuclear missiles (Flew from ND to LA on August 30) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:20 AM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Coming Soon to an Airport Near You! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #72 |
107. Mounted On The Wings Yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
77. They forgot Rule Number One of cruise missile safety |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Desertrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
79. Just a little "oops" there guys. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
80. Please, please - explain the stand down. My gut has been telling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:37 AM Response to Reply #80 |
89. In the military, when a unit screws up royally, they stand down, which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:20 PM Response to Reply #89 |
101. Why Sep 14? Why not Aug 31? Thanks for your reply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shipwack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:51 PM Response to Reply #101 |
119. Well, one could claim it takes a bit of planning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
82. THIS IS BEING SAFER IN A POST 9/11 WORLD??!?!?!?!?!?!?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crowman1979 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
85. Now another reason why we should have no nukes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bamacrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
86. "Mistakenly" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Summer93 (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:29 AM Response to Reply #86 |
98. Hurricanes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
90. BBC LINK HERE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
94. We'll meet again, don't know where, don't know when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Turgidson (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
96. Turgidson advocates a further nuclear attack to prevent a Soviet response to Ripper's attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mahatmakanejeeves (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
97. Navy flying B-52s now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
99. Careless dumb bunch of bastards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
100. Just a little somthing for Putin to ponder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
102. some guy on cnn said heads will roll. oh really? i'll believe that when i see it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerLaw2010 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 04:18 PM Response to Reply #102 |
116. Oh, people will be fired for this. Someone(s) at Minot lost five nukes for 3 1/2 hours. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Megahurtz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
103. Oh But We Don't Have Nuclear Weapons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ghost Dog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
106. Damn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snazzy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
112. Minot Air Force Base’s Northern Neighbors open house and air show Saturday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasLawyer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
121. Interesting comments from Navy Times readers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:07 PM Response to Reply #121 |
126. "Bigger picture here folks........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrin_73 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
125. Im surprised that they didn't blame al qaida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
127. I think this story should be tied to the put-options story - I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bennyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. There has to be more to the story..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:18 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. Yep, we only have to figure out which city is going to do it for them - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:46 PM Response to Original message |
130. I suspect a made for tee-vee CNN Psy-Ops story intended for Putin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
131. I am soo glad it didn't crash into any "towers" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
138. Accidentally? Forgot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
entanglement (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:16 PM Response to Original message |
139. Psyops? Fiction? A terrible blunder? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #139 |
143. maybe a cry for help? and that is why the story was leaked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoddessOfGuinness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
141. Maybe it was a test run... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calteacherguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
144. I'm glad they didn't, er, drop one. Ahem. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
145. What a load of unbelievable crap -- and the Navy Times is reporting it -- ???? hmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-05-07 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
146. A mix up "mistake" could allow George to do some nuclear damage while only "intending" . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 06:13 AM Response to Original message |
150. Mistake my ass.....the discovery fucked up a PLOT of some sort...IMHO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yojon (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #150 |
152. Stand down September 14? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #152 |
153. The Shortage of Virgins was met by a RUSH ORDER of those Vinyl HOOTERs with 6 batteries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-06-07 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
154. Talk about national security issue! - why has this story been allowed leaked to us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snazzy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 02:25 PM Response to Original message |
156. Fallout Continues From Bomber Flight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 07:02 PM Response to Reply #156 |
157. "...and had a hard time convincing superiors..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-07-07 08:02 PM Response to Reply #156 |
158. Key to success: the “little brown book” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Pundit (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
159. Inside Job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leaninglib (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-08-07 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
160. Would you like to buy a W80-1 warhead? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC