Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Navy Shows Force in Persian Gulf

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:36 AM
Original message
U.S. Navy Shows Force in Persian Gulf
Source: NY Times

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) -- The U.S. Navy on Tuesday began its largest demonstration of force in the Persian Gulf since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, led by a pair of aircraft carriers and backed by warplanes flying simulated attack maneuvers off the coast of Iran.

The maneuvers bring together two strike groups of U.S. warships and more than 100 U.S. warplanes to conduct simulated air warfare in the crowded Gulf shipping lanes.

snip

Overall, the exercises involve more than 10,000 U.S. personnel on warships and aircraft making simulated attacks on enemy shipping with aircraft and ships, hunting enemy submarines and finding mines.

''What it should be seen as by Iran or anyone else is that it's for regional stability and security,'' Aandahl said. ''These ships are just another demonstration of that. If there's a destabilizing effect, it's Iran's behavior.''



Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Gulf-US-Maneuvers.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, if we actually get into the"coming shooting war with Iran"
as I heard some talking head bloviate the other day, that will take everyone's mind off of Alberto, now, won't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes. This exercise I think is extremely provocative.
I know that's an understatement but the BA cannot be gone soon enough for me, they really are crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. "Can the country support a war with another country?" That's the
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 09:04 AM by higher class
way an MSNBC bimbo asked the question in reoporting the extension / recall of Marines.

No where does anyone ask why Iranians captured 15 British Navy men from their 141' long ship by Iranians on their 8' boat?

Everything that comes out of corporate entertaining news networks is complicit.

Anyone who thinks that entertaining news networks in this country are reporting barbarian war mongering and torturing by this country responsibly is nuts. The media is complicit and should stand alongside Rumsfeld at the coming tribunal in Euroope.

We are doomed by the war manipulators who own us through tv.

General Electric
Microsoft
Time-Warner
Murdoch empire
Disney
Viacom
and many more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. I know the Shatt-al-Arab. And if you look at wars between Iran and Iraq over the
eons, they always start with some gripe over WHERE the line is. Is it down the middle, is it just off one bank or the other, or is it something else entirely? Neither country agrees. Each insists their little line is the right one.

The Iranians need to let these guys go. They're fucking with the wrong crew. And they could end up mixing it up with us, when all they really want to do is generate some "good" local press and wave the sabre with this capture. The economy is so shitty, inflation rampant, public services threadbare, that they need a rallying point to inspire nationalism. Hell, how pathetic is it that the country now has so little refining capability that they have to import almost half the gas they use? There are people over there who miss the old five rial gasoline under the Shah...especially when the new Morality Police are the same as the old SAVAKH, except the latter didn't care what you wore on the street or who you held hands with.

The fact that the cheering isn't universal suggests that the people aren't buying this whole business, and fear that their 'fearless leader' might take it a smidge too far and fuck them all. They'd better not stall too long, BushCo is CRAZY, and they'll end up with a bombed nuke plant to help BushCo make their point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. Um, they'd first have to have a nuke plant to bomb.
Where's the credible evidence they have any such plants?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is not good, really not good.
I just dusted off my tin foil hat and wondered...convenient we had those war ships in the area when the Brits were taken...it isn't possible that George and Tony planned this, is it? IS IT???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It is so convenient, isn't it? I am so friggin sick of this macho
game playing that is so deadly serious for the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. We ALWAYS have a warship in the gulf.
There is always a aircraft carrier sitting around the gulf somewhere at all times, so yeah, it's probably convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is done all the time something like this happens...
We know it and they know it so nothing will happen. It's a chest puffing contest right now, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. That may very well be the case. To me it's macho posturing and
I'm sick of it - it is so juvenile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Welcome to international politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Isn't it funny how international politics is just like boys in a
schoolyard.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. The boys with their toys syndrome is real. No one is more juvenile
than Cheney. Juveniles make fortunes from war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. "The Walls Came Down" - The Call
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 11:31 AM by Roland99
Well they blew the horns
And the walls came down
Theyd all been warned
And the walls came down
They juststood there laughing
Theyre not laughing anymore
The walls came down
Sanctuary fades
Congregation splits
Nightly military raids
The congregation splits
Its a song of assassins
Ringin in your ears
We got terrorist thinking
Playing on fears
Well they blew the horns
And the walls came down
Theyd all been warned
But the walls came down
I dot think there are any russians
And there aint no yanks
Just corporate criminals
Playin with tanks

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Very good - thanks. Is it yours? With music? If yes, consider
sending to Democracy Now? They probably don't have staff to communicate. Just an idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. It's from The Call (an 80s band)
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I'll be humming this tune all day...
The Call...seems like a lifetime ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yet the words still ring true today. Wow, how far we've come, eh?
:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Centered Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. it's all crazy
I've seen some pretty vicious girls in the school yard too though...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maggie_May Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just woke up to read this
I started crying. I just could not take another war. Tell me please that this is just a scare tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is an act of desperation by a bunch of thugs backed into
a friggin' corner by their own corruption (the bush** admin as if you couldn't figure that out). But their little gambit designed to take the focus off the losing wars in Afganistan and Iraq is their biggest f**k up yet. This ain't a sanctions-weary nation that they're messing with. This is a country that can (and will) fight back. And it ain't going to be pretty.

If the criminals in Washington thought Iraq would be a cake-walk, what the hell can they be thinking now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. From one of my favorite characters in "Hunt for Red October"
Jeffrey Pelt: It would be well for your government to consider that having your ships and ours, your aircraft and ours, in such proximity... is inherently DANGEROUS. Wars have begun that way, Mr. Ambassador.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Check Out The Following Links To Previous DU Threads Re: Impending Attack.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. "simulated attacks on enemy shipping "
''What it should be seen as by Iran or anyone else is that it's for regional stability and security,''

Oh bullshit. This is just gunboat diplomacy. Fear! Obey! Submit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
17. Imagine if China or Iran were to do a "show of force".
Nooo, only America is allowed to threaten (terrorize) other nations and their peoples with war.

Only America is allowed to wage illegal wars of aggression (exactly like Hitler did).

And the really shocking thing is how many Americans still wonder "why do they hate us".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armodem08 Donating Member (186 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. exactly. imagine China or Russia had carriers off of our coast.
How long do you think * would wait before he nuked them? This is an act of outright provocation. Doesn't the UN Charter accept a situation like this as grounds for self-defensive action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
39. China
does this all the time off the coast of Taiwan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. Warmongerers making up for their small intellects (and small penises)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. They don't even have to be small, just perceived as such by the bearer
Not speaking of intellect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Oh, I don't think there's any perception aspect to it. I think it's quite real
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. Blood-boiling arrogance
Edited on Tue Mar-27-07 11:32 AM by marekjed
Here's a bit from the BBC:


BBC NEWS | Europe | US Navy starts war games in Gulf

(...)
US Navy Commander Kevin Aandahl, based with the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain, across the Gulf from Iran, said: "What it should be seen as by Iran or anyone else is that it's for regional stability and security.

"These ships are just another demonstration of that. If there's a destabilising effect, it's Iran's behaviour."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6499605.stm


Just this one little quote is so unbelieveably arrogant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. It sounds like imperial Germany in 1914
"That troop mobilization is just for regional stability, and if there's a destabalizing effect, it's France's behaviour."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Good find!
Funny (well, not Really...) how much History repeats itself over and over... I mean, when the $tupid$ in charge never care - nor ever cared - to really study it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
30. At least saber-rattling...
But at most, what is this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. Maybe Bush should read a little history, with special emphasis on
Xerxes and the Spanish Armada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
32. So THIS is Their Idea of ReDeployment???
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
33. More of Bush's ridiculous "My dick is bigger than yours" posturing
No one is impressed anymore about America's military might. It causes more harm to American interests than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
36. Thats it use up all that expensive fuel, and wear out our planes so we will suck at war yet again.
This might backfire on us ala Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
38. Iran monitoring US exercises closely, unconcerned-TV
Source: Reuters

Iran monitoring US exercises closely, unconcerned-TV
28 Mar 2007 08:33:30 GMT
Source: Reuters

-snip-

TEHRAN, March 28 (Reuters) - Iranian state television said
on Wednesday Iran was not concerned about U.S. naval
exercises in the Gulf but was monitoring them closely.

A scrolling headline in English said: "Iran: 'no concern about
Pentagon's war games in the Persian Gulf ... Tehran monitors
(the U.S.) war games closely ... '".

It was not clear whether the television was quoting an Iranian
official or a statement. Officials were not immediately available
for comment.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L28597373.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-28-07 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
40. translation: PRACTICE
they aren't fooling anyone. what will be funny (yet horribly tragic) is that when they DO attack they'll pretend it was NEVER planned, that they merely were reacting to events and whatnot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC