Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Labor Lawyer Provides True Picture Of Law Workers Face When Organizing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 09:15 PM
Original message
Labor Lawyer Provides True Picture Of Law Workers Face When Organizing

http://www.laborradio.org/node/5297

Labor Lawyer Provides True Picture Of Law Workers Face When Organizing - 02/16/07

By Doug Cunningham

AFL-CIO Associate General Counsel Nancy Schiffer says current labor law with its NLRB elections puts workers through a gauntlet of intense anti-union harassment and intimidation by employers who are free to wage all-out war on the legal right of workers to form unions. For thirty years Schiffer has tried to use the law to protect workers, but she says what really happens is their rights are rendered meaningless under current law.

: ““But I knew full well that in practice it would not and could not protect them. I had seen it fail too many times. I knew the difference between what was supposed to happen and what really happened. And I knew that they would have to be heroes in order to survive their organizing effort. And that’s just wrong.”

Contrary to Bush administration claims , Schiffer says the Employee Free Choice Act - just passed by the U.S. House this week - will restore, not short-circuit, workers rights to form unions. Right now, she says, this is the reality workers face when trying to join unions.

: “Workers see that their rights are violated with impunity during the so-called NLRB supervised election process and they lose heart, because they feel betrayed by the law they thought protected them. And they feel afraid.”

AUDIO story here http://www.laborradio.org/files/lo/winsheadlines.ram

Please note, yesterday Cheney promise a veto if this gets to the President's desk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would say...
It's time for Organized Labor to march on Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
I come from a line of union workers myself, I was union when I was younger, been through a messy strike and an organizing drive or two. (I'm management now, but don't shoot!)

A march on DC is in order, a massive one. Not just unions, but working people in general too. Our interests are not being addresed in the slightest. We have little or no access and it's just getting worse every day.

As much as I hate to say it, it might be high time for the union folks to go back to cracking some heads when necessary. Playing nice hasn't gotten them very far.

Go union!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
llmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. There's nothing wrong with a prounion person.............
going management. I did. That way I'm able to surreptiously help the union out. It's the antiunion people you DON'T want in management.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. It never dawns on them....
It never dawns on them that unemployed folks have TIME OFF to go to marches, protests, etc. because they ain't got a life!!!

I'm still waiting for that bums' union, myself. Maybe I could be a Wobblie, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. maybe cheney will walk into a bog!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. How about him walking in the boots of ironworkers?
40 stories up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doondoo Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. mergers are unions for owners
if they have something against unions, why aren't they opposed to mergers? a merger is just collective bargaining for employers.

ah, because they DON'T have something against unions, they have something against WORKERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kick for Labor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC