Interrogation Research Is Lacking, Report Says

[cal04]

Few Studies Have Examined U.S. Methods
There is almost no scientific evidence to back up the U.S. intelligence community's use of controversial interrogation techniques in the fight against terrorism, and experts believe some painful and coercive approaches could hinder the ability to get good information, according to a new report from an intelligence advisory group.

The 374-page report from the Intelligence Science Board examines several aspects of broad interrogation methods and approaches, and it finds that no significant scientific research has been conducted in more than four decades about the effectiveness of many techniques the U.S. military and intelligence groups use regularly. Intelligence experts wrote that a lack of research could explain why abuse has been alleged at U.S. facilities in Afghanistan, Cuba and Iraq.

"Since there had been little or no development of sustained capacity for interrogation practice, training, or research within intelligence or military communities in the post-Soviet period, many interrogators were forced to 'make it up' on the fly," wrote Robert A. Fein, chairman of the study, published by the National Defense Intelligence College. "This shortfall in advanced, research-based interrogation methods at a time of intense pressure from operational commanders to produce actionable intelligence from high-value targets may have contributed significantly to the unfortunate cases of abuse that have recently come to light."

The report explores scientific knowledge on interrogation in the wake of reported abuse around the globe. The study, sponsored by the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Pentagon's Counterintelligence Field Activity, was posted yesterday on the Federation of American Scientists' Web site, at http://www.fas.org/irp/dni/educing.pdf.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/15/AR2007011501204.html

[madeline_con]

1. "Pentagon Clears Pentagon of Wrongdoing"

Another one of THOSE headlines. :eyes:

A couple of years back, it was all about how torture can't be relied on to gather useful, truthful information.

A Pentagon CYA tactic regarding "the unfortunate cases of abuse" that were part of the strategy all along. Now, they're making like they just didn't have enough info. They studied this crap going in. They knew what they were doing, and did it intentionally. No weaseling out of it now, fellas.

[KT2000]

2. The flip side of this

is that there would be no scientific evidence to backup any claims of damage from the use of aggressive and dangerous techniques. The injured people would likely have their damage diagnosed as PTSD from childhood experiences.

[unhappycamper]

3. "unfortunate cases of abuse" ??????

Plueeeeze.

Torture is never acceptable. Period. Never.

Kidnapping is never acceptable. Period. Never.

Secret gulags are never acceptable. Period. Never.