|
business of his country. He is the democratically elected president, and the U.S.-backed fascist elite has tried one thing after another, to destroy both him and constitutional government in Venezuela. What would happen to Venezuela if they succeeded? Actually, I think the democracy movement in Venezuela is so strong that Venezuelan democracy would survive, or eventually be restored, but there might be hell to pay in the meantime (Pinochet-type hell). Bear in mind that the democracy movement in Venezuela is linked to the democracy movement throughout Latin America--and other Latin American countries WOULD take action, in the case of a military coup in V.--sanctions, isolation of the coupsters, demand for restoration of constitutional government, strong diplomacy, etc. But it could be a rough time for Venezuelan democrats and political activists. So, Chavez talking about these threats, and trying to prevent them, IS public business.
Secondly, your statement is so exaggerated that it literally cannot be true. He makes a few statements, issues a few press releases, about this subject, and the rest of his time he is doing...? ...what?
Do you KNOW how much time Chavez spends on the OTHER business of his own country? Let's see. His government has restructured their oil company and its relationship with the oil giants to yield more revenues for Venezuela--a huge project in and of itself--and his government is spending those revenues on massive programs to provide schools, teachers, adult literacy programs, free university educations, medical clinics, community centers, and small business loans and grants to poor areas never before served by government; to buy back land for small farmers in a program to achieve food self-sufficiency for the nation, and to restore indigenous rights; to build low-cost housing for the shantytown residents of Caracas (whose homes regularly slide off the hills in heavy rains); to fund public radio and TV; to develop indigenous arts (traditional music, for instance); and to subsidize food for the poorest of the poor. Among other things. He also spends him time working with Mercosur (regional Latin American trade and development group) on projects of mutual benefit; arranging easy-term loans for Argentina (so they can get out of onerous World Bank/IMF debt); finding alternative markets for Venezuelan oil and partners for oil infrastructure (China, for instance)--so that Venezuela is not so dependent on oil sales to the U.S.; and initiating diplomatic missions around the world for various Venezuela goals (trade, medical and educational projects, and various kinds of cooperation). Chavez in addition does a regular, lengthy TV broadcast to the nation, reporting on all of his activities and those of his government. He is responsible for all of the new projects within his country, and visits them regularly--and, as executive, oversees them, appoints managers, reviews reports, gives reports to congress, and consults with his cabinet. He is also responsible for the military, and for national emergency services. And all of these things--government projects, and accountability for them, as well as Latin American regional cooperative projects--are running so smoothly, that you have to figure they are well-managed and that someone is in charge. Chavez does have a government filled with highly intelligent, competent people, but he is the leader of it, and--as they say--"the buck stops there." And if it weren't all going well, don't you think we would have heard about it from our kneejerk anti-Chavez press? All indicators are UP in Venezuela. It's a successful government AND country. No one can deny it. Chavez is a great president. And he spends actually VERY LITTLE time talking about the White House plots against him.
I think the problem is that that is the only time you notice him--when he says something about Bush, and it gets reported here. I would suggest that you do some research on Chavez's accomplishments in Venezuela. www.venezuelanalysis.com is a good place to start. It is pro-Chavez, but it's well-written, with a lot of different commentators, and it does post news that is critical of him (--if it's reasonable, factual and not just rightwing rantings).
Chavez's statements about the threats against him COULD be demagoguery--but I have seen no other evidence of demagoguery in Chavez. He doesn't tend that way. So I am inclined to believe him. ANY politician can get a big head, and get into powermongering, exaggeration and deceit. All should be held in suspicion. I am no pollyanna about politicians--even ones I like. But we also need to be aware of the campaign against Chavez in our war profiteering corporate news monopolies--it is very intense (and sometimes just absurd)--and seek out more objective information, and also counter-balancing positive information, and try to determine what is true and what isn't. My opinion, after much information gathering: The great majority of Venezuelans love Chavez and greatly approve of his policies; he is genuinely representative of his country; he is a good influence in Latin America and in the world.
|