|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
kskiska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 10:43 PM Original message |
WP: Connecticut Groups Push to Remove Lieberman From Ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greeby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ooo, Loserman before a hearing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nancy Waterman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 10:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. They are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 10:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. The reason he created this sham party was so that he would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 10:51 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Now if it would be televised, that would be big. That would doom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
5. Isn't there also questions on whether he got enough signatures? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
54. Google news is our friend! Here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
life_long_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
6. He should give all the campaign money he has received to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
7. Good tactics. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-21-06 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
8. What's your platform, Joe. Keep us updated on your contributors on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minnesota_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 07:44 AM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Everything Joe does is ethical, anything his opponents do is not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:02 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Welcome to DU minnesota_liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phredicles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
9. Sweeeeet - recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Placebo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:10 AM Response to Original message |
10. "Connecticut for Lieberman Party" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 07:48 AM Response to Reply #10 |
26. I'm surprised it's not the other way around |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
architect359 (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:33 AM Response to Reply #10 |
31. I thought about that too after reading it a few days ago... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
primavera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 06:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
95. Doesn't the egotism just boggle the mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Placebo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 11:52 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. Indeed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Az_lefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
11. How can he possibly be a Democrat and an Independent? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Charlie Brown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
12. Lieberman has lost the privilege of being a Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nedbal (675 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
13. Fodder for RW talking heads, no merit in either of the 2 actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
14. If he is in the Democratic party still how can he be in another one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuvor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
15. Is it really called the "Connecticut for Lieberman Party"? What an ego! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 07:36 AM Response to Reply #15 |
24. Its motto is "Lieberman: Party of One". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:46 AM Response to Original message |
16. City asked to un-"Democrat" Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IthinkThereforeIAM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:46 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Just wondering... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiviaOlivia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:46 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Bravo/Brava Connecticut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:54 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Petty. I bet it costs Lamont votes. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 04:42 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Oh bull, its not petty. Its forcing him off the democratic ballot because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 05:20 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. It is petty, and it's not "forcing him off the democratic ballot". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 07:22 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. What are you talking about? So screw the party now? Get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:08 AM Response to Reply #23 |
37. You need to read up on the issue a bit more. This is about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:57 AM Response to Reply #37 |
47. Well BFD. Kick his ass out of the party. He's NOT A DEM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:27 AM Response to Reply #47 |
56. He is *not* a republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Whatever. Are you his kid or something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:30 AM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Nope. Just someone with some common sense. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:21 PM Response to Reply #63 |
69. So you think. We dems have enough problems with those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 12:08 AM Response to Reply #69 |
88. We Dems have far greater problems.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-27-06 05:57 AM Response to Reply #88 |
100. And letting Lieberman get away with this keeps those problems from being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 07:37 PM Response to Reply #63 |
82. Common Sense? Check Yourself... (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 03:42 PM Response to Reply #56 |
77. Lamont, imho, needs to make this election a "You're either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #47 |
61. Noise anf fury signifying nothing.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:30 PM Response to Reply #61 |
71. Your in the minority here. I think people like you roll over too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. LOL.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. More than your 'do nothing' opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:57 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 12:05 PM Response to Reply #74 |
91. "Do nothing"? I was in Connecticut on August 8. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-27-06 06:17 AM Response to Reply #21 |
102. Sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:04 AM Response to Reply #20 |
36. Um.. he isn't on the Democratic Ballot. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:25 AM Response to Reply #19 |
40. Is it as petty as losing the primary, ignoring the results, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:28 AM Response to Reply #40 |
57. So now both sides are being petty. How's that help Lamont? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:09 PM Response to Reply #57 |
68. I didn't agree that this tactic is "petty" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 03:19 PM Response to Reply #68 |
76. Talk about a Republican talking point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 05:19 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. Great - he got only 48% - so by your "logic" we should ignore the wishes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 07:20 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. No. I think liberals certainly should vote for Lamont. I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #76 |
85. Huh? A Republican talking point would be IGNORING laws because of terists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 05:14 PM Response to Reply #19 |
78. Bullshit. It's about time the Democrats got a spine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freedomburn (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
22. It's not petty. It's entirey justified. Joe doesn't get to have his cake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strawman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
27. Hope he loses, but if he has enough signatures he should be on the ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:16 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IthinkThereforeIAM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:38 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. What part of the law/statute dont you two understand... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strawman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:57 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. That's fine. Officially kick him out of the party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:35 AM Response to Reply #34 |
42. I strongly disagree with him being able to run as an independent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strawman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:05 AM Response to Reply #42 |
53. Not defending Lieberman's behavior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:06 PM Response to Reply #53 |
67. I agree with most of your statements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:17 AM Response to Reply #34 |
55. *IF* he gets elected, and I hope he doesn't, but *if*... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strawman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:39 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. He would caucus with the Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:35 AM Response to Reply #58 |
64. I think it depends on the numbers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toopers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 02:03 PM Response to Reply #34 |
73. I wonder what all these people pulling against Lieberman now . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meganmonkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:54 AM Response to Reply #32 |
46. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:29 AM Response to Reply #27 |
41. Actually, he's not an independent candidate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrens (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:17 AM Response to Original message |
30. While I sincerely hope for a Lieberman loss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
REACTIVATED IN CT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:17 AM Response to Reply #30 |
39. Sadly, there are a lot of stupid people in CT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RCinBrooklyn (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
33. They are using the LAW to stop him and Joe is contesting it a la Bush! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The2ndWheel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
35. Alright, this is where we should be headed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seedersandleechers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
38. I don't see how you can just ignore a statute. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bretttido (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:38 AM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Don't you see? Laws are petty, just like those petty wiretapping laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
43. Good... F*n Mole (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
45. I might support this if Lieberman is in blatant violation of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawgs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
48. Lieberman's registration as Democrat questioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:01 AM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Excellent. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:01 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:01 AM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Cool. Keep on hammering people :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovuian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 10:01 AM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Let Lieberman be honest he's a Republican Bush butt kisser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:18 AM Response to Reply #48 |
60. John Anderson ran as an "independent" not an "independent Republican"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:23 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Did anyone actually read the article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 12:01 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. There are 2 seperate motions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
65. Nader was not a member of the Green Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 01:16 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. But he didn't try to call himself "the independent green party candidate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeyJones (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
80. How American is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 07:48 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. Lieberman Is Dismissing CT's Democratic Process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 11:51 PM Response to Reply #83 |
87. There's a reason, but it has nothing to do with democracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 07:53 AM Response to Reply #87 |
89. Says a Lieberman Fan (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-27-06 05:59 AM Response to Reply #89 |
101. A Lieberman fan who never tolerated anybody ELSE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeyJones (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 05:52 PM Response to Reply #87 |
94. re:stranglehold: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeyJones (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 05:51 PM Response to Reply #83 |
93. But that still doesn't justify censoring him as an independent..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 08:11 AM Response to Reply #80 |
90. It's more American than the "Connecticut for Lieberman Party" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
84. The problem as I see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RCinBrooklyn (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-22-06 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
86. Hit the road Joe and dontcha come back no more no more no more no more.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
92. this double whammy is forcing Lieberman to declare who he really is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
screenplaya (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
96. Keep Lieberman from the Debates too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Anakin Skywalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 06:39 PM Response to Original message |
97. Please Kick His Ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goforit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-23-06 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
98. Hmmm, great point! A person should not be allowed to run under one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Master of Disaster (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Aug-27-06 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
103. They can push all they want, but they will not be able to deny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC