Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leading Antivirus Software Exposes Customer Computers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 03:23 PM
Original message
Leading Antivirus Software Exposes Customer Computers
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Symantec Corp.'s leading antivirus software, which protects some of the world's largest corporations and U.S. government agencies, suffers from a flaw that lets hackers seize control of computers to steal sensitive data, delete files, or implant malicious programs, researchers said Thursday.

Much more:
http://www.wtol.com/Global/story.asp?S=4950762
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. another buffer overflow, I bet
Buffer overflows allowed by mistakes in C/C++ code are the #1 cause of this kind of code insecurity. These are another argument for coding in C# or Java whenever possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sort of defeats the purpose of the software...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've stopped using Symantec on ANY of my client's machines
I recommend McAfee only. Symantec is well and truly broken, and has been for at least two years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agreed, but their software vulnerabilities have made me a lot of money...
removing viruses and trojans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. My Norton contract is about up,
Do you agree on McAfee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HannibalBarca Donating Member (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Happy user of norton for several years now
....and not a virus in sight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. ...that you're aware of.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Beware, when you go to renew it
read my cautionary tale below!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. Me too. Actually I use Norton Internet Security (has Anti-Virus SW in it)
We test our systems from time to time with other products and have not found any viruses for many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Try this...

... Computer Associates Etrust Anti-Virus. I have put it on many of my friends and relatives computers and it seems to solve all their problems. McAfee has caused problems for several of them, too. Etrust has a nicer price, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. Thanks for the info...
I'm checking it out now. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. McAfee or....
free.grisoft.com
AVG Antivirus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Pc World misses the mark
Edited on Thu May-25-06 04:38 PM by acmejack
Symantec's Norton Internet Security 2006 is a mature product that performs nicely--so nicely that we named it the Best Buy among ten security suites we looked at.

http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,125857,00.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Thanks all, but, now I am confused
I do plan to check McAfee out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Me too
but my job is still to protect their machines, and I will NOT install defective crap, including software, on a client machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ott Ooh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. in modern life, the cure is often worse than the disease...
how did we ever get away with developing penicillin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brianzero Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Just get a physical firewall and use Firefox...
And you wont have to worry about viruses. Yes, and of coarse, dont screw around with attachments. Bottomline, I think that software virus scanners are a false sense of security.

The only time I had viruses/spyware, is when I still used Internet Explorer. Now, I use Firefox and havent had a virus/spyware issue for the last two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Is a router a physical firewall or do I need another piece of eqpt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McKenzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. It's a peripheral hardware gizmo
I'm behind one right now - I trust it waaay more than vapourware.

Don't need to worry about virii either because I'm on a Mac.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Most modern
routers are also firewalls of some sort. How configurable they are, and how much of a firewall depends on the specific model.

For home use, just about anything with NAT which denies outgoing connections will work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. I ditched Norton last year in favor of Grisoft's AVG
and I haven't regretted it.

ZoneAlarm for firewall, Firefox browser, Thunderbird E-mail client.

It's a beautiful thing. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. AVG is the best
http://free.grisoft.com

(I have no business with them, I just use and like thier products)



Educate A Freeper - Flaunt Your Opinions!
http://brainbuttons.com/home.asp?stashid=13



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm using Trend Micro on my Windows PC, very happy with it...
It takes a little tweaking and isn't ideal for novice Windows users, but I like it FAR better than the memory-hogging, long-past-its-peak Symantec software.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. I also like Trend Micro way more than Symantec
I am convinced that Norton allowed several evil things to slip on by and infect my computer. I had my credit card info stolen, for one, and I also had a warning message pop up telling me that there were odd things happening to my registry.

I wiped my HD and installed Trend Micro and haven't had a problem in over two years, plus I get updates every day from Trend whereas with Symantec I got an update every few days.

John- What sort of tweaking are you referring to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Tweaking? Basically, it's all the OPTIONS Trend Micro gives...
... in their control panel. I have a home network, and it takes a little bit of looking around at all the features and settings to make it work on a network, but it's worth poking around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldEuropean Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. Alternatives
Have a look at the test results here:

http://www.av-comparatives.org/

If your antivirus program is not listed there, they
either refused to participate or failed to reach the
minimum detection rate. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
28. Thanks! I was all set to switch to AVG until I saw...
the results of that analysis. Now I'm not so sure... only 90.47% detection overall. Even Norton had 97.61%. The test linked in your post broke the programs down into three categories: Advanced+, Advanced, and Standard. AVG was "Standard" (lowest). Norton was Advanced+ (highest). But AVG has a free version.

I'm using a Firewall with NAT and Firefox most of the time (some pages don't display correctly in Firefox and force me to flip to IE). Would any of you who are experts in the field have any qualms about using AVG despite the rating in those tests? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldEuropean Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Another test
http://www.virus.gr also did some testing, however their virus collection is considered unsorted and includes too many non-malware and damaged files. However, they tested alot more programs and the test results pretty much reflect the impression I have (I am working for an anti virus company) from my own testing.

Firefox is becoming more and more vulnerable as it became more popular. By now, there are almost as many exploits for Firefox as for IE - only that Microsoft needs longer to release patches. Opera is the fastest in releasing security fixes.
Keep in mind that you not only must keep Windows up-to-date with the latest security patches, but also Firefox, Opera, Java (!), mail, firewall, ICQ, IRC, Winamp (streaming) and every other programm that you use that has online functionality.
Every program that accepts data from the internet and parses the data is a potential security risk.
DiamondCS Process Guard or System Safety Monitor are excellent additional protection tools (I never use any PC without
Process Guard on it), but they are a bit more complicated to use and configure propperly.
DefenseWall from Softsphere is interesting too and far easier to use (you only must add all online applications to the untrusted list).

BTW, av-comparatives will release a new test on June, 1st, covering heuristic (retro-active) detection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Thanks OldEuropean...
Your comments and resources were very helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. They just discovered a problem?
Edited on Thu May-25-06 05:28 PM by arikara
Freaking morons! My norton firewall expired some time last year and I purchased a new one online. Their process is so screwy, in order to install the new one, I had to remove the old copy. During this process 2 trojans - that norton virus had allowed in the first place - were set off. Thankfully, I noticed the modem lights flashing and shut everything down but it was too late. I had to take it in to the shop to remove the virii and all traces of norton. I complained and got my money back, but nobody that I spoke to cared about what happened. In fact they wanted to charge me a fee to tell me how to remove the virus that they caused!

If it happened with me, it probably happened with thousands of other users too. I'm now using AVG for virus and a router for security. An added benefit is that the computer is 4 times as fast without that pig norton.

edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyonn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Hmmm, about a month ago Norton said I had a trojan??
Warnings flashing that evening and I scoped out my latest scan and was, as usual, confused. Computer Stupid. Anyway, days later I ran a scan and it didn't show up?? Since you mentioned your "trojans" and the process for the new acct., I am worried. Just checked AVG and think that is what I'll use. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. But thank God computer voting is safe from all problems!
The systems are designed by "experts," who have made their voting systems invulnerable to hacking or tampering!

Yay!

:sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm::sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Ya, Symantec sucks, Ya, definately sucks, Ya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
30. A few thoughts
This bug does NOT affect the consumer version -- just the corporate licenses.

Norton has a very slick deployment for corporate installations. CA's eTrust AV is probably the only one comparable for deployment features.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
33. phew! I have AVG
and I seem to stay well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC