Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Goss Aide Is Linked to Military Contracting Scandals

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 11:17 AM
Original message
Another Goss Aide Is Linked to Military Contracting Scandals
Another Goss Aide Is Linked to Military Contracting Scandals
Investigators are looking into ties between one of the outgoing CIA Director's right hand men and a defense contractor at the center of the Duke Cunningham lobbying scandal

By TIMOTHY J. BURGER/WASHINGTON
Posted Wednesday, May. 10, 2006

An old Central Intelligence Agency hand who was close to outgoing Director Porter Goss was previously a paid consultant to one of the defense contractors who allegedly bribed ex-Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, according to government documents and a person familiar with the matter. The financial link between Brant Bassett — who served two stints at the CIA and recommended the controversial Kyle "Dusty" Foggo for a top agency post — and defense contractor Brent Wilkes could prove a further embarrassment to Goss in the wake of what sources in and out of government say are investigations by the CIA inspector general and the Justice Department into Wilkes' ties to the Agency, as well as to Congress and the Pentagon.

Bassett was paid $5,000 in May 2000 as a consultant to ADCS Corp., a company headed by Wilkes, Foggo's friend since childhood, according to disclosure forms Bassett filed when he was a House intelligence committee aide to Goss while the former Congressman was the panel's Republican chairman. Bassett was not working for the CIA at the time of the payment. Still, it may not look good for yet another of Goss's right hand men to be associated with Wilkes — whom prosecutors allege, in Cunningham's guilty plea, provided more than $600,000 of the $2.4 million in bribes that landed Cunningham a more than eight-year federal prison sentence in March.

As part of its mushrooming Cunningham probe, the Justice Department has been looking into whether Foggo received improper gifts such as lavish travel from Wilkes, according to a source familiar with the case. Wilkes' business held at least one contract with the CIA as well as technology contracts with the Pentagon, according to U.S. officials and other sources. An investigator for the House intelligence committee is also scrutinizing Bassett's link to Wilkes, according to government disclosures obtained by TIME.

When Goss became CIA director in late 2004, he brought Bassett back for a second stint at the agency as a consultant in the directorate of operations, according to a person who spoke on behalf of Bassett. Bassett knew Foggo from the days when both served in the CIA's directorate of operations, according to one official.
(snip/...)

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1192766,00.html?promoid=rss_nation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. We have "Dusty," "Nine-Fingers," and now the Bassett-Hound...
These creeps sound more like Dick Tracy villains than CIA officials...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I thought Bassett was Nine-fingers.
No?

Isn't that who Newsweek identified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Eep! Perhaps...
You might be right...:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I think I heard it on the fly on Rachel Maddow's show. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Golly, the Republicans have such bad luck in hiring help
Every last one of them seems to be corrupt or crooked, pandering to bribers and other scumbags. But of course, we know that the officials who hired these crooks had absolutely no knowledge of their nefarious schemes and ways, and are as pure as the driven snow. But maybe they drifted.

No investigation, however, will be necessary. Just a few more bad apples. Nothing really to see here. Besides, it's too complicated to follow. I mean, some guy gave some money to some other guy, and the other guy did something shady to benefit yet another guy, and oooh, it's just so confusing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. The fact all these "public servants" are so wealthy is a slap in the face
of our democracy. Limos, yachts, whores, multi-million dollar homes, private jet travel... what has happened to us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Used to be, Republican types didn't go into politics because there
wasn't any money in it. They've solved that problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Perhaps that is the reason the Democratic leaders are so quiet
these days? They're taking lessons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-10-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes, in AZ they were complaining because of our "Clean Election Law"
They said it was hard to entice Republicans to run because there isn't enough money in it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC