Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hil blasts Team Bush 'pattern' of secrecy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 11:25 AM
Original message
Hil blasts Team Bush 'pattern' of secrecy

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wn_report/story/391469p-332045c.html

Hil blasts Team Bush 'pattern' of secrecy


WASHINGTON - The White House's failure to come clean about the vice president's shooting of a 78-year-old fellow hunter is part of a pattern of unacceptable secrecy, Sen. Hillary Clinton charged yesterday.

"A tendency of this administration from the top all the way to the bottom is to withhold information, to resist legitimate requests for information, to refuse to be forthcoming," Clinton (D-N.Y.) said.

"Putting it all together going back years now, there is a pattern that should be troubling," she said, apparently referring to the CIA leak case, Cheney's secret meetings with energy execs and White House refusal to release documents relating to judicial nominees.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. IT'S PART OF A VAST RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 11:28 AM by SpiralHawk
For real. No shit. No tin-foil hat needed.

Face the facts, America. It IS a vast right wing conspiracy arising out of a Republican culture of corruption.

The Secret State. The Corrupt State. The Big BushCo State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Go Hil. go go go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Started with day one and Bush*'s refusal to obey Presidential
Papers Act. A Congressional LAW that requires the release of Presidential Papers after twelve years of leaving office. Both Reagan and Bush 1 are beyond that time frame and Reagan was when Bush* came to office. Bush* just wrote an executive order that said he didn't have to follow the law and not one Senator, Hillary included, said a damn word...Breaking existing law was how Bush* began his time in office and things have not changed a bit..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. GMTA
I should have read your post before making mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. She is right on target with this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. It should have been troubling from the beginning
The day that * signed the Executive Order closing Reagan's Presidential Records (which were to become the property of the American people on 1/20/01). That was back in 2001. Few noticed because the EO was signed after 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. just as the framers of the constitution intended:
government for the corporations, by the corporations and of the corporations, and all done covertly because the people are just too stupid to be informed. The people, WHO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rastaman Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. as much as I want to agree with her...
I cant think of any administration since WWII that didnt have pattern of secrecy. This one may come close to topping the list but please. To think that they are the only ones who would do this is naive. I can bet you anything something like this will happen again. It always does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. ah, so its ok because THE OTHER GUY did it. Nice logic.
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 09:26 PM by thebigidea
Al Gore just as secretive as Dick Cheney? Uh huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rastaman Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Its interesting...
that you read my comment as an endorsement or excuse and not as a simple fact. A pronouncement of the fact that the system we have breeds corruption, deceit and secrecy is not
not a statement of approval. Do you really think that future administrations will be less secretive? What compounds the problem for this administration is that in addition to the inherrent institutional deceitfulness there is a very high level of personal dishonesty. We simply cant trust them with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. GOOD GIRL! nt
:applause:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC