Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Lawyers in Leak Case Outline Libby's Defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Algorem (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-01-06 01:01 AM
Original message
Lawyers in Leak Case Outline Libby's Defense
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/01/politics/01leak.html

By NEIL A. LEWIS
Published: February 1, 2006

WASHINGTON, Jan. 31 — Lawyers for I. Lewis Libby Jr., the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, offered a detailed outline on Tuesday of Mr. Libby's likely defense to charges that he lied about his role in exposing the identity of a C.I.A. operative.

In papers filed in federal court, the lawyers strongly suggested they would argue that if Mr. Libby's statements to investigators were untrue, it was a case of innocent confusion or faulty memory because of his preoccupation with weightier national security matters at the time.

Mr. Libby was indicted on five counts of perjury and obstruction of justice last October in what a special prosecutor had charged was his willful misleading of investigators about his role in the exposure of Valerie Wilson's connection to the Central Intelligence Agency. The indictment said that Mr. Libby concealed the fact that he learned of Ms. Wilson's connection to the agency from government officials and instead falsely told investigators that information he gave to reporters came from other journalists.

In a pleading filed in United States District Court, Mr. Libby's lawyers asked the judge to order the special counsel to obtain and turn over to them a large number of records, some of them classified, that demonstrate the kinds of issues he was involved in as both the chief of staff and national security adviser to Mr. Cheney...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   so, basically, Libby's defense is....... 9/11  jsamuel   Feb-01-06 01:03 AM   #1 
   NOW I get it!!!!  NanceGreggs   Feb-01-06 01:05 AM   #2 
   The Chewbacca Defense  dave29   Feb-01-06 01:25 AM   #3 
   He should thank his lucky stars that he even gets to have a trial  bluestateguy   Feb-01-06 01:26 AM   #4 
   His team still seems to be going for the "we are being denied our defense  HereSince1628   Feb-01-06 08:13 AM   #5 
 
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-01-06 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. so, basically, Libby's defense is....... 9/11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Feb-01-06 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. NOW I get it!!!!
"... it was a case of innocent confusion or faulty memory because of his preoccupation with weightier national security matters at the time."

In other words, "I FORGOT not to leak confidential information that directly impacts on NATIONAL SECURITY, because I was too busy worrying about NATIONAL SECURITY at the time."



:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-01-06 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Chewbacca Defense
nice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-01-06 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. He should thank his lucky stars that he even gets to have a trial
He should be very grateful for that. Very, very grateful. Some people just get shipped off to Gitmo, without being charged, sent into solitary confinement and have no access to lawyers.

Libby should be very, very grateful that he gets the privilege of even having a trial and the right to put on a defense.

He should be very, very, very grateful for that.

Very grateful.

Libby should hang from a rope with his balls in his mouth. Same for Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Wed Feb-01-06 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. His team still seems to be going for the "we are being denied our defense
strategy.

First they want reporters to be supoenaed. Now they want classified documents to be available in court.

If they don't get them they'll argue that they can't present a real defense of their client, and go for relief on that basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Nov 21st 2009, 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC