Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice authorized National Security Agency to spy on UN Security Council

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sweetm2475 Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:40 PM
Original message
Rice authorized National Security Agency to spy on UN Security Council
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 01:59 PM by sweetm2475
From Raw Story:
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/After_domestic_spying_reports_U.S._spying_1227.html

Jason Leopold

President Bush and other top officials in his administration used the National Security Agency to secretly wiretap the home and office telephones and monitored private email accounts of members of the United Nations Security Council in early 2003 to determine how foreign delegates would vote on a U.N. resolution that paved the war for the U.S.-led war in Iraq, NSA documents show.

Two former NSA officials familiar with the agency's campaign to spy on U.N. members say then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice authorized the plan at the request of President Bush, who wanted to know how delegates were going to vote. Rice did not immediately return a call for comment.

The former officials said Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld also participated in discussions about the plan, which involved "stepping up" efforts to eavesdrop on diplomats.

A spokeswoman at the White House who refused to give her name also would not comment, and pointed to a March 3, 2003 press briefing by former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer when questions about U.N. spying were first raised.

For entire story go to:
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/After_domestic_spying_reports_U.S._spying_1227.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. these guys are the keystone kops of spying.
spying on the un, and on foreign diplomats in general, is not cool but, let's face it, a reality of diplomatic life. every diplomat knows this and expects it. this is not in the same league at all as spying on america citizens.

but fer cryin' out loud, be discreet about it! don't go blabbing to the media about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Excuse me, but why do you think this story was leaked? Who do you....
...think was "blabbing" to the media about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. "two former nsa officials" according to the article
not clear to me whether they're pissed at shrub and trying to make them look bad by adding more spying to the list or if they're shrub apologists trying to confuse the spying issue by leaking this unseemly but less objectionable (and certainly less illegal) form of spying.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. well bush did spend his first 3 years in office fighting with them.
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 06:33 PM by superconnected
He wanted to privatize the cia too - most likely giving the contract to carlyle.

The Carlyle Group is handling US back ground and security checks as well as airline security right now, and owns Qintetig - the British intelligence agency(Blair privatized and gave to them against great Britians wishes - ie. their miltiary)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yes, I've suspected the revenge of the CIA for awhile now
Under that theory, we should expect wave afer wave of damning leaks, until the Bush mobsters who severely compromised the integrity of the Agency are brought down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetm2475 Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. well then, leak away......
Under this administration, it's the only way for Americans to even have a clue about what is going on in their own government, anyway. So if the CIA has a bone to pick, then leak away CIA!!!!!!!!!! Or in the words of the Shrub "Bring em' on"!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. Word. And welcome to DU, Sweet!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetm2475 Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. thanks
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YourBrother Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. HAHAHAHA
you used the words "CIA" and "integrity" in the same sentence!

nice one, i couldn't have done it! :D

lets see if "integrity" stands the test of time when you do a search on "michael Meiring" an agent who described himself as working for the CIA ... but insisted on telling people it stood for "Christ In Action"

if you google his name it might open your eyes a little

if that doesnt do it for ya, do a search for "operation northwoods"

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. These are strange times.
I find it very weird to find myself sometimes "unter eine Decke steckt," a Fellow Traveler with the CIA--or at least some part of the CIA. Yet that seems to be the way it often shakes out, what with Bush trying to muzzle & control them (think Porter Goss), & the Company fighting back. I pray for a return to normal times so I can just go back to hating the spooks without having to worry about what they're trying to slip through to whom via Walter Pincus.

And BTW--I'll see your Northwoods & raise you a Salvador Allende and a Norodom Sihanouk--although I have to admit Northwoods is hard to beat for sheer effrontery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YourBrother Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Touche'
nice to hear from such an enlightened individual :D

all the best to you and yours this holidays bro, whichever one you celebrate:D

peace :o)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #54
69. Welcome to DU. I think you'll find lots of people around here
know about Northwoods & similar esoterica. Smedley Butler, for example, is a local folk hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
73. Operation Northwoods had nothing to do with the CIA. That was a......
...Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff op-plan all the way.

As to your issue with the CIA and why they would be going to war against the NeoCons, perhaps you remember Valerie Plame? Or maybe you remember Cheney visiting the CIA and twisting arms to produce the intelligence against Iraq that the NeoCons wanted as justification to attack Iraq? I bet if you put your mind to it you might even remember that the NeoCons have replaced the top leadership of the CIA with their own stooges.

In an "integrity" contest between the CIA and the NeoCons, the CIA wins, hands-down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
36. KINDASLEEZY GETS EVEN
WITH THE (insert racial epithet here) HEADS



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. WTF!!!!!
I am fuming right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. sweetm2475, please edit your post
Please be aware that DU copyright rules require that excerpts of copyrighted material be limited to four paragraphs.

Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetm2475 Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Done. Sorry About That
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. thanks
no problem :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. should do something about the propaganda that rice is a rising star..
cant stand that nonsense...since anyone with half a brain can see that, she like her alien brother dick are not human..have not a heart...are evil..from some alien planet..probably the only evil planet in the universe..easy to see the similarity...same sneer...same wicked angry hateful twisted mouth....good...now we can forget that rising star bullshit..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
29.  A good rice vinegar is indeed vintage.......
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 03:24 PM by 0007
Much like sourness of speech or mood and at times an illustrated ill temper. Especially when Condi's integrity is impugned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. Rice a "rising star"? Bwahahahaha...more like floating shit that keeps
rising to the surface every time they try to push it down...

I read the same crap you did in the local paper in Eugene, OR yesterday (taken off the wire)...it talked about her modeling for Vogue and being such a fashionista and how popular she is....I got sick and laughed pretty darn hard thinking about what a nice propaganda fluff piece that was that they paid someone to write....

I have one thing to say about Condi Rice....honey, you aint' no Oprah, and you will never be chosen as the POTUS or Vice POTUS....forget about it.....The closest you will be to the Office of the POTUS after 2008 is probably in the same prison system as Bush and the rest of the crew when they are indicted or that you'll be running away with your husband seeking asylum in some rogue nation that would take you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YourBrother Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
56. hmmmm
maybe they could all run to Israel? Just a thought

on a lighter note, i wouldn't touch her with yours mate

and as for letting my todger anywhere near those tombstones/gnashers ... leave it out!

I have it under good authority she is being headhunted at the moment ... by ivory traders! :rofl:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
43. indeed. just yesterday AP's Anne Gearan scribed 'Rice's image
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 04:51 PM by cosmicdot
shines amid White House clouds' ...

at least, the Buffalo News put the propaganda advanced-marketing PR press release in Editorials .. a DUer noted that the Seattle PI put it at the back of Section A ... they all dug out a somewhat not-too-evil looking Kindasleazy photo ...

I see MSNBC failed to even mention who penned it for AP (Anne Gearan), and published it under "Politics" ...

If the resignation/removal dominoes fall, I don't want of any of their illegitimate line of succession culture of corruption and treason.

in case anyone missed it - both in the Editorials Forum

***Warning ... serious :puke: alert***

"Condoleezza Rice’s star rising"
"Secretary of state most popular member of Bush administration...."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x181023

Rice's image shines amid White House clouds
Condoleezza Rice has shed image as hawkish "warrior princess."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=103&topic_id=181163&mesg_id=181163
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Where is the outrage? One thing to say they are spying on
those who are supposedly calling Al Queda people, 'nother thing to say you are spying on the United Nation delegates. It would seem to be indefensible. However, in a way this is old news, as you can see by this:

pointed to a March 3, 2003 press briefing by former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer when questions about U.N. spying were first raised.

"As a matter of long-standing policy, the administration never comments on anything involving any people involved in intelligence," Fleischer said. "So I'm not saying yes and I'm not saying no."

Where is the outrage?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. And not just on their offices, but on their home phones and private email.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. Expect media silence and fluff from the Corporate "News" outlets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
8.  US takes bugging at the UN to 'new levels'(Condi mentioned in2003)
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 02:24 PM by cal04
US takes bugging at the UN to 'new levels'
Mar 5, 2003

The United States came under fire on Monday over news reports that key United Nations diplomats in the Security Council were under high-intensity surveillance by US intelligence agencies. According to a report in the British Observer newspaper, the US is conducting a secret "dirty tricks" campaign against diplomats from countries that have remained non-committal on how they will vote on a proposed US-British resolution legitimizing a war on Iraq. The campaign has been directed mostly at delegates from six non-permanent members in the Security Council: Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Mexico, Guinea and Pakistan.

"We knew all along that senior UN officials and diplomats were under constant surveillance," Jim Paul of the New York-based Global Policy Forum, told Inter Press Service. "But the existing surveillance has raised bugging to new levels," he added.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer refused to offer any comments on the story at a news briefing in Washington. The newspaper quoted a memo from the National Security Agency (NSA) in Washington advising senior US intelligence officials to ferret out information not only on how delegates would vote on a second resolution but to seek out "negotiating positions" and "alliances" among Security Council members. The plan includes interception of email messages and bugging home and office telephones of diplomats whose countries are represented in the Security Council. "The existence of the surveillance operation, understood to have been requested by President George W Bush's National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, is deeply embarrassing to the Americans in the middle of their efforts to win over the undecided delegations," the Observer noted.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EC05Ak01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Interesting how this report tends to lend credence to...
this earlier thread:

Gov. Bill Richardson fears his calls monitored by NSA for Bolton

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5692549
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Impeach him now
That's just going way too far and destroyed a lot of American Diplomacy now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Got Her! Cool!
I knew we could find a way to have Kindasleazy join her husband in the Hague. Maybe adjoining cells? I'm sure the UN could be that accommodating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's not like this is breaking news or anything
This is common knowledge for avid LBN readers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
46. isnt tying condi to it news?...whatever, im glad her name is on this.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. We knew they were spying on the UN.
It seems the only new information here is that they had the NSA do the spying.

If it didn't clobber the administration then, then I don't see how this will damage them now.

Incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yostsghost Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. HELP!!!!!!
I am hearing from Conservative friends that both Carter and Clinton used the same "techiques" for spying as Bush is now. They keep sighting the Aldridge case for Clinton and supossed statemnts from a Bell in Carters cabinet. Can someone out there provide me a link to counter this, or at leat point me in the right direction.

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. There was a good one in General Discussion.
Good to have you here, by the way!

I saw a very complete argument about this. If I recall, the gist was that Clinton obtained the warrants, whereas Bush did not. But do not take my word for that. I'm notoriously brainless. There's just too damn much to try and keep up with.

You can search using the search function. I'll give it a try too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Check out the video in this link
It was posted in GD a few days ago.
Welcome to DU! :hi:

http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/mitchellclintoncartersmackdowndec2105.wmv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Here is the link... You can debunk the right wing nuts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetm2475 Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. ThinkProgress did a pretty good job last week.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Here is some good debunking of the garbage spewed by the GOP:
In addition to debunking the myth about Carter and Clinton used the same techniques for spying and authorizing spying without warrants on US Citizens, you'll find some other debunking of the crap the Right Wing Presstitutes and GOP operatives are spewing to counter the truth:

http://mediamatters.org/items/200512240002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. Here's one link to the GD discussion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TommyO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. mediamatters.org has a lot of good info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
59. We knew the NSA was involved
The memo Katherine Gunn leaked came from Frank Koza - "chief of staff of the NSA's Regional Targets section".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1125854,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #59
74. Thanks.
We live in an anechoic chamber, it appears.

I remember that article. And many more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. This is becoming a dictatorship...
These people are out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. They spied on Kerry and are spying on Pat Fitzgerald, the DNC...
...various (all?) DEMs in congress and anyone else who threatens them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
50. I know there was conjecture on them spying on Kerry, but have
they admitted it. (Gee, he would then have the distinction of being spied on by Nixon and W - and who knows in between. Pretty pathetic with all this spying they found NOTHING and had to make stuff up.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. It's not conjecture- it is a fact.
They spied on Kerry and continue to spy on percieved ememies.

You suggest that they are doing it soley for blackmail purposes- dont forget- they also spied on Kerry to find out what his "next move" was.

They used/usw it for strategy purposes as well as for potential black-mailing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #52
60. Sorry Dr. Fate, I was seriously just asking as I hadn't
heard that they were spying on Kerry. You are correct that knowing his plans and strategy is far more likely and definitely to their advantage. If this is true, it is definityly sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #60
71. No need to apologize- I was just being grumpy. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. How much you want this was leaked from the WH
One gets the feeling that the WH is selectivly leaking these things.

Thier base's reaction : "Oh well, spying on the UN is fine by me."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
32. Boy, ya really nabbed yourself a bunch a terra-ists there, Georgie!
Fucking fascist warmongering felonious pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. The Neo Fascists don't need no..
stinkin' warrents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
38. Maybe she'll be re-designated Secy. of Espionage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. IMHO, we need to get up off our asses and get out into the streets!
Enough is enough already!

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
40. here's the yahoo link- vote it up folks!
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 03:40 PM by Maine-ah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Apparently the only media that didn't mention NSA was ours
the media coverage has made virtually no mention of the fact that the Bush administration used the NSA to spy on U.N. diplomats in New York before the invasion of

Last Sunday's revelation, published in The Observer, of a 'top secret' US memo, supposedly showing that the NSA has eavesdropped on members of the UN Security Council in recent weeks for insights into their negotiating positions on Iraq, is shocking. But perhaps not for the reasons that might first come to mind.

While the US administration has refused to confirm or deny the authenticity of the memo, it is a sad truth that spying at the United Nations, both at the headquarters and among its various agencies and field missions is as old as the UN itself. The real significance of this story is what this rare public disclosure of such aggressive dipomatic tactics, whether seen as fair or foul, tells us about the atmosphere at the United Nations at a time when the world's diplomats stand starkly divided over the prospect of war on Iraq.

First, the story is clearly embarrassing for the US Administration coming as it does at a crucial moment in its joint efforts with the British Government to secure a second resolution in the Security Council. It will be seen by detractors as heavy-handed and confirm deep-rooted suspicions among many Europeans and others about the direction of US foreign policy under the Bush Administration. It has also upset some of the key undecided UN delegations in the current debate. The Chileans in particular have been vocal about this.

However, the media maelstrom the memo has set off as far away as Sydney and Moscow - but significantly not in Washington - is indicative of a wider malaise in the transatlantic arms control and foreign policy relationship. It says a great deal about the current differences between Bush and Blair's position on Iraq and that of France, Germany and Russia, and why these erstwhile allies have been unable to find a compromise position in Iraq.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,910350,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Do you expect Katie Corporate Lipstick Couric to discuss this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
42. This is really old news
everyone knew this.. what is Raw Story doing now, just going back in time and grabbing from the grab bag of crap these guys have pulled and then sticking a piece of the puzzle up one story at a time and calling it some kind of SCOOP?

I tossed this into my film "Rove's War" as an afterthought in the section on Rove Tricks, the bugging of the UN folks was INTIMIDATION to force them to vote for Bush's faked war..

What's next from Raw Story, George Washington crosses Delaware, Bush IN THE DARK on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
47. What I want to know, is how many US citizens have been victims of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
48. I love how that government rag, the New York Times, is all over this.
Its web site has had the bogus Iraqi government "meetings" on its front page for 12 hours now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
6th Borough Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
51. The Guardian reported on this in early 2003.
Rice wasn't implicated by name, but the article included a leaked document referring to the wiretapping at the UN (by the US; of the Security Council; known by our whatchamacallit treaty partners, UK, US, CA, NZ, and the Aussies).

The targets found out before they voted vis-a-vis Iraq (or before at least some of the votes); I remember the outrage (in other countries) at the time.

Just another reason I didn't trust the administration with war-making powers...or propaganda to ease the transition into a state of (more) war.

I need to tune out...life would be so much easier...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grounded11 Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
55. Didnt Nixon do something like this????
If you consider the level of access that this situation gave and still gives the GOP, can you imagine how it might be utilized to snoop into the affairs of political candidates? Do you think that the Kerry Edwards duo might have been spied on? If you think about it, what other areas could the administration have abused this illegal power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
57.  Bush got caught, Clinton and Carter followed FISA rules
GOP reliance on 'everybody did it" defense won't fly with most people. Don'
t the fundies preach that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
58. IMPEACHMENT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
61. Mediablast with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
62. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
63. I wouldn't blame the UN if they moved out of the US
Of course the neocons would take that as "Victory". This has got to rile the whole world that no conservations here are secure. Big Brother is listening and watching at all times - I'm even freaking myself out. :freak:

Condi gets her fingers dirty this time, eh.
Leak after leak, come'on Cia, take them down. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
64. Their spying on Kerry is probably why we lost the election
Does anyone doubt that they were spying on Kerry and turning that info over to groups running ads against Kerry?

The Bush admin is out of control!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #64
65. Isn't that exactly why Nixon was impeached??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
66. But....but....
I just heard Condi`s star is rising. Must be some mistake here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaBecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
67. WOW - they went hog wild with this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
68. What the hell more is it going to take before this guy is held
accountable? Every day it's something new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
70. About time for the World Court to step up and jail these bastards.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-28-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
72. The Hague court needs to issue a summons;
Or whatever legality they posses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC