Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia and US in the Throes of a New Arms Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:16 AM
Original message
Russia and US in the Throes of a New Arms Race
Russia and US in the Throes of a New Arms Race
by Jim Kouri
Dec 27, 2005

During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union embarked on the most massive military buildups in history. Part of President Reagan's strategy for winning was to entice the Soviets into a competition it could never even hope to win. A communist economy by its very nature is ill-equipped to compete with a free-market, capitalist system whether its foreign trade or weapons technology.

And so, slowly the Soviet economy became a basket case due to the communists desire to exceed America in an enormously expensive arms race.

After the Cold War, with the Soviet threat gone and with Democrat President Bill Clinton in the White House, terms such as "the peace dividend" became commonplace within the Washington Beltway and in the mainstream news media. No longer was the political establishment interested in defense, and the new agenda for the US was domestic.

However, slowly and methodically Russia's steel-eyed leader Vladamir Putin began to rebuild and expand his nation's arsenal and its fighting forces. This new phase in Russia's military buildup has created fear in some quarters in the US that a new arms race exists. Recently the Russians deployed a nuclear ballistic system that their generals made clear could render US anti-missile defense systems ineffective, according to reports in the European news media.
(snip/...)

http://www.postchronicle.com/news/security/article_2122501.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hooray! A Threat We Understand
Now all we have to do in case of attack is duck & cover and we'll be OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Kids can get right under their school desks and be safe.
I remember this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrRang Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Missile defense is already ineffective without Russian nukes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. What horseshit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. China is still much more a long-term military threat on a large scale..
than Russia will ever "hope" to be. The threat from Russia is still its lack of security of its nuclear weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great News For Cold War Condi!
This is exactly what she (and her throwback BushCo buddies) wanted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. AFTER SHE WAS BEATEN WITH AN "UGLY STICK"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. DAMN YOU Saigon!@!!A!A!A!
There goes my perfectly good keyboard
due to a painful nasal expulsion of coffee!!!
ROTFLMAO!!!
BHN:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bush/America has restarted the cold war
ain't our war president grand

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. I knew that "Pootie-Poot" moniker would come back to haunt us. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1932 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Putin is responsible for build up? Hello! US foreign policy for the last
thirty years has been to talk all of the middle east into spending their petrodollars on US weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Yes!!...Thank you GHWB +GWB +Cheney for the New Cold War!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Cheney and Rummy are happy again
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 01:02 PM by Julius Civitatus
This is what they like. And Condi is excited as well, since this is all she knows.

Santa brought a brand new arms race with Russsia. Merry Crhistmas to all!!!

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barkley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. U.S. broke from the ABM treaty to build missile defense & exanded NATO
Edited on Tue Dec-27-05 01:09 PM by Barkley
Many people on the left warned against dumping the ABM treaty but Bush wouldn't listen.

The Clinton and Bush Administrations NATO expansions probably didn't help matter much either.

We have established military bases in neighboring countries to Russia was well.

So the reaction is predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. There was no race to keep up with the U.S. by Russia
Russia's military spending held steady at just over 4% before and during Raygun's administration.

The "arms race" was a figment of the neo-cons imagination and fear-mongering in order to justify Raygun's massive deficit spending on the military.

And let's not forget, it was during this time that defense contractors (and the neo-cons) were ripping off the U.S. taxpayers for tens of billions in cost overruns, fraud and waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tatertop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That is an excellent summation
4% is lower than I had thought
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Considering what is happening in Iraq, it's pretty
understandable a country might want to build up its weapons in order to defend itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-27-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. The U.S. arms buildup began with Bush's election years ago
Blaming the Russians now is just an excuse for a buildup that has been ongoing for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC