Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrat demands criminal probe of oil execs - Go Lautenberg!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:43 PM
Original message
Democrat demands criminal probe of oil execs - Go Lautenberg!
Democrat demands criminal probe of oil execs

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic Sen. Frank Lautenberg (news, bio, voting record) said on Thursday he will push the Justice Department to investigate whether major oil company executives lied to Congress when they testified their firms did not participate in a 2001 White House task force that formulated the Bush administration's national energy policy.
...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. But, but, but didn't Sen. Stevens (R) make sure they weren't under oath?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. From what I understand
it's still a crime to lie to congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. When the Repug committee chairmen pull that stunt,
I'd like to see one of the Democratic members ask the witness, "Do you have any objections to being sworn in for your testimony today?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I think that was tried during this very session we are discussing
and Ted Stevens scolded and reprimanded the rep who suggested it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. In that case...
I wish Stevens had then been asked, "Can you explain to the American consumers why it is not necessary to have these oil executives sworn in before their testimonies?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Document Says Oil Chiefs Met With Cheney Task Force
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/15/AR2005111501842.html

A White House document shows that executives from big oil companies met with Vice President Cheney's energy task force in 2001 -- something long suspected by environmentalists but denied as recently as last week by industry officials testifying before Congress.

The document, obtained this week by The Washington Post, shows that officials from Exxon Mobil Corp., Conoco (before its merger with Phillips), Shell Oil Co. and BP America Inc. met in the White House complex with the Cheney aides who were developing a national energy policy, parts of which became law and parts of which are still being debated.

In a joint hearing last week of the Senate Energy and Commerce committees, the chief executives of Exxon Mobil Corp., Chevron Corp. and ConocoPhillips said their firms did not participate in the 2001 task force. The president of Shell Oil said his company did not participate "to my knowledge," and the chief of BP America Inc. said he did not know.

...more...

Oil Executives Deny Misleading Congress

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/30/AR2005113001800.html

excerpt:

John Hofmeister, chairman of Shell Oil Co., said Shell representatives did not meet with the task force but added, "Shell representatives did meet with the administration _ including the vice president and his staff _ on a broad range of energy policy issues."

Exxon Mobil Corp. said its chairman, Lee Raymond, responded accurately when he said no one at the company participated in a task force meeting _ as the question was phrased by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J.

In its letter, however, Exxon Mobil confirmed that company officials met with a Bush administration official for 45 minutes on Feb. 14, 2001, to discuss the "global energy supply and demand situation." On the same day, the company said, the same information was given to members of Congress and others. The Cheney task force issued its report on energy priorities in May 2001.

Lautenberg called the executives' clarifications "corporate doublespeak that only further demonstrates the need for a criminal investigation" of their Nov. 9 testimony. He said he planned to discuss the issue further with Justice Department officials on Thursday.

...more...

Did oil execs lie to Congress?
Report contradicts big oil execs testimony denying a White House meeting. Democrats seek probe.


http://money.cnn.com/2005/11/16/news/fortune500/oil_execs.reut/

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrats asked the U.S. attorney general Wednesday to investigate whether top executives from big oil companies lied to Congress when they said their companies did not take part in Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force.

Democrats and environmental groups have fought unsuccessfully to find out which energy industry executives met privately with Cheney's group in 2001 as it prepared a broad plan friendly to oil industry interests. Environmental groups said they were mostly excluded from the discussions.

At a Senate hearing last week on record oil profits, Democratic Sen. Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey asked five executives, "Did your company or any representatives in your companies participate in Vice President Cheney's energy force in 2001?"

Each executive answered the question in the negative.

...more...

Go Lautenberg! You have these guys by the balls - now squeeze!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Thanks for the context! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wonder if they discussed campaign contribution$ to NeoCons
in this secret privileged communication meeting/s? Did the execs bring bag$ of money to the White House task force?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oil execs deny misleading Senate (Misleading vs lying?)
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B5D5E1CC2%2DA4F1%2D46FA%2DABDB%2D70F61BC82865%7D&siteid=mktw

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - The Senate's top Democrat pressed the Justice Department Thursday to investigate whether oil company executives lied to senators last month when they denied participation in Vice President Dick Cheney's 2001 energy task force.

Five oil company CEOs have subsequently acknowledged contacts between corporate representatives and Bush administration officials on energy-related issues, but have also insisted they truthfully answered Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., regarding their participation in Vice President Dick Cheney's 2001 energy task force.

"I find it deeply disturbing that energy company CEOs may have made false statements before Congress about their involvement in the secretive Cheney energy task force," said Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., in a statement issued Thurday.

"When evidence arises that some of the statements made to Congress may be false, it calls into question a witness's entire testimony and undermines Congress's constitutional role," Reid said.

The White House has repeatedly refused requests for information on who met with the task force, which formulated a series of energy policy proposals in 2001.

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silvermachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Much to my shock...
...Joe Scarborough of all people has been pushing this story. He has had Barbara Boxer on at least twice and was extremely supportive and laudatory concerning her efforts. I almost thought I was in a parallel universe.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/10003371/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-01-05 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. wow...
i am shocked, just read the transcript.... sounds like they were hitting on each other, kinda chummy like... is there a video link? Maybe i was just imagining it... i'd hate to think Babs'd be into joey...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. ask them under oath about asking for Iraq War. Palast has some on record
for "regime change."

The biggest foreign policy change we need is to stop killing people and overthrowing their governments every time an oil company or sweatshop or plantatio owner gets their knickers in a knot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W stands for Wacko Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Senate rules no longer permit minority party oversight! Senate a farce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Broken_Hero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-05 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good!!!...
and Stevens can rot in hell...:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC