Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. to lift safety net for Yellowstone grizzlies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 11:43 AM
Original message
U.S. to lift safety net for Yellowstone grizzlies
Link

WASHINGTON - Noting that the grizzly bear population in the Yellowstone area has thrived in recent years, the Bush administration on Tuesday announced that it plans to remove federal protections for the animals in the areas around the national park.

“A population that was once plummeting towards extinction is now recovered,” Interior Secretary Gale Norton said in making the announcement. “These bears are now no longer endangered” and should be removed from the Endangered Species Act listing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bears are evil and they want our honey. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And our picnic baskets (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pushycat Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. The bears are now endangering extractive interests and must
be delisted now. Clears the political pathway for the drillers, loggers, etc. to move in. When the bears get in the way, they can legally 'control' them. Viola, every man wins. (those not human don't count).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Does this mean we can now run them over with our ATVs?
Just asking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's pretty close to what I was thinking...
Here's how a rancher can justify that grizzly rug in his den:

Go out and kill a lame or dying cow.
Run over it with a lawn mower a few times.
Go kill a grizzly.
Blame the cow death on the griz.
Visit your local taxidermist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goju Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. And hed wind up in jail
Delisted doesnt mean open season. Try that with a moose in the area and youd end up in jail, no matter what the excuse. Moose, at least in Idaho, is a once a lifetime hunt, no exceptions. Grizzlies wont be hunted at all (montana state law does allow grizzly hunting now, but its in violation of the esa).

Delisting has been on the agenda for a while. If they cant delist species that are on it, the program isnt working.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. the goal of the endangered species act is delisting
this should be viewed as a success. it took at least 3 decades but nonetheless, a success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, the goal of *Gale Norton* is delisting species
for the economic benefit of her and her boss' special interests.

The goal of the Endangered Species Act is conservation:

"The purposes of this Act are to provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be conserved, to provide a program for the conservation of such endangered species and threatened species, and...(more)"

Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. here is a link from the FWS
"conservation" simply isn't good enough. Recovery is what is important. Having species listed as endangered in perpetuity is not "good". the recovery and stability of endangered species is what is important.

I am glad the grizzly is being delisted. It shows the population has expanded and is stable.

am I happy they will hunt grizzlies? no. but I am happy that there are enough that they can actually even talk about that.

http://www.fws.gov/endangered/pubs/esa_basics.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wrong, again...
"It shows the population has expanded and is stable."

That should read..."The Secretary of the Interior under Bush, a president who wants to open wilderness areas to development, has shown that the population has expanded and is stable."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I do not care about the politics, the ESA has operated for 30 years
under both Democratic and Republican administrations. The bald eagle was delisted a few years back and now the grizzly. I think this is fantastic news.

http://www.journalnet.com/articles/2005/07/17/news/local/news01.txt

lots of other links on it too.

now that the population is expanding, I would expect to hear about more grizzly/people encounters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The thing about those bald eagles...
is that there is not an industry in existence that will profit from their deaths.

Hunting services and ranchers, for example, both have a vested economic interest in the killing of bears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. hunting is pretty big business
I am not sure how the states within the grizzlies' home range will respond. those states will be responsible for the bears' management including hunts if they so desire.

grizzlies/brown bears are hunted in Alaska already. again, I don't want to see grizzly hunts but am glad the population seems to be recovering.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mixed feelings....
I haven't seen this at Yellowstone, but camping in the Grand Tetons last summer we had grizzly bears roaming IN the campground. This was a mainstream and not a wilderness campground. Campers are told they are in the grizzlys' home and we should respect that. Not everyone has the safety of a hard-sided camper, and I feel that not only dangerous wild animals ought to be protected, but that there ought to be some protection for the people who come there...

On another note, it came to mind on my last trip to Yellowstone, that it seemed the park was the breeding ground for the NRA...just a joke...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't trust these * assholes to delist any species.
These * assholes and that norton POS always have ulterior motives.

I recall there are other species these assholes tried to delist that were challenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC