Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. says no need for N.Korea civil nuclear program

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:19 PM
Original message
U.S. says no need for N.Korea civil nuclear program
http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=143&sid=5999802&cKey=1123698031000

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - North Korea's nuclear track record undermines its demand to have a peaceful atomic program, the top U.S. negotiator in six-party nuclear disarmament talks with Pyongyang said on Wednesday.

North Korea's insistence that it be allowed to pursue a peaceful nuclear program was a major stumbling block in 13 days of talks in Beijing this month among the United States, North and South Korea, Japan, China and Russia. The six are due to resume negotiations the week of August 29.

Christopher Hill, the U.S. envoy to the talks, told reporters Washington wants all of North Korea's nuclear facilities dismantled, not just the program believed to have produced enough material for several nuclear bombs. snip

Energy-starved North Korea, which appears nearly all black in satellite photos, says it has the sovereign right to develop peaceful nuclear power to meet its electricity needs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cool -- what do they think about me going to get lunch?
Am I really hungry or not? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Claybrook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They have no problem with you getting lunch
The big concern is that your dessert may come in the form of a mushroom cloud.

And by the way, they know where your lunch is: it's in the areas west, north, and east of Tikrit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. So they have no non-nuclear energy resources
but they have no need for nuclear energy. I guess they should just pound sand. Or die. Or both.

I wonder how our track record as the only nation that has ever used nuclear weapons in war stacks up with the standard being used to measure Korea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. NK's biggest problem is FOOD not energy
They should not embark on any kind of high-tech development until they can feed their own people without international aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They are starving due to lack of ENERGY
Need to irrigate to grow crops. It takes energy to irrigate. Unless someone can figure out a better way.

Don't need food if you are freezing to death in the winter. Need ENERGY to not freeze to death during the winter. Unless someone can figure out a better way.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smb Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Their Biggest Problem
...is that the country is run by somebody who belongs in a rubber room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. don't buy into the insane leader bullshit
he might be a vile tyrant but NK has played us very smoothly. Not the handiwork of a lunatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smb Donating Member (761 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You Know The Old Joke
A guy gets a flat while driving in front of a lunatic asylum. He starts to change it, but a careless move flips the nuts for that tire into a sewer grate.

Trying to figure out what to do, he notices one of the inmates of the asylum watching him. The inmate waves to get his attention and yells, "Take one nut off each of the other wheels. That'll hold it till you get to a shop."

"Thanks. How come somebody as smart as you is in there?"

"I'm in here for being CRAZY, not for being STUPID."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. But energy is key to having the resources to get food.
Agriculture does take electricity. Furthermore, north Korea receives its hard currency reserves, with which is purchases some foreign food, with money obtained from exports of goods that require energy to produce. Additionally, energy is required for heating in the harsh winters and transport of food.

Nuclear energy is a good solution for north Korea's energy shortage, and would indeed help alleviate its economic problems which are the root cause of the food shortage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bush's strategy seems to be non-proliferation by force
I think the game is to ensure there are no more nuclear powers, even if that takes a nuclear attack by the U.S., since these countries can't be 'trusted' with nuclear weapons the way the current nuclear club can.

Paradoxical and hypocritical? Of course.

Achievable? For a while, if pursued mercilessly and at the cost of intermittent warfare with half the human race. But only for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. There's something more going on here - not sure what though. The US
wants NK to stay a bit wack-o, they want that instability next door to China. This came up a few weeks ago in the SMW thread with Kinda-sleazy piping up.

Not sure how many of the links still work. Sorry about the cut and paste but I'm too tired tonight to try and piece it all together again.

China is quickly becoming an economic threat to the US. They're making friends and business partners in countries where Shrub is making enemies. About the only "weapon" Shrub has to use against China is a collapse of Kim Jong-il's regime. Something I think Shrub is going to want to keep in his pocket for later use.


ozymandius (1000+ posts) Wed Jul-13-05 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. related: Aramco (Saudi) joins forces with China’s Sinopec
BEIJING: Saudi Arabia’s state-owned Aramco said yesterday it has joined with China Petroleum and Chemical Corp (Sinopec) on a massive oil and chemicals venture in China’s Fujian province.

Abdullah Jum’ah, president and chief executive of Aramco, said it highlighted the importance of China as a oil consumer, and said his company was ready to work with Beijing to keep its economy racing along.

The Wall Street Journal said the deal was valued at $3.5bn, although Abdullah refused to comment. But he said more projects with Sinopec were in the pipeline.

“That will expand an existing refinery complex to provide additional quantities of refined products and petrochemicals,” he said at a briefing here.

lots more...http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=44196&version=1&template_id=48&parent_id=28


Printer Friendly | Link | | Top
54anickel (1000+ posts) Wed Jul-13-05 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Sort of makes one wonder how Rice's rattling of North Korea ties in,
especially so soon after NK agreed to return to the table.


Printer Friendly | Link | | Top
54anickel (1000+ posts) Wed Jul-13-05 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. U.S. tries courtesy with North Korea
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPSt...

BEIJING -- Secret diplomatic intrigue and economic pressure were key factors, but North Korea's surprise announcement of a return to the nuclear bargaining table may be largely due to a newly respectful tone by U.S. leaders who now refer to the regime's dictator as "Mr. Kim."

After a year of stalemate in the nuclear crisis, a diplomatic breakthrough on the weekend led to an announcement that North Korean officials will return to Beijing later this month to resume the six-nation negotiations on the crisis.

The deal was sealed Saturday night at a three-hour dinner between U.S. and North Korean diplomats at a Beijing restaurant. The biggest factor in the deal may have been Washington's new politeness toward the nuclear-armed regime.

For years, U.S. leaders had been denouncing the regime as "an outpost of tyranny," a member of the "axis of evil." President George W. Bush declared that he "loathed" the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-il.

When the nuclear negotiations broke down last year, Pyongyang made it clear that respect from the United States was a crucial issue in the discussions. North Korean officials demanded a better attitude from Washington. And they insisted on face-to-face bilateral talks between the two countries, despite the U.S. preference for the six-nation process.

more...


http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-513...

Kim Jong Il Wants Nuclear-Free Korea

snip>

China, the North's last major ally, has campaigned hard over the past year to restart the disarmament negotiations. Beijing is believed to supply North Korea with up to one-third of its food and one-quarter of its energy needs.

snip>

North Korea said over the weekend it would return to the nuclear talks after being reassured by the top U.S. nuclear envoy that Washington recognized Pyongyang's sovereignty. The North has stayed away from the weapons negotiations since June 2004, citing ``hostile'' U.S. policies.

Pyongyang declared in February that it had nuclear weapons and has insisted that the nuclear standoff can only be discussed with the United States. The North's claim has not been verified independently.

In March, it declared that it should be treated equally as a nuclear power, and it demanded that the six-nation talks address the disarmament of all countries involved - including the United States.

Like that's ever going to happen

more...


Printer Friendly | Link | | Top
ozymandius (1000+ posts) Wed Jul-13-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
35. I don't think they want N. Korea at any table.
Their absence keeps China off balance and distracted by its kooky neighbor.


Printer Friendly | Link | | Top
54anickel (1000+ posts) Wed Jul-13-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. Seoul Not to Abuse Energy Aid Plan
http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200507/kt2005071...

South Korea would never use its proposed electricity aid to North Korea as ``leverage" to pressure the impoverished country once its nuclear weapons problem is resolved, a high-profile official in Seoul said Wednesday.

``When the North dismantles its nuclear program and the South starts to provide electricity, it means they are moving forward toward co-prosperity on the peninsula based on mutual trust," he said on condition of anonymity. ``How can we use it as leverage to pressure the North?"

snip>

South Korea's plan is to give the North 2 million kilowatts of electricity annually if it agrees to dismantle all of its nuclear programs. South Korea will build power transmission facilities in the coming three years, during which the North should complete denuclearization.

The targeted amount of 2 million kilowatts per year came out of a calculation based on the amount supposed to be produced by two light-water nuclear reactors, which had been built by KEDO according to the 1994 deal between the North and the United States.

The $4.6 billion plan for the two reactors has been in crisis over the past two years as the U.S. and Japan wanted to scrap it. With 35 percent of construction work completed, $1.54 billion has been poured into the KEDO project, 70 percent of which was paid by South Korea.

snip>

Officials in Seoul said the KEDO project is not dismantled for good, but just suspended for more years.

more...



China signals high-stakes role in North Korea
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/SP343756.htm

BEIJING, July 13 (Reuters) - An old ally of Pyongyang and the source of most of its aid, China can wield both a carrot and stick to woo North Korea back to six-party talks, but as early as last week there were grumblings it was using neither.

snip>

But when North Korea pulled out last year, the credibility of China as a world power aiming to prove it had the diplomatic skills to match its economic clout was on the line.

snip>

While China insisted the crux of the problem was mistrust between the United States and North Korea, there were quiet grumblings that China was not using the leverage of food and fuel aid to strongarm Pyongyang back to the table.

For China, the stakes are high.

"I really don't think they are using aid as pressure, because they have said very clearly that whatever Washington decides they will continue supporting North Korea," said Kathi Zellweger of the Catholic charity Caritas.

snip>

A collapse of Kim Jong-il's regime in North Korea could lead to millions of refugees spilling across its borders which would result in chaos for both countries.

more...


Hmmm, China's reluctant to use "leverage" of aid, and Rice is suddenly all for lots of aid from South Korea. Trying to give the carrot and stick to a more willing player? :shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC