Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Priest indicted on rape charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:49 AM
Original message
Priest indicted on rape charges
http://www.cleveland.com/newsflash/cleveland/index.ssf?/base/sports-15/1121312766115920.xml&storylist=cleveland

7/14/2005, 12:35 a.m. ET
By JOE KAY
The Associated Press

CINCINNATI (AP) — A Roman Catholic priest already convicted of soliciting sex from an undercover police officer was indicted Wednesday on charges he raped a boy while he was a church pastor in the 1990s.

The Archdiocese of Cincinnati placed the Rev. Raymond Larger, 54, on administrative leave following the indictment by a Hamilton County grand jury. Prosecutors said the victim came forward earlier this year.

It's the second time that Larger has faced sex charges.

In 2003, Larger pleaded no contest to misdemeanor charges of public indecency and soliciting sex from a male undercover officer in a Dayton park. The archdiocese returned him to active duty last year over the objection of a support group for victims of clergy abuse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. CINCINNATI
Uh oooh...here comes Santorum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Cincinnati is a very red town, right ?
And I'm not talking about the baseball team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Santorum will blame Boston liberals for this.
Sorry, Boston (and Massachusetts) for our idiot Senator from PA.:cry:

Our best apology to all of you will come in his defeat in 06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Awe shit. Won't they ever learn? I thought this stuff was in the past!
As a Catholic, I'm ashamed at how the Church has handled these things. If this was the fundie church, I'd be screaming. Well, it's not theirs, it's mine! and I AM SCREAMING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Well done.
It will take such screaming if this establishment is ever to be dragged into the 21st century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Husted Heisman
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=post&forum=102&topic_id=1627053&mesg_id=1627053 (4th story down)

Ohio House Speaker Jon Husted has plenty of time for fishing with lobbyists in Florida. But he doesn't have time for Regina Scolaro.

Scolaro sued Cleveland's Catholic Diocese in 2002, alleging that a priest molested her in the mid-'80s. But since state law bars people older than 20 from suing over abuse suffered as a child, she was out of luck.

So last week Scolaro, who now lives in San Francisco, traveled to Ohio to see why Husted is intentionally stalling a bill that raises the age to 38 and provides a one-year window allowing anyone to sue for abuses committed after 1970 <"The Sin That Keeps On Giving," April 27>.

But Husted -- recently ensnared in yet another scandal involving legislators living large on the lobbyists' dime -- gave Scolaro his best Heisman. First he ignored her e-mails, she says. Then he had a staffer call back to blow her off. The message: The Speaker's too busy. But he'd be happy to have someone who doesn't know anything serve you tap water, nod, and smile...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Pope Tells Journalists To Search For 'Truth'
Pope Tells Journalists To Search For 'Truth'
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/23/AR2005042301372.html?nav=rss_world/europe

The Vatican has sought the intervention of the U.S. State Department to declare Pope Benedict XVI immune from a sexual abuse lawsuit filed here, according to court documents.
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/3201751

Vatican said Monday there was no investigation under way of allegations that the Mexican founder of a conservative religious order sexually abused seminarians
http://www.winktv.com/x466.xml?URL=http://localhost/APWIREFEED/d8a8vi600.xml

Vatican Reportedly Clears Priest
Vaca, a former priest, is one of at least eight men in Mexico and the United States who have accused the Rev. Marcial Maciel Degollado of molesting them when they were teenage seminary students in the 1940s, '50s and '60s.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/22/AR2005052200966.html?nav=rss_world/europe

Despite the horrific drumbeat of child molestation revelations, however, sensible Catholics hoping for a more transparent and less sexually repressed church shouldn't hold their breath. The new pope is not only a longtime leader of vicious church attacks on "evil" gays, he also has shamefully blamed the molestation scandal on the media.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/thenation/20050524/cm_thenation/20050606scheer0524_1

Vatican Accused of Child Molestation Cover-Up
http://atheism.about.com/b/a/098516.htm

Survivors Network says the overwhelming majority of its members have never sued and are too traumatized to do so. They say they adopted their tactics after bishops promised for years to take action against guilty clergy, then never did.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7463011/page/2

Pope's Nazi past
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7576505 /









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. its BOSTON'S fault!
right? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. WHY WHY WHY??!! "The archdiocese returned him to active duty last year"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Because the kid was trying to seduce him
:sarcasm:

At least that was how the Church documentation of the Boston cases often characterized the issue: Those damn slutty six-year-olds (that was one case that stuck in my head) were asking for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. To Demonstrate That They Are Above The Law
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 11:21 AM by AndyTiedye
That is what this is really about, what any sexual abuse is about,
asserting one's power over others. They rape children because they can.
They can do it and get away with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Meanwhile, the Pope closes in on those subversive Harry Potter novels.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. I posted this suggestion before and it was deleted the second time.


Please think about this before complaining. My thought is that the very paradigm that priest must be celibate selects for the abnormal person.

But first, a brief history of clerical celibacy:
http://www.futurechurch.org/fpm/history.htm
______________________________________________________________________

306-Council of Elvira, Spain, decree #43: a priest who sleeps with his wife the night before Mass will lose his job.
325-Council of Nicea: decreed that after ordination a priest could not marry. Proclaimed the Nicene Creed.
352-Council of Laodicea: women are not to be ordained. This suggests that before this time there was ordination of women.
385-Pope Siricius left his wife in order to become pope. Decreed that priests may no longer sleep with their wives.

Fifth Century
401-St. Augustine wrote, “Nothing is so powerful in drawing the spirit of a man downwards as the caresses of a woman.”

Sixth Century
567-2nd Council of Tours: any cleric found in bed with his wife would be excommunicated for a year and reduced to the lay state.
580-Pope Pelagius II: his policy was not to bother married priests as long as they did not hand over church property to wives or children.
590-604-Pope Gregory “the Great” said that all sexual desire is sinful in itself (meaning that sexual desire is intrinsically evil?).

Ninth Century
836-Council of Aix-la-Chapelle openly admitted that abortions and infanticide took place in convents and monasteries to cover up activities of uncelibate clerics.
St. Ulrich, a holy bishop, argued from scripture and common sense that the only way to purify the church from the worst excesses of celibacy was to permit priests to marry.

Eleventh Century
1045-Pope Boniface IX dispensed himself from celibacy and resigned in order to marry.
1074-Pope Gregory VII said anyone to be ordained must first pledge celibacy: ‘priests first escape from the clutches of their wives.’
1095-Pope Urban II had priests’ wives sold into slavery, children were abandoned.
_____________________________________________________________________

In fact, as late as the fifteenth century half of the priests in the RCC were married and accepted by their congregations.

My point at the start was to argue that enforced celibacy selected for the very tendencies the we today find abhorrent.

Man (both the male and female varieties) is born with some innate, hard wired drives. After survival, the most forceful is procreation, the drive to pass on our genes. I would argue that celibacy is even more difficult because it negates another hardwired need: The need to be loved and accepted by another.

If this is true, and it is accepted psychology now, then anyone pledging celibacy for life is going against his basic needs as a human being. So it would follow naturally that for those in training for the priesthood, denied the contact of females, would turn to each other for contact. The problem comes when those in the priesthood, with the power of their position, turn to those innocents they are supposed to be shepherding and use them for substitutes.

This subset of what is called abnormal is present in all of society, but in the general population they don't have the cover of their position to hide behind. In a setting such as the church, they would be attracted to the facts that they would have power, cover, and plausible deniability. They would be powerfully attracted to the position, not to forge that in their early years they would feel apart from society and the priesthood would certainly satisfy that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaRa Donating Member (705 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. This is exactly what a former priest writes about
I think his name is Kennedy and he writes essentially that the Catholic Church's position with their priests creates and promotes sexual deviance; that by not allowing men to develop normal sexual relations (adult relations) that the Church sets up this wicked scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voltaire99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Reasonable idea. However...
That line of thinking is plausible.

Of course, you aren't accounting for the problem of married people being pedophiles. Marriage selects for an extremely broad group, structures sexuality in the relationship, and yet still fosters abuse. Do you have any evidence that Catholic priests are likelier than married heterosexuals to be pedophiles?

I suspect the celibacy requirement is part of a bouquet of factors that produces priest pedophilia, some of which you mention: secrecy, authoritarianism, the catcechism's sexual confusion and repression, the concepts of "sin" and "confession" that ritualize invasive priest behavior, and most importantly a hierarchical leadership that places its interests ahead of its own parishoners' safety.

Short of putting CCTV cameras in churches and rectories, I don't think the problem will end soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zara Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Rick "Man on Dog" Santorum: Must have been a LIBERAL priest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. YEAH...only hundreds more to indict! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC