Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Air Force: Tests for Lost Nuke Found No 'significant' Radiation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 02:19 PM
Original message
Air Force: Tests for Lost Nuke Found No 'significant' Radiation
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBEX3LGG7E.html

SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) - Government testing for possible signs of a nuclear bomb lost off the Georgia coast in 1958 found no significant radiation, the Air Force said in a letter to a Georgia newspaper.
Last September, government scientists took radiation readings and soil samples in waters near Tybee Island after a retired Air Force pilot who has searched privately for the bomb reported finding possible radioactive clues.

The government has not released a final report, but a letter by Air Force Col. James DeFrank, written in response to a story by The Associated Press, said government tests did not match radiation levels reported by Derek Duke.

"Since the interagency team did not find the 'significant' radiation levels Mr. Duke's team reported, the focus shifted to the arduous task of analyzing data to determine what the samples did contain," wrote DeFrank, the Air Force deputy director of public affairs.

Boy, thats a relief...NOT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. my guess is that...
... the bomb in question is long gone, and was picked up by a submarine (ours or theirs) long ago.

Many of the beaches in the South contain very small amounts of thorium and smaller amounts of uranium, as monazite. Depending upon the concentration of monazite in the sand, the radiation level can exceed normal background.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I remember in the early 70's the navy lost something at sea and said
there was no danger. A friend of mine was a chemist and when he read the list of chemicals that were released, he called them liars. I don't think anything has changed for the better in the last 35 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why would the military lie? Just to influence public opinion?
Edited on Tue Apr-12-05 02:47 PM by JohnOneillsMemory
Psy-ops is their first resort while war is the 'last resort.'

Remember this when considering candidates in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. My understanding is it's uranium and TNT...
...no plutonium capsule to start the chain reaction. So the real danger would be people mucking around with it, eh? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. We (EOD Unit Two)
Charleston, South Carolina spent many weeks searching for that weapon. It was thought to be buried in the mud/sand in shallow waters.

If the parachute did not open when jettisoned it might be buried very deep in the bottom or in pieces.

I did not personally go on that job as I was on leave at the time (Whoooo Hoooo).

Reports of the CLASSIFIED search efforts were front page news in Savannah and Charleston complete with pictures of some of the EOD divers.

Exciting times.

180

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC