Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anthrax Scare Closes 3 Military Mailrooms (update)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:35 PM
Original message
Anthrax Scare Closes 3 Military Mailrooms (update)
Edited on Tue Mar-15-05 05:40 PM by jpak
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-exec/2005/mar/15/031504825.html

Hundreds of postal workers were offered antibiotics Tuesday after initial tests detected anthrax in a pair of military mailrooms. Nobody reported symptoms of the disease as officials awaited results of further testing.

<snip>

Asked about suspicious results this week, McClellan said initial anthrax testing was positive, secondary testing was negative but "we're still waiting on more definitive results."

<snip>

Follow-up tests were being conducted at the U.S. Army Research Institute for Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md. They could take up to three days to complete.

<snip>

A filter on a device that screens mail for chemical and biological agents at the Pentagon's Remote Delivery Facility was pulled for testing Thursday, said Pentagon spokesman Glenn Flood. The tests take three days before results are available, he said, and on Monday morning, the tests of the Thursday filter came back positive for anthrax.

<more>

on edit: The third mailroom was closed today...(and more details)

Anthrax Closes Another Military Mailroom

http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-exec/2005/mar/15/031504687.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. so many "maybe" happenings of late!
maybe anthrax, maybe attacks might happen possibly in schools and parks,etc. maybe..maybe..maybe...whats this weeks attack of maybes about? Is it a diversion? Is it a bravo for catching this stuff by bushco? Is it a build up for some announcement? Is some newly assigned boogy man after us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. It's a juggling act.
Look at all the scary things the juggler is moving through the air

He hopes you won't notice the sneaky legislation and military plans being made behind the scenes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. What doe a positive anthrax test imply?
Ok, assuming it was sufficient to go over the top of some threshold for an alert.

What does that mean?

Admitting that the machinery at the pentagon remote mail facility might have detected anthrax, its detection must be measured against some background occurrence.

How common is anthrax?

What is the threshold of the alarm's detection system?

What is the likelihood of a false positive or a true positive from natural sources?

I don't know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I'm sure that the details of the surveillance system won't
be revealed to the public.

It is probably conservative (like the chemical weapons test kits carried by US troops in Iraq) and more likely to produce false positives.

Anthrax is pretty ubiquitous - found in soils world-wide.

There is another Bacillus species that is nearly identical to the anthrax Bacillus - it takes a little bit more detailed DNA analysis to ID the two species....

more info here...

http://textbookofbacteriology.net/Anthrax.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Anthrax
Edited on Tue Mar-15-05 06:08 PM by Columbia
Usually initial tests are done utilizing a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test which compares sample DNA strands to anthrax DNA. This is highly reliable, but not 100%. Considering how often these tests are done, false positives are a definite certainty. Both live and "dead" spores and natural and "weaponized" anthrax can be detected with this test.

The 100% test comes utilizing a bacteria culture and seeing if anthrax spores develop. This can take approximately 2-3 days to complete.

All this information is available in the public domain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. But even if there are viable anthrax spores present how many times
can you expect that out of 1X10^6 pieces of mail?

I am guessing that although anthrax is relatively common in the soil its detection on mail is typically very low.

But that guessing makes me vulnerable to being manipulated by an administration with a proven record of screwing with public information.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. It depends on the threat
Are you talking about how often naturally occuring anthrax will get onto mail enough to set off the detector? Probably next to zero.

If anthrax is positively detected (after the culture test) in mail, it is probably weaponized anthrax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Thanks, that's basically what I want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. No prob.
I'm here to help. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. From previous reports, it was said that the mail had been irradiated
Edited on Tue Mar-15-05 06:48 PM by jpak
That suggested the spores were not be viable.

Which would certainly complicate the follow-up DNA analyses.

Single-cell PCR of the irradiated spores??? Dunno.

They were also swabbing people yesterday for cultures (again, the mail bags had been irradiated). I thought that was odd.

If they do find viable spores, that would suggest that the contaminated packages may have originated from within the mail room.

Yes yes yes - all speculation I know...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Columbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Spores are spores
It doesn't say whether the mail was irradiated before or after the test (or whether it even was a PCR test, although that is likely).

So, yes it is all speculation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. I guess Fucktard's poll numbers are getting worse...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Just about says it all. Numbers down. NEW TERROR!
Just wait and see for what happens next. CONDI AND KAREN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ah, quit calling it the military, newspeople!
Heard them say regarding this "apparently targeting the military" on CNN last night.
It's the Pentagon.
Sure, you might find the military's leadership there, but that's not like military military. It takes no courage to be Rumsfeld or his toadies.
Don't try to turn this into a "they don't support our troops" thing.
It's targeting the military when it's in a mailbag at company level.
At the Pentagon it's something else altogether, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Agreed! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinonedown Donating Member (329 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Does it matter?
I mean, most here seem to think that this is all made up, to improve *bUSH poll numbers. So does it matter if it is the Pentagon or whatever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Does to me.
The Pentagon isn't "the military". The Pentagon uses the military like a tool to accomplish what should be sound national objectives.
More recently the Pentagon has used the military more like a club in the hands of a drunk.
If the Pentagon was military, you wouldn't see generals fired for voicing genuine concerns over the civilian "leadership's" lack of planning and the hiring of other generals whose chief qualification appears to be burying their noses in Bush's ass and keeping them there.
A genuine attack against the military would elicit some sympathy from me.
Is it another fake terra alert? That's quite possible. This administration has a history of playing the terra card and it has been shown that they play it when shrub's poll numbers dip.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. or - it might have originated from the Pentagon mail room
no one knows yet...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. In addition
The second facility is that of a federal contractor (SAIC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. And what's the terror alert color code now?
Oh, I forgot, they only use that when there is an election coming up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Pee-your-pants yellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. Of course, just because the
Pentagon's detectors found this, that doesn't mean anybody was sending Anthrax to the Pentagon. Could just mean that the letters in question went through another postal facility where the actual spiked letters passed through.

I wonder how many postal facilities have detectors?

There was rumor, repeated on another thread, that the letters originated inside the Pentagon, but I find that kind of hard to believe. The perp would have to be a moron. Another poster said that, in an apparently Anthrax related occurence, a SAIC building was "locked down" and the employees then sent home.

That's an interesting twist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. in Virginia: thousands affected....THREE buildings CLOSED (link)
Edited on Tue Mar-15-05 06:53 PM by diamond14

main link
http://www.jrnl.com/


go to VIRGINIA for local coverage, this is a pdf link showing the actual newspaper here today....

http://www.jrnl.com/PDFs/nva/tuesday.pdf


summary:

THOUSANDS locked down in their offices in Virginia


TWO mail facilities in Virginia shut down: do not return to work...


Three buildings in Falls Church, VA, SHUT DOWN...many other offices affected outside mail facilities...powdery substance found in an 8th floor mailroom...all buildings CLOSED until further testing (3 or 4 more days)....THOUSANDS on antibiotics....








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
23. Hmm. Up to now attacks were RW attacks against "liberals."
The anthrax came from a Ft. Detrick secret military lab.
Sent to Democrats.
Sent to "liberal" media figureheads.
Well, also sent to that tabloid guy that printed pictures of Bush's daughters.

And, now it is ALLEGEDLY sent THROUGH military infrastructure until LEVELS of FALSE POSITIVES can be confirmed.

Just as Bush needs a draft and higher polling numbers.

Things tht make ya go: Hmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC