Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rewritten Bible banishes saints

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 08:35 PM
Original message
Rewritten Bible banishes saints
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/03/15/nbible15.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/03/15/ixhome.html

Rewritten Bible banishes saints
-----------------------------------------
By Jonathan Petre, Religion Correspondent
(Filed: 15/03/2005)
-----------------------------------------

For readers of the Bible confused by its archaic language, such as its use of the term "stoned" for a form of execution rather than the effects of smoking dope, help is at hand.

One of the world's most widely read Bibles, the New International Version, has been modernised by a team of 15 American and British scholars and is published today.

Gone is the word "aliens", which the academics thought was invariably associated in the minds of the younger generation with extra-terrestrials. It is replaced with "foreigners".

Even the term "saints" is deemed to be too "ecclesiastical" and has been banished, to be replaced with "God's chosen people". The Virgin Mary is no longer "with child"; she is "pregnant".

And, to the dismay of traditionalists, who will suspect a feminist agenda, "inclusive" language has been introduced throughout.



complete story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/03/15/nbible15.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/03/15/ixhome.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't suppose they've replaced the appalling "handmaiden"
with the original "woman." That would be expecting too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. How about....
Paul with Sex-obsessed Fool?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing like updating the translation on God's unerring word.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renaissanceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. *GASP* You mean that they can actually change the wording
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh right... people really think stoned means to smoke a joint
when they read it in the bible. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. What did they do about "knowing"
and "spilling seed"????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. "Boinking" and "pulling off" might draw the younger crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Now if they'd just replace "Jesus" with "tolerant liberal Jewish rabbi"
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. That's a good description of Jesus...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
41. Carpenter...
You forgot un-unionized carpenter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Agreed!
Edited on Mon Mar-14-05 10:42 PM by AuntiBush
Unmarried abbi's were not allowed in temples when Christ walked the earth. Interesting thoughts there when referring to what Gnostics suggest.

They believe Mary Magdalene was the Apostle's Apostle.

Edited: MY typos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Something else to worry about
If it's not Janet's boob, it's Michael. If it's not Michael, it's Martha. If it's not Martha, it's the New International Version of the Bible.

When, oh when will my odyssey of suffering come to an end?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Learn Hebrew, Greek & Latin If You Really Want To Understand What
is written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. What about the Gnostic Gospels....
...no matter how it's interpreted - todays 'modern' Bible is incomplete....

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/gnostics.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. The gnostic gospels were generally written later than the canonical
books of the New Testament. The core of the NT was written in the first century. Some gnostic gospel fans will argue they were written earlier and the canonical writings were written later, but modern secular scholarship tends to put the gnostic stuff from the mid second century on.

Basically, the fourth-century council that arrived at the modern canon choose the books it choose according to the criterion of apostolic authorship (written by the apostles or their immediate followers). We now know their choices weren't always correct (five to seven of the twelve letters of Paul in the NT are now understood not to have been written by him). But the gnostic writings were never under serious consideration because they knew that the writings were much different than the writings they knew were from the apostles or their immediate followers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I'm reading those now.
And contrary to what one side says, other's have done remarkable work contrasting both Gnotic scriptures to Old & NT writings; very similiar in many areas.

1 Major difference that bothers some is Gnostics firmly believe women and all nations of ethnicity are equal. There's more to it, but it's the foundations that they held dear.

I'm finding them very, very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. And re-written so many times...
And chosen. To this day, not one scholar knows for certain "which" John if any wrote Revelations. It's yet to be proven. High-Priest w/big political agenda's supervised which books to in place and many are believed strongly to have been re-written as well.

So, what is the truth? I say keep it simple. Too many read it literally, and forget it was written during a different era, different settings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Great Link on the Gnostics - Entire Book online
Go here: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl_thomas.htm

Literally several books online freely to read, that I bought already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. we Presbyterians banished saints a few centuries ago
We seem to have not yet been struck down by lightning from a wrathful God.

The conservation movement is a breeding ground of communists
and other subversives. We intend to clean them out,
even if it means rounding up every birdwatcher in the country.
--John Mitchell, US Attorney General 1969-72
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. God probably thought
that John Knox was enough punishment to inflict on anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Amazona, may I ask respectfully...
Are you a conservative Democrat? Respectfully, just curious. I'd like to diffuse my thoughts that all Presbyterians are neoconservative Republicans.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. Nobody else replied, so I will....
I was baptized Presbyterian. There are many wealthy Presbyterians, so, it may be that THAT is why you think we're all conservative Dems, if Dems at all! And, certainly, there are many conservatives in the Pres. church.

However, I lean so far left, I could tip over w/ a strong breeze!

There is hope...EVERYWHERE! There are even Southern Baptists who are DEEPLY liberal Dems!

:shrug: Things don't always have to make sense, I suppose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
34. No, even when I dig down deep into my conscious,
I love the intercessions and honoring our saints and martyrs. I must admit, that banishing the saints - the vast majority of us Catholics (liberals even!) are NOT willing to comply with such actions. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. they shoulda kept the "aliens" part
the fundies could add UFO's to their bizarro rapture scenarios.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selteri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
31. They can't have the terroritoy of Bob!
Bob needs money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. No matter how much they embellish it, it's just a bunch of stories
written by a bunch of old people a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. And, to the dismay of traditionalists, who will be required
to think of women as people .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Exactly, SharonAnn... exactly!
Perish their thoughts ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. Almah or bethulah Mary? "Young woman" Mary or "Virgin" Mary?
http://www.appliedlanguage.com/articles/virgin_birth_and_red_underpants.shtml

(snip)

The Old Testament talks about almah 'young woman,' not bethulah 'virgin.' However, the scholars in the 3rd century BC translated the Hebrew almah as parthenos in Greek. Thus the 'young woman' in Hebrew metamorphosed into a 'virgin' in Greek—and she has remained a virgin ever since in translations across the world. The notion of 'virgin birth' was born, thanks to a mistranslation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntiBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Many, many mistranslations and just as many w/political agendas.
Think simple.

We were given a brain, and it says "use it!"
We were given instincts. Think of an alley cat that instinctly knows to give birth without help of the pro's we use, and to defend it's young from predators.

Here we are, humans - higher beings on earth. A brain and instincts, still we ignore our inner-common sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Rose Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
26. The author of The Language Police ,Diane Ravitch, would love this one.
The author of The Language Police ,Diane Ravitch, would love this one.

It would seem that if folks aren't smart enough to know the meanings of these words, perhaps they shouldn't be reading this book. We wouldn't want them to have to study a little to understand the meaning of the written word.

If you have read Ravitch's book you will see the comparison of changes in textbooks and what the translators have done to the Bible. It looks like they are prepping it for use in classrooms.

Textbooks can no longer be gender biased, gender unbalanced,or use words or ideas that might make the reader uncomfortable. They are dumbing down the Bible, but I guess with the education most are getting these days that is the only way to understand it.


:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlashHarry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-05 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. Boy, am I conservative! Give me the King James version!
1607, baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heidler1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
28. How about the flip flopping on things like polygamy. The whole new way
to get into Heaven. In the old Testament it was a life long effort, but no body went to Hell because they hadn't invented it yet. It seems a lot like US dollars you save them up and Bush (God) devalues them when ever he feels like it. Then he wonders why people aren't saving them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
29. They banished the Saints?
Well, they hardly ever beat the spread anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElectroPrincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. LOL daleo, you goof ball ! (tease) still, with each new season ...
I hope the New Orleans Saints win ... now that's optimism. ;)

http://www.neworleanssaints.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Well, they are supposed to be good with miracles.
You never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anitar1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
32. How Many Times Has It Been Rewritten now?
Peopel have been tinkering with the Bible through the ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Azathoth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
33. The Catholic Church ain't gonna like this one bit...
Besides, who's going to come marchin' in if not the saints?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
36. I bet they managed to include the word "Rapture"
even though it's not in the original text.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
37. Have they replaced Jesus with Dubya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
39. 'inclusive" language has been introduced throughout'
oopsie, that accidentally spells it out for everyone, doesn't it?

wouldn't want the bible to be inclusive, would we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
42. This looks like a pretty good traslation. Much easier to read than other
translations I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC