Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unmet health needs costly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:20 AM
Original message
Unmet health needs costly
Some patients in the Sacramento region are twice as likely as others to be hospitalized for preventable health problems that should have been treated in a doctor's office, a new study shows........
Researchers have long known that these and other socioeconomic factors can limit access to health care. The study is the most recent snapshot of local communities with the greatest unmet medical needs.
...
Three clinic visits to treat many common chronic health problems and illnesses that can lead to hospitalization will cost about $760, according to CHW analysis.

A hospital admission after a severe asthma attack - one type of preventable hospitalization - would cost about $5,567. For an ear infection hospitalization, also preventable with clinic care, the price tag would be about $4,200. Hospital stays for pneumonia and bronchitis, often avoidable if doctors catch and treat the symptoms early, run about $7,270.

"I think hospitals have tried clinics because it makes business sense," said Amerish Bera, an assistant dean of admissions at the University of California, Davis, School of Medicine and former head of primary care clinics for Sacramento County.

http://www.sacbee.com/content/business/story/12538078p-13393397c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. and in other news on the "Duh" channel.....
but any sort of universal health coverage doesn't make "good economic sense".


Whatever happened to that bill in Wash.State that would tax large employers who don't offer health insurance? Makes good solid Republican "ownership"/"responsibility" sense to me. Meanwhile, if I use the hospital, my employer and I are paying for those employers who don't offer health insurance. Where's the "ownership" and "responsibility" there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC