Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canada Will Sign On To Missile Defence: Ambassador

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 11:35 PM
Original message
Canada Will Sign On To Missile Defence: Ambassador
From the new World Media Watch up now at http://www.zianet.com/insightanaltical

Tomorrow at Buzzflash.com


1//The Toronto Star, Canada Jan. 9, 2005. 04:51 PM

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1105272065017&call_pageid=968332188492&col=968705899037



CANADA WILL SIGN ON TO MISSILE DEFENCE: AMBASSADOR

Robert Russo, Canadian Press


OTTAWA — The United States is optimistic Canada will sign on to President George W. Bush's missile defence plan before the end of March, Ambassador Paul Cellucci has told The Canadian Press.

Cellucci, who is scheduled to leave his post this spring, said he expects the issue will be resolved before he returns to the U.S.

"We've been told that it will be dealt with over the next couple of months," he said during a brief conversation.

Asked if, based on his discussions, he anticipates that Canada will take part in the controversial missile shield, Cellucci replied: "Yes."


(SNIP)

Participation in missile defence represents a potentially explosive issue for the federal Liberals and could conceivably bring down their minority government.



(MORE)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Canada's new envoy to DC is a Carlyle Group board member
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Frank C. Carlucci is a Carlyle Group member for sure.
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 08:19 PM by 0007
But the article is talking about Paul Cellucci


I'm sorry, I thought you were confused when it was I.

McKenna, 57, has been practising law and sitting on numerous corporate boards since he left office in 1997, including the international advisory board of Carlyle Group, a huge private equity firm based in Washington with close ties to the Bush family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The article I linked is about the new Canadian envoy to DC, McKenna
McKenna, a Canadian, is on the Carlyle board too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Your correct!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. What does the USA NOT UNDERSTAND about "HELL. NO."
Good luck trying to convince the 96% of Canadians who are AGAINST this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Since the other 4% consist of Paul Martin and his government...
they don't need to bother with that 96%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Really Funny
Statement at this time.

Paul Cellucci has stated that he will be leaving his post and wants to move on. Is he trying to raise a flag to Washington that he still exists?

The Conservatives are to have a convention in March, I believe. Is this to take some pressure off their convention or an attempt to create an issue to bring them together.

The PM, in the end of the year interview, seemed to make his case pretty clear. Is he going to have to go back on the impressions that he has created, as he is doing in Newfoundland and Labrador?

Maybe Paul wants Homeland Security?

Like I said. Seems really funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. One caveat...
The author of this article, Robert Russo, is seriously slanted to the right in everything he produces. You'd expect him to be Cellucci's poodle, which this article he sure as hell is. During the Clinton presidency, he did hatchet jobs on the big dog at every possible opportunity. Basically, he sucks.



Interesting that Frank McKenna will be the new ambassador to the US. He was previously premier of New Brunswick (Province of Swine), and looked like quite the golden boy at the time. Unfortunately, he hitched a lot of the province's progress to the IT boom of the 90's, and... well, you know what happened.

I wasn't aware of his recruitment into the Caryle Group or his friendship with Poppy Bush. :puke: Still, what else would you expect from the premier of New Brunswick (Province of Swine)?

:hi: from Nova Scotia (much better than New Brunswick, Province of Swine)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GHOSTDANCER Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Someone should pass this little tidbit of 411 to the new guy.
If the US missle defense shield does work it will become every Canadian's worst nightmare. Imagine nuclear weapons being detonated over Canada by anti-missile defences from the US or even worse from Canada controlled from the US. Do we really want this war conducted in Canadian air space with all its resulting nuclear fallout?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. the idea is to see the heat signs
from the launch and target the missle in the first few minutes of flight. but the problem is whether or not large fires would trigger the system. plus as i posted the russians have mobiles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GHOSTDANCER Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. ya ya the lasers in space and attached to 747's have done it so well
in the past.. Right now we got missile on missile action, o ya baby!!! Fallout would end up in Canada and the NW or even if they did, Are you saying is it fair to those people that it would affect near the launch site? I mean isn't that kinda not taken whats coming to you? At least it wasn't me mentality? Just some more civilians?? Fuq we have missiles embedded all over the mid-west. You know how many civilians would get fuqed up? What about when we sale this technology to other so called "friendly nations" you know the "Axis-of-Freedom" and they use it on us? The whole things a fuqin nightmare powered by stupid humans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Just because you blow up the missiles means you blow up the warhead.
Edited on Mon Jan-10-05 07:57 PM by Massacure
Nuclear weapons have to go through a series of events to blow up. If you take out one step, it cannot detonate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. No, it won't. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. It goes from "Canada will sign on" to "he is optimistic that"
A pretty big jump. But the Bushies are used to big jumps in "logic" - it pretty well sums up their foreign policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. it won`t work
the Russians just lit up a new mobile launcher that makes the whole missile shield worthless. in fact bush encouraged Russia to design and build this new system to counter his abms...remember potato head tore up the abm treaty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. The idea is for it to never work. Missle Defense is a cash cow for the MIC
Military Industrial Complex. It's all about US the tax payers giving billions of dollars to the MIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Where's Cellucci getting this idea? Doesn't he read the newspapers, either
Canada won't fund missile shield: PM

Windsor Star

Wednesday, December 15, 2004

Canadian Press

Prime Minister Paul Martin said Tuesday he does not believe the U.S. ballistic missile shield will succeed in shooting down incoming rockets, as he threw up new roadblocks to counter President George W. Bush's strong appeal for Canada to join his continental defence plan.

Canada will not put any money into building the missile shield and it will not allow Washington to station rockets on Canadian soil as the price of participation in the multibillion-dollar program, Martin told Global National in a year-end interview.

In another issue that could cause friction with Bush, Martin said Canada was prepared to accept U.S. citizens who do not want to serve in the war in Iraq.

"In terms of immigration, we are a country of immigrants and we will take immigrants from around the world. I'm not going to discriminate," said Martin, when reminded that former prime minister Pierre Trudeau opened Canada's doors to draft dodgers and deserters during the Vietnam War.

'AN ILLEGAL WAR'

When asked whether the prime minister was referring to ongoing attempts by Jeremy Hinzman, a 26-year-old U.S. deserter, to gain asylum in Canada after refusing to serve in what he calls "an illegal war," Martin spokesman Scott Reid said the prime minister "was not commenting on any individual case and certainly was not sending a signal to the immigration board."

Martin was emphatic Canada's participation in the missile defence program would depend on a key decision-making role in the U.S. command and control structure that operates the shield.

"The decision as to whether or not we participate in the ballistic missile defence system is going to depend on whether, in fact, Canada can have a voice in the structure," Martin said in the interview, to be broadcast Christmas Day.

"I'm not going to put money into it. I'm going to put money into our priorities ... Having missiles on our territory is not one of those priorities."

The conditions laid out by Martin are the clearest indication to date the Liberal government is increasingly disinterested in the missile defence program despite Bush's public appeal during his visit to Canada on Dec. 1.

Martin has been under heavy pressure from the Liberal caucus and the party's grassroots to reject the defence shield, which he admitted may not even work to knock down incoming missiles from rogue states or global terrorists.

"Do I believe it could work tomorrow? I suspect there are very few people out there who testify that it could. Do I believe eventually technology could bring it to that point, in all likelihood, but I'm not a rocket expert," he said in another TV interview.

Martin said Canada is not even close to negotiating a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. on missile defence, but added any document must include guarantees that it would not lead to the weaponization of space.

Canada would immediately pull out of the defence shield if it were to join and the U.S. subsequently put missile weapon systems in space.

"I don't believe space belongs to any country," Martin said. "We will not engage in the weaponization of space."

Martin acknowledged for the first time that next year's budget will pump money into Canada's hard-pressed military, including funds to allow the Armed Forces to recruit 5,000 more troops over the next five years.

Martin admitted he struggled over his personal belief in the traditional marriage but finally decided same-sex weddings were a right entitled to all citizens regardless of their sexual orientation.

© The Windsor Star 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. No shit?
Paul Martin has been waffling on this for the longest time, and this is the first I've seen of him actually standing up to George Walker Bush on the issue. Maybe he's feeling the heat from the NDP and the Bloc, and is worried they'll try to force an election if he doesn't get his shit together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. Celluci of the "we create our own reality" clique. Trying to get that buzz
going, gonna ride that wave. I think drug abuse explains them better than anything else. I mean, what else explains their constant, unrelenting spewage?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Celluci is so full of crap, he reeks every time he opens his mouth....
this is not the first time he has spoken in total ignorance of the facts and ANY understanding of the role of an Ambassador. I am glad the piece of cow manure is going, wish it had been sooner.

FYI, Martin was asked about this today at his news conference and his response was very short, "There have been NO SUCH assurances". His tone indicated Celluci has pissed off the PM mightily, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. You know the recent deal about letting Canadian beef in?? Is
support Canada's payment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. Oh Canada
Don't give into BushCo blackmail! NMD is a joke and if you would listen to some reputable scientists like Ted Postol at MIT, you would not even be considering dumping money down this rat-hole.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1213-27.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. Good, Maybe it won't cost me so much!
We've been paying for this thing for almost 20 years, it will be great to someone else pay part of my share. (/sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC