Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Same-sex marriage allies, foes file in court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 04:54 PM
Original message
Same-sex marriage allies, foes file in court
http://www.registerguard.com/news/2004/11/19/a1.gaymarriage.1119.html

excerpted paragraphs:

Gay couples may not be allowed to marry in Oregon, but they're still entitled to all the legal benefits that married couples enjoy, the American Civil Liberties Union argues in a new legal brief filed with the state Supreme Court.

The court should order the Legislature to pass a law creating a civil union alternative to marriage for same-sex couples, and also recognize as legal the nearly 3,000 marriage licenses issued to same-sex couples by Multnomah County last spring, the civil liberties group contends.

But a competing brief filed by the Defense of Marriage Coalition says gay rights advocates can't change in legal midstream and now push for civil unions. Furthermore, the 3,000 licenses have never been valid and should be voided, the group says.

end excerpt...........
and there is also a related op-ed in the same paper:

http://www.registerguard.com/news/2004/11/19/ed.col.weiner.1119.html

excerpt from that piece:

Guest Viewpoint: Will Measure 36 end all marriages in Oregon?
By Merle Weiner
With the passage of Measure 36, Oregonians have said that marriage shall not be extended to same-sex couples. The voters probably did not realize that heterosexual marriage is now threatened.

How can that be? After all, opponents of same-sex marriage said exactly the opposite: Same-sex marriage was supposed to threaten opposite-sex marriage.

The irony is the logical result of an application of the Equal Benefits Clause of the Oregon Constitution, something that Measure 36 did not change in any way. That provision says, "No law shall be passed granting to any citizen or class of citizens privileges or immunities, which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens."

bwah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah hah neener neener.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-19-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah! And I'm proud to say I contributed financially to that
effort. Great bunch of constitutional lawyers and scholars. Don't know what we'd do without them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC