OMG... PUKE!!! GQ Magazine says repukes better in bed, WTF?!?

Interviewed by the bowtie no less..... someone shoot me.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11979370 /

Republicans assert dominance in the bedroom
Magazine article researches which party rates better at sex


Republicans control Congress and the White House. According to an informal study in the latest issue of “GQ” magazine, the GOP is also asserting its dominance over Democrats in the bedroom.

The anonymous author, who wrote the piece for “GQ” reports “After years of intensive research on both sides of the aisle, I’m here to report that Republican men are infinitely better to have sex with.”

The article in the April issue of “GQ” lays out 10 reasons why Republicans are better and kinkier in the sack.


SICK SICK SICK

They're so freakin' repressed.

on the video link and tell me that guy is qualified to speak about the issue. Him and bowtie should hook up

All liberals, all the time.

Maybe years later, it's different. But that's another topic.

I get he drives a hummer too.

For god's sake, how much more of this crap must we endure?

and there's a line in there that goes something like, "even watching a culture disintegrate has some entertainment value." I think I'll adopt that as my new philosophy for now.

That is a face only a republican male could love.

Maybe that explains his results.

Give me a break...I have always avoided Republican men. In fact, I've have a 'built-in' natural and intuitive repulsion of Republican men.

*hurl*

What little they posted of it sounds exactly like a Coulter hit piece.

If they do it to their women like they do it to the country, it's got to be true.

Which is Worse? Screwing an intern or screwing the country?

Welcome to DU.

respect for choice, integrity, life or circumstance?


You think that's what WOMEN like? You should hang your face in shame.

This goes along with that Harvard guy's "Manliness" bullshit.

Whatever turns you on anonymous.

tacky enough to answer a poll like that???

It's the repressed little braggarts lying like they do about everything.

But it doesn't surprise me that they could get a little freaky. You know that it's always the most repressed ones that do the freakiest things.

Link to the DU Lounge:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

What the Hell do these frigid and repressed cows know?

to whom they aren't married, billing all the prostitutes and child sex slaves to the RNC under "family values" per diem.

If I was having sex with five or six different women a week, perhaps more, and billing it to Christians, I'd be pretty damned good, too.

informal study...and if an article claiming statistics is submitted by some one anonomously....More Repug bullshit....


Why is this news...for a group of people that abhor sex.....they sure do talk about it and brag about it a lot..

I posted this below, but enjoyed writing it so much I'm sharing here:


Sorry for the f-bomb, but the very idea that this is some kind of valid "thesis" is absurd! Did she really fuck ALL the Democrats and ALL the Republicans? And, if not, what's a fair sample? 50 of each for a total of 100 men? Or 250 each for a total of 500? And what about the Independents? Did she throw in one or 2 for good measure? OR did some independents TELL her they were Democrats just to get a piece of the action?

"According to an informal study"



here's some random quotes from miss malkin's refutation of the "whiny repuke baby" story:

"It is not mentioned anywhere in the text..."

"it could just as easily be argued that..."

"But on a more informal, anecdotal level..."

"from my personal observation..."

"I can assure you that whatever data they gathered..."

"Maybe they were whiny because..."

"Someone should follow up..."

had sex with a lot of guys to come up with that brilliant conclusion.

What else can you expect

Well, that's settled then. It has to be true.

Notice they think "dominance" makes them good in bed. Yeah sure, and it's a great foreign policy too!

hmm...yep, sounds about right to me.

If they were to provide the actual survey, hold it to any kind of scrutiny whatsoever and the author spoke of his/her results, it's fall apart.

It's vague, unsubstantiated and slanted. Sounds like something right up the alleys of the repukes.

Credit: TheProphetess

Who did the 'intensive research'? Laura Ingraham?

You know, I found, you know, that when someone, you know, says "you know" a lot, well, you know, they are really, you know, trying to sell you a bill of, you know, goods.


Plus, did you get a look at Michael Hainey?

see the pic of the GQ guy, I laughed my ass off.

"Hey Tucker, let's go to the bar and have an expirement." YA. Those dudes will pick up lotsa women... suuuuure

available men from the Dem & Rep. parties didn't get to them.

"Sucks" for them, I guess.



Sorry for the f-bomb, but the very idea that this is some kind of valid "thesis" is absurd! Did she really fuck ALL the Democrats and ALL the Republicans? And, if not, what's a fair sample? 50 of each for a total of 100 men? Or 250 each for a total of 500? And what about the Independents? Did she throw in one or 2 for good measure? OR did some independents TELL her they were Democrats just to get a piece of the action?

I'm not done laughing from the image of them trying to pick up women in a bar....BWAHAHAHAH.....
"Pimp that bowtie dude I'll be your wingman!" BWA!

laughing!

Did you ever, you know, listen to this guy, you know, at an interview or, you know, press conference?

otherwise his former bedmates would publicly recant his claims!

I am going to get sick

Let's not kid ourselves and be silly. Good sex knows no policial party.

Welcome to DU. Have fun. BTW who the fuck is Nagler? Did you mean Nadler? Enjoy your stay!

Republicans lack staying power... It's all about them... and they they won't vary their position on anything.

ha! ha! ha!

Or at least neutered.

But she prefers to remain anonymous.

I hope not.

If you had done all of them, wouldn't you want to remain anonymous too?

YUCK! Just the thought of it makes me want to

to purge the whole idea out of my head!

Can you imagine what they'd be saying about this woman if she had said that Democrats were better in bed?

i hope she protection because if not she's slept with every farm animal they've ever slept with.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

I'm sure that's what was meant by both sides of the aisle and considering the source pub, I'm sure one aisle was explored than another.

How good is a drink of water going to be after 3 days in the desert without ? (assuming you are still alive).
These people are so out of touch with themselves, no wonder they are so out of touch with the world. I can state for fact the some of the best sex I've had in my life was from preacher's daughters and republicans. Of course I did not know this about them at the time.....*grin

MZr7

How else do you get a chimp hybrid?

shouldn't they? After all, they're certainly never going to ask WOMEN.

rapists, and wife beaters...it was an informal survey by an anonymous author and I can't really share how the data was collected. But trust me...it is completely valid and true.

- Anonymous

http://www.armchairsubversive.com

Check out this webpage titled "Republican Hypocrisy Revealed". Chilling stuff.

of a tendency to molest children and rape and physically and emotionally abuse women. I wish they would do a scientifically sound study of people who do these horrific things and compare their personality to the personality of people who vote Republican. Especially those people who claim to be ultra-religious/conservative.

that's why he won't say who the 'woman' is. He invited Tucker out to dinner so they could conduct their 'own experiment'!

I'm so glad I don't have tv anymore ~ when I read this kind of garbage I'm so glad I'm not paying for it ~

Tucker loves this kind of stuff. He's begging for attention, like the time he said women need a good spanking or some such nonsense. He's trying to get a reaction, hoping a bunch of liberals will jump all over him, but judging by his numbers, it's not working.

They're like little boys, trying to get mommy's attention ~ and soooooo jealous of all those sexy, liberal men!!

What an inane conversation ~ they just don't have 'it' and it would be impossible to explain to them what 'it' is!! Pathetic attempt at trying to create a controversy, because truth, in their minds, doesn't sell. Tucker says he's all roused up by this 'woman'. I bet it's a freeper guy who wrote it ~ wishful thinking!

so unless 45 minutes of crying, begging and praying followed with the request to call you mommy gets you off--why bother?

if we can't even know WHO is doing the real 'judging', then the claims he/she makes are baseless...GQ may as well be making this up as fiction...

Or maybe it's an April Fool's Joke? they HAVE done things like this before with outrageous, fake stories, and then clued all the readers in when the next issue came...

Or maybe one of those Chinese women who showed up at Neil Bush's hotel door?

Or Santorum's dog?

And stupidest interview.

Though it is interesting to see men who are Republicans or admire Republicans talking about how sexy Republican men are, and how "some things are hung like elephants."

Brokeback Journalism, the mating call of Republicans in love with themselves.

Maybe he'd make half of a nice pair with my avatar.

period of time on this very subject, I say 'HELL NO, they aren't!!"

supposed to enjoy it or it's a sin. I wish they didn't contradict themselves with their lies all the time.

NT

Snicker!

Manure is good for the flowers.

How desperate they are for winning everything!

Well, I've done my own research and there's no comparison. Lefties are the best lovers.

After all, this is the same man that was quoted a couple of months back stating that women "need a good spanking once in awhile". I wonder if his wife will be happy to learn that he thought some field experiments would be in order at a local bar with the editor of "GQ". Let's face it, the biggest sex organ in the human body is the brain, and Tucker Carlson seems to have been born without one.

>The anonymous author, who wrote the piece for “GQ” reports “After years of intensive research on both sides of the aisle, I’m here to report that Republican men are infinitely better to have sex with.”<

How can I tactfully put this? I don't know how you ladies feel, but I think I'll pass on the party of Lindsay Graham, Rick Santorum, and Bill O'Reilly. I'd rather SuperGlue my knees together.

Fondly,
Julie

p.s. I'd bet $20 that Ann Coulter wrote the article, but I'm hard pressed to imagine any Democrat that would ever sleep with her.

"Better" wouldn't be the first adjective I'd reach for, though.

"Bitter?"

I am here to say this is another Republican lie.
IF they were so good in bed, why the need to troll the internet for little girls, molest Boy Scouts, and force women to have sex?
IF they are so good--why are Republican women so repressed and mean and nasty (See Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkan, et al)?
IF they are so good, why send the ugliest little bastard they got out to tell everyone else how good they are?
The Republicans I have "researched", were all LITTLE squids who thought they were God's gift.

how many of you have ever thought of using those as sex toys? i'm sure most of them are self centered and not particularly interested in satisfying partners, but you have to give them credit for having very ..uh..imaginative
fantasies and coming up with very novel ways of getting off.

but they aren't doing anything more than just trying to convince themselves that it's somehow true that they are better.

i thought there would at least be a survey whether or not it was scientific or anything else.

but instead they are just making up shit as they go along and somehow connecting it to sex.

BUT, of the 5 people I've had in bed, the best have been republicans. They tend to be more passionate and more... well interesting in bed...

Now THAT made for some passionate lovin! Pukes are pathetic at everything they do ESPECIALLY SEX. My dildo had 26 million miles on it by the time I kicked that fucker to the curb.

I'm sorry.

It's all good now. I have a lefty lover and damn is he THE MAN!

check in with 'hate radio' if you want to pick up on the gist of this what will be primary/secondary theme of whatever they bring to 06 & 08, and it is this...

they are "manly" men, woman, thinkers, and policy wonks. and that whomever is not towing their party line will be cast as a liberal, dandy, cut and runner. them's yer choices.

vote for a party that has cast the world into an endless debt, hatred & war without an exit...or be seen as a group without so much as a viable idea that will not be able to 'get it up'.

but don't get shrill with a response...they'll just say you're angry. these guys have telegraphed every stratagem prior to polling time, dems have just been chronic about not believing, or understanding, that they will deploy them in real time

But tucker said he was kind of aroused by it. Oh good. They get out of it that the book implies but doesn't say republicans are better endowed.

And their charm? She’s like, you know, they come in. They take control. They tell you what they want to do. And I guess she’s found out that’s very attractive to a woman.

Oh I am quivering.

Love the part She has a line in here about Republicans. They understand that foreplay is about sex and lots of it. Democrats are too busy checking if the condoms you keep by the bed are good for the environment.

Who was she sleeping with?

Kiss me twice, I'm bisexual.

They've been screwing America for years.

"Me, I think the whole list is a not-so-subtle diss on Republicans. If the person who wrote this believes in what they wrote, or if some sad sap gets a spring in his step from reading it, that can't be helped. In fact, I think it's a doubly effective diss. On the one hand, it takes constant swipes at Republicans, while simultaneously taking them for such chumps that they'll smile because they think their egos are being stroked."

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/33879/

Jeff Gannon? You kissing and telling again?

Sorry, but I've always considered "GQ" to be a rag for guys still in the closet. YEARS before the "Metrosexual" was invented.

It was a guy who said Repugs were better lovers. Well, okaaay...

However, as there is often some truth in a stereotype, there are many young women who are clearly more attracted to type A "alpha" males, in keeping with the repug "might makes right" mentality, and consciously avoid males lacking such trappings and attributes.

Apologists for this will usually site biological hard-wiring as the reason: women seek out partners who are demonstrative, highly competitive, and on a primitive level, attract on the basis of being a better provider/protector. It's an obviously preferred rationale, one which avoids socio/environmental conditioning as the primary determinant that reveals the preference for "might makes right" as it manifests in modern consumer culture: conforming to the superficial prescription set forth by cold, corporatized values which appeal to the manipulation of lowest common denominator.

That said, however, people's concept of what constitutes true love and good sex varies quite a bit.

the bow-tie.

-snip-

CARLSON: You really get the sense that this woman is probably a Democrat, probably some center left, you know, kind of moderate Democrat. And for that reason, probably in name a feminist, but everything she says is kind of antifeminist.

She makes the point that men who don’t decide or proclaim where you’re having dinner are wusses. And there’s nothing less appealing than a wuss. Whatever happened to the kind of, you know, the feminist view that we go Dutch on dinner and we, you know, come to a group decision on things like that?

HAINEY: I think she’s simply saying, you know, maybe she’s more of a Hillary Clinton. She wants a stronger man there. I don’t think you should be threatened, Tucker.

CARLSON: I’m not threatened at all. I’m kind of aroused, honestly. I mean, she likes Republicans, because they have no conscience and they’re less sensitive.

HAINEY: Exactly, yes, and because you know, they have no regard for who’s going to be going into debt or anything.

-snip-

No conscience, less sensitive & debt... yeah, that really does it for me.

That does routinely do it for many.

You are telling me that woman what a man who talks a lot of crap, start's a fight and then sends other's to clean up his mess?
No wonder I stopped reading GQ.

Selfishness does not bode well for successful deployment of Colonel Angus and we know they aren't very good at exit strategies either.

Most women will tell you the proper enthusiastic and well timed deployment of Colonel Angus is paramount to any successful operation.

sick and twisted repubs

That fucking Lynne Cheney, what a hoot!

Yeah.

Sounds like a great time.

ICK.

Yuck.

Gross.

"“After years of intensive research on both sides of the aisle, I’m here to report that Republican men are infinitely better to have sex with.”

How in hell would ANYBODY know?

What a piece of crap.

Republicans are much better in bed if the woman has no self-respect or identity.

I would think it would be something like attentive to your needs, relaxed, fun, comfortable. Sounds like masochistic women would love republican screws... but no one else would.

clearing throat, this stuff never gets old, I guess I am the exception to the rule.

Brings conservatives to orgasm every time

Not that I've slept with any outright Republicans -- or, at least I don't think so -- but, it is my wide-ranging experience that the less educated a man, the better he is in bed. The most well-educated men with whom I've had relations were the worst lovers. They either had issues with their sexuality, were impotent, had lower sex drives, had problems with their sexual narrative and were more self-conscious. I think that these things were simply side-effects of being complex, or overly analytical, more eager to please the woman, and non-absolutist opinions on sexuality. As far as "dominance," it seems that the smarter men were more concerned with mutual pleasure, and were much more feminized.

I think that its possible that liberals are worse lovers, simply because of two things: I think that more liberals take drugs and have alcohol problems, and supersmart men have sexual "issues." More moderate, less-educated, traditional values types are just kind of dumber, and meatier. And, just because they're "dominant," it doesn't mean they're just rough and selfish, either.

That said, I've never been happy with either kind of male -- the dumber ones didn't provide intellectual stimulation, and the smarter ones were just too sexually maudlin and complex.

And, I believe that MOST men fall in the middle, and that this study is actually bullshit, and that, when all is said and done, there are probably good lovers from both pools, and intellectually stimulating men on both sides.

Yes, the study is BS, but it does raise interesting points. I don't think it has to do with a person being a liberal or conservative, per se. It has to do with how comfortable and creative one is with his own sexuality. Even though I'm a progressive, I'm the most masculine person in my wife-to-be's life. Other guys were metrosexual or had very feminine qualities about them. She (who is very liberal) says that I'm by far the best and most daring lover. As for taking control, truth is that many women like to be taken charge of in bed (not all the time, mind you) as it adds to the rush. As for me, I have days that I like to take charge, and other days, no...she says the best ones are when I do.

But there's no reason to generalize all women based on this experience. The older I get the more comfortable I am with my sexuality and that includes getting quite a thrill out of "taking charge".

We let the world's problems weigh more heavily on us. We worry more in general. Smarter "EQ" are less analytical when it comes to emotions.

High IQ people, male and female both, more often seem to see overt sexuality in both genders as uncouth. Most of my favorite men tend to lean more to the right than I am, and they are the type of guys who make no apologies for being men, they enjoy it. Put a beer in their hand and stick them on barbeque grill duties and they're happy. Put a good bra and a low-cut bodice on me, and they've got a happy grin on.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073650 /

Salo: 120 Days of Sodom

I can't see any progressives getting that *kinky* like the fascists do in the movie. Point taken!

but only a few.

How difficult would it be for another "anonymous woman" to write another article drawing the opposite conclusion, based on equally stale stereotypes?

1. The "lazy welfare liberals" have more time on their hands, so they can spend hours in bed, whereas hardworking rightwingers have to actually WORK for a living and have little time to spare.

2. The "rich limousine liberals" can seduce you with champagne and strawberries, whereas rightwingers might offer you a Bud.

3. 90% of Black men vote Democratic, and you know what they say about them.

4. Real men -- which is to say rightwingers -- don't care about grooming; it's just gay. Unfortunately, the scent of ball sweat is not an aphrodisiac.

5. Liberals are perverted, immoral, and unGodly -- they may read aloud books that ought to be banned ("The Story of O" or "My Secret Garden") whereas rightwingers are more likely to read Leviticus to get you in the mood. Unfortunately, that doesn't work.

6. Being overly-sensitive wussy men, liberals ask inappropriate questions during sex, such as "Does this feel good to you?" Whereas manly men ask "dominant" questions like, "Are you through yet?" Contrary to GQ writers' opinions, the latter is not a turn-on.

7. Bleeding-heart liberals who support pro-women legislation also tend to engage in foreplay; Manly Republicans have a natural aversion to catering to women, and forego foreplay -- unless scratching their balls counts.

8. Liberals are overly-emotional, and frequently say those three little words "I love you." Assertive rightwing lovers prefer the three little words, "We got beer?"

9. Liberals are pessimistic, so they think of their actual partner during sex, no matter what their partner looks like. Rightwingers like to "focus on the good" and if there's no "good," they make it up. That's why they need to fantasize about other people during sex, which works until they inadvertently cry out, "Jeffff!!!"

10. After sex, Liberals -- who have no ideas of their own -- say trite phrases like, "Wow that was great" or "Was it good for you?" Some even light cigarettes. Manly Republicans say things like, "That was even better than last month" or "What's the charge?"

Fucking boring shags. I won't touch a conservative again. It was almost as if I was alone. There was one who said she never felt so good. And afterwards felt horribly guilty for feeling that way.

**As a rule I don't kiss & tell. But I doubt with the anonymous nature of this discussion that they could be identified. As if they'd read this commie forum.

Kinkier? Yeah, as in more republicans have been arrested for wierd shit. Better? Not even close.

republicans are better and kinkier in the sack. Really? I guess that's why they want sex toys outlawed--so they can get all of those.

When sex toys are outlawed, then only outlaws will have sex toys.

experience with the application process?

>Tucker Carlson was literally giddy over that story<

I'm sure Tucker loves every chance he gets to talk about sex. After all, it's Forbidden. It's Titillating. God knows he doesn't have much else to pontificate about, so he's forced, FORCED I tell you, to discuss fictitious information about other people's sexuality. His ratings would be higher if he had something substantive to talk about.

I don't mean to start the flame war of all time, but the guy's got four kids. I've read some of his interview comments about women, etcetera. It's hard for me to believe that there is a woman with positive brain wave activity that would agree to sleep with him.

Julie