Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iowa Democratic leaders trying to "rig the game"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 02:38 PM
Original message
Iowa Democratic leaders trying to "rig the game"
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Saturday, September 15, 2007

DES MOINES Democratic Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich said Iowa Democratic Party leaders and other groups aligned with the entrenched political power structure are "rigging the game in Iowa" by excluding him from two Presidential events this week.

"The whole purpose of the primary and caucus season is to provide voters with opportunities, not to enable a carnival of interest groups to subvert the process," Kucinich said. "When Party leaders and their allies pre-select which candidates they will allow the voters to hear, it's a disservice to the voters. Iowans deserve better than a rigged game."

Congressman Kucinich, (D-OH), was not invited to Sunday's Democratic Steak Fry in Indianola, nor to a Democratic Presidential Forum Thursday in Davenport. Representatives of both events have falsely claimed that Kucinich does not have a sufficiently "active organization" in Iowa.

However, statewide and national polls consistently show Kucinich running ahead of Senators Joe Biden and Christopher Dodd, who were invited to participate. A recent American Research Group poll in Iowa showed Kucinich getting 3% of the vote, ahead of Biden and Dodd, who were at the bottom with 1% each. In the Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg Poll in Iowa two weeks ago, Kucinich and Biden were both at 2% and Dodd was at 1%.

In the most recent CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll, Kucinich was at 3% nationally, Biden was at 2%, and Dodd was below 1%. Another national poll, Rasmussen Reports, showed Kucinich tied with New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson in fourth place, behind Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, and former Senator John Edwards. Richardson was also invited to participate in the Iowa events. Kucinich also won a post-debate poll on ABC's website after the last Iowa debate.

We're doing better than some of the establishment candidates, and we're moving up," Kucinich said. "Instead of spending millions of dollars on high-priced consultants, and slick advertising, we have a highly motivated grassroots organization."

He also questioned the decision by the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) Iowa Public Television to exclude him from Thursday's Democratic Presidential Forum, which will focus on the issues of health care and financial security.

"The Presidential debate on health care has been largely fake, with phony claims from candidates that they are providing universal health care when, in fact, they are preserving the for-profit system of private insurance companies who make money not providing health care," Kucinich said.

"I am the only Presidential candidate to offer a true universal healthcare plan for America, HR676, Medicare for All. It is a comprehensive, not-for-profit, national health insurance plan, and everyone is covered," Kucinich said. "No premiums, no deductibles, no co-payments."

"How can AARP and Iowa Public Television claim they are committed to educating and informing the voters of Iowa on the Number One domestic issue in this campaign when they deny a voice to the only candidate who is leading the effort to bring real reform to the health care system by ending the control of for-profit insurance and pharmaceutical companies? Since the AARP's own insurance sales interests would be affected by HR 676, serious questions must be raised about their decision to deny me a place on the platform," Kucinich said.

In one highly publicized incident in July, unaware that their microphones were still on and the cameras were still rolling, Clinton and Edwards whispered to each other on stage about eliminating some candidates from future debates. It is most interesting, Kucinich noted, that a number of post-debate analyses determined that I performed better than all the other candidates (AFL-CIO, ABC, Howard University, Logo Forum). I can well understand why the other candidates do not want competition, but the credibility of the Democratic process is at risk if sponsoring organizations join in the subversion of that process.

"You would think that the Iowa Democratic Party leaders, fighting to preserve the states status as the first caucus state, would be a little more careful about giving other states the impression that they and they alone have the right to determine who the next President will be." Kucinich said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. So remind me, that DLC chair before Hillary was who? was from where?
Nah, there are no New Dems trying to rig the game in Iowa, can there be??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That Doesn't Make Sense
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 03:36 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
Kucinich is the most "unHillary"... His candidacy like all candidacies in a primary hurts the candidates closest to him or her... In this case his candidacy hurts Obama and Edwards much more than it hurts Hillary... If I was a Hillary fan I would want DK to get as high a profile as possible...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Elites M.U.S.T. Stamp Out What Elites Cannot Control
This is payback time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You Have Loftier Goals Than Me And Are Probably Less Jaded...
I'd be content to see any of our nominees in the White House...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Unfortunately, the new good ol boy system is still a good ol boy system
It shifted power in the Democratic party from NE liberals to a more corporate, investor class friendly type of conservative democrat, its a GOB.

And GOB systems in politics are still about by-invitation-only members holding and managing power and pretty much using voters rather than representing them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry Ogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Stack the cards and steel the election in the media before the poles ever open.
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 03:54 PM by Larry Ogg
JFK was the first to really use the powers of new media technology, and he caught the conservatives by surprise, so we know how they remedied that problem.

In these days no one takes up residents in the White House with out the support of the criminals that own the banks, the corporations, the RNC, the DLC, the conservative politicians and the media.

But keep fighting them Dennis, because people are waking up to what a shell game our political process is, and the day will come when these criminal conservatives capitalist loose the reins of stolen power and are finally held accountable.

It doesn't mater if a Conservative Republican wins or a Conservative Democrat wins, because they are Conservative we the people will loose.

We need a Liberal president who will tell the corporations ware to go, not a conservative union steward puppet head who will bow too the big money



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Jul 23rd 2014, 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC