Where do you stand on NATO / military intervention in Darfur?

[wyldwolf]

What is sure to be a major issue soon.

Wes Clark is for it:

http://securingamerica.com/articles/npr/2005-08-22

The DLC is for it:

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=253263&kaid=131&subid=207

Are you for it? Kinda sorta for it with conditions? Opposed?

[atreides1]

1. NO

Why shoud NATO get involved? Has the Sudanese military attacked a NATO member? Have the rebels attacked a NATO member?

This is a UN problem, in other words all member states should be providing the needed assistance, in both material and man power. All BushCo wants to do is to make NATO the whipping boy, while US forces
prepare for a possible attack on Iran.

[The Magistrate]

2. Who Intervenes Is Immaterial To Me, Sir

Someone damned well should: the thing is intolerable....

[ThomCat]

3. Yes,

I don't care what umbrella organization does it, so long as it's done as Humanitarian Action and it gets done.

[LSparkle]

4. Agreed.

I'd rather have my tax money going toward helping out in that region than wasted on a Halliburton boondoggle in Iraq.