Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill O'Reilly's False Statement About New York

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Donkey Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 10:49 AM
Original message
Bill O'Reilly's False Statement About New York
By now, we've all read that Bill OReilly went on a rant last week in reaction to a ballot initiative in San Francisco that opposed military recruitment in public schools. Please note that the measure did not actually ban military recruitment and thus will not really change anything. Rather, the new initiative merely codifies the citys disapproval of such action.

Predictably, OReilly overreacted to the measure by inviting terrorists to attack the City of San Francisco. On the November 8 broadcast of The OReilly Factor, he stated the following:

Hey, you know, if you want to ban military recruiting, fine, but I'm not going to give you another nickel of federal money. You know, if I'm the president of the United States, I walk right into Union Square, I set up my little presidential podium, and I say, "Listen, citizens of San Francisco, if you vote against military recruiting, you're not going to get another nickel in federal funds. Fine. You want to be your own country? Go right ahead." And if Al Qaeda comes in here and blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except San Francisco. You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead.

Now you would think that after saying something like that on the air, OReilly would at least say his quotes were taken out of context, and that he meant something slightly different. But just a few days later on a radio talk show in San Francisco, Bill said the following:

I mean, look, everybody knows whats going on there. What I said isnt controversial. What I said needed to be said. Im sitting here and Im looking at a city that has absolutely no clue of what the world is. None. You know, if you had been hit on 9/11 instead of New York, believe me, you would not have voted against military recruting. Yet the left-wing, selfish, Land of Oz philosophy that the media and the city politicians have embraced out there is an absolute intellectual disgrace.

Ah yes, if only San Francisco were more like New York City. Only then would they see the error of their ways and think exactly like Bill OReilly, whose world outlook mirrors that of every other New Yorker.

Well it seems that on this measure, Bill O'Reilly has once again failed to do even the most passive level of research to back up his claim. I did a five-minute Google search and discovered that just this past July, the New York City Council drafted a measure for deliberation that would have effectively banned military recruitment in public schools (you can find the link to it here).

So not only is Bill OReilly a ridiculously poor journalist, he also has no knowledge of the political makeup of his own city. Nice going!






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Jeez! The only thing he left out of his SF description was...
"Cake eating friends of Dorothy."

We all know that's what he meant.

Maybe he'll leave his heart in SF one day.

Ice chests are on sale at Wal-Mart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good work
O'Reilly certainly knows an "intellectual disgrace" when he sees one

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Was it enacted?
I, in no way, am defending or agreeing with BOR (and to prove it, I'll link to this awesome column by Mark Morford on the the whole affair: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/gate/archive/2... ) BUT, unless they actually enacted that measure, BOR would likely say something like "Yeah, but the voters didn't vote for it, like they did in San Francisco." or some other such idiotic thing...

If it was enacted, then that bit of info should be spread far and wide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Donkey Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. From what I can tell,
It has only been drafted at this stage. I don't believe that it has come up for an up or down vote yet by the council, but it likely will soon.

But the fact that it has been deliberated to the point where the actual language has been written shows that at least the City Council considers banning military recruiting in public schools to be worth consideration.

Furthermore, military recruiters have already been kicked out of Harvard and Yale law schools, which also receive some federal funding. The Supreme Court is expected during the next session to determine the legality of tying federal funding with the caveat of allowing military recruiters on public school grounds, as specified in the No Child Left Behind legislation.

San Fransisco is by no means outside of the mainstream on this issue. O'Reilly should know this, especially when it might happen soon in his own city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BloodyWilliam Donating Member (665 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-16-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. I work in Manhattan and live in the metro area
And Bill O'Reilly's a cock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jul 24th 2014, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC