http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20040731213239607Senator Dayton: NORAD Lied About 9/11
Sunday, August 1, 2004
Introduction
Mark Dayton has become the first U.S. senator to challenge the
establishment consensus that "The 9/11 Commission Report" settles the open
questions of Sept. 11, 2001.
In Senate hearings last Friday Dayton (D-MN) raised an obvious point: if
the timeline of air defense response as promoted in the Kean Commission's
best-selling book is correct, then the timeline presented repeatedly by
NORAD during the last two years was completely wrong. Yet now no one at
NORAD is willing to comment on their own timeline!
When the official story of 9/11 can be changed repeatedly without anyone
ever being held accountable, we have no right to ever again expect honest
government. Please read the following story and do your part to support
Sen. Dayton for highlighting the contradiction, and to encourage the media
to follow up.
Background: Evolution of the Official Story
From the beginning, the 9/11 investigations, official and alternative, have
been about timelines: what happened, who knew about it and who did
what in response.
Written by the government's Kean Commission, the just-published "9/11
Commission Report" presents a timeline of air defense response that differs
radically from all of the previous official stories.
Since Sept. 11 government representatives have in fact promoted a series of
mutually contradictory narratives of how the nation's air defenses
responded to the unfolding attacks. Various chronologies were presented at
different times by the high military command, the North American Air
Defense command (NORAD), the Federal Aviation Administration, and now the
Kean Commission.
Little noticed, the original story was delivered by Gen. Richard Myers, the
acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on 9/11. Just two days after
the events, Myers appeared before the Senate for hearings, scheduled many
weeks earlier, to consider his appointment as the nation's supreme military
officer. Myers told the Senate that no fighter jets were scrambled to
intercept any of the 9/11 flights until after the Pentagon was struck.
The Pentagon attack occurred at 9:38 a.m., a full 1 hour 20 minutes after
the first of the 9/11 flights was diverted from its designated flight path.
Myers's statement to the Senate was incredible, given the standard U.S. air
defense protocols for dealing with errant instrument flights (including
off-course passenger planes). In place many years before Sept. 11, these
procedures are automatic and require no special order. Within minutes after
a flight ceases to respond to ground control, the FAA is expected to alert
NORAD - which scrambles jet fighters to intercept the errant flight for
reconnaissance purposes. These are supposed to be airborne within 10
minutes of the problem arising.
This routine was activated on at least 67 occasions in the year prior to
Sept. 11, 2001. Exceptional as the events of 9/11 proved to be, the
procedures should have also been activated automatically within minutes of
each flight diversion on that day.
Before Myers's disturbing admission to the Senate received much notice,
NORAD under General Ralph Eberhard effectively put the lie to his
statement. A partial timeline of U.S. air defense response published on
Sept. 18, 2001 presented the times at which NORAD was alerted about each
flight diversion by the FAA. In its statement, NORAD claimed to have
responded to the alerts by scrambling two squads of interceptors. These,
however, never reached any of their targets in time to intercept, let alone
prepare for a possible shootdown.
As late as May 2003, General Arnold of NORAD, sitting alongside Gen. Myers,
presented a slightly revised version of NORAD's Sept. 2001 timeline, in
testimony to the Kean Commission.
The NORAD timeline indicated that during the crisis hours of 9/11, the FAA
became increasingly slower in delivering alerts to NORAD. This seemed to
shift the blame for the failed response to the FAA.
The FAA, however, disputed Gen. Arnold's testimony with a statement of May
21, 2003. The FAA claimed that regardless of the official notification
times claimed by NORAD, phone bridges were established immediately after
the initial attack (at 8:46). NORAD was informed in real time throughout of
all developments, including about the plane that ultimately hit the
Pentagon, the FAA said.
Thus for more than a year the FAA has been in open dispute with NORAD on
who informed whom and when about the Sept. 11 hijackings; unfortunately,
this has never become the major media story it deserves to be.
The Kean Commission itself intervened in June 2004. In a staff statement
delivered at its final set of hearings ("Improvising a Homeland Defense"),
the Commission outlined a chronology that completely ditched the timeline
that NORAD had upheld for two years. It also effectively placed almost all
of the blame for delayed air defense response on the FAA.
Gens. Arnold and Myers, who testified to the Commission that same morning,
were not held to account for having presented an entirely wrong timeline.
Instead, they simply thanked the Kean Commission for clearing up the
confusion. In return, one commissioner made a point of telling the generals
they were not to blame; after all, it was all the FAA's fault!
A group of FAA officials who testified in the subsequent, final session
stuck by their old defense that they had in fact provided adequate and
timely information to NORAD via the phone bridges. As the hearings
concluded, they still disputed both timelines: the old one from NORAD, and
the new one from the Kean Commission.
Dayton: Demanding Accountability
Now that the Kean Commission has published the new timeline in its final
report, these contradictions must not be simply swept under the rug. Either
the Kean Commission is wrong, or else NORAD was pushing a flawed timeline
for more than two years. Either way, the FAA story still differs from both.
There can be no excuses. Those responsible for dispensing false information
must be held accountable, or else nothing in the behavior of government is
likely ever to improve.
Instead of accountability, several of the key figures - Gens. Myers and
Eberhard, FAA official Ben Sliney - have been promoted since Sept. 11! Yet
one or more of them must be wrong about what happened on 9/11.
This is the simple point that Sen. Mark Dayton made yesterday at Senate
hearings on the 9/11 Commission Report: now that it has accepted the Kean
Commission findings, NORAD must explain its old timeline, and anyone
responsible for pushing it, whether intentionally or not, must be held
accountable.
To our knowledge the story so far has been reported only by Greg Gordon in
the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. An excerpt:
(From
http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/4904237.html)
Dayton: FAA, NORAD hid 9/11 failures
By Greg Gordon, Star Tribune Washington Bureau Correspondent
July 31, 2004
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Sen. Mark Dayton, D-Minn., charged Friday that the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the North American Aerospace
Defense Command (NORAD) have covered up "catastrophic failures" that left
the nation vulnerable during the Sept. 11 hijackings.
"For almost three years now, NORAD officials and FAA officials have been
able to hide their critical failures that left this country defenseless
during two of the worst hours in our history," Dayton declared during a
Senate Governmental Affairs Committee hearing.
(snip)
During the hearing, Dayton told leaders of the Sept. 11 commission, that,
based on the commission's report, a NORAD chronology made public a week
after the attacks was grossly misleading. The chronology said the FAA
notified the military's emergency air command of three of the hijackings
while those jetliners were still airborne. Dayton cited commission findings
that the FAA failed to inform NORAD about three of the planes until after
they had crashed.
And, he said, a squadron of NORAD fighter planes that was scrambled was
sent east over the Atlantic Ocean and was 150 miles from Washington, D.C.,
when the third plane struck the Pentagon -- "farther than they were before
they took off."
Dayton said NORAD officials "lied to the American people, they lied to
Congress and they lied to your 9/11 commission to create a false impression
of competence, communication and protection of the American people." He
told Kean and Hamilton that if the commission's report is correct,
President Bush "should fire whoever at FAA, at NORAD ... betrayed their
public trust by not telling us the truth."
Asked about Dayton's allegation, a spokesman for Colorado Springs-based
NORAD said, "We stand on our testimony to the commission" and declined to
discuss the 2001 chronology. Erin Utzinger, a spokeswoman for Dayton, said
the senator "assumes the FAA knew of NORAD's coverup."
(End of excerpt. Full story here at
http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/4904237.html)
In the weeks ahead, we will be presenting a complete treatment of the old
NORAD timeline and of "The Emperor's New Timeline" as spelled out in the
Kean Commission report. This will be part of a series exposing the many
Omissions of the Commission. END
(Story: Nicholas Levis)
Meanwhile, we encourage you all to write and call Sen. Dayton's office to
offer your support, and also to write to author Greg Gordon of the
Star-Tribune to thank him for his article. Finally, write to media and get
them to cover this story!
Kyle Hence of Citizens' Watch has already written an excellent letter to
Dayton's office, one that we urge all 9/11 truth seekers to freely
"plagiarize" in writing their own letters a.s.a.p.:
Letter to be hand delivered to:
Representative Patrick Kennedy (D-RI 1st)
U.S. House of Representatives
407 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C.
Senator Mark Dayton (D-MN)
United States Senate
346 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C.
*****************
Dear Senator Dayton,
I commend you today for your courage in speaking out about the evidence
you've seen that NORAD lied to the American people and to the Commission
when it released it's official timelines in September of '01 and again at
the May '03 hearing (not under oath!).
forcing the Commission to take testimony under oath].
I feel that the timeline offered us by the Commission is suspect as well.
This brings me to my primary message to you and your colleagues as you look
ahead to further hearings on the Hill about the Commission's Report.
I cannot stress enough how important it is to not just examine the 9/11
Commission recommendations. The Commissions findings of facts and
circumstances including suspect timelines must be scrutinized as well with
equal commitment and vigor. If the facts are wrong or incomplete then the
recommendations that flow from those flawed findings may be flawed as well.
Please read the first 8 pages of Richard Clarke's book. His timeline
conflicts grossly with that of the Commission's. The Commission has
Rumsfeld and Myers out of the loop until well after 10AM. Myers they say
was in a car enroute to the Pentagon when he saw smoke there. Rumsfeld was
in a breakfast meeting through the whole course of the attack. Clarke has
then both in a White House directed video conference beginning at
approximately 9:12AM.
Also, please read Gail Sheehy's "Who's in Charge Here?" (it's posted at
www.911citizenswatch.org)
Clarke quotes a Deputy Director of the Situation Room in the White House
(the Director being in FL with Pres. Bush) saying when Clarke arrives at
approximately 9:10 that a "Threat Conference Call" was underway.
The 9/11 Commission has the "Threat conf." starting at 9:37 or 9:39.
These are major discrepancies that beg for answers and explanations. How
were they resolved? Is there a cover-up? Why was there no call for courts
martial? How could Rumsfeld, Myers and the President be left out of the
loop over the 109 minutes you mentioned it took for the attacks to be
carried out?
Thank you for your diligence in the most critical search for the whole
truth about what happened on 9/11.
This brief email has touched on a tip of an iceberg that would throw grave
suspicions on the work of the Commission and the supposed cooperation of
the Agencies asked to assist in getting to the truth.
Sincerely,
Kyle F. Hence
9/11 Citizens' Watch
911citizenswatch.org
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
