Eugene
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:32 AM
Original message |
| Bush won't supply subpoenaed documents |
 |
Source: Associated PressBush won't supply subpoenaed documentsBy TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent 2 minutes ago WASHINGTON - The White House, moving toward a constitutional showdown with Congress, asserted executive privilege Thursday and rejected lawmakers' demands for documents that could shed light on the firings of federal prosecutors. President Bush's attorney told Congress the White House would not turn over subpoenaed documents for former presidential counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor. "With respect, it is with much regret that we are forced down this unfortunate path which we sought to avoid by finding grounds for mutual accommodation," White House counsel Fred Fielding said in a letter to the chairmen of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees. "We had hoped this matter could conclude with your committees receiving information in lieu of having to invoke executive privilege. Instead, we are at this conclusion." Thursday was the deadline for surrendering the documents. The White House also made clear that Miers and Taylor would not testify next month, as directed by the subpoenas, which were issued June 13. The stalemate could end up with House and Senate contempt citations and a battle in federal court over separation of powers. -snip-Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070628/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush...
|

Rhetorical question: |
laylah |
Jun-28-07 09:36 AM |
#1 |
 
Because the "liberal" media allows them. Enables them, even. |
Roland99 |
Jun-28-07 09:39 AM |
#3 |
  
100% on the money!!! |
old guy |
Jun-28-07 09:44 AM |
#8 |
   
Hey, old guy, welcome to DU! |
Dhalgren |
Jun-28-07 11:32 AM |
#49 |
    
Yes, as Vikings we do have our cross to bear. |
old guy |
Jun-28-07 11:51 AM |
#64 |
   
Anybody wanna bet afainst the Supremes upholding Bush? |
Jackpine Radical |
Jun-28-07 11:40 AM |
#58 |
  
Some day I will get to know more about how these "tubes" work. |
old guy |
Jun-28-07 11:59 AM |
#69 |
   
Welcome to DU old guy |
ooglymoogly |
Jun-28-07 01:28 PM |
#98 |
  
Maybe we can be of benefit somehow with our sage opinions. |
old guy |
Jun-28-07 01:45 PM |
#103 |
  
Yes, and there are a few smart senior women, too! Moi, for one... |
Radio_Lady |
Jun-28-07 04:15 PM |
#121 |
  
I've got lots of sage here |
realpolitik |
Jun-28-07 11:07 PM |
#179 |
  
You got to be kidding ... |
humbled_opinion |
Jun-28-07 04:55 PM |
#134 |
   
They don't want to overturn Roe Vs Wade |
Enthusiast |
Jun-28-07 05:07 PM |
#137 |
    
So little time, so much to hate |
LastLiberal in PalmSprings |
Jun-28-07 09:36 PM |
#167 |
    
Right - The carrot is meant to be dangled, not gotten. /nt |
Beartracks |
Jun-28-07 10:07 PM |
#170 |
   
This country is so divided now Civil War is not out of the question. |
PinkyisBlue |
Jun-28-07 11:03 PM |
#178 |
  
Civil War? |
Socal31 |
Jun-29-07 03:00 AM |
#196 |
  
I'd bet on it. There is no way a President can trump Congress, the Senate and |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Jun-28-07 05:58 PM |
#147 |
  
Bingo! |
loudsue |
Jun-28-07 09:51 AM |
#12 |
  
congress has been enabling them for the last 6 years |
leftchick |
Jun-28-07 10:41 AM |
#31 |
  
give that guy a ceegar. the media has been bought and paid for by these crooks |
leQ |
Jun-28-07 10:52 AM |
#34 |
  
That and because the "democratic" congress alows them. Enables them, even. |
Exiled in America |
Jun-28-07 11:23 AM |
#45 |
   
And that is what I lament the most. |
Roland99 |
Jun-28-07 11:32 AM |
#50 |
   
100% agree. |
emilyg |
Jun-28-07 01:41 PM |
#101 |
  
Wish there was a blowjob involved. |
Rockholm |
Jun-28-07 12:03 PM |
#72 |
   
This just makes me SICK! We could have an impeachment NOW! |
redqueen |
Jun-28-07 01:02 PM |
#90 |
   
No the blowjob issue applies only to democrats...Just like the laws and the constitution |
ooglymoogly |
Jun-28-07 01:18 PM |
#94 |
    
Naturally the Democrats are too chickenshit..... |
Rockholm |
Jun-28-07 04:40 PM |
#129 |
   
Well, he's screwing the entire country... |
TwoSparkles |
Jun-28-07 05:02 PM |
#135 |
   
How do we know |
ProudDad |
Jun-28-07 11:46 PM |
#183 |
  
That is ONE image that I just cannot stomach. |
Rockholm |
Jun-29-07 08:25 AM |
#202 |
  
They wont be tried on FOX and CNN |
niceypoo |
Jun-28-07 01:13 PM |
#93 |
  
and becuase they want it to end up in teh supreme, where they will win every time. |
robinlynne |
Jun-28-07 04:44 PM |
#132 |
 
Because the Dems feel they must "keep their powder dry"? |
TechBear_Seattle |
Jun-28-07 09:48 AM |
#10 |
  
junior ain't too bright? He just pissed on us again. |
0007 |
Jun-28-07 10:54 AM |
#35 |
 
What amazes me is how the Senate doesn't use its power fully |
Cronus Protagonist |
Jun-28-07 09:56 AM |
#17 |
 
It is pointless, anymore, to make the point "If Bill Clinton did this...." |
PurpleChez |
Jun-28-07 11:23 AM |
#46 |
  
Exactly right. If Gore as VP had failed to produce papers |
Turn CO Blue |
Jun-28-07 11:43 PM |
#182 |
 
Freepers will, of course, have reasons why all of the Chimpy precedents |
PurpleChez |
Jun-29-07 10:38 AM |
#215 |
 
I think ultimately you have to be prepared to send in guys with |
MGKrebs |
Jun-28-07 11:42 AM |
#60 |
  
I'm wondering if you might be right about that. |
stubtoe |
Jun-28-07 11:52 AM |
#66 |
 
obstruction of justice-put these criminal bastards in handcuffs & haul them to jail, where they |
wordpix |
Jun-28-07 04:29 PM |
#125 |
 
Precedent |
Cant trust em |
Jun-28-07 07:00 PM |
#154 |
 
Because, well, in our system of gover OMG - PARIS HILTON IS OUT OF JAIL!!! |
Oregonian |
Jun-28-07 10:42 PM |
#175 |
  
ROFL!!! |
southerncrone |
Jun-28-07 11:54 PM |
#186 |
 
The Dem "leadership" is too cowardly |
ProudDad |
Jun-28-07 11:42 PM |
#181 |
 
The big money big corporate shareholders own all 3 branches of govt. |
valerief |
Jun-29-07 09:58 AM |
#213 |

rape is never "mutual accommodation" |
UpInArms |
Jun-28-07 09:39 AM |
#2 |

Crashing trying to protect the mad monk |
underpants |
Jun-28-07 09:39 AM |
#4 |
 
Citing contempt of Congress is next |
Warpy |
Jun-28-07 09:42 AM |
#6 |
 
A confrontation in the Supreme Court is exactly what they want |
formercia |
Jun-28-07 09:56 AM |
#18 |

Is the Supreme Court decision as a lock? |
Barrett808 |
Jun-28-07 10:17 AM |
#25 |
 
kennedy |
november3rd |
Jun-28-07 01:21 PM |
#97 |
 
The "fix" will be in |
Enthusiast |
Jun-28-07 03:46 PM |
#116 |

Right |
underpants |
Jun-28-07 10:31 AM |
#27 |

Exactly |
Winebrat |
Jun-28-07 11:38 AM |
#54 |

if Supreme court negates Congresses power that would |
lovuian |
Jun-28-07 12:00 PM |
#70 |
 
And it would be a successful |
Enthusiast |
Jun-28-07 05:16 PM |
#140 |
 
Agreed. |
old guy |
Jun-28-07 06:17 PM |
#153 |

I think you are exactly right. These criminals having been pushing towards this goal |
AikidoSoul |
Jun-28-07 05:58 PM |
#148 |

Now's the time, Dems. Now's the time to use all that powder you've been keeping dry... |
KansDem |
Jun-28-07 09:41 AM |
#5 |
 
Yes, please God/FSM, do something here! |
GreenPartyVoter |
Jun-28-07 09:42 AM |
#7 |

I'm having flashbacks to the 70s |
MaineDem |
Jun-28-07 09:46 AM |
#9 |
 
I see moron* as the type to take everyone down with him*... |
Javaman |
Jun-28-07 09:56 AM |
#16 |
 
if the haze is purple, you really were there n/t |
wizstars |
Jun-28-07 04:23 PM |
#123 |
 
Another White House Deja Vu Moment |
Raejeanowl |
Jun-28-07 04:40 PM |
#130 |
 
nixon resigned |
ProudDad |
Jun-28-07 11:50 PM |
#185 |

I think back of the Pelosi change of power hoopla and wonder if today's new's of |
Imagevision |
Jun-28-07 09:50 AM |
#11 |
 
Like a fart in the wind... |
EnviroBat |
Jun-28-07 09:54 AM |
#15 |
 
Absolutely. Congresss has got to show that |
mountainvue |
Jun-28-07 12:55 PM |
#88 |
 
The fix was in before that... |
rucky |
Jun-29-07 12:58 AM |
#191 |
 
long past pathetic and well into complicit. |
tomp |
Jun-29-07 08:48 AM |
#206 |

Time to give the US Marshals tanks & send them in. |
Vidar |
Jun-28-07 09:52 AM |
#13 |

Here comes the backbone time. Will the Dems show some or will the back down? |
Javaman |
Jun-28-07 09:54 AM |
#14 |
 
It pains me to say that I expect them to back down. |
PurpleChez |
Jun-28-07 11:28 AM |
#48 |

This is the Dems way of saying; "now folks make sure you vote Dem for next prez... |
Imagevision |
Jun-28-07 12:11 PM |
#74 |

This is beyond unbelievable |
Highway61 |
Jun-28-07 09:57 AM |
#19 |
 
Bush wants to force this into his Supreme Court. |
aquart |
Jun-28-07 10:58 AM |
#37 |
 
Welcome to DU! |
calimary |
Jun-28-07 11:11 AM |
#40 |

Calimary, you are just wonderful. You say it all so well and so quick. |
Decruiter |
Jun-29-07 05:15 AM |
#199 |

Someone in Dem leadership needs to call a press conference |
loudsue |
Jun-28-07 09:59 AM |
#20 |
 
no shit! I agree 100% lousue |
themartyred |
Jun-28-07 10:43 PM |
#176 |
 
Sure...and it'll be shown 24/7... |
Wednesdays |
Jun-29-07 09:48 AM |
#211 |

ITMFA |
jollyreaper2112 |
Jun-28-07 10:01 AM |
#21 |
 
Exactly! Ridiculous how long overdue this really is!! |
anotherCTliberal |
Jun-28-07 08:12 PM |
#159 |

If Bush caved and supplied subpoenaed documents it would open |
Imagevision |
Jun-28-07 10:02 AM |
#22 |

if the dems cave on this, it's time to pull the sheet. nt |
Javaman |
Jun-28-07 10:04 AM |
#23 |

Erm, impeach Gonzales now, then the Justice Dept. won't be compromised |
bunny planet |
Jun-28-07 10:11 AM |
#24 |

They are using executive privledge, if it goes to the supreme court |
still_one |
Jun-28-07 10:29 AM |
#26 |

This is the last straw... |
Highway61 |
Jun-28-07 10:31 AM |
#28 |
 
It could be the beginning of the end for bushco. |
wizstars |
Jun-28-07 04:53 PM |
#133 |

How many times have we thought this though? Seriously. |
file83 |
Jun-28-07 08:34 PM |
#165 |

This is good! No weasling out of this by Congress! |
dmosh42 |
Jun-28-07 10:33 AM |
#29 |
 
I doubt it will happen. Perhaps someone should educate them on the Constitution |
still_one |
Jun-28-07 11:23 AM |
#47 |
 
Don't count on it |
realbluesky |
Jun-28-07 11:41 AM |
#59 |
 
So what do we do when the Dems do... nothing? |
Zhade |
Jun-28-07 04:11 PM |
#119 |

Who didn't see this coming!! |
dkofos |
Jun-28-07 10:41 AM |
#30 |

This asshole just doesn't have to play by the rules |
bif |
Jun-28-07 10:49 AM |
#32 |

bu$hco continues to abuse OUR government and OUR laws. |
Massachusetts |
Jun-28-07 10:49 AM |
#33 |

Now that purported "legal genius" Roberts gets to pen some pedestrian opinion cutting and pasting |
The Stranger |
Jun-28-07 10:56 AM |
#36 |
 
He doesn't have to, |
trashcanistanista |
Jun-28-07 01:38 PM |
#100 |

This is very interesting regarding Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley |
KalicoKitty |
Jun-28-07 11:01 AM |
#38 |
 
That last sentence is the key: The Democrats are neither smart nor courageous enough to go to the |
The Stranger |
Jun-28-07 11:16 AM |
#43 |
 
We could only hope |
realbluesky |
Jun-28-07 11:45 AM |
#63 |
 
Yeah. US v Nixon was decided in the context of a criminal case: |
pinto |
Jun-28-07 12:23 PM |
#80 |

Executive privilege to avoid Constitutional oversight...makes those |
MasonJar |
Jun-28-07 11:10 AM |
#39 |

It is way past time for our congress to say... |
Stuckinthebush |
Jun-28-07 11:12 AM |
#41 |

OK, so the Admin has thumbed their noses at the Dems again. Now what are they |
EV_Ares |
Jun-28-07 11:13 AM |
#42 |
 
If a subpoena is issued |
treestar |
Jun-28-07 11:51 AM |
#65 |
  
Thanks. So then they need to follow up on the sanctions against |
EV_Ares |
Jun-28-07 12:30 PM |
#82 |
  
Which court decides if the supeona |
trashcanistanista |
Jun-28-07 01:41 PM |
#102 |
 
self-delete. refer to post # 71 nt |
tomp |
Jun-29-07 08:57 AM |
#208 |
 
The bottom line is power and being consumed with holding on to it at all cost |
alllyingwhores |
Jun-28-07 12:13 PM |
#76 |

Understand and I am with you. eom. |
EV_Ares |
Jun-28-07 12:30 PM |
#83 |

Nixon's ghost seems to inhabit Bush now... |
sakabatou |
Jun-28-07 11:21 AM |
#44 |
 
Nixon seems like a boy scout now. |
sellitman |
Jun-28-07 03:43 PM |
#114 |

now don't go insulting the Boy Scouts like that.......... |
wizstars |
Jun-28-07 05:09 PM |
#138 |

How many Republicans will continue to be lap dogs? |
young_at_heart |
Jun-28-07 11:35 AM |
#51 |
 
Not enough of them will. |
sellitman |
Jun-28-07 03:45 PM |
#115 |
 
Maybe it's because those who turned against Nixon R gone now. |
Amonester |
Jun-28-07 04:04 PM |
#117 |

Take 'em to court, expedite the process, and then get it into the hands of the Supremes. |
Major Hogwash |
Jun-28-07 11:36 AM |
#52 |

When are We The People |
chervilant |
Jun-28-07 11:37 AM |
#53 |
 
Durn, again |
chervilant |
Jun-28-07 11:39 AM |
#57 |
 
Exactly the game they are playing.. |
southerncrone |
Jun-29-07 12:32 AM |
#189 |

IMPEACH NOW |
realbluesky |
Jun-28-07 11:38 AM |
#55 |

Serously, did anyone here ever think they would do anything to |
efhmc |
Jun-28-07 11:39 AM |
#56 |

Justice Kennedy is the key if this goes to the Supreme Court. |
dubyadubya3 |
Jun-28-07 11:43 AM |
#61 |
 
if he lives.................n/t |
diamidue |
Jun-29-07 02:06 AM |
#194 |

Fire him n/t |
va4wilderness |
Jun-28-07 11:44 AM |
#62 |

What is it going to take.. |
NotGonnaTakeIt |
Jun-28-07 11:55 AM |
#67 |

Its official this is a Dictatorship Congress makes no difference |
lovuian |
Jun-28-07 11:58 AM |
#68 |

Speaking of Presidents and Subpoenas... |
Hissyspit |
Jun-28-07 12:01 PM |
#71 |

The shredders are working overtime |
Gamey |
Jun-28-07 12:09 PM |
#73 |
 
Welcome to DU! Yes indeed, those shredders are going 24-7 as we speak. |
CLW |
Jun-28-07 03:31 PM |
#111 |
 
self-deleted - wrong thread |
CLW |
Jun-28-07 03:39 PM |
#112 |

What? We still don't have enough evidence for Impeachment yet? |
ShortnFiery |
Jun-28-07 12:13 PM |
#75 |
 
Wow, you really sound "concerned". |
brentspeak |
Jun-28-07 03:42 PM |
#113 |

Pelosi has disappeared, Reid has gotten boring to hear, WTF?!! |
Imagevision |
Jun-28-07 12:14 PM |
#77 |

Impeach. Indict. Aggressively Interrogate. Convict. Imprison. n/t |
IanDB1 |
Jun-28-07 12:14 PM |
#78 |
 
If they FAIL to act, we are obliged to KICK OUT our House Leadership despite |
ShortnFiery |
Jun-28-07 12:17 PM |
#79 |

Impeach. Indict. Imprison. |
Jack Rabbit |
Jun-28-07 12:24 PM |
#81 |

The fucking "Associated Press" quoted whole portions of Bush's lawyer, and only stated |
The Stranger |
Jun-28-07 12:37 PM |
#84 |

Like they were ever going to comply. |
graywarrior |
Jun-28-07 12:50 PM |
#85 |

Talk about a power grab |
Highway61 |
Jun-28-07 12:51 PM |
#86 |
 
Good Link, did not know this. So much for WSJ. |
ringtailtooter |
Jun-29-07 09:11 AM |
#209 |

Its time. |
Jim4Wes |
Jun-28-07 12:54 PM |
#87 |
 
Exactly |
AandP |
Jun-28-07 01:08 PM |
#92 |

How are the Alito and Roberts comfirmations looking right about now Senators? |
MilesColtrane |
Jun-28-07 12:57 PM |
#89 |

mutual accommodation? GMAB! |
redqueen |
Jun-28-07 01:03 PM |
#91 |

Congress Can Overcome Executive Privilege if Investigating Potential Crimes |
L. Coyote |
Jun-28-07 01:19 PM |
#95 |
 
Hopefully this is what they are going for. Congress wanted to exhaust every possible |
KoKo01 |
Jun-28-07 02:30 PM |
#106 |
 
Turley said this on Olbermann's show. |
Perragrande |
Jun-28-07 05:05 PM |
#136 |
 
And you are not the judges of the merits of the evidence.... We are. |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Jun-28-07 05:30 PM |
#145 |

You ever feel like it's the end of the earth as we know it? |
Connonym |
Jun-28-07 01:20 PM |
#96 |
 
Hardly |
AandP |
Jun-28-07 02:12 PM |
#105 |

This is such bullshit. The Dems are total cowards if they don't act |
Neo |
Jun-28-07 01:29 PM |
#99 |
 
Immediate Articles of Impeachment |
sampsonblk |
Jun-28-07 02:33 PM |
#108 |

If Bush Is the Weakest President In Our History |
Mr. Ected |
Jun-28-07 02:06 PM |
#104 |

Maybe whistleblowers in the NSA could provide said documents |
EVDebs |
Jun-28-07 02:31 PM |
#107 |

Will 'moderate' Dems agree to fight on? |
sampsonblk |
Jun-28-07 02:36 PM |
#109 |
 
No. Moderates would rather criminals walk for political expediency. |
Zhade |
Jun-28-07 04:14 PM |
#120 |

My impression as well. (n/t) |
kenzee13 |
Jun-28-07 09:38 PM |
#168 |

And this is surprising, why? |
DemSoccerMom |
Jun-28-07 02:58 PM |
#110 |

Such lawbreaking usually results in arrest. |
Zhade |
Jun-28-07 04:08 PM |
#118 |

Congress is responsible to Americans and DO THEIR JOBS |
lovuian |
Jun-28-07 04:18 PM |
#122 |

We need a president who worries less about his own ass and more about his country's. nt |
Miss Chybil |
Jun-28-07 04:27 PM |
#124 |

Americans need to shout out |
jonnyra |
Jun-28-07 04:32 PM |
#126 |
 
You are right on! |
Enthusiast |
Jun-28-07 05:13 PM |
#139 |

I want to echo what others on this thread have said |
senseandsensibility |
Jun-28-07 04:39 PM |
#127 |
 
Why ISN'T the DU Activist Corps up and running?!!!!! |
AikidoSoul |
Jun-28-07 06:02 PM |
#150 |

exactly |
senseandsensibility |
Jun-28-07 06:05 PM |
#151 |

Diverse Group, Insurmountable odds, certain failure, -- |
sbyte |
Jun-29-07 04:58 AM |
#198 |

How shameless can these people get? |
nam78_two |
Jun-28-07 04:39 PM |
#128 |

So, when is Congress going to get the message to pursue Impeachment and Criminal Charges? |
Pachamama |
Jun-28-07 04:43 PM |
#131 |

THEN THROW HIS FUCKING ASS IN JAIL!!!!!!!!!!! |
sandrakae |
Jun-28-07 05:17 PM |
#141 |

Why should he? |
depakid |
Jun-28-07 05:17 PM |
#142 |

Where is Barbara Jordan when we need her? |
wizstars |
Jun-28-07 05:19 PM |
#143 |
 
I don't know who she is, but I bet she and Burt Reynolds are mucking about |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Jun-28-07 06:01 PM |
#149 |

Look up Barbara Jordan's speech as a congressional member of the Watergate Hearings. |
CLW |
Jun-28-07 10:37 PM |
#173 |

Barbara Jordan and Elizabeth Holzman |
ProudDad |
Jun-29-07 12:03 AM |
#187 |
 
Thank you for those quotations, ProudDad. Both evidently great women, |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Jun-29-07 08:42 AM |
#204 |

Your really DON'T know who she is! |
southerncrone |
Jun-29-07 12:48 AM |
#190 |

Your welcome. I hope the lacunae in my knowledge continue to bring |
KCabotDullesMarxIII |
Jun-29-07 08:23 AM |
#201 |

Let's git it on |
Gman |
Jun-28-07 05:19 PM |
#144 |

BushCo renegades and criminals and a fascist supreme court |
whistle |
Jun-28-07 05:52 PM |
#146 |

King George |
classysassy |
Jun-28-07 06:07 PM |
#152 |

i am going to make a citizen's arrest! |
scarface2004 |
Jun-28-07 07:01 PM |
#155 |

It's put up or shut up time, Dems |
BlueStater |
Jun-28-07 07:06 PM |
#156 |
 
Yes, no more backing down without a fight. This is put up or shut up time. |
faygokid |
Jun-28-07 07:26 PM |
#158 |

This is what happens when you allow them to steal an election... |
RestoreGore |
Jun-28-07 07:20 PM |
#157 |

Brings back old times doesn't it? |
Highway61 |
Jun-28-07 08:25 PM |
#160 |

He better be careful or the Dems will send him another non-binding resolution |
jgraz |
Jun-28-07 08:26 PM |
#161 |
 
I doubt it |
rpannier |
Jun-28-07 08:32 PM |
#163 |

Gonna be a fun summer, watching junior do the 'o stutter dance |
0007 |
Jun-28-07 08:30 PM |
#162 |

I guess its time for another angry letter. |
Pawel K |
Jun-28-07 08:34 PM |
#164 |

I remember when Pelosi said she would make this admistration accountable for |
Imagevision |
Jun-28-07 09:06 PM |
#166 |

This is what happens when one has a "gradualist" Democrat-Corporate Congress. |
nealmhughes |
Jun-28-07 10:00 PM |
#169 |

Aw, shucks, sure he will .... |
sjdnb |
Jun-28-07 10:19 PM |
#171 |

This is just wrong - We need to Destroy America |
dubeskin |
Jun-28-07 10:35 PM |
#172 |

the BS King has spoken..oh what a web they weave when at first they....nm |
april |
Jun-28-07 10:39 PM |
#174 |

Breaking: Dems threaten to re-send the subpoena in CAPITAL LETTERS to show they mean business |
entanglement |
Jun-28-07 10:47 PM |
#177 |
 
Rep Waxman has INSIDERS spilling their guts ! Qui tam time |
EVDebs |
Jun-28-07 11:17 PM |
#180 |

So now Bush makes people think he is trying to cover it up |
bambino |
Jun-28-07 11:48 PM |
#184 |

Barbara Jordan's speech is TOO important to leave upthread |
ProudDad |
Jun-29-07 12:05 AM |
#188 |

it can all change on a dime folks.. |
peacetheonlyway |
Jun-29-07 01:01 AM |
#192 |

FUCK BUSH! |
iLikeJello |
Jun-29-07 01:47 AM |
#193 |
 
They certainly should |
texastoast |
Jun-29-07 10:43 AM |
#216 |

HOW MANY WAYS TO SPELL "KICK THE BUM OUT" |
happygoluckytoyou |
Jun-29-07 02:35 AM |
#195 |

Rocket Science... |
19jet54 |
Jun-29-07 03:01 AM |
#197 |

Jail all of them for contempt of court nt |
auburngrad82 |
Jun-29-07 06:29 AM |
#200 |

Nothing of any signifcance will be done. Any takers? |
wake.up.america |
Jun-29-07 08:34 AM |
#203 |

We all know he has contempt for Congress, the legal justice system .... |
lpbk2713 |
Jun-29-07 08:44 AM |
#205 |
 
God everytime I see that picture of Rush |
Highway61 |
Jun-29-07 08:48 AM |
#207 |

OxyRush puts gross at an entirely greater level. |
lpbk2713 |
Jun-29-07 09:29 AM |
#210 |

3 POINTS OF INTEREST |
ringtailtooter |
Jun-29-07 09:54 AM |
#212 |
 
Excellent points, right on the money (no pun intended) |
southerncrone |
Jun-29-07 06:02 PM |
#218 |

we need to impeach |
focusfan |
Jun-29-07 10:33 AM |
#214 |

We are the frogs in the pot |
Hideboh |
Jun-29-07 11:18 AM |
#217 |
 |
How in the HELL are these bastards allowed to do this again and again and again, with impunity and no consequences? I really don't understand.
|
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Because the "liberal" media allows them. Enables them, even. |
 |
And that keeps the American public apathetic, at best.
|
old guy
(833 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
Dhalgren
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 49. Hey, old guy, welcome to DU! |
 |
I, too am an old guy - and also a Vikings fan (though in the past couple of years it's been pretty hard). 
|
old guy
(833 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #49 |
| 64. Yes, as Vikings we do have our cross to bear. |
 |
Perhaps in the future in a Galaxy far,far away our dreams will... well forget it.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 58. Anybody wanna bet afainst the Supremes upholding Bush? |
 |
And BTW, Welcome Old Guy. Chippewa Falls here. I haven't been up that way for a while but I know another DUer up your way (kinda near Danbury, actually).
|
old guy
(833 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #58 |
| 69. Some day I will get to know more about how these "tubes" work. |
 |
At present I'm feeling my way very slowly and carefully. When we used to have snow? in this area, we used to trailer to Danbury and ride the trails north. Very nice up there.
|
ooglymoogly
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #69 |
| 98. Welcome to DU old guy |  |
 |
I think there are a lot of us old guys on DU.
|
old guy
(833 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #98 |
| 103. Maybe we can be of benefit somehow with our sage opinions. |
 |
God, did I really say that?
|
Radio_Lady
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #103 |
| 121. Yes, and there are a few smart senior women, too! Moi, for one... |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 04:19 PM by Radio_Lady
Nice to meet-chu on the DU! In peace, Radio Lady in Oregon (film, theater and book reviewer) Aging as gracefully as possible -- just turned 68 on May 31. 35 years in TV and talk radio broadcasting in Miami and Boston, now retired to true blue Portland, OR and volunteering at Oregon Public Broadcasting, the PBS station out here. http://www.opb.org More about Radio_Lady at: http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Radio_Lady OT: Our best friends just moved to Mequon, WI in January. We miss them like heck and we're Chicago, IL and Milwaukee, WI bound for a visit -- probably sometime in 2008.
|
Fovea
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #103 |
| 179. I've got lots of sage here |
 |
and am being overrun by oregano, thyme and mint!
Welcome to DU!
|
humbled_opinion
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #58 |
| 134. You got to be kidding ... |
 |
Today they voted to desegregate schools effectively saying that race cannot be used as a quota to fill student vacancies in schools... That is a huge conservative victory... Stephen Bryer said it best today
"Never have so few done so much so quickly" Making the court conservative.
Bush will win and SCOTUS decision hands down.
This country is so divided right now Civil War is not out of the question.
Stand by because this court is far from done...
I predict Roe V Wade to be overturned in the near future that may be the catalyst.
|
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #134 |
| 137. They don't want to overturn Roe Vs Wade |
 |
If they overturn Roe Vs Wade they will lose their most powerful catalyst. This, along with gay rights, is how they invigorate the Christian fundamentalist vote. Think it over.
|
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #137 |
| 167. So little time, so much to hate |
 |
Even if Roe v. Wade was overturned and the Constitutional Amendment prohibiting gay marriage was enacted, the fundies wouldn't be satisfied. There are so many other issues: mandatory Christian prayer in school, full public funding of Christian churches (vouchers are just the tip of the iceberg), the Ten Commandments posted in every public building, the Lord's Prayer said at every public event, etc., etc. Somewhere in the noise of television evangelists and O'Reilly clones the message of Christ -- love your neighbor, take care of the poor and infirm, etc. -- got lost.
The Repugs will always have some hot-button issue that makes their base turn off their ability to think rationally. And if all else fails, they can always fall back on racism.
|
Beartracks
(819 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #137 |
| 170. Right - The carrot is meant to be dangled, not gotten. /nt |
PinkyisBlue
(611 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #134 |
| 178. This country is so divided now Civil War is not out of the question. |
 |
Sometimes I feel like there are two countries now. I have absolutely nothing in common with the Ann Coulter's and Sean Hannity's of our time, or the people who champion them. It would be great if they could take their elitist, hypocritical and distorted opinions with them to another place and start their own little utopia.
|
Socal31
(328 posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #178 |
 |
Sorry, most people are too caught up in Paris Hilton to care what is going on. We are a LONG way from any sort of armed anything.
|
Joe Chi Minh
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #58 |
| 147. I'd bet on it. There is no way a President can trump Congress, the Senate and |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 06:25 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
the American people. I suspect the Supremes are judicious enough, if not all virtuous enough, to recognise that.
The US is founded on parallel and opposite concepts. The rights of robber barons to have their will with the people as they please; and the concept of democracy, rule of the people, by the people and for the peopple. Isn't that your expression?
Now, in order to get their evil way, the far right have paid scandalously mendacious lip-service to the latter. Thing is though, this is the ultimate condensation of the said conflict into the most transparent of nutshells.
It is the pivot, the fulcrum, upon which everything the US is said to stand for - by Republicans, no less than Democrats (however often putative the allegiance of the latter to democracy might be). There would be no more saluting Old Glory, singing the Star Spangled Banner, no more dwelling on the history of the country's fight for independence. Any commemoration of "no taxation without representation" would be a total embarrassment. It would be, as if Bush were to order the Statue of Liberty to be taken down and smashed in a public ceremony, and a statue of Honecker erected in its place.
Mendacious propaganda, it seems, can be like karma. It works as long as the whole nation are not able to examine it under a spotlight. If they are... well, you have to restore credibility in an equally simple and transparent way, i.e by compliance of the the Oval Office with the lawmakers' requirements.
When the Supremes, at their pleasure, awarded the presidency to Bush, it was at the apogee of an emotional roller-coaster election charade; not in the clear light of day.
|
loudsue
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
 |
They are above the law of the land, and have no respect for any stinkin' constitution. Assholes. 
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 31. congress has been enabling them for the last 6 years |
 |
there have been ZERO consequences for their crimes.
|
leQ
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 34. give that guy a ceegar. the media has been bought and paid for by these crooks |
 |
who think they are above any laws and can do whatever the hell they please. dictators do that you know.
|
Exiled in America
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 45. That and because the "democratic" congress alows them. Enables them, even. |
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #45 |
| 50. And that is what I lament the most. |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
Rockholm
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 72. Wish there was a blowjob involved. |
 |
We would have already have an impeachment by now.
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
| 90. This just makes me SICK! We could have an impeachment NOW! |
 |
But SOME people CHOOSE not to! 
|
ooglymoogly
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
| 94. No the blowjob issue applies only to democrats...Just like the laws and the constitution |  |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 01:30 PM by ooglymoogly
Why do you think those 23% Luddites still support this dangerous fool along with the corporate press. THEY LIKE BEING ABOVE THE LAW...Its a Nazi thing. Its like impeachment only applies to democrats too.
|
Rockholm
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #94 |
| 129. Naturally the Democrats are too chickenshit..... |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 04:40 PM by Rockholm
to DO anything! What, we don't want the mean nasty republicans to get mad at us? Please. We promise not to filibuster. Timid and meek does not win many battles.
|
CoffeeCat
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
| 135. Well, he's screwing the entire country... |
 |
...that should count for something.
Impeach the bastard!
|
ProudDad
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
 |
Karl Rove hasn't been on bended knees beneath the Oval Office desk giving the shrub some head?
With Jeff Gannon taking the video...
|
Rockholm
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #183 |
| 202. That is ONE image that I just cannot stomach. |
 |
Little Jeffy holding the camera is rich, and, while under normal circumstances it could be rather hot, this is one production I would rather not thank about.
Actually, my guess it was Harriet Miers holding the camera. Jeffy was probably the boom man.
|
niceypoo
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 93. They wont be tried on FOX and CNN |
 |
they will be tried in the courts and the congress
|
robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 132. and becuase they want it to end up in teh supreme, where they will win every time. |
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 10. Because the Dems feel they must "keep their powder dry"? |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:49 AM by TechBear_Seattle
Or maybe they are incapable of doing anything (other than meaningless, symbolic gestures) until they know for certain that they are guaranteed of success?
Or maybe, they are hoping to claim the same vast power when the Republicks are voted out of the White House, regardless of how unconstitutional that power might be?
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 35. junior ain't too bright? He just pissed on us again. |
 |
The people are the government and the only way to fight the big corporations that put these thugs in office is to unionize together to fight corporate America and bullshit artists such as the Neocon.
|
Cronus Protagonist
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 17. What amazes me is how the Senate doesn't use its power fully |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:57 AM by Cronus Protagonist
The Senate, having a Democratic majority and several Republicans against Bush/Cheney now, should be ramming subpoenas up Bush and Cheney's proverbial asses. There should be public hearings under oath by Bush and Cheney and Rice and all the rest of the cabal.
If you don't agree, think for a minute or two about what would be happening if the president were currently Democratic and the Senate was just as it is. You know the Republicans would be like a nest of fire ants and the TV would be filled with pictures of crooked politicians shamefully admitting guilt or fighting like banshees to stay out of jail. Now reverse the picture back again. Why are our guys so slow, so polite, so understanding? WHY ALL THIS DEFERENCE TO CRIMINALS???? WHY????
|
PurpleChez
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 46. It is pointless, anymore, to make the point "If Bill Clinton did this...." |
 |
But the fact is, that if Bill Clinton DID do this, or if Al Gore (Hail Al Gore!) had asserted that he was not a member of the executive branch, the talk radio wingnuts would be apoplectic, and would likely be forming lynch mobs to march on washington as we speak. But Dumbya could be caught sodomizing the dead coming into Dover AFB and the yokels would tell themselves he must've had a good reason and then zone out until the next runaway bride update.
|
Turn CO Blue
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
| 182. Exactly right. If Gore as VP had failed to produce papers |
 |
or asserted executive privilege time and time again, or met in secret with so-called energy task forces, or was always hiding out in undisclosed locations, or had seemed to be pulling Clinton's puppet strings -- then Hannity's head would have exploded with the force of a neutron bomb.
The only tiny comfort I take is that the Dems may very well win the White House, and in January 2009 we will start seeing if the Freepers really like these ideas about unitary executive, and the politicizing the Dept of Justice, and signing statements and having separate email accounts paid for by the DNC, and lack of transparency and photo-ops, and other high crimes and misdemeanors. Any liberties taken in the WH office will be applicable to the new President and Vice-president. I can't wait to see how the roaches in all those government offices scatter when the Dem president has the Bush-granted rights to wire-tap anyone he GD well pleases...legally.
|
PurpleChez
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #182 |
| 215. Freepers will, of course, have reasons why all of the Chimpy precedents |
 |
cannot be invoked by a democratic president. Jesus may or may not be involved. Everything will be different. EVERYTHING.
|
MGKrebs
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 60. I think ultimately you have to be prepared to send in guys with |
 |
guns and handcuffs into the White House, and you better have ALL your ducks in a row before you do that.
|
stubtoe
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #60 |
| 66. I'm wondering if you might be right about that. |
 |
This could get interesting.
|
wordpix
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 125. obstruction of justice-put these criminal bastards in handcuffs & haul them to jail, where they |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 04:29 PM by wordpix
should stay until these docs are handed up to the Hill. That is the sight I'm waiting for but looks like BushCo will just run out the clock. I wish Congress would just arrest these obstructors-of-justice. 
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
 |
At least when Dems are in office in 2008 we can use this as precedent to blow off subpoenas. Oh wait, that won't matter since we'll be in control of Congress too.
|
Arugula Latte
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 175. Because, well, in our system of gover OMG - PARIS HILTON IS OUT OF JAIL!!! |
 |
Shiny thing!! Lookee!! Shiny thing!!
|
southerncrone
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #175 |
ProudDad
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 181. The Dem "leadership" is too cowardly |
 |
to allow John Conyers to investigate their crimes...
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 213. The big money big corporate shareholders own all 3 branches of govt. |
 |
And the media. They get what they want. In any language.
|
| 2. rape is never "mutual accommodation" |
 |
and that is what this mal-administration has done to this country, its Constitution and its government.
|
| 4. Crashing trying to protect the mad monk |
 |
 Have they not learned anything from history? Oh I forgot they are all under some sort of spell that makes them put his defense above their own best interests They know that if this goes to the SC they had better than a 50/50 shot at winning.
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. Citing contempt of Congress is next |
 |
followed by censure.
Bought judges voting against the constitution are sowing the seeds for their eventual impeachment as the pendulum continues its swing back from the brink of fascism.
|
formercia
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 18. A confrontation in the Supreme Court is exactly what they want |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:57 AM by formercia
They want their rigged court to affirm the Unitary Executive. if they do, God help us.
This has been the Federalist Society battle plan all along.
|
Barrett808
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 25. Is the Supreme Court decision as a lock? |
 |
Is the fix in, like in 2000? Or will the court defy Bush, like with Gitmo?
|
november3rd
(581 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
 |
I don't think kennedy is one of those unitary executive wingnuts.
|
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
| 116. The "fix" will be in |
 |
There is no way they rule against Bush. The Neo-Cons have effectively pulled off a successful coup d'Etat and the American people aren't even aware of it. Welcome to fascist America.
|
underpants
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
Auggie
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
lovuian
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 70. if Supreme court negates Congresses power that would |
 |
eliminate checks and balances
|
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #70 |
| 140. And it would be a successful |
 |
And it would be a successful coup d' Etat by the Neo-Cons. We have been taken over by fascists and the American people don't even realize it.
|
old guy
(833 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #70 |
 |
Plus the fact that if the SCOTUS would rule the congress irrelevant do they not realize that they will be setting themselves up as well? * could simply say he doesn't need to pay attention to the court and since the court has said congress has no over site, * rules alone. Too far fetched?
|
AikidoSoul
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 148. I think you are exactly right. These criminals having been pushing towards this goal |
 |
for the past six years. Once the Supreme Court right wingers vote for Unitary Executive Privilege, we will have an official fascist state.
|
| 5. Now's the time, Dems. Now's the time to use all that powder you've been keeping dry... |
GreenPartyVoter
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| 7. Yes, please God/FSM, do something here! |
| 9. I'm having flashbacks to the 70s |
 |
That contempt case ended only because of a resignation, if I remember correctly. (But it was the seventies so you'll have to forgive me if my memory is a little shaky.)
|
Javaman
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 16. I see moron* as the type to take everyone down with him*... |
 |
nixon resigned. moron* will make sure that everyone takes the blame but him*, but in the end he* will be and like he* always has been, the biggest loser of them all.
|
wizstars
(409 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 123. if the haze is purple, you really were there n/t |
Raejeanowl
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 130. Another White House Deja Vu Moment |
 |
There were a few other layers of wrangling to cover up the
wrongdoing and specious invocations of executive privilege,
if I recall, including much that amounted to obstructions of
justice on top of obstructions of justice. But yes,
mind-boggling similarities for some of us who lived through
that era as well.
'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat
it.'
George Santayana
|
ProudDad
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
 |
'cause after the good guys made the case against him there were enough pukes convinced that they should remove him.
Conyers should have been allowed to begin the process the day the Dems were sworn in control of the Congress.
Fuck Pelosi and her cowardice!!!
|
| 11. I think back of the Pelosi change of power hoopla and wonder if today's new's of |
 |
Bush's refusal to supply subpoenaed documents will also fade into the Dem's list of bothched attempts to make this administration accountable?!! getting really pathetic folks...
|
EnviroBat
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 15. Like a fart in the wind... |
mountainvue
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 88. Absolutely. Congresss has got to show that |
 |
they mean business or our chances in '08 are shaky at best.
|
rucky
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 191. The fix was in before that... |
 |
when they confirmed Alito
|
tomp
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 206. long past pathetic and well into complicit. |
 |
coroner's report:
cause of death or u.s. democracy: dry powder syndrome.
|
| 13. Time to give the US Marshals tanks & send them in. |
| 14. Here comes the backbone time. Will the Dems show some or will the back down? |
 |
sigh. So sad that I even have to ponder such a question.
|
PurpleChez
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 48. It pains me to say that I expect them to back down. |
 |
But c'mon, guys, prove me wrong!!!
|
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
| 74. This is the Dems way of saying; "now folks make sure you vote Dem for next prez... |
| 19. This is beyond unbelievable |
 |
My God, everyday it gets worse. I said 6 years ago to my family...."If we only knew 1/8th of what was REALLY going on...our hair would fall out." This is getting really scary...they have deemed us all powerless simply by refusing anything they want coming down the pike. The apathy of the American Idol mentality has painted us all in a corner. God help us all.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 37. Bush wants to force this into his Supreme Court. |
 |
I'll just point out that Supreme Court judges can be impeached by the Congress.
|
calimary
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
 |
Yeah, a lot of us were in that same place - trying to warn the resolutely ignorant, apathetic, or "too busy". But even we couldn't have guessed how far or how deep or how egregious...
Dear God, I hope the Dems are going to flex some muscle.
My kingdom for a Democratic backbone!
|
Decruiter
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
| 199. Calimary, you are just wonderful. You say it all so well and so quick. |
 |
I'd like to recommend to all the DU Activist Forum and please, get involved in any action Calimary suggests.
Thank you, C. You are one of the bestest of the best ever in the long history of DU.
Peace\
|
| 20. Someone in Dem leadership needs to call a press conference |
 |
And announce, loud and clear, that this admin. thinks they are above the law of the land, and that congress has no choice but to act on this immediately. Has anyone heard any response from the Dems? crickets..... 
|
Divine Discontent
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 176. no shit! I agree 100% lousue |
 |
this IS the time.. it's like a movie scene right about now, and the credits are about to roll, are they going to force the issue by law against this fascist state that says they can do whatever they want with no oversight, or are they going to lay back and get paid for their meaningless position in the gov't that effectively just decides where the money is scattered? www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<<---- speak on your car with these stickers!
|
Wednesdays
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
| 211. Sure...and it'll be shown 24/7... |
 |
Exclusively on the shopping channel.
|
jollyreaper2112
(955 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |
 |
Impeach the motherfucker already.
|
anotherCTliberal
(73 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 159. Exactly! Ridiculous how long overdue this really is!! |
 |
Impeach, Indict and IMPRISON! Enough already!!
|
| 22. If Bush caved and supplied subpoenaed documents it would open |
 |
a can of worms of investigative material going back to the election fraud in 2004, if gives an inch they lost it all... it's up to the Dem's to flex there backbone if they have one?!!
|
| 23. if the dems cave on this, it's time to pull the sheet. nt |
| 24. Erm, impeach Gonzales now, then the Justice Dept. won't be compromised |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 10:12 AM by bunny planet
anymore. This is a hydra administration facing us, lets start lopping off some heads so we stand a chance in the Constitutional crisis that's coming down the road.
There's more than enough reason to impeach Gonzo, he's lied under oath several times. Hello. Pick the low hanging fruit first.
|
| 26. They are using executive privledge, if it goes to the supreme court |
 |
the court will rule 5-4 in the administration's favor
When will the Democrats in Congress get it through their head that the ONLY way to hold this administration for their actions is impeachment?
|
| 28. This is the last straw... |
 |
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 10:31 AM by Highway61
The Dems have to stay on this like a bunch of pit-bulls...this IS the moment of truth....PUSH BACK GOD SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
wizstars
(409 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 133. It could be the beginning of the end for bushco. |
 |
Lettem have it! both barrels! The Senate has got to go for the jugular on this, or they might as well castrate themselves--they'll be impotent forever if they let chimpster win on this.
|
file83
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #133 |
| 165. How many times have we thought this though? Seriously. |
 |
The entire government is controlled by the corporations - the government is just a charade - a show to provide us hope and drama that somebody at some point is going to actually do something for the American people.
But it will never happen - because it's just a TV show. Hearings are shows. Votes are shows. Speeches are shows. It's all a big illusion.
And in the end, sure there may be somebody who gets "busted" - but even that's just the nature of show business. Even actors get fired and written of a show every once in a while.
The corporations will always win in the end, after all, they are the "sponsors" of the show.
|
| 29. This is good! No weasling out of this by Congress! |
 |
Many of us have waited for the right time, and this is it. They have until July 18th to comply, and then it's time for contempt citations, which I believe document their criminal behavior. Then congress should move to impeachment proceedings. Leahy and Conyers know the drill, but the rest of the gang might need some diaper changing to follow through.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
| 47. I doubt it will happen. Perhaps someone should educate them on the Constitution |
 |
and what their duties are. Major abuse of power has occurred, from illegal wiretaps, invading a country based on lies, an attorney general who lied under oath, and witness tampering, and the only thing congress does is talk with no action
There is a reason their popularity is so low
|
realbluesky
(115 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
 |
I agree with your sentiments, but I have lost faith in the Dems to do anything right.
|
Zhade
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
| 119. So what do we do when the Dems do... nothing? |
 |
Because that's the party's track record, despite massive criminality on the part of the administration.
|
| 30. Who didn't see this coming!! |
| 32. This asshole just doesn't have to play by the rules |
 |
How many times have we seen this before? And if they don't like the rules, they go and change them.
|
Massachusetts
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message |
| 33. bu$hco continues to abuse OUR government and OUR laws. |
 |
Impeachment is definitely on the table now!
|
| 36. Now that purported "legal genius" Roberts gets to pen some pedestrian opinion cutting and pasting |
 |
from some "unitary executive" piece undoubtedly published by the Federalist Society.
It is impossible for an ideologue to be a genius, or anything close to genius, or anything -- actuualy -- other than a toady, a slave, a lobotomized, pathetic shell.
|
trashcanistanista
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
 |
I bet he has already done it. He is ready and waiting.
|
| 38. This is very interesting regarding Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley |
 |
This was on an mlive.com forum: http://www.mlive.com/forums/newstalk/index.ssf?page=-1 I Saw Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley On Countdown Last Night.... He presented an interesting possibility. If the Democrats base their case for the records on possible criminal activity (illegal warrantless surveillance ordered by Bush)it could open the door to impeachment. So, Bush could be opening the door to possible impeachment or criminal charges after he leaves office by fighting the subpoena. Could get very interesting. I'm just not sure the Democrats Congressional leadership is smart enough or courageous enough to go down that road.
|
The Stranger
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
| 43. That last sentence is the key: The Democrats are neither smart nor courageous enough to go to the |
 |
bathroom without getting permission from the GOP, much less smart or courageous enough to save the Union.
|
realbluesky
(115 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
 |
I saw the same thing. And I agree that door is wide open, but I don't have very much faith in the current batch of elected dems to do anything that takes a little political courage.
|
pinto
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
| 80. Yeah. US v Nixon was decided in the context of a criminal case: |
 |
US v. Nixon The Supreme Court addressed that the 'executive privilege' in United States v. Nixon, the 1974 case involving the demand by Watergate special prosecutor Leon Jaworski that Richard Nixon produce the audiotapes of conversations he and his colleagues had in the Oval Office of the White House in connection with criminal charges being brought against members of the Nixon Administration. Nixon invoked the privilege and refused to produce any records. The Supreme Court did not reject the claim of privilege out of hand; it noted, in fact, "the valid need for protection of communications between high Government officials and those who advise and assist them in the performance of their manifold duties" and that " uman experience teaches that those who expect public dissemination of their remarks may well temper candor with a concern for appearances and for their own interests to the detriment of the decisionmaking process." This is very similar to the logic that the Court had used in establishing an "executive immunity" defense for high office-holders charged with violating citizens' constitutional rights in the course of performing their duties.
The Supreme Court however rejected the notion that the President has an "absolute privilege." The Supreme Court stated: "To read the Article II powers of the President as providing an absolute privilege as against a subpoena essential to enforcement of criminal statutes on no more than a generalized claim of the public interest in confidentiality of nonmilitary and nondiplomatic discussions would upset the constitutional balance of 'a workable government' and gravely impair the role of the courts under Article III." Because Nixon had asserted only a generalized need for confidentiality, the Court held that the larger public interest in obtaining the truth in the context of a criminal prosecution took precedence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege
|
| 39. Executive privilege to avoid Constitutional oversight...makes those |
 |
docs appear very significant. I read yesterday on DU that Cheney gave the docs to National Archives until 2003, so he knows the drill just does not want to continue it. Very suspicious. I doubt in the Cheney/Bush duo there is anything left to subpoena.
|
Stuckinthebush
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
| 41. It is way past time for our congress to say... |
 |
"The American people have had it with this President. He has great disdain for Congress and its oversight role. He cares nothing for the Constitution, and he has destroyed our confidence in the fragile system that the founding fathers painstakingly developed over 200 years ago. In light of this, we have no other option than to begin impeachment proceedings. The framers gave our country this ability for exactly the situation we find ourselves in today. An out of control president who flaunts the rule of law and ignores the role of Congress must be removed from office. He is a danger to our way of government and he must be replaced. We have tried many times to work with him only to find that he repeatedly ignores the wishes of Congress and the American people. Perhaps with impeachment our country can begin to believe in itself and its leaders once more."
|
| 42. OK, so the Admin has thumbed their noses at the Dems again. Now what are they |
 |
going to do? Are they going to slink away and say "we tried". How many times have they tried?
Are they going to use the excuse about the numbers in the senate and house?
I think we all understand their difficulty but we at least want some follow-up, some balls and some effort at getting something done.
So far they have been very weak and seem to cave if Bush just looks at them sternly.
However, I will continue to hope for something out of them.
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #42 |
| 65. If a subpoena is issued |
 |
the person to whom it issues has to comply or be in contempt. Contempt has sanctions that can end up in jail time if the one in receipt of a subpoena remains recalcitrant.
One who receives a subpoena can also move to quash it.
These are the procedures. It is not that Congress is "weak" or "caving" but that * is thumbing his nose at the law. Congress has to follow through, but if they are going within the rules, it's all they can do, so all the frustration with them expressed on DU is just failure to appreciate that.
|
EV_Ares
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #65 |
| 82. Thanks. So then they need to follow up on the sanctions against |
 |
whoever is in contempt. Is that correct?
|
trashcanistanista
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #65 |
| 102. Which court decides if the supeona |
 |
is quashed? Does Congress make that decision?
|
tomp
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #102 |
| 208. self-delete. refer to post # 71 nt |
 |
Edited on Fri Jun-29-07 09:06 AM by tomp
|
alllyingwhores
(295 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
| 76. The bottom line is power and being consumed with holding on to it at all cost |
 |
The bottom line is power and being consumed with holding on to it at all cost...and, I'm describing Dems--with few exceptions.
The whole gutless, spineless, all talk BS is a part of it. The whole trying to over-think and over analyze to avoid any possibility of losing an individual seat is a big part of it. And, they being part of the same plutocracy is the biggest part of it!
I've been reading DU for several years and I've gotta be as fucking pissed off as anyone--but as far as I'm concerned, the waiting is over. Again, with few exceptions, we're being played.
Short of an all out rebellion, this same shit is going to continue forever.
|
EV_Ares
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #76 |
| 83. Understand and I am with you. eom. |
| 44. Nixon's ghost seems to inhabit Bush now... |
sellitman
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
| 114. Nixon seems like a boy scout now. |
 |
Cheney junior & Rove have perfected the play.
|
wizstars
(409 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #114 |
| 138. now don't go insulting the Boy Scouts like that.......... |
young_at_heart
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message |
| 51. How many Republicans will continue to be lap dogs? |
 |
They turned against Nixon, but for some reason they still think Cheney/Bush are gods.
|
sellitman
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 115. Not enough of them will. |
 |
That is my guess. They will defend their turd of a leader forever. Bank on it.
|
Amonester
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 117. Maybe it's because those who turned against Nixon R gone now. |
 |
The "New" (de-)generation of Republiks thinks bu$che/chainy R divinities. 
|
Major Hogwash
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message |
| 52. Take 'em to court, expedite the process, and then get it into the hands of the Supremes. |
 |
Do it. Do it now. Do it before the summer recess.
|
| 53. When are We The People |
 |
going to recognize and NAME the actual POWERS behind this puppet administration (with its de facto CEO Dick Cheney)?!? The Corporate Megalomaniacs--and who doesn't see that Cheney IS their CEO?!--have been successfully creating an environment most conducive to their profitability for the duration of Bush's administration (and before)! Are we too frightened to address this flaw inherent in Capitalism?!? Are we SO invested in grabbing the brass ring ourselves that we refuse to acknowledge that our own greed enables this administration?!?
I read recently a comment posted on Crooks and Liars decrying the impeachment of Dick Cheney. The author of said post asserted that impeaching Cheney would make him a martyr, and that "this is what they want!" Setting aside for now the question of who comprises this undefined 'they' (see above), consider this: this is a specious, vacuous argument, spun for us, I'm confident, by the Republicans themselves: "If they believe that impeachment will turn the nation against the Democrats, they won't impeach!"
We The People have begun to amass our voices and our votes. We The People want impeachment. We The People MUST use impeachment to heal our great nation, and to restore ourselves in the eyes of the rest of the world.
As Teddy said, "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public<\i>." Teddy was a Republican--a TRUE Republican.
Be steadfast in your bravery, my fellow activists!
|
chervilant
(260 posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #53 |
 |
If I can only remember to use the forward slash in my HTML!!!
|
southerncrone
(1000+ posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #53 |
| 189. Exactly the game they are playing.. |
 |
Since they control media, they control the spin. They beat Dems to punch, because of it & spin out reasons why Dems "can't" or "shouldn't" do X or Y or Z. If we see it, why can't our Reps in Congress see this? BTW, Welcome to DU! 
|
 |
It's the only way to stop them...
|
| 56. Serously, did anyone here ever think they would do anything to |
 |
further this investigation. Bush is sure that he has the courts in his hands and will win over the law/Constitution every time. The four SC right wing decisions yesterday proved that fact.
|
cureautismnow
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Jun-28-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |
| 61. Justice Kennedy is the key if this goes to the Supreme Court. |
 |
We have 4 that work for the good of America and 4 that are basically evil-doers toward the common man. Kennedy sometimes comes down on the righteous side. Lately, though, he's been siding with the troglodytes. Hopefully, his Gitmo rulings will carry over here.
|
diamidue
(546 posts)
|
Fri Jun-29-07 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #61 |
| 194. if he lives.................n/t |
| 67. What is it going to take.. |
 |
...for justice to be served?? I am so fucking sick of all this. We no longer live in a democracy, the average American just doesn't realize it yet. I guess the only other recourse is to have another revolution as suggested in the Declaration of Independence. I don't see anything else that would work. Unfortunately, it is not a viable option. And so we continue down the path to facism.
|
| 68. Its official this is a Dictatorship Congress makes no difference |
 |
we have a Constitutional Crisis
Congress doesn't matter Laws don't matter
its reality
Bush controls the country
|
| 71. Speaking of Presidents and Subpoenas... |
| 73. The shredders are working overtime |
 |
Soon there will be nothing to subpoena. Like millions of e-mails, they will have been "lost".
|