Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Bush won't supply subpoenaed documents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:32 AM
Original message
Bush won't supply subpoenaed documents
Source: Associated Press

Bush won't supply subpoenaed documents

By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent
2 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The White House, moving toward a constitutional
showdown with Congress, asserted executive privilege Thursday
and rejected lawmakers' demands for documents that could shed
light on the firings of federal prosecutors.

President Bush's attorney told Congress the White House would
not turn over subpoenaed documents for former presidential
counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor.

"With respect, it is with much regret that we are forced down
this unfortunate path which we sought to avoid by finding grounds
for mutual accommodation," White House counsel Fred Fielding said
in a letter to the chairmen of the House and Senate Judiciary
Committees. "We had hoped this matter could conclude with your
committees receiving information in lieu of having to invoke
executive privilege. Instead, we are at this conclusion."

Thursday was the deadline for surrendering the documents. The
White House also made clear that Miers and Taylor would not
testify next month, as directed by the subpoenas, which were
issued June 13. The stalemate could end up with House and Senate
contempt citations and a battle in federal court over separation
of powers.

-snip-

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070628/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
   Replies to this thread
   Rhetorical question:  laylah   Jun-28-07 09:36 AM   #1 
   Because the "liberal" media allows them. Enables them, even.  Roland99   Jun-28-07 09:39 AM   #3 
   100% on the money!!!  old guy   Jun-28-07 09:44 AM   #8 
   Hey, old guy, welcome to DU!  Dhalgren   Jun-28-07 11:32 AM   #49 
   Yes, as Vikings we do have our cross to bear.  old guy   Jun-28-07 11:51 AM   #64 
   Anybody wanna bet afainst the Supremes upholding Bush?  Jackpine Radical   Jun-28-07 11:40 AM   #58 
      Some day I will get to know more about how these "tubes" work.  old guy   Jun-28-07 11:59 AM   #69 
      Welcome to DU old guy  ooglymoogly   Jun-28-07 01:28 PM   #98 
         Maybe we can be of benefit somehow with our sage opinions.  old guy   Jun-28-07 01:45 PM   #103 
            Yes, and there are a few smart senior women, too! Moi, for one...  Radio_Lady   Jun-28-07 04:15 PM   #121 
            I've got lots of sage here  realpolitik   Jun-28-07 11:07 PM   #179 
      You got to be kidding ...  humbled_opinion   Jun-28-07 04:55 PM   #134 
      They don't want to overturn Roe Vs Wade  Enthusiast   Jun-28-07 05:07 PM   #137 
      So little time, so much to hate  LastLiberal in PalmSprings   Jun-28-07 09:36 PM   #167 
      Right - The carrot is meant to be dangled, not gotten. /nt  Beartracks   Jun-28-07 10:07 PM   #170 
      This country is so divided now Civil War is not out of the question.  PinkyisBlue   Jun-28-07 11:03 PM   #178 
         Civil War?  Socal31   Jun-29-07 03:00 AM   #196 
      I'd bet on it. There is no way a President can trump Congress, the Senate and  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Jun-28-07 05:58 PM   #147 
   Bingo!  loudsue   Jun-28-07 09:51 AM   #12 
   congress has been enabling them for the last 6 years  leftchick   Jun-28-07 10:41 AM   #31 
   give that guy a ceegar. the media has been bought and paid for by these crooks  leQ   Jun-28-07 10:52 AM   #34 
   That and because the "democratic" congress alows them. Enables them, even.  Exiled in America   Jun-28-07 11:23 AM   #45 
   And that is what I lament the most.  Roland99   Jun-28-07 11:32 AM   #50 
   100% agree.  emilyg   Jun-28-07 01:41 PM   #101 
   Wish there was a blowjob involved.  Rockholm   Jun-28-07 12:03 PM   #72 
   This just makes me SICK! We could have an impeachment NOW!  redqueen   Jun-28-07 01:02 PM   #90 
   No the blowjob issue applies only to democrats...Just like the laws and the constitution  ooglymoogly   Jun-28-07 01:18 PM   #94 
   Naturally the Democrats are too chickenshit.....  Rockholm   Jun-28-07 04:40 PM   #129 
   Well, he's screwing the entire country...  TwoSparkles   Jun-28-07 05:02 PM   #135 
   How do we know  ProudDad   Jun-28-07 11:46 PM   #183 
      That is ONE image that I just cannot stomach.  Rockholm   Jun-29-07 08:25 AM   #202 
   They wont be tried on FOX and CNN  niceypoo   Jun-28-07 01:13 PM   #93 
   and becuase they want it to end up in teh supreme, where they will win every time.  robinlynne   Jun-28-07 04:44 PM   #132 
   Because the Dems feel they must "keep their powder dry"?  TechBear_Seattle   Jun-28-07 09:48 AM   #10 
   junior ain't too bright? He just pissed on us again.  0007   Jun-28-07 10:54 AM   #35 
   What amazes me is how the Senate doesn't use its power fully  Cronus Protagonist   Jun-28-07 09:56 AM   #17 
   It is pointless, anymore, to make the point "If Bill Clinton did this...."  PurpleChez   Jun-28-07 11:23 AM   #46 
   Exactly right. If Gore as VP had failed to produce papers  Turn CO Blue   Jun-28-07 11:43 PM   #182 
      Freepers will, of course, have reasons why all of the Chimpy precedents  PurpleChez   Jun-29-07 10:38 AM   #215 
   I think ultimately you have to be prepared to send in guys with  MGKrebs   Jun-28-07 11:42 AM   #60 
   I'm wondering if you might be right about that.  stubtoe   Jun-28-07 11:52 AM   #66 
   obstruction of justice-put these criminal bastards in handcuffs & haul them to jail, where they  wordpix   Jun-28-07 04:29 PM   #125 
   Precedent  Cant trust em   Jun-28-07 07:00 PM   #154 
   Because, well, in our system of gover OMG - PARIS HILTON IS OUT OF JAIL!!!  Oregonian   Jun-28-07 10:42 PM   #175 
   ROFL!!!  southerncrone   Jun-28-07 11:54 PM   #186 
   The Dem "leadership" is too cowardly  ProudDad   Jun-28-07 11:42 PM   #181 
   The big money big corporate shareholders own all 3 branches of govt.  valerief   Jun-29-07 09:58 AM   #213 
   rape is never "mutual accommodation"  UpInArms   Jun-28-07 09:39 AM   #2 
   Crashing trying to protect the mad monk  underpants   Jun-28-07 09:39 AM   #4 
   Citing contempt of Congress is next  Warpy   Jun-28-07 09:42 AM   #6 
   A confrontation in the Supreme Court is exactly what they want  formercia   Jun-28-07 09:56 AM   #18 
      Is the Supreme Court decision as a lock?  Barrett808   Jun-28-07 10:17 AM   #25 
      kennedy  november3rd   Jun-28-07 01:21 PM   #97 
      The "fix" will be in  Enthusiast   Jun-28-07 03:46 PM   #116 
      Right  underpants   Jun-28-07 10:31 AM   #27 
      Exactly  Winebrat   Jun-28-07 11:38 AM   #54 
      if Supreme court negates Congresses power that would  lovuian   Jun-28-07 12:00 PM   #70 
      And it would be a successful  Enthusiast   Jun-28-07 05:16 PM   #140 
      Agreed.  old guy   Jun-28-07 06:17 PM   #153 
      I think you are exactly right. These criminals having been pushing towards this goal  AikidoSoul   Jun-28-07 05:58 PM   #148 
   Now's the time, Dems. Now's the time to use all that powder you've been keeping dry...  KansDem   Jun-28-07 09:41 AM   #5 
   Yes, please God/FSM, do something here!  GreenPartyVoter   Jun-28-07 09:42 AM   #7 
   I'm having flashbacks to the 70s  MaineDem   Jun-28-07 09:46 AM   #9 
   I see moron* as the type to take everyone down with him*...  Javaman   Jun-28-07 09:56 AM   #16 
   if the haze is purple, you really were there n/t  wizstars   Jun-28-07 04:23 PM   #123 
   Another White House Deja Vu Moment  Raejeanowl   Jun-28-07 04:40 PM   #130 
   nixon resigned  ProudDad   Jun-28-07 11:50 PM   #185 
   I think back of the Pelosi change of power hoopla and wonder if today's new's of  Imagevision   Jun-28-07 09:50 AM   #11 
   Like a fart in the wind...  EnviroBat   Jun-28-07 09:54 AM   #15 
   Absolutely. Congresss has got to show that  mountainvue   Jun-28-07 12:55 PM   #88 
   The fix was in before that...  rucky   Jun-29-07 12:58 AM   #191 
   long past pathetic and well into complicit.  tomp   Jun-29-07 08:48 AM   #206 
   Time to give the US Marshals tanks & send them in.  Vidar   Jun-28-07 09:52 AM   #13 
   Here comes the backbone time. Will the Dems show some or will the back down?  Javaman   Jun-28-07 09:54 AM   #14 
   It pains me to say that I expect them to back down.  PurpleChez   Jun-28-07 11:28 AM   #48 
      This is the Dems way of saying; "now folks make sure you vote Dem for next prez...  Imagevision   Jun-28-07 12:11 PM   #74 
   This is beyond unbelievable  Highway61   Jun-28-07 09:57 AM   #19 
   Bush wants to force this into his Supreme Court.  aquart   Jun-28-07 10:58 AM   #37 
   Welcome to DU!  calimary   Jun-28-07 11:11 AM   #40 
      Calimary, you are just wonderful. You say it all so well and so quick.  Decruiter   Jun-29-07 05:15 AM   #199 
   Someone in Dem leadership needs to call a press conference  loudsue   Jun-28-07 09:59 AM   #20 
   no shit! I agree 100% lousue  themartyred   Jun-28-07 10:43 PM   #176 
   Sure...and it'll be shown 24/7...  Wednesdays   Jun-29-07 09:48 AM   #211 
   ITMFA  jollyreaper2112   Jun-28-07 10:01 AM   #21 
   Exactly! Ridiculous how long overdue this really is!!  anotherCTliberal   Jun-28-07 08:12 PM   #159 
   If Bush caved and supplied subpoenaed documents it would open  Imagevision   Jun-28-07 10:02 AM   #22 
   if the dems cave on this, it's time to pull the sheet. nt  Javaman   Jun-28-07 10:04 AM   #23 
   Erm, impeach Gonzales now, then the Justice Dept. won't be compromised  bunny planet   Jun-28-07 10:11 AM   #24 
   They are using executive privledge, if it goes to the supreme court  still_one   Jun-28-07 10:29 AM   #26 
   This is the last straw...  Highway61   Jun-28-07 10:31 AM   #28 
   It could be the beginning of the end for bushco.  wizstars   Jun-28-07 04:53 PM   #133 
      How many times have we thought this though? Seriously.  file83   Jun-28-07 08:34 PM   #165 
   This is good! No weasling out of this by Congress!  dmosh42   Jun-28-07 10:33 AM   #29 
   I doubt it will happen. Perhaps someone should educate them on the Constitution  still_one   Jun-28-07 11:23 AM   #47 
   Don't count on it  realbluesky   Jun-28-07 11:41 AM   #59 
   So what do we do when the Dems do... nothing?  Zhade   Jun-28-07 04:11 PM   #119 
   Who didn't see this coming!!  dkofos   Jun-28-07 10:41 AM   #30 
   This asshole just doesn't have to play by the rules  bif   Jun-28-07 10:49 AM   #32 
   bu$hco continues to abuse OUR government and OUR laws.  Massachusetts   Jun-28-07 10:49 AM   #33 
   Now that purported "legal genius" Roberts gets to pen some pedestrian opinion cutting and pasting  The Stranger   Jun-28-07 10:56 AM   #36 
   He doesn't have to,  trashcanistanista   Jun-28-07 01:38 PM   #100 
   This is very interesting regarding Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley  KalicoKitty   Jun-28-07 11:01 AM   #38 
   That last sentence is the key: The Democrats are neither smart nor courageous enough to go to the  The Stranger   Jun-28-07 11:16 AM   #43 
   We could only hope  realbluesky   Jun-28-07 11:45 AM   #63 
   Yeah. US v Nixon was decided in the context of a criminal case:  pintoDU Moderator   Jun-28-07 12:23 PM   #80 
   Executive privilege to avoid Constitutional oversight...makes those  MasonJar   Jun-28-07 11:10 AM   #39 
   It is way past time for our congress to say...  Stuckinthebush   Jun-28-07 11:12 AM   #41 
   OK, so the Admin has thumbed their noses at the Dems again. Now what are they  EV_Ares   Jun-28-07 11:13 AM   #42 
   If a subpoena is issued  treestar   Jun-28-07 11:51 AM   #65 
   Thanks. So then they need to follow up on the sanctions against  EV_Ares   Jun-28-07 12:30 PM   #82 
   Which court decides if the supeona  trashcanistanista   Jun-28-07 01:41 PM   #102 
      self-delete. refer to post # 71 nt  tomp   Jun-29-07 08:57 AM   #208 
   The bottom line is power and being consumed with holding on to it at all cost  alllyingwhores   Jun-28-07 12:13 PM   #76 
      Understand and I am with you. eom.  EV_Ares   Jun-28-07 12:30 PM   #83 
   Nixon's ghost seems to inhabit Bush now...  sakabatou   Jun-28-07 11:21 AM   #44 
   Nixon seems like a boy scout now.  sellitman   Jun-28-07 03:43 PM   #114 
      now don't go insulting the Boy Scouts like that..........  wizstars   Jun-28-07 05:09 PM   #138 
   How many Republicans will continue to be lap dogs?  young_at_heart   Jun-28-07 11:35 AM   #51 
   Not enough of them will.  sellitman   Jun-28-07 03:45 PM   #115 
   Maybe it's because those who turned against Nixon R gone now.  Amonester   Jun-28-07 04:04 PM   #117 
   Take 'em to court, expedite the process, and then get it into the hands of the Supremes.  Major Hogwash   Jun-28-07 11:36 AM   #52 
   When are We The People  chervilant   Jun-28-07 11:37 AM   #53 
   Durn, again  chervilant   Jun-28-07 11:39 AM   #57 
   Exactly the game they are playing..  southerncrone   Jun-29-07 12:32 AM   #189 
   IMPEACH NOW  realbluesky   Jun-28-07 11:38 AM   #55 
   Serously, did anyone here ever think they would do anything to  efhmc   Jun-28-07 11:39 AM   #56 
   Justice Kennedy is the key if this goes to the Supreme Court.  dubyadubya3   Jun-28-07 11:43 AM   #61 
   if he lives.................n/t  diamidue   Jun-29-07 02:06 AM   #194 
   Fire him n/t  va4wilderness   Jun-28-07 11:44 AM   #62 
   What is it going to take..  NotGonnaTakeIt   Jun-28-07 11:55 AM   #67 
   Its official this is a Dictatorship Congress makes no difference  lovuian   Jun-28-07 11:58 AM   #68 
   Speaking of Presidents and Subpoenas...  Hissyspit   Jun-28-07 12:01 PM   #71 
   The shredders are working overtime  Gamey   Jun-28-07 12:09 PM   #73 
   Welcome to DU! Yes indeed, those shredders are going 24-7 as we speak.  CLW   Jun-28-07 03:31 PM   #111 
   self-deleted - wrong thread  CLW   Jun-28-07 03:39 PM   #112 
   What? We still don't have enough evidence for Impeachment yet?  ShortnFiery   Jun-28-07 12:13 PM   #75 
   Wow, you really sound "concerned".  brentspeak   Jun-28-07 03:42 PM   #113 
   Pelosi has disappeared, Reid has gotten boring to hear, WTF?!!  Imagevision   Jun-28-07 12:14 PM   #77 
   Impeach. Indict. Aggressively Interrogate. Convict. Imprison. n/t  IanDB1   Jun-28-07 12:14 PM   #78 
   If they FAIL to act, we are obliged to KICK OUT our House Leadership despite  ShortnFiery   Jun-28-07 12:17 PM   #79 
   Impeach. Indict. Imprison.  Jack Rabbit   Jun-28-07 12:24 PM   #81 
   The fucking "Associated Press" quoted whole portions of Bush's lawyer, and only stated  The Stranger   Jun-28-07 12:37 PM   #84 
   Like they were ever going to comply.  graywarrior   Jun-28-07 12:50 PM   #85 
   Talk about a power grab  Highway61   Jun-28-07 12:51 PM   #86 
   Good Link, did not know this. So much for WSJ.  ringtailtooter   Jun-29-07 09:11 AM   #209 
   Its time.  Jim4Wes   Jun-28-07 12:54 PM   #87 
   Exactly  AandP   Jun-28-07 01:08 PM   #92 
   How are the Alito and Roberts comfirmations looking right about now Senators?  MilesColtrane   Jun-28-07 12:57 PM   #89 
   mutual accommodation? GMAB!  redqueen   Jun-28-07 01:03 PM   #91 
   Congress Can Overcome Executive Privilege if Investigating Potential Crimes  L. Coyote   Jun-28-07 01:19 PM   #95 
   Hopefully this is what they are going for. Congress wanted to exhaust every possible  KoKo01   Jun-28-07 02:30 PM   #106 
   Turley said this on Olbermann's show.  Perragrande   Jun-28-07 05:05 PM   #136 
   And you are not the judges of the merits of the evidence.... We are.  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Jun-28-07 05:30 PM   #145 
   You ever feel like it's the end of the earth as we know it?  Connonym   Jun-28-07 01:20 PM   #96 
   Hardly  AandP   Jun-28-07 02:12 PM   #105 
   This is such bullshit. The Dems are total cowards if they don't act  Neo   Jun-28-07 01:29 PM   #99 
   Immediate Articles of Impeachment  sampsonblk   Jun-28-07 02:33 PM   #108 
   If Bush Is the Weakest President In Our History  Mr. Ected   Jun-28-07 02:06 PM   #104 
   Maybe whistleblowers in the NSA could provide said documents  EVDebs   Jun-28-07 02:31 PM   #107 
   Will 'moderate' Dems agree to fight on?  sampsonblk   Jun-28-07 02:36 PM   #109 
   No. Moderates would rather criminals walk for political expediency.  Zhade   Jun-28-07 04:14 PM   #120 
      My impression as well. (n/t)  kenzee13   Jun-28-07 09:38 PM   #168 
   And this is surprising, why?  DemSoccerMom   Jun-28-07 02:58 PM   #110 
   Such lawbreaking usually results in arrest.  Zhade   Jun-28-07 04:08 PM   #118 
   Congress is responsible to Americans and DO THEIR JOBS  lovuian   Jun-28-07 04:18 PM   #122 
   We need a president who worries less about his own ass and more about his country's. nt  Miss Chybil   Jun-28-07 04:27 PM   #124 
   Americans need to shout out  jonnyra   Jun-28-07 04:32 PM   #126 
   You are right on!  Enthusiast   Jun-28-07 05:13 PM   #139 
   I want to echo what others on this thread have said  senseandsensibility   Jun-28-07 04:39 PM   #127 
   Why ISN'T the DU Activist Corps up and running?!!!!!  AikidoSoul   Jun-28-07 06:02 PM   #150 
      exactly  senseandsensibility   Jun-28-07 06:05 PM   #151 
         Diverse Group, Insurmountable odds, certain failure, --  sbyte   Jun-29-07 04:58 AM   #198 
   How shameless can these people get?  nam78_two   Jun-28-07 04:39 PM   #128 
   So, when is Congress going to get the message to pursue Impeachment and Criminal Charges?  Pachamama   Jun-28-07 04:43 PM   #131 
   THEN THROW HIS FUCKING ASS IN JAIL!!!!!!!!!!!  sandrakae   Jun-28-07 05:17 PM   #141 
   Why should he?  depakid   Jun-28-07 05:17 PM   #142 
   Where is Barbara Jordan when we need her?  wizstars   Jun-28-07 05:19 PM   #143 
   I don't know who she is, but I bet she and Burt Reynolds are mucking about  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Jun-28-07 06:01 PM   #149 
      Look up Barbara Jordan's speech as a congressional member of the Watergate Hearings.  CLW   Jun-28-07 10:37 PM   #173 
      Barbara Jordan and Elizabeth Holzman  ProudDad   Jun-29-07 12:03 AM   #187 
      Thank you for those quotations, ProudDad. Both evidently great women,  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Jun-29-07 08:42 AM   #204 
      Your really DON'T know who she is!  southerncrone   Jun-29-07 12:48 AM   #190 
         Your welcome. I hope the lacunae in my knowledge continue to bring  KCabotDullesMarxIII   Jun-29-07 08:23 AM   #201 
   Let's git it on  Gman   Jun-28-07 05:19 PM   #144 
   BushCo renegades and criminals and a fascist supreme court  whistle   Jun-28-07 05:52 PM   #146 
   King George  classysassy   Jun-28-07 06:07 PM   #152 
   i am going to make a citizen's arrest!  scarface2004   Jun-28-07 07:01 PM   #155 
   It's put up or shut up time, Dems  BlueStater   Jun-28-07 07:06 PM   #156 
   Yes, no more backing down without a fight. This is put up or shut up time.  faygokid   Jun-28-07 07:26 PM   #158 
   This is what happens when you allow them to steal an election...  RestoreGore   Jun-28-07 07:20 PM   #157 
   Brings back old times doesn't it?  Highway61   Jun-28-07 08:25 PM   #160 
   He better be careful or the Dems will send him another non-binding resolution  jgraz   Jun-28-07 08:26 PM   #161 
   I doubt it  rpannier   Jun-28-07 08:32 PM   #163 
   Gonna be a fun summer, watching junior do the 'o stutter dance  0007   Jun-28-07 08:30 PM   #162 
   I guess its time for another angry letter.  Pawel K   Jun-28-07 08:34 PM   #164 
   I remember when Pelosi said she would make this admistration accountable for  Imagevision   Jun-28-07 09:06 PM   #166 
   This is what happens when one has a "gradualist" Democrat-Corporate Congress.  nealmhughes   Jun-28-07 10:00 PM   #169 
   Aw, shucks, sure he will ....  sjdnb   Jun-28-07 10:19 PM   #171 
   This is just wrong - We need to Destroy America  dubeskin   Jun-28-07 10:35 PM   #172 
   the BS King has spoken..oh what a web they weave when at first they....nm  april   Jun-28-07 10:39 PM   #174 
   Breaking: Dems threaten to re-send the subpoena in CAPITAL LETTERS to show they mean business  entanglement   Jun-28-07 10:47 PM   #177 
   Rep Waxman has INSIDERS spilling their guts ! Qui tam time  EVDebs   Jun-28-07 11:17 PM   #180 
   So now Bush makes people think he is trying to cover it up  bambino   Jun-28-07 11:48 PM   #184 
   Barbara Jordan's speech is TOO important to leave upthread  ProudDad   Jun-29-07 12:05 AM   #188 
   it can all change on a dime folks..  peacetheonlyway   Jun-29-07 01:01 AM   #192 
   FUCK BUSH!  iLikeJello   Jun-29-07 01:47 AM   #193 
   They certainly should  texastoast   Jun-29-07 10:43 AM   #216 
   HOW MANY WAYS TO SPELL "KICK THE BUM OUT"  happygoluckytoyou   Jun-29-07 02:35 AM   #195 
   Rocket Science...  19jet54   Jun-29-07 03:01 AM   #197 
   Jail all of them for contempt of court nt  auburngrad82   Jun-29-07 06:29 AM   #200 
   Nothing of any signifcance will be done. Any takers?  wake.up.america   Jun-29-07 08:34 AM   #203 
   We all know he has contempt for Congress, the legal justice system ....  lpbk2713   Jun-29-07 08:44 AM   #205 
   God everytime I see that picture of Rush  Highway61   Jun-29-07 08:48 AM   #207 
      OxyRush puts gross at an entirely greater level.  lpbk2713   Jun-29-07 09:29 AM   #210 
   3 POINTS OF INTEREST  ringtailtooter   Jun-29-07 09:54 AM   #212 
   Excellent points, right on the money (no pun intended)  southerncrone   Jun-29-07 06:02 PM   #218 
   we need to impeach  focusfan   Jun-29-07 10:33 AM   #214 
   We are the frogs in the pot  Hideboh   Jun-29-07 11:18 AM   #217 
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rhetorical question:
How in the HELL are these bastards allowed to do this again and again and again, with impunity and no consequences? I really don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Because the "liberal" media allows them. Enables them, even.
And that keeps the American public apathetic, at best.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy (833 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. 100% on the money!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
49. Hey, old guy, welcome to DU!
I, too am an old guy - and also a Vikings fan (though in the past couple of years it's been pretty hard). :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy (833 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #49
64. Yes, as Vikings we do have our cross to bear.
Perhaps in the future in a Galaxy far,far away our dreams will... well forget it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
58. Anybody wanna bet afainst the Supremes upholding Bush?
And BTW, Welcome Old Guy. Chippewa Falls here. I haven't been up that way for a while but I know another DUer up your way (kinda near Danbury, actually).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy (833 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #58
69. Some day I will get to know more about how these "tubes" work.
At present I'm feeling my way very slowly and carefully. When we used to have snow? in this area, we used to trailer to Danbury and ride the trails north. Very nice up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #69
98. Welcome to DU old guyUpdated at 10:29 PM
I think there are a lot of us old guys on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy (833 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #98
103. Maybe we can be of benefit somehow with our sage opinions.
God, did I really say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #103
121. Yes, and there are a few smart senior women, too! Moi, for one...
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 04:19 PM by Radio_Lady
Nice to meet-chu on the DU!

In peace,

Radio Lady in Oregon (film, theater and book reviewer)

Aging as gracefully as possible -- just turned 68 on May 31. 35 years in TV and talk radio broadcasting in Miami and Boston, now retired to true blue Portland, OR and volunteering at Oregon Public Broadcasting, the PBS station out here.

http://www.opb.org

More about Radio_Lady at: http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Radio_Lady

OT: Our best friends just moved to Mequon, WI in January. We miss them like heck and we're Chicago, IL and Milwaukee, WI bound for a visit -- probably sometime in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #103
179. I've got lots of sage here
and am being overrun by oregano, thyme and mint!

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
134. You got to be kidding ...
Today they voted to desegregate schools effectively saying that race cannot be used as a quota to fill student vacancies in schools... That is a huge conservative victory... Stephen Bryer said it best today

"Never have so few done so much so quickly" Making the court conservative.

Bush will win and SCOTUS decision hands down.

This country is so divided right now Civil War is not out of the question.

Stand by because this court is far from done...

I predict Roe V Wade to be overturned in the near future that may be the catalyst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #134
137. They don't want to overturn Roe Vs Wade
If they overturn Roe Vs Wade they will lose their most powerful catalyst. This, along with gay rights, is how they invigorate the Christian fundamentalist vote. Think it over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #137
167. So little time, so much to hate
Even if Roe v. Wade was overturned and the Constitutional Amendment prohibiting gay marriage was enacted, the fundies wouldn't be satisfied. There are so many other issues: mandatory Christian prayer in school, full public funding of Christian churches (vouchers are just the tip of the iceberg), the Ten Commandments posted in every public building, the Lord's Prayer said at every public event, etc., etc. Somewhere in the noise of television evangelists and O'Reilly clones the message of Christ -- love your neighbor, take care of the poor and infirm, etc. -- got lost.

The Repugs will always have some hot-button issue that makes their base turn off their ability to think rationally. And if all else fails, they can always fall back on racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks (819 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #137
170. Right - The carrot is meant to be dangled, not gotten. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkyisBlue (611 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #134
178. This country is so divided now Civil War is not out of the question.
Sometimes I feel like there are two countries now. I have absolutely nothing in common with the Ann Coulter's and Sean Hannity's of our time, or the people who champion them. It would be great if they could take their elitist, hypocritical and distorted opinions with them to another place and start their own little utopia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 (328 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #178
196. Civil War?
Sorry, most people are too caught up in Paris Hilton to care what is going on. We are a LONG way from any sort of armed anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #58
147. I'd bet on it. There is no way a President can trump Congress, the Senate and
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 06:25 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
the American people. I suspect the Supremes are judicious enough, if not all virtuous enough, to recognise that.

The US is founded on parallel and opposite concepts. The rights of robber barons to have their will with the people as they please; and the concept of democracy, rule of the people, by the people and for the peopple. Isn't that your expression?

Now, in order to get their evil way, the far right have paid scandalously mendacious lip-service to the latter. Thing is though, this is the ultimate condensation of the said conflict into the most transparent of nutshells.

It is the pivot, the fulcrum, upon which everything the US is said to stand for - by Republicans, no less than Democrats (however often putative the allegiance of the latter to democracy might be). There would be no more saluting Old Glory, singing the Star Spangled Banner, no more dwelling on the history of the country's fight for independence. Any commemoration of "no taxation without representation" would be a total embarrassment. It would be, as if Bush were to order the Statue of Liberty to be taken down and smashed in a public ceremony, and a statue of Honecker erected in its place.

Mendacious propaganda, it seems, can be like karma. It works as long as the whole nation are not able to examine it under a spotlight. If they are... well, you have to restore credibility in an equally simple and transparent way, i.e by compliance of the the Oval Office with the lawmakers' requirements.

When the Supremes, at their pleasure, awarded the presidency to Bush, it was at the apogee of an emotional roller-coaster election charade; not in the clear light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Bingo!
They are above the law of the land, and have no respect for any stinkin' constitution.

Assholes.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
31. congress has been enabling them for the last 6 years
there have been ZERO consequences for their crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
34. give that guy a ceegar. the media has been bought and paid for by these crooks
who think they are above any laws and can do whatever the hell they please. dictators do that you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exiled in America (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
45. That and because the "democratic" congress alows them. Enables them, even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #45
50. And that is what I lament the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #45
101. 100% agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
72. Wish there was a blowjob involved.
We would have already have an impeachment by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #72
90. This just makes me SICK! We could have an impeachment NOW!
But SOME people CHOOSE not to!

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #72
94. No the blowjob issue applies only to democrats...Just like the laws and the constitutionUpdated at 10:29 PM
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 01:30 PM by ooglymoogly
Why do you think those 23% Luddites still support this dangerous fool along with the corporate press. THEY LIKE BEING ABOVE THE LAW...Its a Nazi thing. Its like impeachment only applies to democrats too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #94
129. Naturally the Democrats are too chickenshit.....
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 04:40 PM by Rockholm
to DO anything! What, we don't want the mean nasty republicans to get mad at us? Please. We promise not to filibuster. Timid and meek does not win many battles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #72
135. Well, he's screwing the entire country...
...that should count for something.

Impeach the bastard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #72
183. How do we know
Karl Rove hasn't been on bended knees beneath the Oval Office desk giving the shrub some head?

With Jeff Gannon taking the video...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #183
202. That is ONE image that I just cannot stomach.
Little Jeffy holding the camera is rich, and, while under normal circumstances it could be rather hot, this is one production I would rather not thank about.

Actually, my guess it was Harriet Miers holding the camera. Jeffy was probably the boom man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
93. They wont be tried on FOX and CNN
they will be tried in the courts and the congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
132. and becuase they want it to end up in teh supreme, where they will win every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Because the Dems feel they must "keep their powder dry"?
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:49 AM by TechBear_Seattle
Or maybe they are incapable of doing anything (other than meaningless, symbolic gestures) until they know for certain that they are guaranteed of success?

Or maybe, they are hoping to claim the same vast power when the Republicks are voted out of the White House, regardless of how unconstitutional that power might be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
35. junior ain't too bright? He just pissed on us again.
The people are the government and the only way to fight the big corporations that put these thugs in office is to unionize together to fight corporate America and bullshit artists such as the Neocon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. What amazes me is how the Senate doesn't use its power fully
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:57 AM by Cronus Protagonist
The Senate, having a Democratic majority and several Republicans against Bush/Cheney now, should be ramming subpoenas up Bush and Cheney's proverbial asses. There should be public hearings under oath by Bush and Cheney and Rice and all the rest of the cabal.

If you don't agree, think for a minute or two about what would be happening if the president were currently Democratic and the Senate was just as it is. You know the Republicans would be like a nest of fire ants and the TV would be filled with pictures of crooked politicians shamefully admitting guilt or fighting like banshees to stay out of jail. Now reverse the picture back again. Why are our guys so slow, so polite, so understanding? WHY ALL THIS DEFERENCE TO CRIMINALS???? WHY????



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
46. It is pointless, anymore, to make the point "If Bill Clinton did this...."
But the fact is, that if Bill Clinton DID do this, or if Al Gore (Hail Al Gore!) had asserted that he was not a member of the executive branch, the talk radio wingnuts would be apoplectic, and would likely be forming lynch mobs to march on washington as we speak. But Dumbya could be caught sodomizing the dead coming into Dover AFB and the yokels would tell themselves he must've had a good reason and then zone out until the next runaway bride update.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #46
182. Exactly right. If Gore as VP had failed to produce papers
or asserted executive privilege time and time again, or met in secret with so-called energy task forces, or was always hiding out in undisclosed locations, or had seemed to be pulling Clinton's puppet strings -- then Hannity's head would have exploded with the force of a neutron bomb.

The only tiny comfort I take is that the Dems may very well win the White House, and in January 2009 we will start seeing if the Freepers really like these ideas about unitary executive, and the politicizing the Dept of Justice, and signing statements and having separate email accounts paid for by the DNC, and lack of transparency and photo-ops, and other high crimes and misdemeanors. Any liberties taken in the WH office will be applicable to the new President and Vice-president. I can't wait to see how the roaches in all those government offices scatter when the Dem president has the Bush-granted rights to wire-tap anyone he GD well pleases...legally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #182
215. Freepers will, of course, have reasons why all of the Chimpy precedents
cannot be invoked by a democratic president. Jesus may or may not be involved. Everything will be different. EVERYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
60. I think ultimately you have to be prepared to send in guys with
guns and handcuffs into the White House, and you better have ALL your ducks in a row before you do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stubtoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #60
66. I'm wondering if you might be right about that.
This could get interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
125. obstruction of justice-put these criminal bastards in handcuffs & haul them to jail, where they
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 04:29 PM by wordpix
should stay until these docs are handed up to the Hill.

That is the sight I'm waiting for but looks like BushCo will just run out the clock. I wish Congress would just arrest these obstructors-of-justice. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
154. Precedent
At least when Dems are in office in 2008 we can use this as precedent to blow off subpoenas. Oh wait, that won't matter since we'll be in control of Congress too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
175. Because, well, in our system of gover OMG - PARIS HILTON IS OUT OF JAIL!!!
Shiny thing!! Lookee!! Shiny thing!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #175
186. ROFL!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
181. The Dem "leadership" is too cowardly
to allow John Conyers to investigate their crimes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
213. The big money big corporate shareholders own all 3 branches of govt.
And the media. They get what they want. In any language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. rape is never "mutual accommodation"
and that is what this mal-administration has done to this country, its Constitution and its government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Crashing trying to protect the mad monk


Have they not learned anything from history? Oh I forgot they are all under some sort of spell that makes them put his defense above their own best interests

They know that if this goes to the SC they had better than a 50/50 shot at winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Citing contempt of Congress is next
followed by censure.

Bought judges voting against the constitution are sowing the seeds for their eventual impeachment as the pendulum continues its swing back from the brink of fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. A confrontation in the Supreme Court is exactly what they want
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 09:57 AM by formercia
They want their rigged court to affirm the Unitary Executive. if they do, God help us.

This has been the Federalist Society battle plan all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Is the Supreme Court decision as a lock?
Is the fix in, like in 2000? Or will the court defy Bush, like with Gitmo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
november3rd Donating Member (581 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
97. kennedy
I don't think kennedy is one of those unitary executive wingnuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
116. The "fix" will be in
There is no way they rule against Bush. The Neo-Cons have effectively pulled off a successful coup d'Etat and the American people aren't even aware of it. Welcome to fascist America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. Right
exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
54. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
70. if Supreme court negates Congresses power that would
eliminate checks and balances

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #70
140. And it would be a successful
And it would be a successful coup d' Etat by the Neo-Cons. We have been taken over by fascists and the American people don't even realize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy (833 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #70
153. Agreed.
Plus the fact that if the SCOTUS would rule the congress irrelevant do they not realize that they will be setting themselves up as well? * could simply say he doesn't need to pay attention to the court and since the court has said congress has no over site, * rules alone. Too far fetched?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
148. I think you are exactly right. These criminals having been pushing towards this goal
for the past six years. Once the Supreme Court right wingers vote for Unitary Executive Privilege, we will have
an official fascist state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Now's the time, Dems. Now's the time to use all that powder you've been keeping dry...
It's now or never...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes, please God/FSM, do something here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm having flashbacks to the 70s
That contempt case ended only because of a resignation, if I remember correctly. (But it was the seventies so you'll have to forgive me if my memory is a little shaky.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. I see moron* as the type to take everyone down with him*...
nixon resigned. moron* will make sure that everyone takes the blame but him*, but in the end he* will be and like he* always has been, the biggest loser of them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars (409 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
123. if the haze is purple, you really were there n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
130. Another White House Deja Vu Moment
There were a few other layers of wrangling to cover up the
wrongdoing and specious invocations of executive privilege,
if I recall, including much that amounted to obstructions of
justice on top of obstructions of justice. But yes,
mind-boggling similarities for some of us who lived through
that era as well.

'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat
it.' 
George Santayana



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
185. nixon resigned
'cause after the good guys made the case against him there were enough pukes convinced that they should remove him.

Conyers should have been allowed to begin the process the day the Dems were sworn in control of the Congress.

Fuck Pelosi and her cowardice!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think back of the Pelosi change of power hoopla and wonder if today's new's of
Bush's refusal to supply subpoenaed documents will also fade into the Dem's list of bothched attempts to make this administration accountable?!! getting really pathetic folks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Like a fart in the wind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
88. Absolutely. Congresss has got to show that
they mean business or our chances in '08 are shaky at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Fri Jun-29-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
191. The fix was in before that...
when they confirmed Alito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
206. long past pathetic and well into complicit.
coroner's report:

cause of death or u.s. democracy: dry powder syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. Time to give the US Marshals tanks & send them in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
14. Here comes the backbone time. Will the Dems show some or will the back down?
sigh. So sad that I even have to ponder such a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
48. It pains me to say that I expect them to back down.
But c'mon, guys, prove me wrong!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #48
74. This is the Dems way of saying; "now folks make sure you vote Dem for next prez...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is beyond unbelievable
My God, everyday it gets worse. I said 6 years ago to my family...."If we only knew 1/8th of what was REALLY going on...our hair would fall out." This is getting really scary...they have deemed us all powerless simply by refusing anything they want coming down the pike. The apathy of the American Idol mentality has painted us all in a corner. God help us all. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. Bush wants to force this into his Supreme Court.
I'll just point out that Supreme Court judges can be impeached by the Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. Welcome to DU!
Yeah, a lot of us were in that same place - trying to warn the resolutely ignorant, apathetic, or "too busy". But even we couldn't have guessed how far or how deep or how egregious...

Dear God, I hope the Dems are going to flex some muscle.

My kingdom for a Democratic backbone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #40
199. Calimary, you are just wonderful. You say it all so well and so quick.
I'd like to recommend to all the DU Activist Forum and please, get involved in any action Calimary suggests.

Thank you, C. You are one of the bestest of the best ever in the long history of DU.

Peace\
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
20. Someone in Dem leadership needs to call a press conference
And announce, loud and clear, that this admin. thinks they are above the law of the land, and that congress has no choice but to act on this immediately.

Has anyone heard any response from the Dems?

crickets.....


:kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
176. no shit! I agree 100% lousue
this IS the time.. it's like a movie scene right about now, and the credits are about to roll, are they going to force the issue by law against this fascist state that says they can do whatever they want with no oversight, or are they going to lay back and get paid for their meaningless position in the gov't that effectively just decides where the money is scattered?
www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <<<---- speak on your car with these stickers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #20
211. Sure...and it'll be shown 24/7...
Exclusively on the shopping channel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jollyreaper2112 (955 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. ITMFA
Impeach the motherfucker already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherCTliberal (73 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
159. Exactly! Ridiculous how long overdue this really is!!
Impeach, Indict and IMPRISON! Enough already!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. If Bush caved and supplied subpoenaed documents it would open
a can of worms of investigative material going back to the election fraud in 2004, if gives an inch they lost it all... it's up to the Dem's to flex there backbone if they have one?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. if the dems cave on this, it's time to pull the sheet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
24. Erm, impeach Gonzales now, then the Justice Dept. won't be compromised
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 10:12 AM by bunny planet
anymore. This is a hydra administration facing us, lets start lopping off some heads so we stand a chance in the Constitutional crisis that's coming down the road.

There's more than enough reason to impeach Gonzo, he's lied under oath several times. Hello. Pick the low hanging fruit first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
26. They are using executive privledge, if it goes to the supreme court
the court will rule 5-4 in the administration's favor

When will the Democrats in Congress get it through their head that the ONLY way to hold this administration for their actions is impeachment?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
28. This is the last straw...
Edited on Thu Jun-28-07 10:31 AM by Highway61
The Dems have to stay on this like a bunch of pit-bulls...this IS the moment of truth....PUSH BACK GOD SAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars (409 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
133. It could be the beginning of the end for bushco.
Lettem have it! both barrels! The Senate has got to go for the jugular on this, or they might as well castrate themselves--they'll be impotent forever if they let chimpster win on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #133
165. How many times have we thought this though? Seriously.
The entire government is controlled by the corporations - the government is just a charade - a show to provide us hope and drama that somebody at some point is going to actually do something for the American people.

But it will never happen - because it's just a TV show. Hearings are shows. Votes are shows. Speeches are shows. It's all a big illusion.

And in the end, sure there may be somebody who gets "busted" - but even that's just the nature of show business. Even actors get fired and written of a show every once in a while.

The corporations will always win in the end, after all, they are the "sponsors" of the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 (884 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
29. This is good! No weasling out of this by Congress!
Many of us have waited for the right time, and this is it. They have until July 18th to comply, and then it's time for contempt citations, which I believe document their criminal behavior. Then congress should move to impeachment proceedings. Leahy and Conyers know the drill, but the rest of the gang might need some diaper changing to follow through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #29
47. I doubt it will happen. Perhaps someone should educate them on the Constitution
and what their duties are. Major abuse of power has occurred, from illegal wiretaps, invading a country based on lies, an attorney general who lied under oath, and witness tampering, and the only thing congress does is talk with no action

There is a reason their popularity is so low


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realbluesky (115 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #29
59. Don't count on it
I agree with your sentiments, but I have lost faith in the Dems to do anything right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
119. So what do we do when the Dems do... nothing?
Because that's the party's track record, despite massive criminality on the part of the administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
30. Who didn't see this coming!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
32. This asshole just doesn't have to play by the rules
How many times have we seen this before? And if they don't like the rules, they go and change them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
33. bu$hco continues to abuse OUR government and OUR laws.
Impeachment is definitely on the table now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
36. Now that purported "legal genius" Roberts gets to pen some pedestrian opinion cutting and pasting
from some "unitary executive" piece undoubtedly published by the Federalist Society.

It is impossible for an ideologue to be a genius, or anything close to genius, or anything -- actuualy -- other than a toady, a slave, a lobotomized, pathetic shell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
100. He doesn't have to,
I bet he has already done it. He is ready and waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KalicoKitty Donating Member (765 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
38. This is very interesting regarding Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley

This was on an mlive.com forum: http://www.mlive.com/forums/newstalk/index.ssf?page=-1

I Saw Constitutional Scholar Jonathan Turley On Countdown Last Night....


He presented an interesting possibility. If the Democrats base their case for the records on possible criminal activity (illegal warrantless surveillance ordered by Bush)it could open the door to impeachment. So, Bush could be opening the door to possible impeachment or criminal charges after he leaves office by fighting the subpoena. Could get very interesting. I'm just not sure the Democrats Congressional leadership is smart enough or courageous enough to go down that road.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. That last sentence is the key: The Democrats are neither smart nor courageous enough to go to the
bathroom without getting permission from the GOP, much less smart or courageous enough to save the Union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realbluesky (115 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #38
63. We could only hope
I saw the same thing. And I agree that door is wide open, but I don't have very much faith in the current batch of elected dems to do anything that takes a little political courage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #38
80. Yeah. US v Nixon was decided in the context of a criminal case:
US v. Nixon

The Supreme Court addressed that the 'executive privilege' in United States v. Nixon, the 1974 case involving the demand by Watergate special prosecutor Leon Jaworski that Richard Nixon produce the audiotapes of conversations he and his colleagues had in the Oval Office of the White House in connection with criminal charges being brought against members of the Nixon Administration. Nixon invoked the privilege and refused to produce any records.

The Supreme Court did not reject the claim of privilege out of hand; it noted, in fact, "the valid need for protection of communications between high Government officials and those who advise and assist them in the performance of their manifold duties" and that "uman experience teaches that those who expect public dissemination of their remarks may well temper candor with a concern for appearances and for their own interests to the detriment of the decisionmaking process." This is very similar to the logic that the Court had used in establishing an "executive immunity" defense for high office-holders charged with violating citizens' constitutional rights in the course of performing their duties.

The Supreme Court however rejected the notion that the President has an "absolute privilege." The Supreme Court stated: "To read the Article II powers of the President as providing an absolute privilege as against a subpoena essential to enforcement of criminal statutes on no more than a generalized claim of the public interest in confidentiality of nonmilitary and nondiplomatic discussions would upset the constitutional balance of 'a workable government' and gravely impair the role of the courts under Article III." Because Nixon had asserted only a generalized need for confidentiality, the Court held that the larger public interest in obtaining the truth in the context of a criminal prosecution took precedence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
39. Executive privilege to avoid Constitutional oversight...makes those
docs appear very significant. I read yesterday on DU that Cheney gave the docs to National Archives until 2003, so he knows the drill just does not want to continue it. Very suspicious. I doubt in the Cheney/Bush duo there is anything left to subpoena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
41. It is way past time for our congress to say...
"The American people have had it with this President. He has great disdain for Congress and its oversight role. He cares nothing for the Constitution, and he has destroyed our confidence in the fragile system that the founding fathers painstakingly developed over 200 years ago. In light of this, we have no other option than to begin impeachment proceedings. The framers gave our country this ability for exactly the situation we find ourselves in today. An out of control president who flaunts the rule of law and ignores the role of Congress must be removed from office. He is a danger to our way of government and he must be replaced. We have tried many times to work with him only to find that he repeatedly ignores the wishes of Congress and the American people. Perhaps with impeachment our country can begin to believe in itself and its leaders once more."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
42. OK, so the Admin has thumbed their noses at the Dems again. Now what are they
going to do? Are they going to slink away and say "we tried". How many times have they tried?

Are they going to use the excuse about the numbers in the senate and house?

I think we all understand their difficulty but we at least want some follow-up, some balls and some effort at getting something done.

So far they have been very weak and seem to cave if Bush just looks at them sternly.

However, I will continue to hope for something out of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #42
65. If a subpoena is issued
the person to whom it issues has to comply or be in contempt. Contempt has sanctions that can end up in jail time if the one in receipt of a subpoena remains recalcitrant.

One who receives a subpoena can also move to quash it.

These are the procedures. It is not that Congress is "weak" or "caving" but that * is thumbing his nose at the law. Congress has to follow through, but if they are going within the rules, it's all they can do, so all the frustration with them expressed on DU is just failure to appreciate that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #65
82. Thanks. So then they need to follow up on the sanctions against
whoever is in contempt. Is that correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #65
102. Which court decides if the supeona
is quashed? Does Congress make that decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #102
208. self-delete. refer to post # 71 nt
Edited on Fri Jun-29-07 09:06 AM by tomp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alllyingwhores (295 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
76. The bottom line is power and being consumed with holding on to it at all cost
The bottom line is power and being consumed with holding on to it at all cost...and, I'm describing Dems--with few exceptions.

The whole gutless, spineless, all talk BS is a part of it. The whole trying to over-think and over analyze to avoid any possibility of losing an individual seat is a big part of it. And, they being part of the same plutocracy is the biggest part of it!

I've been reading DU for several years and I've gotta be as fucking pissed off as anyone--but as far as I'm concerned, the waiting is over. Again, with few exceptions, we're being played.

Short of an all out rebellion, this same shit is going to continue forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. Understand and I am with you. eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
44. Nixon's ghost seems to inhabit Bush now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #44
114. Nixon seems like a boy scout now.
Cheney junior & Rove have perfected the play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizstars (409 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #114
138. now don't go insulting the Boy Scouts like that..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
51. How many Republicans will continue to be lap dogs?
They turned against Nixon, but for some reason they still think Cheney/Bush are gods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #51
115. Not enough of them will.
That is my guess. They will defend their turd of a leader forever. Bank on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #51
117. Maybe it's because those who turned against Nixon R gone now.
The "New" (de-)generation of Republiks thinks bu$che/chainy R divinities. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
52. Take 'em to court, expedite the process, and then get it into the hands of the Supremes.
Do it.
Do it now.
Do it before the summer recess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant (260 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
53. When are We The People
going to recognize and NAME the actual POWERS behind this puppet administration (with its de facto CEO Dick Cheney)?!? The Corporate Megalomaniacs--and who doesn't see that Cheney IS their CEO?!--have been successfully creating an environment most conducive to their profitability for the duration of Bush's administration (and before)! Are we too frightened to address this flaw inherent in Capitalism?!? Are we SO invested in grabbing the brass ring ourselves that we refuse to acknowledge that our own greed enables this administration?!?

I read recently a comment posted on Crooks and Liars decrying the impeachment of Dick Cheney. The author of said post asserted that impeaching Cheney would make him a martyr, and that "this is what they want!" Setting aside for now the question of who comprises this undefined 'they' (see above), consider this: this is a specious, vacuous argument, spun for us, I'm confident, by the Republicans themselves: "If they believe that impeachment will turn the nation against the Democrats, they won't impeach!"

We The People have begun to amass our voices and our votes. We The People want impeachment. We The People MUST use impeachment to heal our great nation, and to restore ourselves in the eyes of the rest of the world.

As Teddy said, "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public<\i>." Teddy was a Republican--a TRUE Republican.

Be steadfast in your bravery, my fellow activists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant (260 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. Durn, again
If I can only remember to use the forward slash in my HTML!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #53
189. Exactly the game they are playing..
Since they control media, they control the spin. They beat Dems to punch, because of it & spin out reasons why Dems "can't" or "shouldn't" do X or Y or Z.
If we see it, why can't our Reps in Congress see this?

BTW, Welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realbluesky (115 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
55. IMPEACH NOW
It's the only way to stop them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
efhmc (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
56. Serously, did anyone here ever think they would do anything to
further this investigation. Bush is sure that he has the courts in his hands and will win over the law/Constitution every time. The four SC right wing decisions yesterday proved that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
61. Justice Kennedy is the key if this goes to the Supreme Court.
We have 4 that work for the good of America and 4 that are basically evil-doers toward the common man. Kennedy sometimes comes down on the righteous side. Lately, though, he's been siding with the troglodytes. Hopefully, his Gitmo rulings will carry over here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue (546 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Jun-29-07 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #61
194. if he lives.................n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
va4wilderness (201 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
62. Fire him n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
67. What is it going to take..
...for justice to be served?? I am so fucking sick of all this. We no longer live in a democracy, the average American just doesn't realize it yet. I guess the only other recourse is to have another revolution as suggested in the Declaration of Independence. I don't see anything else that would work. Unfortunately, it is not a viable option. And so we continue down the path to facism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu Jun-28-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
68. Its official this is a Dictatorship Congress makes no difference
we have a Constitutional Crisis

Congress doesn't matter
Laws don't matter

its reality

Bush controls the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
71. Speaking of Presidents and Subpoenas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gamey Donating Member (187 posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Jun-28-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
73. The shredders are working overtime
Soon there will be nothing to subpoena. Like millions of e-mails, they will have been "lost".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts)