EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-27-11 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
| 25. He said it in public at a reception. Oh, and on camera. |
| -Military legal expert: Obama's comments on Bradley Manning represent "unlawful command influence"! |
Better Believe It |
Apr-26-11 10:51 PM |
#0 |
 -
Surprise, surprise. |
EFerrari |
Apr-26-11 11:09 PM |
#1 |
| -
The President caanot be charged under the UCMJ. |
William769 |
Apr-26-11 11:20 PM |
#2 |
 -
So that doesn't make him commander-in-chief of the US Armed Forces? |
FLAprogressive |
Apr-26-11 11:22 PM |
#4 |
 -
Oy vey. |
William769 |
Apr-26-11 11:28 PM |
#6 |
| -
So why does "Command Influence" not apply to the commander of the U.S. Armed Forces? |
FLAprogressive |
Apr-26-11 11:31 PM |
#9 |
| -
As I said show me in the UCMJ where it has jurisdiction of the President. |
William769 |
Apr-26-11 11:34 PM |
#10 |
| -
You're missing the entire point here. Obama didn't commit a crime, he tainted the judge/jury pool. |
FLAprogressive |
Apr-26-11 11:35 PM |
#12 |
| -
Bullshit. You can't taint people with information they already knew beforehand. |
phleshdef |
Apr-27-11 07:42 AM |
#20 |
| -
Are you saying, rules are for the little people and not for the leader |
EFerrari |
Apr-26-11 11:25 PM |
#5 |
| -
I am stating fact. |
William769 |
Apr-26-11 11:30 PM |
#7 |
| -
Obama doesn't need to be charged |
EFerrari |
Apr-26-11 11:34 PM |
#11 |
| -
Don't bother, it's way over his head. |
FLAprogressive |
Apr-26-11 11:35 PM |
#13 |
| -
It well may be over my head |
William769 |
Apr-26-11 11:38 PM |
#14 |
| -
You rock! |
robinlynne |
Apr-27-11 12:43 PM |
#37 |
| -
Please point out in the article where anyone said anything about prosecuting Obama |
Ghost in the Machine |
Apr-26-11 11:31 PM |
#8 |
| -
"Why are people so fucking stupid." - Physician, heal thyself. |
Bluebear |
Apr-27-11 05:49 AM |
#16 |
| -
That's not the point of the article! If you read the article you'll understand it! |
Better Believe It |
Apr-27-11 08:15 AM |
#28 |
| -
They're not saying that he can be. They're saying that he's |
ThomCat |
Apr-27-11 08:31 PM |
#42 |
| -
K&R |
leftstreet |
Apr-26-11 11:20 PM |
#3 |
| -
Inexcusable for a constitutional scholar, serving as President, to make this error. n/t |
Scuba |
Apr-27-11 05:46 AM |
#15 |
| -
Add it to the list. |
FiveGoodMen |
Apr-27-11 04:06 PM |
#41 |
| -
K&R |
crickets |
Apr-27-11 06:20 AM |
#17 |
| -
As a former Army JAG . . . |
Rusticus Too |
Apr-27-11 07:05 AM |
#18 |
| -
The relevant portion of UCMJ is Article 37: "Unlawfully influencing action of court" |
struggle4progress |
Apr-27-11 07:40 AM |
#19 |
| -
BINGO! |
melm00se |
Apr-27-11 08:12 AM |
#26 |
| -
So a comment made during a personal conversation with a civilian is now undue command influence? |
Azathoth |
Apr-27-11 07:44 AM |
#21 |
| -
He said it in public at a reception. Oh, and on camera. |
EFerrari |
Apr-27-11 08:06 AM |
#25 |
| -
Wrong. He said it at a private fundraiser, and it was captured on a *cell phone*. |
Azathoth |
Apr-27-11 08:13 AM |
#27 |
| -
A "private" event attended by the public media and people who are not campaign contributors! |
Better Believe It |
Apr-27-11 08:30 AM |
#30 |
| -
Yes, a private, $5000 a ticket event |
Azathoth |
Apr-27-11 08:50 AM |
#33 |
| -
So did that person break into that "private" event? |
Better Believe It |
Apr-27-11 01:14 PM |
#39 |
| -
LOL, yes in public at a reception and on camera. n/t |
EFerrari |
Apr-27-11 08:31 AM |
#31 |
| -
Apparently, it was a 1990s mobile phone w/o a camera. |
Ignis |
Apr-27-11 01:09 PM |
#38 |
| -
People who are involved in active cases don't talk about them. |
EFerrari |
Apr-27-11 02:12 PM |
#40 |
| -
Yes. It was a public statement by the Commander in Chief of the armed forces at his public event. |
Better Believe It |
Apr-27-11 08:25 AM |
#29 |
| -
Right because no judge knew this admininstration believed Manning broke the law, beforehand. |
phleshdef |
Apr-27-11 07:45 AM |
#22 |
| -
New plan... |
Cid_B |
Apr-27-11 08:01 AM |
#24 |
| -
So, when did you serve as a JAG? |
EFerrari |
Apr-27-11 12:05 PM |
#36 |
| -
Perhaps he is trying to give the defense grounds |
Angry Dragon |
Apr-27-11 07:53 AM |
#23 |
| -
Right. He's real big on civil liberties. |
Better Believe It |
Apr-27-11 08:33 AM |
#32 |
| -
maybe Obama did it on purpose.... |
spanone |
Apr-27-11 08:51 AM |
#34 |
| -
Don't make Obama mad. He might declare you a terrorist & have the CIA murder you w no due process. |
Karmadillo |
Apr-27-11 09:02 AM |
#35 |
| -
! |
Bluebear |
Apr-29-11 05:25 AM |
#43 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread