You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: It's rationed by keeping some people out. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. It's rationed by keeping some people out.
Edited on Tue Apr-12-11 11:41 AM by dkf
Do most countries spend half of a person's lifetime medical costs on the last 2 months of life?

My uncle underwent chemotherapy 3 weeks before he died and later they kept his body going so his kids could see him even though he was already pretty much gone. I guess those were humane options but I'm not sure they made sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Tax cuts for the rich and cut Medicare for the elderly? INdemo  Apr-12-11 05:58 AM   #0 
  - Medicare costs are unsustainable.  dkf   Apr-12-11 05:59 AM   #1 
  - Then we go after those that set the cost.  Bonhomme Richard   Apr-12-11 06:01 AM   #2 
  - That's not it.  dkf   Apr-12-11 06:05 AM   #5 
     - health care is already rationed. what are you talking about?  Hannah Bell   Apr-12-11 06:06 AM   #7 
     - It's rationed by keeping some people out.  dkf   Apr-12-11 11:38 AM   #24 
     - Single payer...+1  Bonhomme Richard   Apr-12-11 06:17 AM   #11 
     - rationing? a big part of the problem is the focus on treating instead of prevention.  ejpoeta   Apr-12-11 06:28 AM   #14 
  - No they're not. We just need more revenue. n/t  Scuba   Apr-12-11 06:28 AM   #13 
  - hmm, Canadian health care  newspeak   Apr-12-11 08:40 PM   #29 
  - And what is your answer? What do we do?  Curmudgeoness   Apr-12-11 08:53 PM   #30 
  - Well certainly not a Roosevelt Democrat.  mmonk   Apr-12-11 06:01 AM   #3 
  - your link? Because that is not what the LA Times or AP is reporting  peacebird   Apr-12-11 06:04 AM   #4 
  - It is called shared sacrifice. nt.  Warren Stupidity   Apr-12-11 06:06 AM   #6 
  - My point is ..he fought like hell to pass  INdemo   Apr-12-11 06:26 AM   #12 
  - It is called irony. nt  Warren Stupidity   Apr-12-11 07:11 AM   #16 
  - Shared sacrafice is NOT MORE TAX CUTS for the rich period nt  daa   Apr-12-11 11:11 AM   #23 
     - Sure it is.  Warren Stupidity   Apr-12-11 02:28 PM   #27 
  - In reality, Obama's proposal is EXACTLY the opposite.  BzaDem   Apr-12-11 06:07 AM   #8 
  - Why didn't he let it expire when he had the chance?  mmonk   Apr-12-11 06:10 AM   #9 
     - You know exactly why.  BzaDem   Apr-12-11 06:17 AM   #10 
     - You're talking to the wrong person. I'm not a supply sider.  mmonk   Apr-12-11 06:32 AM   #15 
     - You apparently don't even know what supply side economics is.  BzaDem   Apr-12-11 07:50 AM   #20 
     - NOT cause another recession......  piratefish08   Apr-12-11 07:15 AM   #17 
     - If he couldn't rally the troops then, how's that going to work now?  progressoid   Apr-12-11 07:35 AM   #19 
     - Nobody at the poverty line has 2,000 in tax liability. A marginal increase isn't 2k.  TheKentuckian   Apr-12-11 09:05 AM   #21 
        - The joke is on you. People at the poverty line get BACK money from the government, and without this  BzaDem   Apr-12-11 08:32 PM   #28 
           - You don't have an increase greater than your liability.  TheKentuckian   Apr-13-11 12:59 PM   #31 
     - He Didn't Have A Chance...  KharmaTrain   Apr-12-11 07:27 AM   #18 
        - Yes he did. He could have allowed them to expire which means the taxes really went up  TheKentuckian   Apr-12-11 12:39 PM   #25 
           - Playing On The Wrong Side Of The Field...  KharmaTrain   Apr-12-11 02:13 PM   #26 
  - No. He's not the only wolf in the chicken coup either. n/t  upi402   Apr-12-11 10:03 AM   #22 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC