You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #10: Why do you keep trying to act like you have to prove the need to do something they are already doing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Why do you keep trying to act like you have to prove the need to do something they are already doing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Prosser outperformed other Republican candidates in Waukesha County in recent history Bjorn Against  Apr-09-11 07:07 PM   #0 
  - wouldn't you have to compare to local elections, which is what this was  dsc   Apr-09-11 07:11 PM   #1 
  - This was not a local election, it was a statewide election  Bjorn Against   Apr-09-11 07:12 PM   #2 
  - of a sort  dsc   Apr-09-11 08:45 PM   #28 
  - For a comparable election, Gableman got 66% in 2008.  Zynx   Apr-09-11 07:12 PM   #3 
     - that is still a presidential year  dsc   Apr-09-11 08:44 PM   #27 
        - There was no presidential election (primary or otherwise) on that ballot.  Zynx   Apr-10-11 08:50 AM   #29 
  - Nate Silver gets it. The people of Waukesha County used this as a confidence vote on Walker  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 07:14 PM   #4 
  - There are many reasons his numbers could be higher, just one of which is fraud  Bjorn Against   Apr-09-11 07:19 PM   #6 
     - Yes, and investigations are happening.  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 07:21 PM   #8 
        - Not to mention it's full of religious nuts.  Zynx   Apr-10-11 09:02 AM   #30 
           - They have religious bowling cults...  Ellipsis   Apr-10-11 05:54 PM   #46 
  - Maybe the T-bag/GOP was energized by the recent  EmmettKelly   Apr-09-11 07:18 PM   #5 
     - Exactly, in a VERY red county, this is exactly what happened.  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 07:20 PM   #7 
     - "....exactly what happened.""  BeFree   Apr-10-11 11:39 AM   #31 
        - sigh  PeaceNikki   Apr-10-11 11:41 AM   #32 
           - I know  BeFree   Apr-10-11 11:47 AM   #33 
              - Because I know my neighbors, co-workers, community, voting habits, and the demographics here.  PeaceNikki   Apr-10-11 11:49 AM   #34 
                 - So you are the expert?  BeFree   Apr-10-11 12:02 PM   #35 
                    - I will say whatever I want and have confidence in whatever I want.  PeaceNikki   Apr-10-11 12:08 PM   #36 
                       - Right  BeFree   Apr-10-11 12:21 PM   #37 
                       - Whatever.  PeaceNikki   Apr-10-11 12:23 PM   #38 
                       - ---  Tresalisa   Apr-10-11 03:02 PM   #43 
     - Possible, but we need an investigation to determine the cause.  Bjorn Against   Apr-09-11 07:23 PM   #9 
     - Why do you keep trying to act like you have to prove the need to do something they are already doing  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 07:25 PM   #10 
        - Because right now there is not a real investigation looking at everything that needs to be looked at  Bjorn Against   Apr-09-11 07:28 PM   #11 
           - Of course the recount "plans" aren't laid out because certification isn't complete.  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 07:30 PM   #12 
              - As even you acknowledged in the previous thread, we can't get a hand count without a judge's order  Bjorn Against   Apr-09-11 07:32 PM   #13 
              - We can't get a recount at ALL without a "judge's order".  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 07:33 PM   #14 
                 - Actually we can get a machine recount without a judge's order, but not a hand recount  Bjorn Against   Apr-09-11 07:39 PM   #17 
                 - The recount petition itself goes to a judge, no?  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 07:44 PM   #18 
                    - Maybe it goes to a judge, but you don't have to argue your case to a judge for a machine count  Bjorn Against   Apr-09-11 07:47 PM   #19 
                       - This is also interesting  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 07:50 PM   #20 
                          - On the first point that would be a good argument for a lawyer to make  Bjorn Against   Apr-09-11 08:01 PM   #21 
                          - And where #10 starts it clearly says:  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 08:08 PM   #22 
                             - I have no doubt that Elias will find many good arguments for a hand recount  Bjorn Against   Apr-09-11 08:21 PM   #25 
                                - And I remain optimistic that it won't even be a fight to get it.  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 08:23 PM   #26 
                          - or tabulators  liberal life   Apr-10-11 12:31 PM   #39 
                             - If you read the rest of the document, "tabulators" in that context are people.  PeaceNikki   Apr-10-11 12:35 PM   #40 
                 - What court do you go to for that? Circuit in Dane I hope. n/t  rzemanfl   Apr-09-11 08:17 PM   #23 
                    - I appear to have been wrong that the recount petition has to go to judge.  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 08:18 PM   #24 
              - gore/bush is why they are worried about voter issues...we've learned not to just wait for the system  Snoutport   Apr-09-11 07:34 PM   #15 
                 - Not in this county. Here's the other thing not factored in:  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 07:37 PM   #16 
     - Except it is also true that a certain % of GOP voters in Wis. now regret their vote for Walker  blm   Apr-10-11 12:49 PM   #41 
        - Not in this county, though. See... THAT'S the thing a lot of you don't get.  PeaceNikki   Apr-10-11 12:56 PM   #42 
           - Yeah... Waukesha county is scary...  Shiver   Apr-10-11 03:12 PM   #44 
              - lol, I leave people with the impression this is a bad place.  PeaceNikki   Apr-10-11 03:32 PM   #45 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC