You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #27: Massive credibility problem [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. Massive credibility problem
however you slice it.

It stinks to high heaven, regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -WALKER's FREUDIAN SLIP: He KNEW on - Wednesday - that the FIX WAS IN! kpete  Apr-08-11 01:36 PM   #0 
  - I remember That Statement  fascisthunter   Apr-08-11 01:37 PM   #1 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Apr-08-11 08:36 PM   #39 
  - Except he's saying that would invalidate a recount (nt)  Recursion   Apr-08-11 01:38 PM   #2 
  - That's exactly what he's saying and exactly what the OP is alluding to. nt  CJCRANE   Apr-08-11 01:43 PM   #6 
  - recommend  xchrom   Apr-08-11 01:39 PM   #3 
  - God this is stupid.  tritsofme   Apr-08-11 01:40 PM   #4 
  - awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww  fascisthunter   Apr-08-11 05:50 PM   #30 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-08-11 07:54 PM   #36 
  - The petty Pubbie who spoke to the media on behalf of Prosser Tuesday night wondered about 8,000...  ClassWarrior   Apr-08-11 01:41 PM   #5 
  - Could the votes have been found been intended to cover up  JDPriestly   Apr-09-11 12:46 AM   #55 
  - Maybe she was hiding them until she got done making them up.  Maraya1969   Apr-09-11 03:14 AM   #60 
  - Ah, the smoke screen above the shell game con. Wait, that's two. But they're CONservatives.  freshwest   Apr-09-11 11:53 AM   #84 
  - Interesting how close this number is to the # of votes that were "found" for him-nt  eowyn_of_rohan   Apr-09-11 08:32 AM   #66 
  - Prosser's election night statement  eowyn_of_rohan   Apr-09-11 09:55 AM   #76 
  - Maybe David Koch needs to give him another call  KamaAina   Apr-08-11 01:44 PM   #7 
  - How can this be after he's demonstrated such law-abiding, ethical leadership?  Blue Owl   Apr-08-11 01:50 PM   #8 
  - Bingo.  felix_numinous   Apr-08-11 01:50 PM   #9 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-08-11 01:54 PM   #10 
  - Why wouldn't they? Think like a Republican for a minute. Let's see, I'm  cognoscere   Apr-08-11 02:44 PM   #11 
  - Might I suggest 'The Purloined Letter'  LanternWaste   Apr-08-11 02:46 PM   #12 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Apr-08-11 02:50 PM   #14 
  - Calling attention, or laying the groundwork?  DefenseLawyer   Apr-08-11 02:53 PM   #15 
  - +1000 My thought exactly.  Junkdrawer   Apr-08-11 03:07 PM   #16 
  - Remember Bush and his family coming on TV in 2000 saying they  deutsey   Apr-08-11 03:12 PM   #18 
  - Or the creepy scene with Bush on election night in 2004  DefenseLawyer   Apr-08-11 03:30 PM   #20 
  - exactly. remember the new pearl harbor of 9/11. nt  tomp   Apr-08-11 06:54 PM   #32 
  - This sort of event is legendary among right-wingers.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-09-11 12:45 AM   #54 
  - wait, what??  Fla_Democrat   Apr-09-11 09:36 AM   #75 
     - Yep.  AtheistCrusader   Apr-09-11 02:33 PM   #90 
  - Yeah, that was what I was trying to say. The better to get people to roll over and take it.  freshwest   Apr-09-11 11:56 AM   #86 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-08-11 03:08 PM   #17 
  - I'm with you on that. It was a Fraudian slip like years ago when  goodnews   Apr-08-11 04:54 PM   #28 
     - I love that term -- "Fraudian". We need it so much when discussing Repugs ... nt  eppur_se_muova   Apr-09-11 09:29 AM   #74 
     - Remember when the rightwing pundits said the 2004 election should be postponed...  freshwest   Apr-09-11 12:02 PM   #87 
  - Hence the term "slip".  Forkboy   Apr-08-11 03:33 PM   #23 
  - Are you using yours now?  Major Hogwash   Apr-08-11 06:02 PM   #31 
  - Yes....  SDuderstadt   Apr-08-11 08:45 PM   #40 
     - You're not the only one who finds no surprises here.  Forkboy   Apr-08-11 09:14 PM   #43 
  - amazing, you're wrong again! how do you do it? nt  tomp   Apr-08-11 06:56 PM   #33 
  - I prefer to draw conclusions...  SDuderstadt   Apr-08-11 08:48 PM   #41 
     - drawing a conclusion does not guarantee....  tomp   Apr-09-11 06:26 AM   #62 
  - Because they're arrogant and stupid...........  socialist_n_TN   Apr-08-11 07:17 PM   #35 
  - ...and it enhances their pleasure when they can maliciously toy with you  bbgrunt   Apr-08-11 10:23 PM   #46 
  - self delete  Octafish   Apr-09-11 08:44 AM   #70 
  - All part of the psychotic mindset of the............  socialist_n_TN   Apr-09-11 09:06 AM   #72 
  - Arrogant yes, but stupid?  ktdid56   Apr-09-11 12:36 PM   #88 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-09-11 03:23 AM   #61 
  - Wrong. STUPID people trying to steal elections...  kag   Apr-09-11 08:15 AM   #64 
  - Condescending, and I'm sick and tired of it.  Faygo Kid   Apr-09-11 08:40 AM   #69 
  - point+ - but - if you could do it without the shenanigans, you would, so you'd want to encourage  patrice   Apr-09-11 10:29 AM   #78 
  - And in re that "significant minority" relative to a Supreme Court race, there's probably some VERY  patrice   Apr-09-11 10:40 AM   #79 
  - Pre-emption.  freshwest   Apr-09-11 11:55 AM   #85 
  - To think... not only is he psychotic, he's psychic too!  Kip Humphrey   Apr-08-11 02:48 PM   #13 
  - If you have the facts no one else knows yet, it is NOT psychic at all.  L. Coyote   Apr-09-11 11:24 AM   #83 
  - Someone needs to see when the last modification was done  alfredo   Apr-08-11 03:14 PM   #19 
  - she didnt find a database  SnakeEyes   Apr-08-11 10:37 PM   #48 
  - Didn't she say she forgot to save the data?  alfredo   Apr-09-11 11:22 AM   #81 
  - No, someone needs to count the official tapes and then look at every ballot.  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 08:38 AM   #68 
  - I'm sure as soon as the county clerk heard him say this  Politicalboi   Apr-08-11 03:32 PM   #21 
  - his homeboys had their own private cameras set up  reggie the dog   Apr-09-11 02:42 AM   #58 
  - We lost. Get over it. nt  LLStarks   Apr-08-11 03:33 PM   #22 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Apr-08-11 05:25 PM   #29 
  - You know, depression is easily treatable. nt  Chef Eric   Apr-08-11 09:12 PM   #42 
  - A shocking reply from you.  Forkboy   Apr-08-11 09:14 PM   #44 
  - lol... "we"  fascisthunter   Apr-09-11 09:00 AM   #71 
  - His campaign director made an interesting statment about "unrecognized opportunity"  suffragette   Apr-08-11 04:12 PM   #24 
  - what is that supposed to mean?  tomp   Apr-08-11 07:00 PM   #34 
  - really! that phrasing makes my brain go "click".  bbgrunt   Apr-08-11 10:27 PM   #47 
  - Struck me as a very Rovian statement  suffragette   Apr-09-11 12:45 AM   #53 
  - Didn't Diebold's head honcho say something to the effect of...  enuegii   Apr-08-11 08:24 PM   #37 
  - Good catch. Yes he said that.  suffragette   Apr-09-11 12:58 AM   #56 
  - good memory and good point. nt  tomp   Apr-09-11 06:28 AM   #63 
  - That unrecognized opportunity thing... It happened in November  midnight   Apr-09-11 12:25 AM   #52 
     - Good point  suffragette   Apr-09-11 01:15 AM   #57 
  - It was a signal to put the "reserve" votes in. The 29 hours were spent scrubbing the computer and  TaylorWatts   Apr-08-11 04:24 PM   #25 
  - scrubbing the computer of what?  SnakeEyes   Apr-08-11 10:39 PM   #49 
  - I'm just curious were those IBM recount machines?  Uncle Joe   Apr-08-11 04:24 PM   #26 
  - Massive credibility problem  Aerows   Apr-08-11 04:35 PM   #27 
  - Ending it with "I think that's fair"  catgirl   Apr-08-11 08:34 PM   #38 
  - also known as another win for Iran  PatrynXX   Apr-08-11 09:54 PM   #45 
  - They do that every time. Foreshadow or shove it in our face after it's been done.  lonestarnot   Apr-08-11 10:39 PM   #50 
  - Well, I guess I am a troublemaker.  dotymed   Apr-08-11 10:42 PM   #51 
  - We can expect  Enthusiast   Apr-09-11 03:09 AM   #59 
  - At the least  PATRICK   Apr-09-11 08:17 AM   #65 
  - There will be a hand recount and every ballot will be looked at by a human being.  PeaceNikki   Apr-09-11 08:34 AM   #67 
  - K & R !!!  WillyT   Apr-09-11 09:28 AM   #73 
  - It's just as probable to claim that the statement wasn't co-incidence as it is to claim that it was.  patrice   Apr-09-11 10:04 AM   #77 
  - P.S. The guy does have a history of playing fast & loose with election rules, so the probability tha  patrice   Apr-09-11 10:47 AM   #80 
  - There were other ones I noticed, like "preserving our victory" when the count was not yet a victory  L. Coyote   Apr-09-11 11:22 AM   #82 
  - Arrogant Scumbags On Parade  colsohlibgal   Apr-09-11 01:08 PM   #89 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC