You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Uh huh. Whatever. nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Uh huh. Whatever. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -K&R if you agree that taking back the House JUST as important as holding the White House. Ken Burch  Dec-28-10 05:13 PM   #0 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-28-10 05:15 PM   #1 
  - Nobody "slammed dems"  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:18 PM   #2 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-28-10 05:19 PM   #5 
  - Uh huh. Whatever. nt  ecstatic   Dec-28-10 05:20 PM   #6 
  - But I thought it was the Blue Dogs who lost their seats to Rs  treestar   Dec-28-10 05:31 PM   #18 
     - The Blue Dogs KILLED the public option.  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:37 PM   #21 
        - No, you are wrong. Collins, Snowe, Brown and Lieberman stopped negotiation on the PO  PBS Poll-435   Dec-28-10 05:42 PM   #24 
           - Ben Nelson is a Blue Dog, too.  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:44 PM   #25 
              - This is what is so frustrating  PBS Poll-435   Dec-28-10 05:47 PM   #26 
                 - Lieberman was essentially a Blue Dog.  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:52 PM   #27 
                    - This is what I am saying  PBS Poll-435   Dec-28-10 05:55 PM   #28 
  - Bwahahahahahaha !!!  WillyT   Dec-28-10 05:24 PM   #8 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Dec-28-10 05:18 PM   #3 
  - Duh  treestar   Dec-28-10 05:19 PM   #4 
  - No one is saying that.  BzaDem   Dec-28-10 05:26 PM   #9 
  - Uh...read post #7 in this thread, for a start.  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:26 PM   #10 
     - Yes. Reading post 7 to understand your strawman is a great place to start. n/t  BzaDem   Dec-28-10 05:27 PM   #11 
        - In post #7, you CONCEDED a GOP House in 2012.  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:29 PM   #13 
           - "That's the same thing as conceding it pretty much for the rest of history."  BzaDem   Dec-28-10 05:30 PM   #17 
  - Getting the House back will be a multi-year process.  BzaDem   Dec-28-10 05:22 PM   #7 
  - Calling it a "multi-year process" is the same thing as giving up  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:28 PM   #12 
     - Simply predicting it might take more elections to get again  treestar   Dec-28-10 05:29 PM   #14 
     - Thank you. n/t  BzaDem   Dec-28-10 05:30 PM   #16 
     - No, it isn't. Just because you say something untrue doesn't make it true.  BzaDem   Dec-28-10 05:29 PM   #15 
        - To make such predictions is to work against Democratic chances in 2012  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:34 PM   #19 
        - Just don't agree with you here.  tritsofme   Dec-28-10 06:34 PM   #33 
        - This thread is not a personal attack on you.  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:40 PM   #23 
           - I updated my post above.  BzaDem   Dec-28-10 06:07 PM   #30 
  - I always vote  caty   Dec-28-10 05:37 PM   #20 
  - Good for YOU!  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 05:39 PM   #22 
  - The House is the only entity that even remotely reflects the constituency  EFerrari   Dec-28-10 06:06 PM   #29 
  - And even THAT is distorted by the artificial 435 seat size limit on the House  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 06:22 PM   #32 
     - Just keep in mind that would make it much harder for party leaders to whip votes.  BzaDem   Dec-28-10 06:39 PM   #34 
     - The House of Commons in the UK has 650 members.  Ken Burch   Dec-28-10 07:14 PM   #35 
     - That doesn't matter, as long as it is roughly equal.  treestar   Dec-29-10 10:06 AM   #36 
  - I agree. k&r n/t  Laelth   Dec-28-10 06:15 PM   #31 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC