You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: "no standing to challenge it" means their tax bracket is not in the 1% [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. "no standing to challenge it" means their tax bracket is not in the 1%
once you get to that bracket, you have all the 'standing' you need to do business with Red US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -SCOTUS trims wall of separation, Kagan sides with liberal bloc usregimechange  Apr-04-11 01:12 PM   #0 
  - If a TAXPAYER doesn't have standing, who exactly DOES?  no_hypocrisy   Apr-04-11 01:17 PM   #1 
  - Corporations?  usregimechange   Apr-04-11 01:18 PM   #2 
     - You betcha!  freshwest   Apr-04-11 02:10 PM   #9 
  - Nicely schizophrenic  gratuitous   Apr-04-11 01:18 PM   #3 
  - Oh yes... they embrace their cognitive dissonance, they wear it as a badge of honor  ixion   Apr-04-11 01:21 PM   #6 
  - indeed. nt  xchrom   Apr-04-11 01:21 PM   #7 
  - Madrassas in Arizona?  Thunderstruck   Apr-04-11 01:19 PM   #4 
  - Soon to be nationwide.  freshwest   Apr-04-11 02:11 PM   #10 
  - "no standing to challenge it" means their tax bracket is not in the 1%  ixion   Apr-04-11 01:19 PM   #5 
  - Yeah, that's their new game, isn't it.  Warren DeMontague   Apr-04-11 01:22 PM   #8 
  - I hate to say this, but Scalia and Thomas concurring Opinion is the best of the three Opinions  happyslug   Apr-04-11 03:24 PM   #11 
  - So under what circumstances could citizens challenge a governmental 1st amendment violation?  Warren DeMontague   Apr-04-11 04:45 PM   #12 
     - If you are personally affected, which is the law in all other cases.  happyslug   Apr-04-11 07:02 PM   #13 
        - So, essentially, what you're saying is it's impossible to challenge religious use of tax dollars.  Warren DeMontague   Apr-04-11 07:19 PM   #14 
           - As a general rule, you can NOT challenge any law unless you are personally affected by it  happyslug   Apr-04-11 10:35 PM   #15 
              - Excessively formalistic approaches to standing are one of the methods conservatives use to  BzaDem   Apr-04-11 10:58 PM   #17 
              - That's bullshit. The Bill Of Rights applies to everyone, and contains no such caveat.  Warren DeMontague   Apr-05-11 01:53 AM   #19 
  - Yet another reason while I will take a lavender-drenched hankie  blondeatlast   Apr-04-11 10:53 PM   #16 
  - Damn!  elleng   Apr-04-11 11:14 PM   #18 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC