You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #30: to bad [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
rdking647 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. to bad
cause they aint going nowhere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Radiation Experts Determine 200,000 Cancers Likely from Fukushima tekisui  Apr-02-11 05:56 PM   #0 
  - nuclear energy  CountAllVotes   Apr-02-11 06:00 PM   #1 
  - If we SHUT THE DAMN THINGS DOWN! ALL OF THEM now  Teaser   Apr-02-11 06:07 PM   #5 
     - If We Switch from Incandescents to LEDs, We Could Shut Them All Down and Not Miss Them  AndyTiedye   Apr-02-11 06:14 PM   #7 
     - how long do you think "switching" would take?  Teaser   Apr-02-11 06:17 PM   #8 
     - investing in LED lights is great!!  CountAllVotes   Apr-02-11 06:34 PM   #12 
     - And if wishes were fishes. Only those allergic to seafood would starve.  TheMadMonk   Apr-02-11 06:57 PM   #13 
     - That is a lie or you are misinformed. Wind is cheaper than nukes.  grahamhgreen   Apr-02-11 06:25 PM   #9 
     - goddammit, read what I write.  Teaser   Apr-02-11 06:28 PM   #10 
        - It Takes a Pretty Long Time to Build a Nuke Too  AndyTiedye   Apr-02-11 07:04 PM   #14 
     - I think we need to do a triage with our nukes. The oldest and ones in  jwirr   Apr-02-11 07:48 PM   #17 
  - "FaireWinds Associates" is a company which profits off of anti-nuclear sentiment.  TheWraith   Apr-02-11 06:03 PM   #2 
  - Good. I hope he makes a fortune off shutting down the entire industry.  Modern_Matthew   Apr-02-11 06:05 PM   #3 
  - Why is fusion considered safer? From the mining to the end product  jwirr   Apr-02-11 08:04 PM   #18 
  - Ummm... seriously?  PavePusher   Apr-02-11 08:14 PM   #19 
     - I'm 69 years old they did not even know about fusion when I was in school. nt  jwirr   Apr-02-11 08:49 PM   #21 
     - No problem - and thanks for the link. I get a lot of my education here  jwirr   Apr-02-11 11:22 PM   #23 
     - No problem, we're here to help each other.  PavePusher   Apr-02-11 11:26 PM   #24 
     - Just finished reading the link - well I did skip the tech parts as they  jwirr   Apr-02-11 11:41 PM   #25 
        - Fusion power needs a Manhatten Project-type effort of funding and research and man-power.  PavePusher   Apr-03-11 08:54 AM   #33 
  - to bad  rdking647   Apr-03-11 08:44 AM   #30 
  - Ah, thanks for the information. I am not familiar with them.  tekisui   Apr-02-11 06:05 PM   #4 
  - FaireWinds is Arne Gundersen's company isn't it?  kristopher   Apr-02-11 07:35 PM   #15 
  - FaireWinds Associates was quoting the LLRC  ELY08   Apr-02-11 07:48 PM   #16 
  - Skeptical  FLPanhandle   Apr-02-11 06:07 PM   #6 
  - Brookhaven National Labs, extensive testing predicted 170000 deaths from ONE spent fuel pool fire nt  flamingdem   Apr-02-11 09:18 PM   #22 
  - Add that to the cost of nuke power generation.  grahamhgreen   Apr-02-11 06:29 PM   #11 
  - since they have no actually estimate of radiation  rdking647   Apr-02-11 08:16 PM   #20 
  - Here are some statistical analyses that suggest emissions are already in the Chernobyl ballpark:  Warren DeMontague   Apr-03-11 02:19 AM   #28 
     - when data like that appears in a peer reviewed journal ill believe it  rdking647   Apr-03-11 08:43 AM   #29 
  - Never let a crisis go to waste! I predict as many as twenty billion deaths!!!1  Chris_Texas   Apr-03-11 02:00 AM   #26 
  - No, no one is going to die. It's actually going to have many beneficial effects.  Warren DeMontague   Apr-03-11 02:15 AM   #27 
  - But think how many jobs those cancers will provide for the medical community! Go cancer! Go nukes!  Karmadillo   Apr-03-11 08:46 AM   #31 
  - the study was done by the eecr  rdking647   Apr-03-11 08:51 AM   #32 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC