GReedDiamond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-27-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 16. Thanks, BBI, I appreciate that...nt |
| -No Tax Holiday for the Working Poor: 42% of taxpayers will actually pay more taxes in 2011! |
Better Believe It |
Dec-27-10 02:50 PM |
#0 |
 -
Why do you hate Obama? n/t |
Foo Fighter |
Dec-27-10 02:53 PM |
#1 |
  -
You're joking. Right? Do you think the writer hates Obama? |
Better Believe It |
Dec-27-10 02:54 PM |
#4 |
| -
LOL, yes, of course I was joking. |
Foo Fighter |
Dec-27-10 06:40 PM |
#35 |
| -
recommend |
xchrom |
Dec-27-10 02:53 PM |
#2 |
| -
Again, was the deal actually better than no deal at all? |
gratuitous |
Dec-27-10 02:54 PM |
#3 |
| -
me too. the poor pay more, but it doesn't bring significant revenue. |
Hannah Bell |
Dec-27-10 03:02 PM |
#7 |
| -
Not to mention |
gratuitous |
Dec-27-10 04:03 PM |
#17 |
| -
Slightly higher taxes vs significantly higher taxes. |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 03:34 PM |
#13 |
| -
For WHOM? |
aquart |
Dec-27-10 03:43 PM |
#14 |
| -
No the people in the 42% stated in the OP. |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 03:46 PM |
#15 |
| -
The deal is done. The bill was signed. eom |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-27-10 06:00 PM |
#27 |
| -
And Obama signed it because.... |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 06:10 PM |
#29 |
| -
Letting the tax cuts expire is not a possibility at this point |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-27-10 06:15 PM |
#30 |
| -
Hardly. For more people the difference is negligble. |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 06:30 PM |
#33 |
| -
Opening the door to the destruction of Social Security. That's some compromise! |
Better Believe It |
Dec-27-10 08:53 PM |
#41 |
| -
Yet it is still is still interesting that |
ThomCat |
Dec-28-10 03:09 AM |
#43 |
| -
Fiscal Responsibility verses Fiscal Irresponsibility |
Bandit |
Dec-28-10 11:34 AM |
#51 |
| -
Don't tilt against the illusion.. |
sendero |
Dec-27-10 05:27 PM |
#20 |
| -
No deal at all is no longer an option. The deal was done. |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-27-10 05:57 PM |
#26 |
| -
Obviously |
gratuitous |
Dec-27-10 06:16 PM |
#31 |
| -
How do you figure? |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 06:32 PM |
#34 |
| -
He could have gotten the Republicans to vote on a unempoyment package |
jtown1123 |
Dec-28-10 02:45 PM |
#53 |
| -
Bogus stat. |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 02:56 PM |
#5 |
| -
without the compromise, it would have been Republicans fault |
hfojvt |
Dec-27-10 03:12 PM |
#8 |
| -
"The Republicans were unwilling to extend MWPC" When did they win control of the government? |
Better Believe It |
Dec-27-10 03:20 PM |
#10 |
| -
No but it takes 60 votes. |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 03:33 PM |
#12 |
| -
Another meaningless non-sequitur.. |
sendero |
Dec-27-10 05:31 PM |
#21 |
| -
60 votes. |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 05:45 PM |
#22 |
| -
Politically... |
sendero |
Dec-27-10 06:22 PM |
#32 |
| -
Politically maybe, but not better for the country, not better for the unemployed, not better for |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 07:16 PM |
#36 |
| -
With most poor people.. |
sendero |
Dec-27-10 07:20 PM |
#37 |
| -
No compromise means poor would be paying SIGNIFICANTLY more taxes. |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 07:32 PM |
#38 |
| -
Sorry, but that sounds a bit too like enabler talk |
NickB79 |
Dec-28-10 02:55 PM |
#54 |
| -
Which still leaves people who earn less than $20K paying more in 2011 vs 2010 |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-27-10 05:53 PM |
#25 |
| -
I followed the link, but the page now "couldn't be found"...nt |
GReedDiamond |
Dec-27-10 03:01 PM |
#6 |
| -
Here's a different link to the same article. |
Better Believe It |
Dec-27-10 03:22 PM |
#11 |
| -
Thanks, BBI, I appreciate that...nt |
GReedDiamond |
Dec-27-10 04:00 PM |
#16 |
| -
No problem. I don't know why the first link stopped working. |
Better Believe It |
Dec-27-10 04:52 PM |
#18 |
| -
Ahh. The Great Compromise = Fuck the poor on behalf of the rich |
somone |
Dec-27-10 03:19 PM |
#9 |
| -
The Making Work pay credit was always intended as a one-shot stimulus. |
pnwmom |
Dec-27-10 05:19 PM |
#19 |
| -
Neither were the Bush cuts but here they are. |
TheKentuckian |
Dec-27-10 05:49 PM |
#23 |
| -
At a minimum. |
Statistical |
Dec-27-10 05:51 PM |
#24 |
| -
I don't know where you got your statistics, |
pnwmom |
Dec-27-10 10:36 PM |
#42 |
| -
I think you misunderstood. |
Statistical |
Dec-28-10 09:40 AM |
#48 |
| -
You're right -- thanks for the clarification, and the numbers. n/t |
pnwmom |
Dec-28-10 02:42 PM |
#52 |
| -
No, that is not the real question. |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-27-10 06:04 PM |
#28 |
| -
Worst case, we're talking about $3.90 a week. C'mon. |
Still a Democrat |
Dec-27-10 08:00 PM |
#39 |
| -
Yeah, and it's just the paupers anyway. Who cares? |
Hello_Kitty |
Dec-27-10 08:15 PM |
#40 |
| -
What economic stimulus are you writing about? |
Better Believe It |
Dec-28-10 08:44 AM |
#44 |
| -
Oh goodie another brilliant firedoglake analysis |
Still a Democrat |
Dec-28-10 09:37 AM |
#47 |
| -
The payroll tax holiday is $120B not $60B. n/t |
Statistical |
Dec-28-10 09:45 AM |
#50 |
| -
Oh, but just the other day, someone was saying that the bottom |
bullwinkle428 |
Dec-28-10 08:47 AM |
#45 |
| -
Exactly! |
katnapped |
Dec-28-10 09:07 AM |
#46 |
| -
But Michael Vick is a great football player - why do you hate Obama? nt |
TBF |
Dec-28-10 09:41 AM |
#49 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread