You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Is this what is meant by NATO taking over? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
joe_sixpack Donating Member (655 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is this what is meant by NATO taking over?
Or are they just taking over command and control while our military still flys combat missions? Confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -U.S. deploys low-flying attack planes in Libya cali  Mar-28-11 07:31 PM   #0 
  - The AC-130 should allow removal of Qaddafi troops encamped inside cities. nt  bluestate10   Mar-28-11 07:35 PM   #1 
  - Essentially, the USA and NATO have taken sides in a civil war.  PufPuf23   Mar-28-11 07:37 PM   #2 
  - The C 130's use a gatling type gun made by GE.  theoldman   Mar-28-11 07:39 PM   #3 
  - All AC-130s carry a 105mm howitzer as well as the gatlings.  ChimpersMcSmirkers   Mar-28-11 07:47 PM   #7 
  - AC130s have been fitted with a variety of guns  kenny blankenship   Mar-28-11 07:48 PM   #8 
  - AC-130 has just about every gun every made...  Statistical   Mar-29-11 12:11 AM   #33 
  - fly 'em low, watch 'em blow.  sad sally   Mar-28-11 07:40 PM   #4 
  - Here's a vid of one in real action. . .  Baclava   Mar-29-11 12:07 AM   #32 
  - If they fly any lower  Canuckistanian   Mar-28-11 07:43 PM   #5 
  - So much for a now fly zone only approach  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-28-11 07:43 PM   #6 
  - Doesn't apply to us. Were just doin' some fancy pageant walk'n.  lonestarnot   Mar-28-11 07:52 PM   #10 
  - Is this what is meant by NATO taking over?  joe_sixpack   Mar-28-11 07:52 PM   #9 
  - I wonder how many Special Forces are on the ground to direct these  neverforget   Mar-28-11 07:52 PM   #11 
  - We've got to fight them there so we don't have to fight them here.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Mar-28-11 07:53 PM   #12 
  - The saying is tired. Plus nothing like that has been said by President Obama. nt  bluestate10   Mar-28-11 08:01 PM   #14 
     - "our vital national interests" are tired as is the neo-con/neo-lib claptrap for more war.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Mar-28-11 08:04 PM   #18 
  - Do the Brits or any other NATO country fly these things?  amandabeech   Mar-28-11 07:58 PM   #13 
  - The AC-130 is good, but a bit outdated. Drones have my vote. nt  bluestate10   Mar-28-11 08:03 PM   #16 
  - Who else has the drones?  amandabeech   Mar-28-11 08:12 PM   #23 
  - Hard for a drone to match the firepower of a gunship though. nt  FLPanhandle   Mar-28-11 08:19 PM   #26 
  - No doubt. Want to fly along on a mission?  Baclava   Mar-28-11 09:40 PM   #29 
  - Outdated or not nothing matches the raw firepower  Statistical   Mar-29-11 12:14 AM   #34 
  - The Brits fly Hercs, C-130 cargo planes,  joe_sixpack   Mar-28-11 08:04 PM   #17 
     - The AC-130 is mostly attached to Special Forces. If SF are operating on the ground  bluestate10   Mar-28-11 08:07 PM   #20 
     - My quick check (wiki) says that we're the only ones operating A-130s and A-10s.  amandabeech   Mar-28-11 08:08 PM   #21 
        - While nobody else has AC-130 and A-10 other jets can be used for close air support.  Statistical   Mar-29-11 12:31 AM   #35 
           - AC 130's can linger over a target area at low altitudes, unlike a fighter  Baclava   Mar-29-11 11:40 AM   #36 
  - I thought this was about preventing Gaddafi's aircraft from flying?  Cali_Democrat   Mar-28-11 08:02 PM   #15 
  - "vicious and brutal" And Qaddafi would pet kittens if we leave him alone. nt  bluestate10   Mar-28-11 08:04 PM   #19 
     - I never said Gaddafi was an angel, but weren't we told that this was only about a no-fly zone?  Cali_Democrat   Mar-28-11 08:09 PM   #22 
     - Mission creep to take out a human creep.  amandabeech   Mar-28-11 08:14 PM   #25 
     - UN Resolution 1973 (2011)  bindelh   Mar-28-11 09:58 PM   #31 
     - Does the record of US/NATO massacres in Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan warrant intervention..  Alamuti Lotus   Mar-30-11 01:54 AM   #39 
  - A-10 Warthog is noted for its use of depleted uranium ammo.  JohnyCanuck   Mar-28-11 08:14 PM   #24 
  - Few cared when Depleted Uranium was spread all over Kosovo  Gravel Democrat   Mar-28-11 08:22 PM   #27 
  - Just terrific.  amandabeech   Mar-28-11 09:58 PM   #30 
  - Its use is optional  ProgressiveProfessor   Mar-30-11 01:46 AM   #38 
  - A-10's and AC 130 gunships? - You asked for a 'no-fly' zone - you got it.  Baclava   Mar-28-11 08:38 PM   #28 
  - Yay, War!  deaniac21   Mar-29-11 11:48 AM   #37 
  - So it is war.  Luminous Animal   Mar-30-11 02:03 AM   #40 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC