You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #31: No, it's because he's an attention whore who doesn't know WTF he's talking about. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. No, it's because he's an attention whore who doesn't know WTF he's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Kucinich: Obama could be impeached for attacking Libya markpkessinger  Mar-21-11 05:24 PM   #0 
  - Well, I'm sure glad you've kept us informed about this.  elocs   Mar-21-11 05:26 PM   #1 
  - Watch the video too  L. Coyote   Mar-21-11 05:49 PM   #24 
  - I hadn't. Just got to 'puter for first time today  ncrainbowgrrl   Mar-21-11 07:05 PM   #41 
     - Thank you!  markpkessinger   Mar-21-11 09:25 PM   #81 
  - We don't need no stinking Constitutional Authority! (heh-heh)  FiveGoodMen   Mar-21-11 05:27 PM   #2 
  - Looks like a few people here agree  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 05:36 PM   #5 
     - I know. It's frightening how many will back any atrocity with a D by it.  FiveGoodMen   Mar-21-11 06:30 PM   #32 
  - Not just Kucinich. Several very good Democrats  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 05:31 PM   #3 
  - most of my favorites  G_j   Mar-21-11 05:38 PM   #6 
  - True, but these numerous postings are really just about Kucinich bashing.  NorthCarolina   Mar-21-11 05:43 PM   #9 
  - Oh, okay. Although I don't see how, if you care about the things  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 05:58 PM   #26 
  - Personally, I wouldn't  NorthCarolina   Mar-21-11 06:03 PM   #28 
  - I WASN'T bashing Kucinich!  markpkessinger   Mar-21-11 09:10 PM   #76 
  - These people are hypocrites  revolutionnow45   Mar-21-11 06:59 PM   #39 
     - No they are not. They are doing their job. And President  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 07:28 PM   #59 
        - All wars are exactly alike, ain't they?  aquart   Mar-22-11 04:40 AM   #90 
           - You forgot, the Iraqis we were told, were begging for assistance  sabrina 1   Mar-22-11 01:36 PM   #91 
  - Dupe-  Bluerthanblue   Mar-21-11 05:33 PM   #4 
  -'ll spoil their fun. nt  NorthCarolina   Mar-21-11 05:46 PM   #23 
  - and little green men from outerspace could land tomorrow.  cali   Mar-21-11 05:39 PM   #7 
  - The War Powers Act gives the President authority to use military force for 60 days  Hippo_Tron   Mar-21-11 05:41 PM   #8 
  - Under what circumstances? Was this country in iminent danger  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 06:21 PM   #29 
     - The Libyan people were in imminent danger...  jmowreader   Mar-21-11 06:45 PM   #35 
        - The American people are not in imminent danger.  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 07:24 PM   #57 
  - EXCLUSIVE: Kucinich calls Obamas attack on Libya an impeachable offense  markpkessinger   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #10 
  - There are already a zillion threads about this.  The Velveteen Ocelot   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #11 
  - Maybe DU can create a "WTF Kucinich" Forum?  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #12 
     - Yes, I mean WTF is he worried about that piece of paper for?  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 06:00 PM   #27 
        - No, it's because he's an attention whore who doesn't know WTF he's talking about.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 06:29 PM   #31 
           - No, he's not and President Obama agrees with him.  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 06:33 PM   #33 
              - But he didn't "unilaterally authorize a military attack"; he's informed Congress as per U.S. law.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 06:37 PM   #34 
                 - Yes, he wrote them a letter. No debate, no imminent threat  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 07:21 PM   #53 
                    - Pres. O followed the law. You're wrong. Not one constitutional law expert agrees with you, either.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 08:06 PM   #66 
                       - Was this country under attack?  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 08:24 PM   #69 
                          - dupe/self-delete  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 09:03 PM   #74 
                          - lol! Are you deliberately ignoring the facts I quoted or did you not understand them?  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 09:08 PM   #75 
                             - Who are those people? Commenters from Daily Kos?  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 09:21 PM   #77 
                                - Here's a clue: A Senate resolution was passed unanimously on March 1 which calls for a no-fly zone.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 09:29 PM   #82 
  - It would have been. Before we didn't impeach Bush for Iraq.  aquart   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #13 
  - Was Clinton's use of US forces in support of the Bosnia/Kosovo  The Velveteen Ocelot   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #14 
     - Not to me, it wasn't.  aquart   Mar-22-11 04:33 AM   #88 
  - A zillion may be misoverestimating  Jersey Devil   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #15 
  - Maybe more like a brazilian.  The Velveteen Ocelot   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #17 
  - Only because it is. Proof = this quote from candidate Obama in 2007: "The President does not have  L. Coyote   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #16 
  - Wrong. The conflict is legal & will remain so as long as Obama keeps Congress informed as he has...  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #19 
     - LISTEN and WATCH  L. Coyote   Mar-21-11 05:51 PM   #25 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-21-11 06:27 PM   #30 
        - FYI: A Senate resolution was unanimously passed on March 1 which calls for a no-fly zone.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 09:36 PM   #83 
  - Interesting article,the link goes to Barack Obama's Q&A when  Autumn   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #18 
  - Yes, that was candidate Obama. Something happened to him  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 07:32 PM   #61 
  - Debunked.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 08:10 PM   #68 
     - I'm not sure how you can debunk Obama's own words  Autumn   Mar-21-11 08:33 PM   #72 
     - I just debunked your implication that Pres. Obama was going back on his "own words".  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 09:02 PM   #73 
        - I pointed out what he said as a candidate, from the article  Autumn   Mar-21-11 09:22 PM   #79 
     - you are debunked!  wildbilln864   Mar-21-11 09:46 PM   #85 
        - You're wrong. On 3/1, a Senate resolution calling for a Libyan no-fly zone was passed unanimously.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 10:08 PM   #86 
  - You have TWO threads on this in the top ten. How many times do you think you need to post this?  Maru Kitteh   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #20 
  - exclusive?????  spanone   Mar-21-11 05:44 PM   #21 
     - Limited time offer! CALL NOW! Operators are standing by!  Maru Kitteh   Mar-21-11 05:45 PM   #22 
  - Kucinich thinks we're idiots.  wysingm   Mar-21-11 06:47 PM   #36 
  - Good find. Thanks.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 07:19 PM   #52 
  - We either have a constitution or we drop the pretenses.  Catherina   Mar-21-11 06:53 PM   #37 
  - You speak sense. Making sense seems a bit out of place on threads such as this though. nt  NorthCarolina   Mar-21-11 06:56 PM   #38 
  - President Obama has already informed Congress as per U.S. law.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 07:03 PM   #40 
     - Wrong. Here's the US law. He had no authority to take this country to war  Catherina   Mar-21-11 07:07 PM   #42 
        - Wasting your time typing at that one.  flvegan   Mar-21-11 07:09 PM   #43 
        - It's ok. Just putting the truth out there directly so other people don't  Catherina   Mar-21-11 07:12 PM   #45 
        - Good point.  flvegan   Mar-21-11 07:13 PM   #46 
        - That's the way I feel, too, which is why I spelled it out for you below.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 07:15 PM   #49 
        - Really? Because I refuse to condone bullshit or an erroneous reading of the Constitution?  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 07:14 PM   #48 
           - No, that's not it at all. n/t  flvegan   Mar-21-11 07:16 PM   #50 
           - I gave you the law itself. Not someone's erroneous interpretation in an article.  Catherina   Mar-21-11 07:19 PM   #51 
              - Pres. Obama is following the law, dear. Not one constitutional scholar agrees with Kucinich, either  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 07:21 PM   #54 
                 - Your response is pathetic. Predictable but pathetic. n/t  Catherina   Mar-21-11 07:22 PM   #55 
                 - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-21-11 07:27 PM   #58 
                    - Well, now. THAT tells us a lot about you.  flvegan   Mar-21-11 07:31 PM   #60 
                       - Yes, it says that I, like so many DUers, are tired of a do-nothing Congressman and want better.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 07:36 PM   #62 
                          - Supporting  flvegan   Mar-21-11 07:39 PM   #63 
                             - Reread my previous post. You're conflating what I said.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 07:47 PM   #64 
                                - Nah.  flvegan   Mar-21-11 07:52 PM   #65 
                 - The president himself is a Constitutional lawyer and he agrees with Kucinich  sabrina 1   Mar-21-11 08:29 PM   #71 
                    - You're wrong. A Senate resolution was passed unanimously on March 1 which calls for a no-fly zone.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 09:24 PM   #80 
        - Wrong again. "Breaking: Obama Sends Libya War Powers Act Notice To Congress"  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 07:14 PM   #47 
  - Dennis needs to spend more time seeing to the needs of his long-neglected constituents. Thankfully,  apocalypsehow   Mar-21-11 07:10 PM   #44 
  - +1000  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 07:23 PM   #56 
  - That (at the very least) makes two of us  Oasis_   Mar-21-11 09:38 PM   #84 
     - Bookmarked. As one of his constituents, you know what you're talking about.  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 11:14 PM   #87 
  - ...  Scurrilous   Mar-21-11 08:07 PM   #67 
  - First Read @ "WH pushes back on charge that it didn't consult with Congress"  ClarkUSA   Mar-21-11 08:26 PM   #70 
  - He's consistent  WatsonT   Mar-21-11 09:22 PM   #78 
  - Kucinich likes perfect.  aquart   Mar-22-11 04:35 AM   #89 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC