You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #22: Possibly safe [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Possibly safe
But it is not safe now. The waste problem is unsafe. Deadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Can we all agree, at least, that nuclear power is not "clean"? grahamhgreen  Mar-17-11 01:13 PM   #0 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-17-11 01:15 PM   #1 
  - March 1988 I was arrested for protesting Nuke weapon's testing at Yucca Flats NV  Ferret Annica   Mar-17-11 01:17 PM   #2 
  - What about Nuclear Medicine?  RC   Mar-17-11 03:26 PM   #11 
     - What is your problem?  Ferret Annica   Mar-17-11 05:11 PM   #19 
        - Reality must hurt, huh?  RC   Mar-17-11 06:13 PM   #23 
           - But you don't know the difference between accept and except ;-)  Ferret Annica   Mar-17-11 07:29 PM   #27 
  - Define "clean" please. eom  yawnmaster   Mar-17-11 01:17 PM   #3 
  - Clean is proportional to population.  Gregorian   Mar-17-11 01:30 PM   #5 
  -  grahamhgreen   Mar-17-11 01:32 PM   #6 
     - according to those definitions, no power is clean. eom  yawnmaster   Mar-17-11 03:33 PM   #12 
        - So you agree, nuclear is not clean?  grahamhgreen   Mar-17-11 04:36 PM   #16 
           - I agree, that according to the definition of "clean" that you posted, no energy source is clean,  yawnmaster   Mar-17-11 08:16 PM   #28 
              - That is the dictionary definition. We agree that nuclear energy is not clean, yes?  grahamhgreen   Mar-17-11 11:53 PM   #41 
              - Further, it is the radioctive waste that is one of the larger problems at Fukushima,  grahamhgreen   Mar-18-11 12:46 AM   #46 
  - Why are you against JOBS???  FormerDittoHead   Mar-17-11 01:26 PM   #4 
  - "clean" coal and natural gas aren't "clean" either  unblock   Mar-17-11 01:49 PM   #7 
  - But you agree, nuclear is not "clean"?  grahamhgreen   Mar-17-11 01:58 PM   #8 
     - when it's working properly, then it's "clean"  unblock   Mar-17-11 07:17 PM   #25 
        - Working properly? Can you say spent fuel? Not clean for eons.  RegieRocker   Mar-17-11 09:45 PM   #38 
           - you want 100% safe and pollutant free? stop using energy.  unblock   Mar-17-11 11:17 PM   #40 
              - Fact is, we can all agree now that nuclear is not in the pool when when reasonable people talk about  grahamhgreen   Mar-17-11 11:57 PM   #42 
  - Can we all agree, at least, that a nuclear power plant  Spoonman   Mar-17-11 02:32 PM   #9 
  - +1  uponit7771   Mar-17-11 04:42 PM   #17 
  - Which will always be a problem with nuclear. There are too many  grahamhgreen   Mar-18-11 12:00 AM   #43 
  - An earthquake can happen anywhere at any time.  Zorra   Mar-18-11 12:07 AM   #45 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-17-11 02:34 PM   #10 
  - clean  grahamhgreen   Mar-17-11 03:46 PM   #15 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Mar-17-11 05:20 PM   #20 
  - Definitely agree, it should all be shut down.  Dappleganger   Mar-17-11 03:34 PM   #13 
  - hasn't coal already stolen that word  Johonny   Mar-17-11 03:43 PM   #14 
  - I don't think any energy source is 100% "clean", nuke power CAN be one of the safest techs out there  uponit7771   Mar-17-11 04:44 PM   #18 
  - So what was Obama talking about then?  grahamhgreen   Mar-17-11 05:23 PM   #21 
  - Possibly safe  BeFree   Mar-17-11 05:24 PM   #22 
     - NOT CLEAN, NOT SAFE, NOT a part of a clean & renewable energy future.  grahamhgreen   Mar-17-11 07:14 PM   #24 
  - Nuclear power is NOT clean!!!!!  underseasurveyor   Mar-17-11 07:25 PM   #26 
  - Clean is a relative term, like anything else in life.  Codeine   Mar-17-11 08:27 PM   #29 
  - what about radioactive waste from nuclear plants?  eowyn_of_rohan   Mar-17-11 08:32 PM   #31 
     - It's also contained and controllable, when handled correctly.  Codeine   Mar-17-11 08:35 PM   #32 
        - clean as compared to, say, wind or solar energy?  eowyn_of_rohan   Mar-17-11 09:14 PM   #33 
           - Those are sideshows in the energy world.  Codeine   Mar-17-11 09:16 PM   #34 
              - Let's turn them into the main attractions and find new ones that are equally clean.  eowyn_of_rohan   Mar-17-11 09:29 PM   #35 
              - Solar = NOT a sideshow. Please read this link.  jacquelope   Mar-17-11 09:35 PM   #36 
              - Solar has been the "next big thing, just around the corner"  Codeine   Mar-17-11 09:44 PM   #37 
                 - Don't believe the fossil fuel propaganda, either  jacquelope   Mar-17-11 09:48 PM   #39 
              - Renewables provide 20% of the worlds power. Not a sideshow. A major player.  grahamhgreen   Mar-18-11 12:06 AM   #44 
  - Did you miss your nightly pill?  Sabriel   Mar-17-11 08:29 PM   #30 
     - Thanks!  grahamhgreen   Mar-18-11 07:49 AM   #47 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC