Bardley
(230 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-17-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
| 44. in theory, the moon could affect quakes |
|
nobody questions that it affects tides, and tutonic plates are kind of floating
but, i'm guessing this guy's remarks are based on him being a loon, rather than hard science
|
| -Fox "News" guest predicts major North American quake imminent based on moon cycle. |
RandySF |
Mar-17-11 01:10 AM |
#0 |
-
Lord protect us from the woo |
nadinbrzezinski |
Mar-17-11 01:12 AM |
#1 |
 -
I really dislike that term. |
MedicalAdmin |
Mar-17-11 07:35 AM |
#19 |
-
I don't even know what it means... |
Skidmore |
Mar-17-11 08:14 AM |
#25 |
-
Disparaging term to refer to non-scientifically sound theories |
Godhumor |
Mar-17-11 08:18 AM |
#26 |
-
Basically, 'woo' is a way Fundie Materialists sneer at anything they are unable to grok |
SpiralHawk |
Mar-17-11 09:34 AM |
#30 |
 -
The problem has always been there is a significant gap between belief and evidence n/t |
Godhumor |
Mar-17-11 09:51 AM |
#31 |
-
And people who leap to conclusions based on bias w/o checking primary sources. Like You. |
KittyWampus |
Mar-17-11 10:04 AM |
#38 |
-
We hear it all the time in medical circles. |
MedicalAdmin |
Mar-17-11 10:58 AM |
#46 |
-
Obama should not have bombed the moon! |
Hardrada |
Mar-17-11 01:12 AM |
#2 |
 -
well, we can't say we warned |
fishwax |
Mar-17-11 01:22 AM |
#4 |
 -
The revenge of the Moon People? |
Baclava |
Mar-17-11 10:14 AM |
#41 |
-
It's a good theory anyway! |
Hardrada |
Mar-17-11 07:56 PM |
#54 |
-
Well, just tell Beck to stop mooning |
pinboy3niner |
Mar-17-11 01:22 AM |
#3 |
-
My fish-brained BIL who wears a magnet to protect himself from arthritis will probably eat that up. |
Maru Kitteh |
Mar-17-11 01:40 AM |
#5 |
-
Not this idiot again |
Brother Buzz |
Mar-17-11 01:45 AM |
#6 |
-
My first memory of Bill O'Reilly is from the New Madrid Earthquake Panic of 1990 |
Adenoid_Hynkel |
Mar-17-11 02:06 AM |
#7 |
 -
So you don't believe the New Madrid fault is a threat? |
proud2BlibKansan |
Mar-17-11 07:41 AM |
#21 |
-
We shall see. |
JDPriestly |
Mar-17-11 02:37 AM |
#8 |
 -
M-O-O-N, that spells moon! n/t |
k2qb3 |
Mar-17-11 02:52 AM |
#10 |
 -
Planting by the Moon is an ancient and venerable approach |
SpiralHawk |
Mar-17-11 06:20 AM |
#16 |
-
Yes. I don't plant vegetables like carrots or beets that |
JDPriestly |
Mar-17-11 03:04 PM |
#53 |
-
Damn |
pulledpork |
Mar-17-11 02:48 AM |
#9 |
 -
lol! |
deacon |
Mar-17-11 05:51 AM |
#15 |
-
oops. How did that happen? |
PufPuf23 |
Mar-17-11 03:36 AM |
# |
-
In all seriousness this guy is a nutter. nt |
PufPuf23 |
Mar-17-11 03:36 AM |
#11 |
-
*facepalm* |
sakabatou |
Mar-17-11 03:59 AM |
#12 |
-
I never do anything without first checking my lucky astrology mood ring. n/t |
deacon |
Mar-17-11 05:46 AM |
#13 |
-
Why is this 'woo'? |
RadiationTherapy |
Mar-17-11 05:51 AM |
#14 |
 -
if it's the same guy I saw, his prediction had nothing to do with astrology |
JanMichael |
Mar-17-11 06:28 AM |
#17 |
  -
"You didn't laugh when I was in action." - Ronald Reagan's Dead Republicon Astrologer* |
SpiralHawk |
Mar-17-11 07:49 AM |
#22 |
 -
"Woo" because the moon is not a cause of earthquakes |
Godhumor |
Mar-17-11 08:06 AM |
#23 |
-
I don't think he claims the moon causes earthquakes. |
RadiationTherapy |
Mar-17-11 09:26 AM |
#27 |
 -
He kind of is - Predicting based on the moon means the moon has influence on the quake |
Godhumor |
Mar-17-11 09:29 AM |
#28 |
-
He kind of isn't. So you didn't listen to his interview. Thanks for confirming that. |
KittyWampus |
Mar-17-11 10:01 AM |
#34 |
-
Tides=moon, and it is flat-out wrong n/t |
Godhumor |
Mar-17-11 10:03 AM |
#37 |
-
You are embarrassing yourself. And obviously STILL haven't listened to the |
KittyWampus |
Mar-17-11 10:08 AM |
#39 |
-
You are wrong. It isn't the "Moon". It's displaced weight on plates via tides. |
KittyWampus |
Mar-17-11 10:01 AM |
#33 |
-
Tides are caused by the moon, and have no bearing on tectonic quakes |
Godhumor |
Mar-17-11 10:02 AM |
#36 |
-
You need to understand there are other tides besides the lunar. You'd know that |
KittyWampus |
Mar-17-11 10:10 AM |
#40 |
-
What exactly is it with right-wingers and fear? |
mwb970 |
Mar-17-11 07:21 AM |
#18 |
-
This would mean major earthquakes happen in North America every month. |
EstimatedProphet |
Mar-17-11 07:37 AM |
#20 |
 -
It would if that's what the geologist was actually saying. Too bad you didn't actually listen |
KittyWampus |
Mar-17-11 10:02 AM |
#35 |
-
Nope, didn't listen. Can't get Youtube at work. |
EstimatedProphet |
Mar-17-11 10:36 AM |
#43 |
-
Lets rush out for more Duct Tape, Plastic Wrap, Flashlights, |
Hubert Flottz |
Mar-17-11 08:12 AM |
#24 |
-
Consult the bones! nt |
Tommy_Carcetti |
Mar-17-11 09:32 AM |
#29 |
-
Apparently every DU'er so far HASN"T LISTENED TO HIS INTERVIEW. It's totally valid and I"ve heard |
KittyWampus |
Mar-17-11 09:59 AM |
#32 |
 -
remember those sardines that got stuck |
rusty fender |
Mar-17-11 10:20 AM |
#42 |
 -
fish only get lost |
Bardley |
Mar-17-11 10:42 AM |
#45 |
 -
And yet, it does not work. Extraordinary tide cycles are a red herring |
Godhumor |
Mar-17-11 11:37 AM |
#48 |
-
My point exactly |
EstimatedProphet |
Mar-17-11 11:39 AM |
#49 |
-
in theory, the moon could affect quakes |
Bardley |
Mar-17-11 10:41 AM |
#44 |
 -
You can always identify an invalid criticism... |
MedicalAdmin |
Mar-17-11 11:17 AM |
#47 |
 -
...the only way the tides would affect a major quake is if the moon decided to move out of its orbit |
Godhumor |
Mar-17-11 11:40 AM |
#50 |
-
The upshot is that everyone is afraid of nuclear power now. |
reformist2 |
Mar-17-11 11:41 AM |
#51 |
-
tide comes in, tide goes out, earthquakes happen, nobody understands it |
Motown_Johnny |
Mar-17-11 11:44 AM |
#52 |