You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: Thank you! n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-21-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why not fund Social Security by a Carbon Tax? denem  Dec-21-10 01:41 PM   #0 
  - HELL NO!  RC   Dec-21-10 01:45 PM   #1 
  - There's nothing to stop retaining a separate fund,  denem   Dec-21-10 02:00 PM   #7 
  - Either raise the cap or elimate the cap altogether on Social Security  avaistheone1   Dec-21-10 01:50 PM   #2 
  - Raise the cap from 106,000 to 250,000 and it's fine  NightWatcher   Dec-21-10 01:58 PM   #6 
     - It's not fine, the wealthy don't make much of their income from a wage.  denem   Dec-21-10 02:01 PM   #8 
     - Thats what I say, except remove the cap all together.  demosincebirth   Dec-21-10 02:35 PM   #20 
  - Social Security it the most solvent program ever run  sabrina 1   Dec-21-10 01:54 PM   #3 
  - Educate yourself:  deaniac21   Dec-21-10 02:06 PM   #9 
  - +1  badtoworse   Dec-21-10 02:08 PM   #11 
  - You're not serious, are you?  sabrina 1   Dec-21-10 02:43 PM   #25 
  - Stop with the nonsense. This argument has been debunked  sabrina 1   Dec-21-10 02:19 PM   #15 
  - One more thing ~  sabrina 1   Dec-21-10 02:57 PM   #29 
  - the rich borrowed from the workers for 30 years, but when it's time to repay "the money  Hannah Bell   Dec-21-10 04:17 PM   #31 
  - I'm suggesting we invest in our grandchildren's future,  denem   Dec-21-10 02:08 PM   #10 
  - I don't know what you are trying to say. Could you be more clear?  sabrina 1   Dec-21-10 02:22 PM   #16 
  - The "social security trust fund" was a scam...  PoliticAverse   Dec-21-10 04:36 PM   #32 
     - You can't convince someone paddling their boat down the Nile.  deaniac21   Dec-21-10 05:23 PM   #33 
     - In 1983, there was a serious shortfall in the SS fund V what it had  sabrina 1   Dec-21-10 08:11 PM   #34 
        - I encourage people to read what I wrote, what you wrote...  PoliticAverse   Dec-21-10 08:49 PM   #35 
           - Fair enough! n/t  sabrina 1   Dec-22-10 12:56 AM   #36 
           - Fair enough. That's what I did and found that all those  sabrina 1   Dec-22-10 01:04 AM   #37 
  - additional funding is needed, so payroll tax plus something else  Motown_Johnny   Dec-21-10 01:56 PM   #4 
  - Isn't the easiest way to get a Big New Tax (Carbon) is scrap  denem   Dec-21-10 02:12 PM   #12 
  - Benefits are tied to what you have paid into the system...  badtoworse   Dec-21-10 02:16 PM   #13 
     - You can tie benefits to the income record  denem   Dec-21-10 02:19 PM   #14 
     - I'm not trying to sell the idea; I want to kill it.  badtoworse   Dec-21-10 02:29 PM   #18 
        - That "fundamental nature" is a hallucination.  denem   Dec-21-10 02:33 PM   #19 
        - As a practical matter, you could fund SS with any kind of tax...  badtoworse   Dec-21-10 02:38 PM   #22 
        - which is why I suggest additional funding, not a change over  Motown_Johnny   Dec-21-10 02:39 PM   #23 
        - Listen to this guy, he know what he is talking about..  RC   Dec-21-10 02:47 PM   #28 
     - Thank you! n/t  sabrina 1   Dec-21-10 02:44 PM   #26 
  - OK. The cost free carbon pollution now  denem   Dec-21-10 02:27 PM   #17 
  - Ending the Bush tax cuts would have helped reduce the deficit, which  sabrina 1   Dec-21-10 02:42 PM   #24 
  - Fine by me. Yet our current national philosophy would definitely not allow it.  Democrats_win   Dec-21-10 01:57 PM   #5 
  - It's not broke, don't try to fix it.  dkofos   Dec-21-10 02:36 PM   #21 
  - The same reason we shouldn't fund it with tobacco taxes  slackmaster   Dec-21-10 02:44 PM   #27 
  - A carbon tax is dead, why do you think the energy industry  doc03   Dec-21-10 04:03 PM   #30 
  - Never fund something you need with a revenue stream you want to be extinct  TheKentuckian   Dec-22-10 08:31 AM   #38 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC